Student field experiences: designing for different instructors and variable weather

References

• Aitchison, K. (2004). Supply, demand and a failure of understanding: Addressing the culture clash between archaeologists’ expectations for training and employment in ‘academia’ versus ‘practice’. World Archaeology, 36, 203–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, D., Thomas, G. P., & Nashon, S. M. (2009). Social barriers to meaningful engagement in biology field trip group work. Science Education, 93, 511–534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyle, A., Maguire, S., Martin, A., Milsom, C., Nash, R., Rawlinson, S., … Conchie, S. (2007). Fieldwork is good: The student perception and the affective domain. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 31, 299–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyle, A. P., Ryan, P., & Stokes, A. (2009). External drivers for changing fieldwork practices and provision in the UK and Ireland. In S. J. Whitmeyer, D. W. Mogk, & E. J. Pyle (Eds.), Field geology education: Historical perspectives and modern approaches (pp. 313–321). Boulder, CO: Geological Society of America.
   Google Scholar
• Breunig, M. C., O’Connell, T. S., Todd, S., Anderson, L., & Young, A. (2010). The impact of outdoor pursuits on college students’ perceived sense of community. Journal of Leisure Research, 42, 551–572.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, D. R., & Wilkerson, F. D. (2000). Comments: In praise of off-season field trips. Journal of Geography, 99, 36–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caulkins, J. L. (2009). Exit survey of graduating EOS students: Goals and results [Department seminar]. Retrieved from https://www.eoas.ubc.ca/research/cwsei/resources/EOS_Exit_Survey_Results_Sept2009.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Colley, S. M. (2003). Lessons for the profession: Teaching archaeological practical work skills to university students. Australian Archaeology, 57, 90–97.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, B. A. (2007). Learning to teach science as inquiry in the rough and tumble of practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 613–642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dohaney, J., Brogt, E., & Kennedy, B. (2015). Strategies and perceptions of students’ field note-taking skills: Insights from a geothermal field lesson. Journal of Geoscience Education, 63, 233–249.
   Google Scholar
• Feig, A. D. (2010). Technology, accuracy and scientific thought in field camp: An ethnographic study. Journal of Geoscience Education, 58, 241–251.
   Google Scholar
• Fuller, I., Edmondson, S., France, D., Higgitt, D., & Ratinen, I. (2006). International perspectives on the effectiveness of geography fieldwork for learning. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 30, 89–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuller, I., Gaskin, S., & Scott, I. (2003). Student perceptions of geography and environmental science fieldwork in the light of restricted access to the field, caused by foot and mouth disease in the UK in 2001. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 27, 79–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuller, I. C. (2006). What is the value of fieldwork? Answers from New Zealand using two contrasting undergraduate physical geography field trips. New Zealand Geographer, 62, 215–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Glass, M. R. (2015). International geography field courses: Practices and challenges. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 39, 485–490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gold, J. R., Jenkins, A., Lee, R., Monk, J., Riley, J., Shepherd, I., & Unwin, D. (1991). Teaching geography in higher education: A manual of good practice. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Greider, T., & Garkovich, L. (1994). Landscapes: The social construction of nature and the environment. Rural Sociology, 59, 1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustafson, P. (2001). Meanings of place: Everyday experience and theoretical conceptualizations. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21, 5–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halpenny, E. A. (2010). Pro-environmental behaviours and park visitors: The effect of place attachment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 409–421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harland, T., Spronken-Smith, R. A., Dickinson, K. J. M., & Pickering, N. (2006). Out of the ordinary: recapturing the liberal traditions of a university education through field courses. Teaching in Higher Education, 11, 93–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernández, B., Hidalgo, M. C., Salazar-Laplace, M. E., & Hess, S. (2007). Place attachment and place identity in natives and non-natives. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27, 310–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidalgo, M. C., & Hernández, B. (2001). Place attachment: conceptual and empirical questions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21, 273–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hope, M. (2009). The importance of direct experience: A philosophical defence of fieldwork in human geography. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 33, 169–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolley, A., Brogt, E., Kennedy, B., Hampton, S., & Fraser, L. (2018b). Motivation and connection to earth on geology field trips in New Zealand: Comparing American study abroad students with local undergraduates. Frontiers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad, xxx, 72–99.
   Google Scholar
• Jolley, A., Kennedy, B. M., Brogt, E., Hampton, S. J., & Fraser, L. (2018a). Are we there yet? sense of place and the student experience on roadside and situated geology field trips. Geosphere, 14, 1–17. doi: 10.1130/GES01484.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kastens, K. A., Manduca, C. A., Cervato, C., Frodeman, R., Goodwin, C., Liben, L. S., … Titus, S. (2009). How geoscientists think and learn. EOS, Transactions, American Geophysical Union, 90, 265–266.
   Google Scholar
• Kent, M., Gilbertson, D. D., & Hunt, C. O. (1997). Fieldwork in geography teaching: A critical review of the literature and approaches. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 21, 313–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyle, G., Graefe, A., & Manning, R. (2005). Testing the dimensionality of place attachment in recreational settings. Environment & Behavior, 37, 153–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyle, G., Graefe, A., Manning, R., & Bacon, J. (2004). Effects of place attachment on users’ perceptions of social and environmental conditions in a natural setting. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 213–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaDue, N. D., & Pacheco, H. A. (2013). Critical experiences for field geologists: Emergent themes in interest development. Journal of Geoscience Education, 61, 428–436.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J., & Ingold, T. (2006). Fieldwork on foot: Perceiving, routing, socializing. In S. Coleman & P. Collins (Eds.), Locating the field: Space, place and context in anthropology (pp. 67–85). Oxford: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Lei, S. A. (2010). Field trips in college biology and ecology courses: revisiting benefits and drawbacks. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 37, 42–48.
