339
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Designing MATLAB course for undergraduates in cartography and geographic information science: linking research and teaching

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, & ORCID Icon
Pages 25-44 | Received 03 Dec 2018, Accepted 10 Oct 2019, Published online: 21 Nov 2019

References

  • Al-Maktoumi, A., Al-Ismaily, S., & Kacimov, A. (2016). Research-based learning for undergraduate students in soil and water sciences: A case study of hydropedology in an arid-zone environment. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 40(3), 321–339.
  • Astin, A. W. (1993). What matters in college? Four critical years revisited. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Barnett, R. (2000). Supercomplexity and the curriculum. Studies in Higher Education, 25(3), 255–265.
  • Barnett, R. (2004). Learning for an unknown future. Higher Education Research & Development, 23(3), 247–260.
  • Biggs, J. (1996). Western misperceptions of the confucian-heritage learning culture. In D. Watkins & J. Biggs (Eds.), The chinese learners: Cultural, psychological and contextual influences (pp. 45–68). Hong Kong: The University of Hong Kong.
  • Boùùaert, M., De Baets, B., Vervust, S., Neutens, T., De Maeyer, P., & Van de Weghe, N. (2016). Computation and visualisation of the accuracy of old maps using differential distortion analysis. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 30(7), 1255–1280.
  • Boyer Commission on Educating Undergraduates in the Research University. (1998). Reinventing undergraduate education: A blueprint for America’s research universities. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
  • Brew, A. (2003). Teaching & research: New relationships and their implications for inquiry-based teaching and learning in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 22(1), 3–18.
  • Brew, A. (2006). Research and teaching: Beyond the divide. New York, NY: Palgrave-MacMillan.
  • Brew, A. (2010). Imperatives and challenges in integrating teaching and research. Higher Education Research & Development, 29(2), 139–150.
  • Brew, A. (2012). Teaching and research: New relationships and their implications for inquiry-based teaching and learning in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 31(1), 101–114.
  • Brew, A. (2013). Understanding the scope of undergraduate research: A framework for curricular and pedagogical decision-making. Higher Education, 66(5), 603–618.
  • Brown, R. B., & McCartney, S. (1998). The link between research and teaching: Its purpose and implications. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 35, 117–129.
  • Burghardt, D., & Cecconi, A. (2007). Mesh simplification for building typification. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 21(3), 283–298.
  • Cantor, A., Delauer, V., Martin, D., & Rogan, J. (2015). Training interdisciplinary “wicked problem” solvers: Applying lessons from hero in community-based research experiences for undergraduates. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 39(3), 407–419.
  • Chang, H. (2006). Turning an undergraduate class into a professional research community. Teaching in Higher Education, 10(2), 387–394.
  • Cornelius, V., Wood, L., & Lai, J. (2016). Implementation and evaluation of a formal academic-peer-mentoring programme in higher education. Active Learning in Higher Education, 17(3), 193–205.
  • Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297.
  • De Tormes Eby, L. T., Allen, T. D., Hoffman, B. J., Baranik, L. E., Sauer, J. B., Baldwin, S., … Evans, S. C. (2013). An interdisciplinary meta-analysis of the potential antecedents, correlates, and consequences of protege perceptions of mentoring. Psychological Bulletin, 139(2), 441–476.
  • Dengler, M. (2008). Classroom active learning complemented by an online discussion forum to teach sustainability. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 32(3), 481–494.
  • DiBiase, D., DeMers, M. N., Johnson, A., Kemp, K., Luck, A. T., Plewe, B., & Wentz, E. (2006). Geographic information science & technology body of knowledge. Washington, DC: Association of American Geographers and University Consortium for Geographic Information Science.
  • Egenhofer, M., Clarke, K., Gao, S., Quesnot, T., Franklin, R., Yuan, M., & Coleman, D. (2016). Contributions of GIScience over the past twenty years. In H. Onsrud & W. Kuhn (Eds.), Advancing geographic information science: The past and the next twenty years (pp. 9–34). Needham, MA: GSDI Association Press.
  • Etherington, T. R. (2016). Teaching introductory GIS programming to geographers using an open source python approach. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 40(1), 117–130.
