Teaching Reflexivity: Undoing or Reinscribing Habits of Gender?

References

• Adkins , L. 2003 . Reflexivity: freedom or habit of gender? . Theory, Culture and Society , 20 ( 6 ) : 21 – 42 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck , U. 1994 . “ Self-dissolution and self-endangerment of industrial society: what does this mean? ” . In Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order , Edited by: Beck , U. , Giddens , A. and Lash , S. 174 – 183 . Cambridge : Polity .
   Google Scholar
• Beck , U. and Beck-Gernsheim , E. 1996 . The Normal Chaos of Love , Cambridge : Polity .
   Google Scholar
• Bondi , L. 2003 . Empathy and identification: conceptual resources for feminist fieldwork . ACME: International Journal of Critical Geography , 2 : 64 – 76 .
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu , P. 1977 . Outline of a Theory of Practice , Cambridge : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Brown , J. 2006 . Reflexivity in the research process: psychoanalytic observations . International Journal of Social Research Methodology , 9 : 181 – 197 .
   Google Scholar
• Butler , J. 1990 . Gender Trouble , London : Routledge .
   Google Scholar
• Butler , J. 2004 . Undoing Gender , London : Routledge .
   Google Scholar
• Cupples , J. 2002 . The field as a landscape of desire: sex and sexuality in geographical fieldwork . Area , 31 : 382 – 390 .
   Google Scholar
• Davidson , J. 2001 . ‘Joking apart …’: a ‘processual’ approach to research self-help groups . Social and Cultural Geography , 2 : 163 – 183 .
   Google Scholar
• Dryden , W. and Feltham , C. 1994 . Developing Counsellor Training , London : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Finch , J. 1984 . “ ‘It's great to have someone to talk to’: ethics and politics of interviewing women ” . In Social Researching: Politics, Problems and Practice , Edited by: Bell , C. and Roberts , H. 70 – 85 . London : Routledge .
   Google Scholar
• Finlay , L. 2003 . “ The reflexive journey: mapping multiple routes ” . In Reflexivity: A Practical Guide for Researchers in Health and Social Sciences , Edited by: Finlay , L. and Gough , B. 3 – 20 . Oxford : Blackwell .
   Google Scholar
• Fonow , M. and Cook , J. 2005 . Feminist methodology: new applications in the academy and public policy . Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society , 30 : 2211 – 2236 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giddens , A. 1992 . The Transformation of Intimacy , Cambridge : Polity .
   Google Scholar
• Harrison , M. , Short , C. and Roberts , C. 2003 . Reflecting on reflective learning: the case of geography, earth and environmental sciences . Journal of Geography in Higher Education , 27 : 133 – 152 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hertz , R. , ed. 1997 . Reflexivity and Voice , London : Sage Publications .
   Google Scholar
• Kobayashi , A. 2003 . GPC ten years on: is self-reflexivity enough? . Gender, Place and Culture , 10 : 345 – 349 .
   Google Scholar
• Lash , Scott . 1994 . “ Reflexivity and its doubles: structure, aesthetics, community ” . In Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order , Edited by: Beck , U. , Giddens , A. and Lash , S. 110 – 173 . Cambridge : Polity .
   Google Scholar
• Mackenzie , C. and Stoljar , N. , eds. 2000 . Relational Autonomy , Oxford : Oxford University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Mearns , D. 1997 . Person-Centred Counselling Training , London : Sage Publications .
   Google Scholar
• Meyers , D. T. , ed. 1997 . Feminists Rethink the Self , Boulder, CO : Westview .
   Google Scholar
• Moss , P. , ed. 2002 . Feminist Geography in Practice: Research and Methods , Oxford : Blackwell .
   Google Scholar
• Nairn , K. , Munro , J. and Smith , A. B. 2005 . A counter-narrative of a ‘failed’ interview . Qualitative Research , 5 : 221 – 244 .
   Google Scholar
• Oakley , A. 1981 . “ Interviewing women: a contradiction in terms? ” . In Doing Feminist Research , Edited by: Roberts , H. 30 – 61 . London : Routledge & Kegan Paul .
   Google Scholar
• Patai , D. 1994 . “ When method becomes power ” . In Power and Method , Edited by: Gitlen , A. 61 – 73 . New York : Routledge .
   Google Scholar
• Pillow , W. 2003 . Confession, catharsis, or cure? Rethinking the uses of reflexivity as methodological power in qualitative research . Qualitative Studies in Education , 16 : 175 – 196 .
   Google Scholar
• Ribbens , J. and Edwards , R. 1998 . Feminist Dilemmas in Qualitative Fieldwork , London : Sage Publications .
   Google Scholar
• Rose , G. 1997 . Situated knowledges: positionality, reflexivity and other tactics . Progress in Human Geography , 21 : 305 – 320 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schön , Donald . 1983 . The Reflective Practitioner , London : Maurice Temple .
   Google Scholar
• Siltanen , J. , Willis , A. and Scobie , W. 2008 . Separately together: working reflexively as a team . International Journal of Social Research Methodology , 11 ( 1 ) : 45 – 61 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West , C. and Zimmerman , D. 1987 . Doing gender . Gender and Society , 1 : 125 – 151 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young , I. M. 1990 . Throwing Like a Girl and Other Essays in Feminist Philosophy , Bloomington : Indiana University Press .
   Google Scholar