Comparison of pulse rate variability from post-auricula and heart rate variability during different body states for healthy subjects

References

• Can YS, Iles-Smith H, Chalabianloo N, et al. How to relax in stressful situations: a smart stress reduction system. In: healthcare. 2020;8(2):100–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alalyan MJ, Alkahtani SA, Habib SS, et al. Suitability of ultra-short-term heart rate variability in military trainees. In: healthcare. 2020;8(4):409–410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernst G. Hidden signalsthe history and methods of heart rate variability. Front Public Health. 2017;5:265–277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karmali SN, Sciusco A, May SM, et al. Heart rate variability in critical care medicine: a systematic review. ICMx. 2017;5(1):1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Bhat S, Adam M, Hagiwara Y, et al. The biophysical parameter measurements from PPG signal. J. Mech. Med. Biol. 2017;17(07):1740005–1740027.
   Google Scholar
• Pernice R, Javorka M, Krohova J, Member, IEEE, et al. Comparison of short-term heart rate variability indexes evaluated through electrocardiographic and continuous blood pressure monitoring. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2019;57(6):1247–1263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sommermeyer D, Zou D, Ficker JH, et al. Detection of cardiovascular risk from a photoplethysmographic signal using a matching pursuit algorithm. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2016;54(7):1111–1121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen J. Photoplethysmography and its application in clinical physiological measurement. Physiol. Meas. 2007;28(3):R1–R39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu S, Teng J, Qi X, et al. Comparison between heart rate variability and pulse rate variability during different sleep stages for sleep apnea patients. Technol Health Care. 2017;25(3):435–445.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janjua G, Hadia R, Guldenring D, et al. Heartrate variability comparison between electrocardiogram, photoplethysmogram and ballistic pulse waveforms at fiducial points In: International Conference on Biomedical and Health Informatics; Springer; 2017. p. 171–177.
   Google Scholar
• Shin H, Lee C. Pulse rate variability as a surrogate method for autonomic nervous systemassessment comparing with heart rate variability. Adv sci Lett. 2012;18(1):92–98.
   Google Scholar
• Bulte CS, Keet SW, Boer C, et al. Level of agreement between heart rate variability and pulse rate variability in healthy individuals. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2011;28(1):34–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulte C, Keet S, Loer S, et al. Pulse rate variability corresponds with heart rate variability in the evaluation of autonomic function: 3ap1–10. European Journal of Anaesthesiology. 2010;27(47):46.
   Google Scholar
• Gil E, Orini M, Bailón R, et al. Time-varying spectral analysis for comparison of HRV and PPG variability during tilt table test In 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology; IEEE; 2010. p. 3579–3582.
   Google Scholar
• Gil E, Orini M, Bailon R, et al. Photoplethysmography pulse rate variability as a surrogate measurement of heart rate variability during non-stationary conditions. Physiol Meas. 2010;31(9):1271–1290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin WH, Wu D, Li C, et al. Comparison of heart rate variability from PPG with that from ECG. In: The International Conference on Health Informatics; Springer; 2014. p. 213–215.
   Google Scholar
• Pinheiro N, Couceiro R, Henriques J, et al. Can PPG be used for HRV analysis?. In: 2016 38th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC); IEEE; 2016. p. 2945–2949.
