1,058
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Fieldwork in geography undergraduate degree programmes of Turkish Universities: status, challenges and prospects

ORCID Icon
Pages 285-309 | Received 01 Mar 2019, Accepted 15 Nov 2019, Published online: 29 Nov 2019

References

  • Alkış, S. (2008). Coğrafya öğretiminde inceleme gezileri ve arazi çalışmaları [Fieldwork and field trips in geography education]. In R. Özey & A. Demirci (Eds.), Coğrafya Öğretiminde Yöntem ve Yaklaşımlar (pp. 93–122). İstanbul: Aktif.
  • Andelkovic, S., Dedjanski, V., & Pejic, B. (2018). Pedagogical benefits of fieldwork of the students at the faculty of geography in the light of the bologna process. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 42(1), 110–125.
  • Arı, Y. (2005). 20. Yüzyılda Amerikan coğrafyasının gelişim [Development of American geography in the 20th Century]. Konya: Çizgi.
  • Arı, Y. (2008a). Coğrafyayı neden çok boyutlu olarak tanımlama ve öğretmeye ihtiyaç vardır? [Why do we need to teach and learn geography as a multi-dimensional subject?]. In R. Özey & A. Demirci (Eds.), Coğrafya Öğretiminde Yöntem ve Yaklaşımlar (pp. 1–22). İstanbul: Aktif.
  • Arı, Y. (2008b). The effects of Bologna process on geography departments in Turkish universities. Herodot Conference on Future Prospects in Geography Proceedings, Liverpool, United Kingdom. pp, 27–35.
  • Arı, Y. (2010a). Integrating fieldwork in undergraduate geography curriculum in Turkish universities. Building bridges between cultures through geographical education. Proceedings of the IGU-CGE Istanbul Symposium, Istanbul, Turkey, July 8–10, pp. 269–277.
  • Arı, Y. (2010b). Coğrafyanın genel eğitime katkısı [Contribution of geography to general education]. In R. Özey & S. İncekara (Eds.), Coğrafya Eğitiminde Kavram ve Değişimler (pp. 9–21). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
  • Arı, Y. (2013). Yeni yüzyılda Türkiye’de coğrafya: Fırsatlar ve tehditler [Geography in Turkey in the new century: Opportunities and threads]. Beşeri Coğrafya Dergisi, 1(1), 6–13.
  • Arı, Y. (2014). Coğrafyada saha öğretimi ve saha araştırmaları [Field teaching and field research in geography]. In Y. Arı & İ. Kaya (Eds.), Coğrafya Araştırma Yöntemleri (pp. 303–317). Balıkesir: Coğrafyacılar Derneği.
  • Arı, Y. (2017). Çevresel determinizmden politik ekolojiye: Son 100 yılda dünya’da ve Türkiye’de insan-çevre coğrafyasındaki yaklaşımlar (From environmental determinism to political ecology: Approaches in human-environment geography in the World and in Turkey during the last 100 years]. Doğu Coğrafya Dergisi, 22(37), 1–34.
  • Arı, Y. (2018). Coğrafya lisans eğitiminde arazi çalışmaları: Problemler ve çözüm yolları [Fieldwork in undergraduate programmes: Problems and solutions]. International Symposium on Geography Education, Proceedings Book. pp. 287–296. Nevşehir, Turkey.
  • Arı, Y. (2019). Innovation and scientific developments: The content analysis of Turkish geography discussion list (cografya) (1997-2012). International Journal of Geography and Environmental Education, 39, 95–120.
  • Atayeter, Y., & Tozkoparan, U. (2014). Sosyal Bilgiler öğretmenleri ile 6. sınıf sosyal bilgiler öğrencilerinin gezi gözlem yöntemi üzerine düşünceleri [The views of teachers and 6th grade social science students on fieldtrips]. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 3(5), 1–21.
