References
- Alaranta H, Lempinen VM, Haavisto E, Pohjolainen T, Hurri H. Subjective benefits of energy storing prostheses. Prosthet Orthot Int 1994; 18: 92–97
- Bowker JH. Critical choices: the art of prosthesis prescription. Atlas of limb prosthetics.‐St 2nd edition, JH Bowker, JW Michael. Mosby Year Book, Louis 1992; 717–720, 1992
- Casillas JM, Dulieu V, Cohen M, Marcer I, Didier JP. Bioenergetic comparison of a new energy‐storing foot and SACH foot in traumatic below‐knee vascular amputations. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1995; 76: 39–44
- Centraal Bureau Voor De Statistiek (CBS). Landelijke gegevens amputates in Nederland; Landelijke medische registratie SIG Utrecht 1993–1998. Jaarboek editie 1999 CD‐Rom 1999, ISBN 9–056090–28–3
- Cortes A, Viosca E, Hoyos JV, Prat J, Sanchez‐Lacuesta J. Optimisation of the prescription for trans‐tibial (TT) amputees. Prosthet Orthot Int 1997; 21: 168–174
- Gailey RS, Roach KE, Applegate EB, Cho B, Cunniffe B, Licht S, Maguire M, Nash MS. The Amputee Mobility Predictor: an instrument to assess determinants of the lower‐limb amputee's ability to ambulate. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002; 83: 613–627
- Gauthier‐Gagnon C, Grise MC, Lepage Y. The Locomotor Capabilities Index: Content validity. J Rehabil Outcomes Meas 1998; 2((4))40–46
- Goh JCH, Solomonidis SE, Spence WD, Paul JP. Biomechanical evaluation of SACH and uniaxial feet. Prosthet Orthot Int 1984; 8: 147–154
- Health Care Fiancing Administration (HCFA). HCFA Common Procedure Coding System HCPCS 2001. US Government Printing Office, Washington DC 2001, Chapter 5.3
- Huang GF, Chou YL, Su FC. Gait analysis and energy consumption of below‐knee amputees wearing three different prosthetic feet. Gait Posture 2000; 12: 162–168
- MacFarlane PA, Nielsen DH, Shurr DG. Transfemoral amputee physiological requirements: comparisons between SACH foot walking and flex‐foot walking. J Prosthet Orthot 1997; 9: 144–151
- Menard MR, McBride ME, Sanderson DJ, Murray DD. Comparative biomechanical analysis of energy‐storing prosthetic feet. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1992; 73: 451–458
- Postema K, Hermens HJ, De Vries J, Koopman HFJM, Eisma WH. Energy storage and release of prosthetic feet. Part 1: biomechanical analysis related to user benefits. Prosthet Orthot Int 1997; 21: 17–27
- Rommers GM, Vos LDW, Groothoff JW, Eisma WH. Clinical rehabilitation of the amputee: a retrospectie study. Prosthet Orthot Int 1996; 20: 72–78
- Rommers GM, Vos LDW, Groothoff JW, Eisma WH. Epidemiology of lower‐limb amputees in the north of the Netherlands: aetiology, discharge destination and prosthetic use. Prosthet Orthot Int 1997; 21: 92–99
- Rommers GM, Vos LDW, Groothoff JW, Eisma WH. Mobility of people with lower limb amputations: scales and questionnaires: a review. Clin Rehab 2001; 15: 92–102
- Rubin G, Fischer E, Dixon M. Prescription of above‐knee and below‐knee prostheses. Prosthet Orthot Int 1996; 10: 117–124
- Rycroft‐Malone J. Formal consensus: the development of a national clinical guideline. Qua Health Care 2001; 10: 238–244
- Stewart CPU, Jain A. Dundee revisited‐25 years of a total amputee service. Prosthet Orthot Int 1993; 17: 14–20
- Stewart CPU. Prescribing a lower limb prosthesis. Dundee Orthopaedic Skills Unit. 2001, CD‐ROM.
- Trickey H, Harvey I, Wilcock G, Sharp D. Formal consensus and consultation: a qualitative method for development of a guideline for dementia. Qual Health Care 1998; 7: 192–199
- Woolf SH, Grol R, Hutchinson A, Eccles M, Grimshaw J. Clinical guidelines: potential limitations, and harms of clinical guidelines. BMJ 1999; 318: 527–530