  • Feldon, D. F., Peugh, J., Timmerman, B. E., Maher, M. A., Hurst, M., Strickland, D., … Stiegelmeyer, C. (2011). Graduate students’ teaching experiences improve their methodological research skills. Science, 333(6045), 1037–1039.
  • Feng, X. (2008). On American and Chinese higher education. Asian Social Science, 4(6), 60–64.
  • Feng, Y., & Liu, Y. (2013). A heuristic cellular automata approach for modelling urban land-use change based on simulated annealing. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 27(3), 449–466.
  • Fuller, I., Mellor, A., & Entwistle, J. (2014). Combining research-based student fieldwork with staff research to reinforce teaching and learning. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 38(3), 383–400.
  • Fuller, I. C., & France, D. (2016). Does digital video enhance student learning in field-based experiments and develop graduate attributes beyond the classroom?. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 40(2), 193–206.
  • González, C. (2001). Undergraduate research, graduate mentoring, and the university’s mission. Science, 293(5535), 1624–1626.
  • Greene, C. A., Gwyther, D. E., & Blankenship, D. D. (2017). Antarctic mapping tools for MATLAB. Computers & Geosciences, 104, 151–157.
  • Guo, L. (2016). Changing the idea of strict entrance and easy graduation in higher education management. Guangming Daily. Retrieved from http://epaper.gmw.cn/gmrb/html/2016-09/01/nw.D110000gmrb_20160901_2-02.htm
  • Hall, E. E., Walkington, H., Shanahan, J. O., Ackley, E., & Stewart, K. A. (2018). Mentor perspectives on the place of undergraduate research mentoring in academic identity and career development: An analysis of award winning mentors. International Journal for Academic Development, 23(1), 15–27.
  • Hardman, C. (2016). Tutor-student interaction in seminar teaching: Implications for professional development. Active Learning in Higher Education, 17(1), 71–88.
  • Harland, T. (2016). Teaching to enhance research. Higher Education Research & Development, 35(3), 461–472.
  • Hathaway, R. S., Nagda, B. A., & Gregerman, S. R. (2002). The relationship of undergraduate research participation to graduate and professional education pursuit: An empirical study. Journal of College Student Development, 43(5), 614–631.
  • Hattie, J., & Marsh, H. W. (1996). The relationship between research and teaching: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 507–542.
  • Healey, M. (2005a). Linking research and teaching to benefit student learning. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 29(2), 183–201.
  • Healey, M. (2005b). Linking research and teaching: Exploring disciplinary spaces and the role of inquiry-base learning. In R. Barnett (Ed.), Reshaping the university: New relationships between research, scholarship and teaching (pp. 67–78). Maidenhead, England: McGraw Hill/Open University Press.
  • Healey, M., & Jenkins, A. (2006). Strengthening the teaching-research linkage in undergraduate courses and programs. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 107, 45–55.
  • Healey, M., & Jenkins, A. (2009). Developing undergraduate research and inquiry. Research Report to the Higher Education Academy. York: Higher Education Academy.
  • Healey, M., & Jenkins, A. (2018). The role of academic developers in embedding high-impact undergraduate research and inquiry in mainstream higher education: Twenty years’ reflection. International Journal for Academic Development, 23(1), 52–64.
  • Healey, M., Jenkins, A., & Lea, J. (2014). Developing research-based curricula in college-based higher education. York: The Higher Education Academy.
  • Heron, L., Baker, R., & McEwen, L. (2006). Co-learning: Relinking research and teaching in geography. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 30(1), 77–87.
  • Hill, J., & Walkington, H. (2016). Developing graduate attributes through participation in undergraduate research conferences. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 40(2), 222–237.
  • Hill, J., Walkington, H., & France, D. (2016). Graduate attributes: Implications for higher education practice and policy. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 40(2), 155–163.
  • Howitt, S., Wilson, A., Wilson, K., & Roberts, P. (2010). ‘Please remember we are not all brilliant’: Undergraduates’ experiences of an elite, research-intensive degree at a research-intensive university. Higher Education Research & Development, 29(4), 405–420.