   Google Scholar
• Jong G-J, Horng G-J, Aripriharta, et al. The PPG physiological signal for heart rate variability analysis. Wireless Pers Commun. 2017;97(4):5229–5276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vescio B, Salsone M, Gambardella A, et al. Comparison between electrocardiographic and earlobe pulse photoplethysmographic detection for evaluating heart rate variability in healthy subjects in short-and long-term recordings. Sensors. 2018;18(3):844–814.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plews DJ, Scott B, Altini M, et al. Comparison of heart-rate-variability recording with smartphone photoplethysmography, polar h7 chest strap, and electrocardiography. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2017;12(10):1324–1328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Firoozabadi R, Helfenbein ED, Babaeizadeh S. Efficient noise-tolerant estimation of heart rate variability using single-channel photoplethysmography. J Electrocardiol. 2017;50(6):841–846.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• dos Santos Ribeiro G, Neves VR, Deresz LF, et al. Can RR intervals editing and selection techniques interfere with the analysis of heart rate variability? Braz J Phys Ther. 2018;22(5):383–390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schäfer A, Vagedes J. How accurate is pulse rate variability as an estimate of heart rate variability?: a review on studies comparing photoplethysmographic technology with an electrocardiogram. Int J Cardiol. 2013;166(1):15–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Periyasamy V, Pramanik M, Ghosh PK. Review on heart-rate estimation from photoplethysmography and accelerometer signals during physical exercise. J Indian Inst Sci. 2017;97(3):313–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dao D, Salehizadeh SM, Noh Y, et al. A robust motion artifact detection algorithm for accurate detection of heart rates from photoplethysmographic signals using time–frequency spectral features. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2017;21(5):1242–1253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu G, Yang F, Taylor J, et al. A comparison of photoplethysmography and ECG recording to analyse heart rate variability in healthy subjects. J Med Eng Technol. 2009;33(8):634–641.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shin H. Ambient temperature effect on pulse rate variability as an alternative to heart rate variability in young adult. J Clin Monit Comput. 2016;30(6):939–948.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morey T, Rice M, Vasilopoulos T, et al. Feasibility and accuracy of nasal alar pulse oximetry. Br J Anaesth. 2014;112(6):1109–1114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budidha K, Kyriacou P. In vivo investigation of ear canal pulse oximetry during hypothermia. J Clin Monit Comput. 2018;32(1):97–107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budidha K, Kyriacou P. The human ear canal: investigation of its suitability for monitoring photoplethysmographs and arterial oxygen saturation. Physiol Meas. 2014;35(2):111–128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinschenk SW, Beise RD, Lorenz J. Heart rate variability (HRV) in deep breathing tests and 5-min short-term recordings: agreement of ear photoplethysmography with ECG measurements, in 343 subjects. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2016;116(8):1527–1535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devices A. Ad8232: Single-lead, heart rate monitor front end data sheet. 2012. https://www.analog.com/media/en/technical-documentation/data-sheets/ad8232.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sparkfun. Ad8232 heart rate monitor hookup guide. 2013. https://learn.sparkfun.com/tutorials/ad8232-heart-rate-monitor-hookup-guide/all
   Google Scholar
• Peralta E, Lazaro J, Bailon R, et al. Optimal fiducial points for pulse rate variability analysis from forehead and finger photoplethysmographic signals. Physiol. Meas. 2019;40(2):025007–025015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolea J, Pueyo E, Orini M, et al. Influence of heart rate in non-linear HRV indices as a sampling rate effect evaluated on supine and standing. Front Physiol. 2016;7:501–512.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailón R, Laguna P, Mainardi L, et al. Analysis of heart rate variability using time-varying frequency bands based on respiratory frequency. In 2007 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society; IEEE; 2007. p. 6674–6677.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell CJL, Martin S, McWhinney B, et al. State-of-the-art vitamin D assays: a comparison of automated immunoassays with liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry methods. Clin Chem. 2012;58(3):531–542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong JS, Lu WA, Wu KT, et al. A comparative study of pulse rate variability and heart rate variability in healthy subjects. J Clin Monit Comput. 2012;26(2):107–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rauh R, Limley R, Bauer RD, et al. Comparison of heart rate variability and pulse rate variability detected with photoplethysmography. In: Saratov Fall meeting 2003: optical technologies in biophysics and medicine V. Vol. 5474. Saratov, Russian Federation: International Society for Optics and Photonics; 2004. p. 115–126. DOI:10.1117/12.578377
   Google Scholar
• Duisit J, Amiel H, Debluts D, et al. Single-artery human ear graft procurement: a simplified approach. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;140(3):599–603.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Awad AA, Ghobashy MAM, Ouda W, et al. Different responses of ear and finger pulse oximeter wave form to cold pressor test. Anesth Analg. 2001;92(6):1483–1486.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel S, Hülsbusch M, Hennig T, et al. In-ear vital signs monitoring using a novel microoptic reflective sensor. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 2009;13(6):882–889.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar