103
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original

A functional evaluation of prosthetic foot kinematics during lower-limb amputee gait

, , , , , & show all
Pages 213-223 | Published online: 12 Jul 2009

References

  • Arya A P, Lees A, Nirula H C, Klenerman L. A biomechanical comparison of the SACH, Seattle and Jaipur feet using ground reaction forces. Prosthet Orthot Int 1995; 19: 37–45
  • Bonnet X. Comportement du pied et de la cheville au cours de la marche de sujets asymptomatiques. Mémoire de DEA. Ecole Nationale Supérieure d'Arts et Métiers, Paris 2004
  • Boonstra A M, Schrama J, Fidler V, Eisma W H. The gait of unilateral transfemoral amputees. Scand J Rehab Med 1994; 26: 217–223
  • Cappozzo A. Gait analysis methodology. Hum Mov Sci 1984; 3: 27–50
  • Cortes A, Viosca E, Hoyos J V, Prat J, Sanchez-Lacuesta J. Optimisation of the prescription for trans-tibial amputees. Prosthet Orthot Int 1997; 21: 168–174
  • Ehara Y, Beppu M, Nomura S, Kunimi Y, Takahashi S. Energy storing property of so-called energy-storing prosthetic feet. Arch Phys Med Rehab 1993; 74: 68–72
  • Geil M D. Energy loss and stiffness properties of dynamic elastic response prosthetic feet. J Prosthet Orthot 2001; 13: 70
  • Geil M D, Parnianpour M, Quesada P, Berme N, Solomonidis S. Comparison of methods for the calculation of energy storage and return in a dynamic response prosthesis. J Biomechanics 2000; 33: 1745–1750
  • Hafner B J, Sanders J E, Czerniecki J, Fergason J. Energy storage and return prostheses: Does patient perception correlate with biomechanical analysis?. Clin Biomechanics 2002; 17: 325–344
  • Leardini A, Benedetti M G, Catani F, Simoncini L, Giannini S. An anatomically based protocol for the description of foot segment kinematics during gait. Clin Biomechanics 1999; 14: 528–536
  • Lehman J F, Price R, Boswell-Bessette S, Dralle A, Questad K, deLateur B J. Comprehensive analysis of energy storing prosthetic feet: Flex Foot and Seattle Foot versus standard SACH foot. Arch Phys Med Rehab 1993; 74: 1225–1231
  • Marin F, Allain J, Diop A, Maurel N, Simondi M, Lavaste F. On the estimation of knee joint kinematics. Hum Mov Sci 1999; 18: 613–626
  • Menard M R, McBride M E, Sanderson D J, Murray D D. Comparative biomechanical analysis of energy-storing prosthetic feet. Arch Phys Med Rehab 1992; 73: 451–458
  • Menard M R, Murray D D. Subjective and objective analysis of an energy-storing prosthetic foot. J Prosthet Orthot 1989; 1: 220
  • Mizuno N, Aoyama T, Nakajima A, Kasahara T, Takami K. Functional evaluation by gait analysis of various ankle-foot assemblies used by below knee amputees. Prosthet Orthot Int 1992; 16: 174–182
  • Postema K, Hermans H J, De Vries J, Koopman H FJM, Eisma W H. Energy storage and release of prosthetic feet – Part 1: biomechanical analysis related to user benefits. Prosthet Orthot Int 1997; 21: 17–27
  • Powers C M, Rao S, Perry J. Knee kinetics in trans-tibial amputee gait. Gait Posture 1998; 8: 1–7
  • Sjödahl C, Jarnlo G B, Söderberg B, Persson B M. Kinematic and kinetic gait analysis in the sagittal plane of trans-femoral amputees before ans after special gait reeducation. Prosthet Orthot Int 2002; 26: 101–112
  • Snyder R D, Powers C M, Fontaine C, Perry J. The effects of five prosthetic feet on the gait and loading of the sound side in dysvascular below-knee amputees. J Rehab Res Dev 1995; 32: 309–315
  • Underwood H A, Tokuno C D, Eng J. A comparison of two prosthetic feet on the multi-joint and multi-plane kinetic gait compensations in individuals with a unilateral trans-tibial amputation. Clin Biomechanics 2004; 19: 609–616
  • Van der Linden M L, Solomonidis S E, Spence W D, Li N, Paul J P. A methodology for studying the effects of various types of prosthetic feet on the biomechanics of trans-femoral amputee gait. J Biomechanics 1999; 32: 877–889
  • Wing D C, Hittenberger D A. Energy-storing prosthetic feet. Arch Phys Med Rehab 1989; 70: 330–335
  • Winter D A. Biomechanics of below-knee amputee gait. J Biomechanics 1988; 21: 361–367
  • Wu G, Cavanagh P R. ISB recommendations for standardization in the reporting of kinematic data. J Biomechanics 1995; 28: 1257–1261

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.