  • Aytaç, A. (2014). Sosyal bilgiler öğretmen adaylarının eğitimlerinde gezi-gözlem metodunun yeri ve önemi [Importance of fieldtrip method on education of social sciences teachers]. Hasan Ali Yücel Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 11(1), 55–69.
  • Balcı, A. (2012). Geography teacher candidates’ experiences of field study in western Anatolia: A qualitative study. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 12(2), 988–997.
  • Bandiera, O., Larcinese, V., & Rasul, I. (2010). The impact of class size on the performance of university students. VOX, CEPR’s Policy Portal. Centre for Economic Policy Research.
  • Bekaroğlu, E., & Yavan, N. (2018). Türk coğrafyacılığında dört gelenek: Ampirik bir analiz [The four traditions in Turkish geography: An empirical analysis]. Marmara Coğrafya Dergisi, 37, 79–93.
  • Bhakta, A., Dickinson, J., Moore, K., Mutinda, D., Mylam, A., & Upton, C. (2015). Negotiating the responsibilities of collaborative undergraduate field courses. Area, 47(3), 282–288.
  • Bland, K., Chambers, B., Donert, K., & Thomas, T. (1996). Fieldwork. In P. Bailey & P. Fox (Eds.), geography teachers’ handbook. (pp. 165–175). Sheffield: Geographical Association.
  • Boyle, A., Maguire, S., Martin, A., Milsom, C., Nash, R., Rawlinson, S., & Conchie, S. (2007). Fieldwork is good: The student perception and the affective domain. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 31(2), 299–317.
  • Brendel, N., Aksit, F., Aksit, S., & Schrüfer, G. (2016). Multicultural group work on field excursions to promote student teachers’ intercultural competence. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 40(2), 284–301.
  • Bryman, A. (2006). Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: How is it done? Qualitative Research, 6(1), 97–113.
  • Çalışkan, O. (2008). Flüvyal jeomorfoloji konularında gezi gözlem metodu ve değerlendirilmesi [Evaluation of fieldwork and fiel trips in fluvial geomorphology]. Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Basılmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi.
  • Çaliskan, O. (2011). Virtual field trips in education of earth and environmental sciences. Egitim Bilimleri Fakultesi Dergisi, 44(1), 91.
  • Charles-Edwards, E., Bell, M., & Corcoran, J. (2014). Integrating undergraduate fieldwork into the study of human mobility. Australian Geographer, 45, 505–519.
  • Cook, V. (2010). Exploring students’ personal experiences of geography fieldwork. Teaching Geography, 35, 55–57.
  • Cook, V. A., Phillips, D., & Holden, J. (2006). Geography fieldwork in a ‘risk society’. Area, 38(4), 413–420.
  • Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage publications.
  • Criss, N. B. (1995). The nature of PKK terrorism in Turkey. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 18(1), 17–37.
  • Dando, W. A., & Wiedel, J. W. (1971). A two-week field course with deferred papers: A possible solution to the problem of undergraduate fieldwork. Journal of Geography, 70, 289–293.
  • Davies, T., Lorne, C., & Sealey-Huggins, L. (2019). Instagram photography and the geography field course: Snapshots from Berlin. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 43(3), 362–383.
  • De Bres, K., & Coomansingh, J. (2006). A student run field exercise in applied tourism geography. Journal of Geography, 105, 67–72.
  • Doğanay, H. (2002). Coğrafya öğretim yöntemleri: Orta öğretimde coğrafya eğitiminin esasları [Methods of geography teaching: Fundamentals of geographic education in secondary education] (5. Baskı ed.). Erzurum: Aktif.
  • Dummer, T., Cook, I., Parker, G., Barrett, G., & Hull, A. (2008). Promoting and assessing ‘deep learning’ in geography fieldwork: An evaluation of reflective field diaries. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 32, 459–479.
  • France, D., & Haigh, M. (2018). Fieldwork@ 40: Fieldwork in geography higher education. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 42(4), 498–514.