   Google Scholar
• Lewicka, M. (2011). Place attachment: How far have we come in the last 40 years? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31, 207–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lonergan, N., & Andresen, L. W. (1988). Field-based education: Some theoretical considerations. Higher Education Research & Development, 7, 63–77.
   Google Scholar
• Luera, G., & Murray, K. (2016). A mixed methods approach to determining the impact of a geoscience field research program upon science teachers’ knowledge, beliefs and instructional practices. Journal of Geoscience Education, 64, 303–313.
   Google Scholar
• Manning, M., Harris, J. A., Maher, W. A., & McQueen, K. G. (1998). Learning in the field: A manual for conducting field classes (Gold Guide No. 5). Jamison: Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia.
   Google Scholar
• Massey, D. (2005). For space. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Muller, S. W. (1983). Some field hints from an old top hand. Journal of Geological Education, 31, 36–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orion, N., & Hoftstein, A. (1994). Factors that influence learning during a scientific field trip in a natural environment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 1097–1119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petcovic, H. L., Stokes, A., & Caulkins, J. L. (2014). Geoscientists’ perceptions of the value of undergraduate field education. GSA Today, 24, 4–40.
   Google Scholar
• Russ, A., Peters, S. J., Krasny, M. E., & Stedman, R. C. (2015). Development of ecological place meaning in New York City. The Journal of Environmental Education, 46, 73–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sandberg, J. (1997). Are phenomenographic results reliable? Higher Education Research and Development, 16, 203–212.
   Google Scholar
• Scannell, L., & Gifford, R. (2010). Defining place attachment: A tripartite organizing framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, I., Fuller, I., & Gaskin, S. (2006). Life without fieldwork: Some lecturers’ perceptions of geography and environmental science fieldwork. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 30, 161–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semken, S., & Butler Freeman, C. (2008). Sense of place in the practice and assessment of place-based science teaching. Science Education, 92, 1042–1057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semken, S., Butler Freeman, C., Watts, N. B., Neakrase, J. J., Dial, R. E., & Baker, D. R. (2009). Factors that influence sense of place as a learning outcome and assessment measure of place-based geoscience teaching. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 13, 136–158.
   Google Scholar
• Sevon, W. D. (1969). Stratigraphy and sedimentology of the tertiary rocks of the Mandamus – Dove River Area, North Canterbury, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 12, 283–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, D. (2004). Issues and trends in higher education biology fieldwork. Journal of Biological Education, 39, 6–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stedman, R. C. (2003). Is it really just a social construction? The contribution of the physical environment to sense of place. Society and Natural Resources: An International Journal, 16, 671–685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stokes, A., & Boyle, A. P. (2009). The undergraduate geoscience fieldwork experience: influencing factors and implications for learning. In S. J. Whitmeyer, D. W. Mogk, & E. J. Pyle (Eds.), Field geology education: Historical perspectives and modern approaches (pp. 291–311). Boulder, CO: Geological Society of America.
   Google Scholar
• Streule, M. J., & Craig, L. E. (2016). Social learning theories – an important design consideration for geoscience fieldwork. Journal of Geoscience Education, 64, 101–107.
   Google Scholar
• Tappenden, V. E. (2003). Magmatic response to the evolving New Zealand margin of Gondwana during the Mid-Late Cretaceous (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Teft, J. (2013). Exploring the why: How expatriate teachers engage in environmental education (Unpublished master’s thesis). Royal Roads University, Victoria, BC.
   Google Scholar
• Tuan, Y.-F. (1977). Space and place: The perspective of experience. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• van der Hoeven Kraft, K. J., Srogi, L., Husman, J., Semken, S., & Fuhrman, M. (2011). Engaging students to learn through the affective domain: A new framework for teaching in the geosciences. Journal of Geoscience Education, 59, 71–84.
   Google Scholar
• Weaver, S. D., & Pankhurst, R. J. (1991). A precise Rb-Sr age for the Mandamus Igneous Complex, North Canterbury, and regional tectonic implications. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 34, 341–345.
   Google Scholar
• Wee, B., Shepardson, D., Fast, J., & Harbor, J. (2007). Teaching and learning about inquiry: insights and challenges in professional development. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18, 63–89.
   Google Scholar
• White, S., & Reid, J.-A. (2008). Placing teachers? Sustaining rural schooling through place-consciousness in teacher education. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 23, 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Whitmeyer, S. J., Mogk, D. W., & Pyle, E. J. (Eds.). (2009). Field geology education: Historical perspectives and modern approaches. Boulder, CO: Geological Society of America.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, D., & Semken, S. (2011). Ethnographic methods in analysis of place-based geoscience curriculum and pedagogy. In A. D. Feig & A. Stokes (Eds.), Qualitative Inquiry in Geoscience Education Research (pp. 49–62). Boulder, CO: Geological Society of America.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, D. R., & Stewart, S. I. (1998). Sense of place: An elusive concept that is finding a home in ecosystem management. Journal of Forestry, 96, 18–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, D. R., & Vaske, J. J. (2003). The measurement of place attachment: validity and generalizability of a psychometric approach. Forest Science, 49, 830–840.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, M. (1999). The social construction of tourist places. Australian Geographer, 30, 373–389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar