The modern era of orthotics

References

• American Academy of Orthotists and Prosthetists (AAOP). Findings of a state of the science conference on knee-ankle-foot orthoses for ambulation. J Prosthet Orthot 2006; 18(35)137–208
   Google Scholar
• Andrews B A, Baxendale R H, Barnett R. Hybrid FES orthosis incorporating closed loop control and sensory feedback. J Biomed Eng 1988; 10: 189–193
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bowker P, Condie D N, Bader D L, Pratt D J. Biomechanical basis of orthotic management. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford 1983
   Google Scholar
• Condie D N. ISO orthotic terminology. Atlas of orthoses and assistive devices, J D Hsu, J W Michael, J R Fisk. Elsevier, Philadelphia 2008
   Google Scholar
• Douglas R, Larson P, D'Ambrosia R. The LSU reciprocating gait orthosis (RGO). Orthopaedics 1983; 6: 834–839
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Condie D, Meadows C B. Some biomechanical considerations in the design of ankle-foot orthoses. Orthot Prosthet 1977; 31(3)45–52
   Google Scholar
• Engen T. Instruction manual for fabrication and fitting of a below-knee corrugated polypropylene orthosis. Texas Institute for Rehabilitation Research, Houston 1971
   Google Scholar
• Glancy J, Lindseth R E. The polypropylene solid ankle orthosis. Orthot Prosthet 1972; 26: 14–26
   Google Scholar
• Gracinin F. Use of functional electrical stimulation in the rehabilitation of hemiplegic patients: Final report. Institute of SR Slovenia for Rehabilitation of the Disabled, Ljubliana 1972
   Google Scholar
• Harris E E. A new orthotic terminology: A guide to its use for prescription. Orthot Prosthet 1973; 27(2)6–19
   Google Scholar
• Hijmans J M, Geertzen J HB. Development of guidelines for the prescription of orthoses in patients with neurological disorders in the Netherlands. Prosthet Orthot Int 2006; 30: 35–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu J, Michael J, Fisk J. Atlas of orthoses and assistive devices4th ed. Elsevier, Philadelphia 2008
   Google Scholar
• International Standards Organisation (ISO). ISO 8549-3 Prosthetics and orthotics – Vocabulary Part 3. Terms relating to external orthoses. ISO, Geneva 1989
   Google Scholar
• International Standards Organisation (ISO). ISO 8551 Prosthetics and orthotics. Functional deficiencies. Description of the person to be treated with an orthosis, clinical objectives and functional requirements of the orthosis. ISO, Geneva 2003
   Google Scholar
• International Standards Organisation (ISO). ISO13404 Prosthetics and orthotics – Classification and description of external orthoses and orthotic components. ISO, Geneva 2007
   Google Scholar
• International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics (ISPO). Report of a Consensus Conference on the lower limb orthotic management of cerebral palsy. D N Condie. ISPO, Copenhagen 1995
   Google Scholar
• International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics (ISPO). Report of a Consensus Conference on the orthotic management of stroke patients. M E Condie. ISPO, Copenhagen 2004
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs N. ISPO Consensus Conference on poliomyelitis: Consensus statements. Prosthet Orthot Int 2001; 25: 171–180
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lehmann J F. A biomechanical evaluation of knee stability in below-knee braces. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1971; 51: 688–695
   Google Scholar
• Lehmann J F, Warren. Restraining forces in various designs of knee-ankle-foot orthoses: Their placement and effect upon the anatomical knee joint. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1976; 57: 430–437
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehneis H R, Frisina W, Marx H W. Plastic spiral below-knee orthosis. New York University Medical Centre, Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine, New York 1972
   Google Scholar
• Major R E. The dynamics of walking using the Hip Guidance Orthosis (HGO) with crutches. Prosthet Orthot Int 1981; 5: 19–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClelland M, Andrews B A, Patrick J H. Augmentation of the Oswestry ParaWalker orthosis by means of surface electric stimulation: gait analysis of three patients. Paraplegia 1987; 25: 32–38
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McCullough N. An approach to patient analysis for orthotic prescription. Artificial Limbs 1970; 14(2)68–80
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McIllmurray W J, Greenbaum W. A below-knee weight-bearing brace. Orthot Prosthet J 1958; 12: 81–82
   Google Scholar
• Meadows C B. The influence of polypropylene ankle-foot orthoses on the gait of CP children PhD Thesis. University of Strathclyde, Glasgow 1984
   Google Scholar
• Motloch W. Device design in spina bifida. The advance in orthotics, G Murdoch. Edward Arnold, London 1971
   Google Scholar
• Nene A V, Patrick J H. Energy cost of paraplegic locomotion using the ParaWalker-Electrical stimulation ‘hybrid’ orthosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1990; 71: 116–120
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen E. Shank angle to floor measures of tuned ankle-foot orthosis/footwear combinations used with children with cerebral palsy. Gait Posture 2002; 16(Suppl.)S132–133
   Google Scholar
• Perry J. Pathologic gait. Atlas of orthotics - biomechanical principles and applications. CV. Mosby, St Louis 1975
   Google Scholar
• Rose G K. The principles and practice of hip guidance articulations. Prosthet Orthot Int 1979; 3: 37–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakamoto A. Stance phase force/pressure patterns in ankle-foot orthoses. Proc 11th ISPO World Congress Abs FP 6C1:392-393. ISPO, Hong Kong 2004
   Google Scholar
• Saltiel J. A one-piece laminated knee locking short-leg brace. Orthot Prosthet 1969; 23(2)68–75
   Google Scholar
• Scott C M. Functional long-leg brace research. 1971, Final Report Los Angeles: University of California, Prosthetics/orthotics Education Program
   Google Scholar
• Travolta R. Stance control revolutionizes knee bracing. Biomechanics 2002; 9: 53–56
   Google Scholar
• Van Leerdam N GA. The Swinging UTX orthosis: Biomechanical fundamentals and conceptual design. Technical University Twente, Enschede 1993
   Google Scholar
• Yates G. A method for the provision of lightweight aesthetic orthopaedic appliances. Orthopaedics Oxford 1968; 1: 153–162
   Google Scholar