  • Friess, D. A., Oliver, G. J., Quak, M. S., & Lau, A. Y. (2016). Incorporating “virtual” and “real world” field trips into introductory geography modules. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 40(4), 546–564.
  • Fuller, I., Edmondson, S., France, D., Higgitt, D., & Ratinen, I. (2006). International perspectives on the effectiveness of geography fieldwork for learning. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 30(1), 89–101.
  • Fuller, I., & France, D. (2014). Fieldwork going digital. In Thornbush, M. J., Allen, C.D., Fitzpatrick, F. A. (Eds.), Developments in earth surface processes (Vol. 18, pp. 117–130). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
  • Fuller, I. C. (2006). What is the value of fieldwork? Answers from New Zealand using two contrasting undergraduate physical geography field trips. New Zealand Geographer, 62, 215–220.
  • Fuller, I. C. (2012). Taking students outdoors to learn in high places. Area, 44(1), 7–13.
  • Fuller, I. C. (2015). Facilitating international fieldwork: The receptive services of New Zealand’s geography community. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 39(4), 513–526.
  • Fuller, I. C., & France, D. (2015). Securing field learning using a twenty-first century Cook’s Tour. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 39(1), 158–172.
  • Fuller, I. C., & France, D. (2016). Does digital video enhance student learning in field-based experiments and develop graduate attributes beyond the classroom? Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 40(2), 193–206.
  • Fuller, I. C., Gaskin, S., & Scott, I. (2003). Student perceptions of geography and environmental science fieldwork in the light of restricted access to the field, caused by foot and mouth disease in the UK in 2001. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 27(1), 79–102.
  • Garipağaoğlu, N. (2001). Gezi-gözlem metodunun coğrafya eğitimi ve öğretimindeki yeri [The place of fieldtrips in geographical education]. Marmara Coğrafya Dergisi, 3(2), 13–30.
  • Geçit, Y. (2010). Coğrafya eğitimi araştırmalarında temel yönelimler [The main trends in research on geographic education]. Kuram Ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 10(2), 923–987.
  • Gökçe, N. (2009). Türkiye’de öğretmen yetiştirmede coğrafya eğitiminin sorunları ve öneriler [The problems of geographical education in candidate teacher’s education and some suggestions]. Kuram Ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 9(2), 721–768.
  • Gold, J. R., Jenkins, A., Lee, R., Monk, J., Riley, J., Shepherd, I. D. H., & Unwin, D. J. (1991). Teaching geography in higher education. Blackwell: Oxford.
  • Greene, J. C. (2007). Mixed methods in social inquiry. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Gümüş, N., & İlhan, A. (2013). Küreselleşmenin Türkiye üniversiteleri coğrafya öğretmenliği ve bölümleri yapısı üzerinde etkisi [The effects of globalisation on Turkish universities and geography programmes]. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 15(1), 47–71.
  • Haigh, M. J. (1986). The evaluation of an experiment in physical geography teaching. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 10(2), 133–147.
  • Higgitt, D., & Bullard, J. (1999). Assessing fieldwork risk for undergraduate projects. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 23(3), 441–449.
  • Higgitt, M. (1996). Addressing the new agenda for fieldwork in higher education. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 20, 391–398.
  • Hoffman, J. I., & Fetter, C. W. (1975). Field trip modules as complete substitutes for weekly geology laboratories. Journal of Geological Education, 23(1), 18–21.
  • Hope, M. (2009). The importance of direct experience: A philosophical defence of fieldwork in human geography. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 33(2), 169–182.
  • House, D., Lapthorn, N., Moncrieff, D., Owen-Jones, G., & Turney, A. (2012). Risky fieldwork. Teaching Geography, 37(2), 60–62.
  • Hovorka, A. J., & Wolf, P. A. (2009). Activating the classroom: Geographical fieldwork as pedagogical practice. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 33(1), 89–102.
