The Passive as an Impersonalisation Strategy in Afrikaans and Dutch: A Corpus Investigation

Bibliography

• Auer, P., and A. Stukenbrock. “When ‘You’ Means ‘I’: The German 2nd Ps.Sg. Pronoun Du between Genericity and Subjectivity.” Open Linguistics 4, no. 2018 (2018): 280–309. doi:10.1515/opli-2018-0015.
   Google Scholar
• Breed, A., F. Brisard, and B. Verhoeven. “Frank Brisard and Ben Verhoeven. “Periphrastic Progressive Constructions in Dutch and Afrikaans: A Contrastive Analysis.”.” Journal of Germanic Linguistics 29, no. 4 (2017): 305–378. doi:10.1017/S1470542717000022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breed, A., J.-A. Chan, and D. Van Olmen. “Developing and validating a visual questionnaire for the study of impersonalisation strategies: A design thinking approach.” Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies. 39, no 2 (2021): 152–176.
   Google Scholar
• Duinhoven, A. M. “Verdwijnt Men?” In Vragende Wijs: Vragen over Tekst, Taal En Taalgeschiedenis, edited by J. B. Den Besten, A. M. Duinhoven, and J. P. A. Stroop, 70–80. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• De Cock, B., and B. Kluge, eds. “Special Issue: The Referential Ambiguity of Personal Pronouns and Its Pragmatic Consequences.” Pragmatics. 3. 26 vol. 2016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Hoop, H., and S. Tarenskeen. “It’s All about You in Dutch.” Journal of Pragmatics 88 (2015): 163–175. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2014.07.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenger, P. “How Impersonal Does One Get? A Study of Man-pronouns in Germanic.” The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 21, no. 3 (2018): 291–325. doi:10.1007/s10828-018-9101-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fonesca-Greber, B., and L. R. Waugh. “On the Radical Difference between the Subject Personal Pronouns in Written and Spoken European French.” In Corpus Analysis: Language Structure and Language Use, edited by P. Leistyna and C. F. Meyer, 225–240. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Gast, V. “On the Use of Translation Corpora in Contrastive Linguistics: A Case Study of Impersonalization in English and German.” Languages in Contrast 15, no. 1 (2015): 4–33. doi:10.1075/lic.15.1.02gas.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gast, V. and van der Auwera, J. “Towards a Distributional Typology of Human Impersonal Pronouns, Based on Data from European Languages.” In Languages across Boundaries: Studies in the Memory of Anna Siewierska, edited by D. Bakker and M. Haspelmath, 119–158. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Haas, F. “You Can’t Control a Thing like That”: Genre and Changes in Modern English Human Impersonal Pronouns.” In Diachronic Corpora, Genre and Language Change, edited by R. J. Whitt, 171–194. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Haas, F. “Changing Human Impersonal Pronouns in English: A Corpus Study.” Paper presented at Societas Linguistica Europaea 51, Tallinn, August 29 – September 1, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Kulikov, L. “Passive to Anticausative through Impersonalization: The Case of Vedic and Indo-European.” In Impersonal Constructions: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective, edited by A. L. Malchukov and A. Siewierska, 229–254. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Malchukov, A. L., and A. Siewierska, eds. Impersonal Constructions: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Nederlandse Taalunie. Corpus Gesproken Nederlands Release 1.0. The Hague: Dutch Language Union, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Ponelis, F. Ponelis Gesproke Korpus van Afrikaans. Stellenbosch: Stellenbosch University, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• Posio, P., and M. Vilkuna. “Referential Dimensions of Human Impersonals in Dialectal European Portuguese and Finnish.” Linguistics 51, no. 1 (2013): 177–229. doi:10.1515/ling-2013-0006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siewierska, A. “Overlap and Complementarity in Reference Impersonals: Man-constructions Vs. Third Person Plural-impersonal in the Languages of Europe.” In Impersonal Constructions: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective, edited by A. L. Malchukov and A. Siewierska, 57–89. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Siewierska, A., and M. Papastathi. “Towards a Typology of Third Personal Plural Impersonals.” Linguistics 49, no. 3 (2011): 575–610. doi:10.1515/ling.2011.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taalkommissie van die Suid-Afrikaanse Akademie vir Wetenskap en Kuns. Taalkommissiekorpus 1.1. Potchefstroom: CTexT, North-West University, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Van Eynde, F. Part of Speech Tagging En Lemmatisering Van Het Corpus Gesproken Nederlands. Leuven: University of Leuven, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Van Noord, Gertjan, G. Bouma, F. Van Eynde, D. de Kok, J. van der Linde, I. Schuurman, E. Tjong Kim Sang and V. Vandeghinste. “Large Scale Syntactic Annotation of Written Dutch: Lassy.” In Essential Speech and Language Technology for Dutch: Theory and Applications of Natural Language Processing, edited by P. Spyns and J. Odijk, 147–164. Berlin: Springer, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Van Olmen, D. and A. Breed. “Human Impersonal Pronouns in Afrikaans: A Double Questionnaire-based Study.” Language Sciences 69 (2018a): 1–29. doi:10.1016/j.langsci.2018.05.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Olmen, D. and A. Breed. “Human Impersonal Pronouns in West Germanic: A Questionnaire-based Comparative Study of Afrikaans, Dutch and English.” Studies in Language 42, no. 4 (2018b): 798–846. doi:10.1075/sl.18036.van.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Rooy, B., Korpus Van Gesproke Afrikaans Uit Die Vroeë 2000’s. Potchefstroom: North-West University, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Zifonun, G. “Man lebt nur einmal: Morphosyntax und Semantik des Pronomens man.” Deutsche Sprache 3 (2001): 232–253.
   Google Scholar