  • Hunter, A., Laursen, S., Seymour, E., Thiry, H., & Melton, G. (2010). Summer scientists: Establishing the value of shared research for science faculty and their students. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Jenkins, A. (2000). The relationship between teaching and research: Where does geography stand and deliver? Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 24(3), 325–351.
  • Jenkins, A., Breen, R., Lindsay, R., & Brew, A. (2003). Re-shaping higher education: Linking teaching and research. London: Routledge-Falmer.
  • Jenkins, A., Healey, M., & Zetter, R. (2007). Linking teaching and research in disciplines and departments. York: Higher Education Academy.
  • Jiang, B., & Harrie, L. (2004). Selection of streets from a network using self-organizing maps. Transactions in GIS, 8(3), 335–350.
  • Johnson, B., & Shneiderman, B. (1991). Tree-Maps: A space-filling approach to the visualization of hierarchical information structures. IEEE Conference on Visualization, San Diego, CA (pp. 284–291).
  • Johnson, W. B. (2007). Student-faculty mentoring outcomes. In T. D. Allen & L. T. Eby (Eds.), The blackwell handbook of mentoring: A multiple perspectives approach (pp. 189–210). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
  • Kennedy, P. (2002). Learning cultures and learning styles: Myth-understandings about adult (Hong Kong) Chinese learners. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 21(5), 430–445.
  • Kilgo, C. A., & Pascarella, E. T. (2016). Does independent research with a faculty member enhance four-year graduation and graduate/professional degree plans? Convergent results with different analytical methods. Higher Education, 71, 575–592.
  • Kim, S. Y., Wang, Y., Orozco-Lapray, D., Shen, Y., & Murtuza, M. (2013). Does “tiger parenting” exist? Parenting profiles of Chinese Americans and adolescent developmental outcomes. Asian American Journal of Psychology, 4(1), 7.
  • Kuh, G. D. (2008). High-impact educational practices: What they are, who has access to them, and why they matter. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities.
  • Kulkarni, A. T., Mohanty, J., Eldho, T. I., Rao, E. P., & Mohan, B. K. (2014). A web GIS based integrated flood assessment modeling tool for coastal urban watersheds. Computers & Geosciences, 64, 7–14.
  • Larson, S., Partridge, L., Walkington, H., Wuetherick, B., & Moore, J. L. (2018). An international conversation about mentored undergraduate research and inquiry and academic development. International Journal for Academic Development, 23(1), 6–14.
  • Levy, P., & Petrulis, R. (2012). How do first-year university students experience inquiry and research, and what are the implications for the practice of inquiry-based learning? Studies in Higher Education, 37(1), 85–101.
  • Linn, M. C., Palmer, E., Baranger, A., Gerard, E., & Stone, E. (2015). Undergraduate research experiences: Impacts and opportunities. Science, 347(6222), 1261757.
  • Liu, X., & LeSage, J. (2010). Arc_Mat: A Matlab-based spatial data analysis toolbox. Journal of Geographical Systems, 12(1), 69–87.
  • Livingstone, D., & Lynch, K. (2002). Group project work and student-centered active learning: Two different experiences. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 26(2), 217–237.
  • Lopatto, D. (2003). The essential features of undergraduate research. Council of Undergraduate Research Quarterly, 23, 139–142.
  • Lopatto, D. (2004). Survey of undergraduate research experiences (SURE): First findings. Cell Biology Education, 3(4), 270–277.
  • Lopatto, D. (2009). Science in solution: The impact of undergraduate research on student learning. Tucson, AZ: Research Corporation for Science Advancement.
  • Mathworks. (2018) https://www.mathworks.com/company/aboutus/products.html
  • Merkel, C. A. (2003). Undergraduate research at the research universities. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 93, 39–53.
  • Moler, C. B. (2011). Experiments with MATLAB. MathWorks Inc. Retrieved from https://www.mathworks.com/moler/exm/chapters.html
  • Monneta, C., Bouchetb, S., & Thiry-Bastien, P. (2003). ISOPAQ, a MATLAB program for stratigraphic and isopach mapping: Example application to the French Bajocian (Jurassic) sediments. Computers & Geosciences, 29, 1101–1110.