  • Ivankova, N. V., & Creswell, J. W. (2009). Mixed methods. In J. Heigham & R. Croker (Eds.), Qualitative research in applied linguistics: A practical introduction (pp. 135–161). Hampshire, NY: Springer.
  • Izbırak, R. (1968). Coğrafi araştırma gezileri ve hazırlıkları [Geographical field research and preparations]. Coğrafya Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2(2), 1–51.
  • Jenkins, A. (1994). Thirteen ways of doing fieldwork with large classes/more students. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 18(2), 143–154.
  • Jenkins, A., & Smith, P. (1993). Expansion, efficiency and teaching quality: The experience of British geography departments 1986-91. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 18(4), 500–515.
  • Karabulut, M. (2013). Fiziki coğrafya tarihi ve felsefesi. [History and philosophy of physical geography]. In Demirci, A., Arı, Y. (Eds.), Coğrafyacılar Derneği yıllık kongresi bildiriler kitabı (pp. 425–433). Istanbul: Coğrafyacılar Derneği.
  • Kasimov, N. S., Chalov, S. R., & Panin, A. V. (2013). Multidisciplinary field training in undergraduate physical geography: Russian experience. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 37(3), 416–431.
  • Kaya, İ. (2010). Değişen sosyal ve bilimsel bağlam ve coğrafyanın sorumlulukları. [Changing social and scientific context and the responsbilities of geography]. In R. Özey& S. İncekara (Eds.), Coğrafya Eğitiminde Kavram ve Değişimler (pp. 227–242). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
  • Kelner, S., & Sanders, G. (2009). Beyond the field trip: Teaching tourism through tours. Teaching Sociology, 37(2), 136–150.
  • Kent, M., Gilbertson, D. D., & Hunt, C. O. (1997). Fieldwork in geography teaching: A critical review of the literature and approaches. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 21(3), 313–332.
  • Kızılçaoğlu, A. (2003). İlköğretim okullarında bir kırsal yerleşmeye düzenlenecek gözlem gezisinde gerçekleştirilecek etkinlikler ile bir gezi planı önerisi [A proposal for activities in a fieldtrip to a rural settlement]. Balıkesir Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 6(9), 1–21.
  • Koç, H. (2018). Teaching geography in higher education: A case study of problem-based learning. Review of International Geographical Education Online, 8(2), 311–337.
  • Kobayashi, A. (1994). Coloring the field: Gender. ‘race’ and the Politics of Fieldwork, Professional Geographer, 46(1), 73–80.
  • Koçman, A., & Sütgibi, S. (2004). Geographical education and training at Turkish universities. International Research in Geographical & Environmental Education, 13(1), 97–102.
  • Kovats‐Bernat, J. C. (2002). Negotiating dangerous fields: Pragmatic strategies for fieldwork amid violence and terror. American Anthropologist, 104(1), 208–222.
  • Lloyd, K., Howitt, R., Bilous, R., Clark, L., Dowling, R., Fagan, R., … McLean, J. (2015). Geographic contributions to institutional curriculum reform in Australia: The challenge of embedding field-based learning. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 39(4), 491–503.
  • Lonergan, N., & Andresen, L. W. (1988). Field-based education: Some theoretical considerations. Higher Education Research and Development, 7(1), 63–77.
  • Maguire, S., & Edmondson, S. (2001). Student evaluation and assessment of group projects. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 25(2), 209–217.
  • Maskall, J., & Stokes, A. (2008). Designing effective fieldwork for the environmental and natural sciences. Plymouth, UK: Higher Education Academy Subject Centre for Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences.
  • Mauchline, A. L., Peacock, J., & Park, J. R. (2013). The future of bioscience fieldwork in UK higher education. Bioscience Education, 21(1), 7–19.
  • McEwen, L. (1996). Fieldwork in the undergraduate geography programme: Challenges and changes. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 20(3), 379–384.
