References
- Bravo-Torija, B., & Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. (2012). Progression in complexity: Contextualizing sustainable marine resources management in a 10th grade classroom. Research in Science Education, 42, 5–23. doi:10.1007/s11165-011-9254-1.
- Bryman, A. (2008). Social Research Methods (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Carew, A., & Mitchell, C. (2002). Characterizing undergraduate engineering students' understanding of sustainability. European Journal of Engineering Education, 27, 349–361. doi:10.1080/03043790210166657.
- Chalkley, B. (2006). Education for sustainable development: Continuation. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 30, 235–236. doi:10.1080/03098260600717307.
- Cornish, L., & Jenkins, K. (2012). Encouraging teacher development through embedding reflective practice in assessment. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 40, 159–170. doi:10.1080/1359866X.2012.669825.
- Davies, R., & Dart, J. (2005). The most significant change (MSC) technique: A guide to its use. Cambridge: CARE International.
- De Bono, E. (1985). De Bono's thinking course. New York, NY: Facts on File.
- DEWHA. (2009). Living sustainably: The Australian Government's National Action Plan for Education for Sustainability. Canberra: Australian Government.
- Flint, R. W., McCarter, W., & Bonniwell, T. (2000). Interdisciplinary education in sustainability: Links in secondary and higher education. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 1, 191–202. doi:10.1108/1467630010328261.
- Kagawa, F. (2007). Dissonance in students' perceptions of sustainable development and sustainability. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 8, 317–338. doi:10.1108/14676370710817174.
- Klosterman, M., Sadler, T., & Brown, J. (2012). Science teachers' use of mass media to address socio-scientific and sustainability issues. Research in Science Education, 42, 51–74. doi:10.1007/s11165-011-9256-z.
- Lombardi, D., & Sinatra, G. (2012). College students' perceptions about the plausibility of human-induced climate change. Research in Science Education, 42, 201–217. doi:10.1007/s11165-010-9196-z.
- Martin, S., Brannigan, J., & Hall, A. (2005). Sustainability, systems thinking and professional practice. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 29, 79–89. doi:10.1080/03098260500030389.
- Martin, S., & Hall, A. (2002). Sustainable development and the professions. Planet, 5, 17–18. doi:10.11120/plan.2002.00050017.
- Rieckmann, M. (2013). The global perspective of education for sustainable development: A European-Latin American study about key competencies for thinking and acting in the world society. Environmental Education Research, 19, 257–258. doi:10.1080/13504622.2012.697547.
- Roberts, C. (2012). Environmental sustainability: Annual report of the Environmental Sustainability Knowledge Transfer Network. Oxford: ESKTN.
- Robottom, I. (2012). Socio-scientific issues in education: Innovative practices and contending epistemologies. Research in Science Education, 42, 95–107. doi:10.1007/s11165-011-9258-x.
- Simonneaux, J., & Simonneaux, L. (2012). Educational configurations for teaching environmental socio-scientific issues within the perspective of sustainability. Research in Science Education, 42, 75–94. doi:10.1007/s11165-011-9257-y.
- Strachan, G. (2009). Systems thinking: The ability to recognize and analyse the inter-connections within and between systems. In A. Stibbe (Ed.), Handbook of sustainable literacy: Skills for a changing world. Totnes, UK: Green Books.
- Summers, M., Corney, G., & Childs, A. (2004). Student teachers’ conceptions of sustainable development: The starting-points of geographers and scientists. Educational Research, 46, 163–182. doi:10.1080/0013188042000222449.
- United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Steering Committee on Education for Sustainable Development. (2012). Learning for the future; competences in education for sustainable development. Geneva: Author.
- Vasconcelos, C. (2012). Teaching environmental education through PBL: Evaluation of a teaching intervention program. Research in Science Education, 42, 219–232. doi:10.1007/s11165-010-9192-3.