  • Pan, W., Cotton, D., & Murray, P. (2014). Linking research and teaching: Context, conflict and complementarity. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 51(1), 3–14.
  • Pascarella, E., & Terenzini, P. T. (1991). How college affects students. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Pfund, C. (2006). Professional skills: Enhanced: The merits of training mentors. Science, 311, 473–474.
  • Prager, S., & Plewe, B. (2009). Assessment and evaluation of GIScience curriculum using the geographic information science and technology body of knowledge. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 33(S1), S46–S69.
  • Prince, M. J., Felder, R. M., & Brent, R. (2007). Does faculty research improve undergraduate teaching? An analysis of existing and potential synergies. Journal of Engineering Education, 96, 283–294.
  • Read, J. M. (2010). Teaching introductory geographic information systems through problem-based learning and public scholarship. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 34(3), 379–399.
  • Regnauld, N. (2001). Contextual building typification in automated map generalization. Algorithmica, 30(2), 312–333.
  • Robertson, J., & Bond, C. (2005). The research/teaching relation: A view from the ‘edge’. Higher Education, 50(3), 509–535.
  • Russell, S. H., Hancock, M. P., & McCullough, J. (2007). The pipeline: Benefits of undergraduate research experiences. Science, 316, 548–549.
  • Schnur, S., Bektaş, K., & Çöltekin, A. (2018). Measured and perceived visual complexity: A comparative study among three online map providers. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 45(3), 238–254.
  • Schwanghart, W., & Kuhn, N. J. (2010). TopoToolbox: A set of Matlab functions for topographic analysis. Environmental Modelling & Software, 25(6), 770–781.
  • Sester, M. (2005). Optimization approaches for generalization and data abstraction. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 19(8–9), 871–897.
  • Seymour, E., Hunter, A., Laursen, S. L., & Deantoni, T. (2004). Establishing the benefits of research experiences for undergraduates in the sciences: First findings from a three-year study. Science Education, 88(4), 493–534.
  • Shanahan, J. O., Ackley-Holbrook, E., Hall, E., Stewart, K., & Walkington, H. (2015). Ten salientpractices of undergraduate research mentors: A review of the literature. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 23(5), 359–376.
  • Speake, J. (2015). Navigating our way through the research-teaching nexus. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 39(1), 131–142.
  • Spronken-Smith, R., Bullard, J. O., Ray, W., Roberts, C., & Keiffer, A. (2008a). Where might sand dunes be on mars? Engaging students through inquiry-based learning in geography. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 32(1), 71–86.
  • Spronken-Smith, R., & Harland, T. (2009). Learning to teach with problem-based learning. Active Learning in Higher Education, 10(2), 138–153.
  • Spronken-Smith, R., & Kingham, S. (2009). Strengthening teaching and research links: The case of a pollution exposure inquiry project. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 33(2), 241–253.
  • Spronken-Smith, R., McLean, A., Smith, N., Bond, C., Jenkins, M., Marshall, S., & Frielick, S. (2016). A toolkit to implement graduate attributes in geography curricula. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 40(2), 254–266.
  • Spronken-Smith, R., Mirosa, R., & Darrou, M. (2014). ‘Learningis an endless journey for anyone’: Undergraduate awareness, experiences and perceptions of the research culture in a research-intensive university. Higher Education Research & Development, 33(2), 355–371.
  • Spronken-Smith, R., Walker, J. B., O’Steen, B., Angelo, T., & Matthews, H. (2008b). Inquiry-based learning. Prepared for the New Zealand Ministry of Education. http://akoaotearoa.ac.nz/projects/inquiry-based-learning
  • Spronken‐Smith, R., & Walker, R. (2010). Can inquiry-based learning strengthen the links between teaching and disciplinary research? Studies in Higher Education, 35(6), 723–740.
  • Thomson, B. J., & Lang, N. P. (2016). Volcanic edifice alignment detection software in MATLAB: Test data and preliminary results for shield fields on venus. Computers & Geosciences, 93, 1–11.
