References
- National Research Council (NRC). (2006). Learning to think spatially: GIS as a support system in the K-12 curriculum. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
- American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (1990). Science for all Americans: Project 2061. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
- Baker, T. R., & Witham Bednarz, S. (2003). Lessons learned from reviewing research in GIS education. Journal of Geography, 102(6), 231–233.
- Bodzin, A. M., Fu, Q., Kulo, V., & Peffer, T. (2014). Examining the effect of enactment of a geospatial curriculum on students’ geospatial thinking and reasoning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(4), 562–574.
- Bush, D., Sieber, R., Seiler, G., & Chandler, M. (2016). The teaching of anthropogenic climate change and earth science via technology-enabled inquiry education. Journal of Geoscience, Education, 64(3), 159–174.
- Bush, D., Sieber, R., Seiler, G., & Chandler, M. (2017). Examining educational climate change technology: How group inquiry work with an authentic scientific instrument alters classroom learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 53(2), 113–136.
- Bush, D., Sieber, R., Seiler, G., Chandler, M., & Chmura, G. L. (2018). Bringing climate scientists’ tools into classrooms to improve conceptual understanding. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 9(1), 25–34.
- Butler, D. M., & Macgregor, I. D. (2003). Globe: Science and education. Journal of Geoscience Education, 51(1), 9–20.
- Chambers, L. H., Alston, E. J., Phelps, C. S., Moore, S. W., Diones, D. D., Oots, P. C., … Mims, F. M. III. (2008). Education: The my NASA data project. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 89(4), 437.
- Doering, A., & Veletsianos, G. (2008). An investigation of the use of real-time, authentic geospatial data in the K–12 classroom. Journal of Geography, 106(6), 217–225.
- Dommenget, D. (2015, April). The monash simple climate model: An interactive climate model for teaching. Paper presented at the European Geosciences Union General Assembly Conference, Vienna, Austria.
- Fraedrich, K., Jansen, H., Kirk, E., Luksch, U., & Lunkeit, F. (2005). The planet simulator: Towards a user friendly model. Meteorologische Zeitschrift, 14(3), 299–304.
- Gallagher, S. M., & Downs, R. M. (Eds.). (2012). Geography for life: National geography standards. Washington, DC: National Council for Geographic Education.
- Gautier, C., & Solomon, R. (2005). A preliminary study of students’ asking quantitative scientific questions for inquiry-based climate model experiments. Journal of Geoscience Education, 53(4), 432–443.
- Gliem, J., & Gliem, R. (2003). Calculating, interpreting, and reporting cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient for likert-type scales. Proceedings of the 2003 Midwest Research to Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing and Community Education (pp. 82–88), Columbus, OH.
- Goodrum, D., & Rennie, L. (2007). Australian school science education national action plan 2008–2012. Canberra, AU: Department of Education Science and Training.
- Hansen, J., Russell, G., Rind, D., Stone, P., Lacis, A., Lebedeff, S., … Travis, L. (1983). Efficient three-dimensional global models for climate studies: Models I and II. Monthly Weather Review, 111(4), 609–662.
- Harwood, W., & McMahon, M. (2013). Effects of integrated video media on student achievement and attitudes in high school chemistry. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(9), 1689–1699.
- Kerski, J. J. (2003). The implementation and effectiveness of geographic information systems technology and methods in secondary education. Journal of Geography, 102(3), 128–137.
- Lloyd, R., & Bunch, R. L. (2008). Technology and map-learning: Users, methods, and symbols. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 93(4), 828–850.
- National Research Council (NRC). (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
- Nellis. (1994). Technology in geographic education: Reflections and future directions. Journal of Geography, 93(1), 36–39.
- NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
- Pallant, A., & Lee, H. S. (2015). Constructing scientific arguments using evidence from dynamic computational climate models. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(2–3), 378–395.
- Pandya, R., Charlevoix, D., Cordero, E., Smith, D., & Yalda, S. (2012). Trends in the AMS education symposium and highlights from 2012. Bulletin of the American. Meteorological Society, 93(12), 39–41.
- Patterson, T. C. (2007). Google earth as a (not just) geography education tool. Journal of Geography, 106(4), 145–152.
- Rea, L., & Parker, R. (2005). Designing and conducting survey research: A comprehensive guide (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Boss.
- Rickles, P., & Ellul, C. (2017). Innovations in and the changing landscape of geography education with geographic information systems. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 41(3), 305–309.
- Riebeek, H., Chambers, L. H., Yuen, K., & Herring, D. (2009, December). Bringing terra science to the people: 10 years of education and public outreach. Paper presented at the Fall Meeting of the American Geophysical Union, San Francisco, CA.
- Schmidt, G. A., Kelley, M., Nazarenko, L., Ruedy, R., Russell, G. L., Aleinov, I., … Canuto, V. (2014). Configuration and assessment of the GISS ModelE2 contributions to the CMIP5 archive. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 6(1), 141–184.
- Sohl, L. E., Chandler, M. A., & Zhou, J. (2013, December). Meeting the next generation science standards through “rediscovered” climate model experiments. Paper presented at the Fall Meeting of the American Geophysical Union, San Francisco, CA.
- Unwin, D. (1981). Teaching a model-based climatology using energy balance simulation. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 5(2), 133–138.
- Waldron, F., Ruane, B., Oberman, R., & Morris, S. (2016). Geographical process or global injustice? Contrasting educational perspectives on climate change. Environmental Education Research, 1–17.