Development and measurement properties of the Orthotics and Prosthetics Users’ Survey (OPUS): A comprehensive set of clinical outcome instruments

References

• The American Board for Certification in Orthotics and Prosthetics. ABC Standards of Profession Manual. 2002, available at http://www.abcop.org/Facility_Standards_of_Performance_Manual.asp#14
   Google Scholar
• American Academy of Orthotists and Prosthetists. The orthotics and prosthetics profession. J Prosthet Orthot 1990; 2: 101–111
   Google Scholar
• Bologna A. Outcomes in the prosthetics and orthotics profession. O & P Almanac 1998; 47((12))23–26
   Google Scholar
• Bowker JH. Amputee rehabilitation: critical factors in outcome. J Arkansas Med Soc 1981; 78: 181–183
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dillingham TR, Pezzin LE, MacKenzie EJ, Burgess AR. Use and satisfaction with prosthetic devices among persons with trauma‐related amputations: a long‐term study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2001; 80: 563–571
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donabedian A. The quality of care: how can it be assessed?. JAMA 1988; 260((12))1743–1748
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher WP. Reliability statistics. Rasch Measure Trans 1992; 6: 238
   Google Scholar
• Fuhrer MJ. Conference report: an agenda for medical rehabilitation outcomes research. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1995; 74: 243–248
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grisé MCL, Gautier‐Gagnon C, Martineau GG. Prosthetic profile of people with lower extremity amputation: conception and design of a follow‐up questionnaire. Arch Phy Med Rehabil 1993; 74: 862–870
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gautier‐Gagnon C, Grisé MC. Prosthetic profile of the amputee questionnaire: validity and reliability. Arch Phy Med Rehabil 1994; 75: 1309–1314
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart DL. Orthotics and Prosthetics National Office Outcomes Tool (OPOT): initial reliability and validity assessment for lower extremity prosthetics. J Prosthet Orthot 1999; 11: 101–111
   Google Scholar
• Hoxie LO. Outcome measurement: a primer for orthotic and prosthetic care. J Prosthet Orthot 1995; 7: 132–136
   Google Scholar
• Hoxie LO. Outcome measurement and clinical pathways. J Prosthet Orthot 1996; 8: 93–95
   Google Scholar
• Legro MW, Reiber GD, Smith DG, Del Aguila M, Larsen J, Boone D. Prosthesis evaluation questionnaire for persons with lower limb amputations: assessing prosthesis‐related quality of life. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998; 79: 931–938
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linacre JM. Sample size and item calibration stability. Rasch Meas Trans 1994; 7: 328
   Google Scholar
• Linacre JM, Wright BD. WINSTEPS: a Rasch program for rating scale analysis. MESA Press, Chicago 2002
   Google Scholar
• Otto J. Outcomes insights: a current perspective Parts 1. O & P Business News 1999; 8((24))23–34
   Google Scholar
• Otto J. Outcomes insights: a current perspective Parts 2. O & P Business News 2000; 9((1))32–46
   Google Scholar
• Polliak AA, Moser S. Outcomes forum: facing the future of orthotics and prosthetics proactively: theory and practice of outcomes measures as a method for determining quality of services. J Prosthet Orthot 1997; 9: 127–134
   Google Scholar
• Pruitt SD, Varni JW, Setoguchi Y. Functional status in children with limb deficiency: development and initial validation of an outcome measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996; 77: 1233–1238
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pruitt SD, Varni JW, Said M, Setoguchi Y. Functional status in limb deficiency: development of an outcome measure for preschool children. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998; 79: 405–411
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasch G. Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests.‐Copenhagen: Danmarks Paedogogiske Institut 1960. University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1960, 1980
   Google Scholar
• Ware JE. SF‐36 Health Survey: manual and interpretation guide. The Health Institute, New England Medical Center, Boston, MA 1993
   Google Scholar
• Ware PJ, Phillips J, Yody BB, Adamczyk J. Assessment tools: functional health status and patient satisfaction. Am J Med Qual 1996; 11: S50–S53
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wright BD, Masters G. Rating scale analysis: Rasch measurement. MESA Press, Chicago 1982
   Google Scholar
• Wright BD, Stone MH. Best test design. MESA Press, Chicago 1979
   Google Scholar
• Wright FV, Hubbard S, Jutai J, Naumann S. The prosthetic upper extremity functional index: development and reliability testing of a new functional status questionnaire for children who use upper extremity prostheses. J Hand Ther 2001; 14: 91–104
   PubMedGoogle Scholar