  • Tian, J. (2017). Mentoring undergraduates in cartography and geographic information science: An apprenticeship model. Transactions in GIS, 21(6), 1148–1164.
  • Tight, M. (2016). Examining the research/teaching nexus. European Journal of Higher Education, 6(4), 293–311.
  • Timmerman, B. C., Feldon, D., Maher, M., Strickland, D., & Gilmore, J. (2013). Performance-based assessment of graduate student research skills: Timing, trajectory, and potential thresholds. Studies in Higher Education, 38(5), 693–710.
  • Turner, N., Wuetherick, B., & Healey, M. (2008). International perspectives on student awareness, experiences and perceptions of research: Implications for academic developers in implementing research-based teaching and learning. International Journal for Academic Development, 13(3), 199–211.
  • Valiente, C. (2008). Are students using the ‘wrong’ style of learning: A multicultural scrutiny for helping teachers to appreciate differences. Active Learning in Higher Education, 9(1), 73–91.
  • Visser-Wijnveen, G. J., van Driel, J. H., van der Rijst, R. M., Visser, A., & Verloop, N. (2012). Relating academics’ ways of integrating research and teaching to their students’ perceptions. Studies in Higher Education, 37(2), 219–234.
  • Walkington, H. (2015). Students as researchers: Supporting undergraduate research in the disciplines in higher education. York: HE Academy. Retrieved from https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/sites/default/files/resources/Students%20as%20researchers_1.pdf
  • Walkington, H., Dyer, S., Solem, M., Haigh, M., & Waddington, S. (2018). A capabilities approach to higher education: Geocapabilities and implications for geography curricula. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 42(1), 7–24.
  • Walkington, H., Griffin, A., Keys-Mathews, L., Metoyer, S., Miller, W., Baker, R., & France, D. (2011). Embedding research-based learning early in the undergraduate geography curriculum. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 35(3), 315–330.
  • Walkington, H., Hill, J., & Kneale, P. (2017). Reciprocal elucidation: A student-led pedagogy in multidisciplinary undergraduate research conferences. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(2), 416–429.
  • Wang, Y., Tian, J., Yu, M., Ren, C., & Wu, X. (2017). GEN_MAT: A MATLAB-based map generalization algorithm toolbox. Transactions in GIS, 21(6), 1391–1411.
  • Wikle, T., & Fagin, T. (2014). GIS course planning: A comparison of syllabi at US college and universities. Transactions in GIS, 18(4), 574–585.
  • Wilson, J. P. (2014). Geographic information science & technology body of knowledge 2.0 project. University Consortium for Geographic Information Science Symposium, Pasadena, California.
  • Yarnal, B., & Neff, R. (2007). Teaching global change in local places: The HERO research experiences for undergraduates program. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 31(3), 413–426.
  • Young, J. (2017). What is going wrong with Chinese higher education? China Daily. Retrieved from http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/opinion/2017-02/10/content_28160557.htm
  • Zamorski, B. (2002). Research-led teaching and learning in higher education: A case. Teaching in Higher Education, 7(4), 411–427.
  • Zhan, Y., & Wan, Z. (2016). Appreciated but constrained: Reflective practice of student teachers in learning communities in a Confucian heritage culture. Teaching in Higher Education, 21(6), 669–685.
  • Zhang, D. (2019). The problem with Chinese universities? Not enough dropouts. Sixth Tone. Retrieved from https://www.sixthtone.com/news/1003440/the-problem-with-chinese-universities%3F-not-enough-dropouts
  • Zimbardi, K., & Myatt, P. (2014). Embedding undergraduate research experiences within the curriculum: A cross-disciplinary study of the key characteristics guiding implementation. Studies in Higher Education, 39(2), 233–250.
  • Zou, S. (2018). Colleges enforcing academic standards with rigor. China Daily. Retrieved from http://global.chinadaily.com.cn/a/201810/26/WS5bd26724a310eff303284a69.html
  • Zou, S. (2019). Ministry calls for high-quality university coursework. China Daily. Retrieved from http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/201904/29/WS5cc6c4aca3104842260b927a.html

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.