Institutional Bias and the Degree Class System

References

• Armstrong , M. , Clarkson , P. and Noble , M. 1998 . “ Modularity and credit frameworks: the NUCCAT survey and 1998 conference report ” . Newcastle upon Tyne : Northern Universities Consortium for Credit Accumulation and Transfer .
   Google Scholar
• Bridges , P. , Bourdillon , B. , Collymore , D. , Cooper , A. , Fox , W. , Haines , C. , Turner , D. , Woolf , H. and Yorke , M. 1999 . Discipline related marking behaviour using percentages: a potential case of inequality in assessment . Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education , 24 ( 3 ) : 285 – 300 .
   Google Scholar
• Elton , L. 1998 . Are degree standards going up, down or sideways? . Studies in Higher Education , 23 ( 1 ) : 35 – 42 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elton , L. 2004 . Should classification of UK honours degree have a future? . Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education , 29 ( 4 ) : 415 – 422 .
   Google Scholar
• Higher Education Quality Council (HEQC) . 1997 . Graduate Standards Programme: Final Report , Vol. 1 , London : HEQC .
   Google Scholar
• Hornby , W. 2003 . Assessing using grade related criteria: a common currency for universities . Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education , 28 ( 4 ) : 437 – 456 .
   Google Scholar
• Hunt , J. G. 1991 . Leadership: a New Synthesis , Newbury Park, CA : Sage Publications .
   Google Scholar
• Knight , P. T. 2001 . A Briefing on Key Concepts: Formative and Summative, Criterion and Norm-referenced Assessment, LTSN Generic Centre Assessment Series , York : LTSN .
   Google Scholar
• Murphy , R. 1995 . Firsts among equals, the case of British university degrees . British Journal of Curriculum and Assessment , 5 : 38 – 45 .
   Google Scholar
• National Committee of Inquiry into Higher Education (NCIHE) . 1997 . “ Higher Education in the Learning Society. Report of the National Committee (The Dearing Report) ” . London : HMSO .
   Google Scholar
• Oh , D. M. , Kim , J. M. , Garcia , R. E. and Krilowicz , B. L. 2005 . Valid and reliable authentic assessment of culminating student performance in the biomedical sciences . Advances in Physiological Education , 29 : 83 – 93 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quality Assurance Agency . 2000 . Promoting Higher Quality Code of Practice for the Assurance of Academic Quality and Standards in Higher Education, Section 6: Assessment of Students , Gloucester : QAA .
   Google Scholar
• Quality Assurance Agency . 2001 . The Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in England, Wales and Northern Ireland , Gloucester : QAA .
   Google Scholar
• Rose-Innes , A. C. 1985 . Letter: Splitting degrees . The Times , 30 May
   Google Scholar
• Simonite , V. 2000 . The effects of aggregation method and variations in the performance of individual students on degree classifications in modular degree courses . Studies in Higher Education , 25 : 197 – 210 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stowell , M. 2004 . Equity, justice and standards: assessment decision making in higher education . Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education , 29 ( 4 ) : 495 – 510 .
   Google Scholar
• Winter , R. 1993 . Education or grading? Arguments for a non-subdivided honours degree . Studies in Higher Education , 18 : 363 – 377 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolf , H. and Turner , D. 1997 . Honours classifications: the need for transparency . The New Academic , 6 ( 3 ) : 10 – 12 .
   Google Scholar
• Yorke , M. , Barnett , G. , Bridges , P. , Evanson , P. , Haines , C. , Jenkins , D. , Knight , P. , Scurry , D. , Stowell , M. and Woolf , H. 2002 . Does grading method influence honours degree classification? . Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education , 27 : 269 – 278 .
   Google Scholar
• Yorke , M. , Barnett , G. , Evanson , P. , Haines , C. , Jenkins , D. , Knight , P. , Scurry , D. , Stowell , M. and Woolf , H. 2004 . Some effects of the award algorithm on honours degree classifications in UK higher education . Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education , 29 : 401 – 413 .
   Google Scholar