  • Mcguinness, M., & Simm, D. (2005). Going global? Long-haul fieldwork in undergraduate geography. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 29(2), 241–253.
  • Medzini, A., Meishar-Tal, H., & Sneh, Y. (2015). Use of mobile technologies as support tools for geography field trips. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 24(1), 13–23.
  • Mullens, J. B., Bristow, R. S., & Cuper, P. (2012). Examining trends in international study: A survey of faculty-led field courses within American departments of geography. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 36(2), 223–237.
  • Murphy, A. B. (2007). Geography’s place in higher education in the United States. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 31(1), 121–141.
  • Nairn, K. (2005). The problems of utilizing ‘direct experience’ in geography education. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 29(2), 293–309.
  • Nairn, K., Higgitt, D., & Vanneste, D. (2000). International perspectives on fieldcourses. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 24(2), 246–254.
  • Nundy, S., Dillon, J., & Dowd, P. (2009). Improving and encouraging teacher confidence in out-of-classroom learning: The impact of the Hampshire Trailblazer project on 3–13 curriculum practitioners. Education 3–13, 37(1), 61–73.
  • Özey, R. (1998). Türkiye üniversitelerinde coğrafya eğitimi ve öğretimi [Geography education and teaching in Turkish universities]. Konya: Öz Eğitim.
  • Özay, E. (2003). Ortaöğretim coğrafya eğitimi ve öğretiminde gezi-gözlem metodunun öğrenci başarısı üzerine etkisi ve diğer öğretim metotlarıyla karşılaştırılması [The effect of fieldtrips on the success of students in secondary education]. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İstanbul: Marmara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
  • Özgen, N. (2011). Fiziki coğrafya dersi öğretim metoduna farklı bir yaklaşım: gezi-gözlem destekli öğretim [A different approach to a physical geography course: Field-based teaching]. Marmara Coğrafya Dergisi, 23, 373–388.
  • Özgür, E. M., & Yavan, N. (2013). Türk coğrafyacılarının iç hesaplaşması: Neden başaramadık, nasıl başarabiliriz? [The internal reckoning of Turkish geographers: Why we failed, how can we succeed?]. Beşeri Coğrafya Dergisi, 1(1), 14–38.
  • Özgür, E. M. (2018). Türk beşeri coğrafyasında yenileşme eğilimleri: Değişim aktörlerinin perspektifinden bir değerlendirme. [Modernization trends in Turkish human geography: An evaluation from the perspective of change actors]. International Journal of Geography and Geography Education, 38, 142–170.
  • Oliver, C., Leader, S., & Kettridge, N. (2018). Birmingham bog outdoor laboratory: potentials and possibilities for embedding field-based teaching within the undergraduate classroom. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 42(3), 442–459.
  • Peacock, J., Mewis, R., & Rooney, D. (2018). The use of campus based field teaching to provide an authentic experience to all students. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 42(4), 531–539.
  • Rickinson, M., Dillon, J., Teamey, K., Morris, M., Choi, M. Y., Sanders, D., & Benefield, P. (2004). A review of research on outdoor learning. Shropshire: Preston Montford, Field Studies Council.
  • Saunders, A. (2011). Exhibiting the field for learning: Telling New York’s stories. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 35(2), 185–197.
  • Scott, G. W., Goulder, R., Wheeler, P., Scott, L. J., Tobin, M. L., & Marsham, S. (2012). The value of fieldwork in life and environmental sciences in the context of higher education: A case study in learning about biodiversity. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21(1), 11–21.
  • Scott, I., Fuller, I., & Gaskin, S. (2006). Life without fieldwork: Some lecturers’ perceptions of geography and environmental science fieldwork. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 30(1), 161–171.
  • Şeremet, M., & Chalkley, B. (2012). Geography in Turkish higher education. Planet, 26(1), 59–65.
  • Şeremet, M., & Chalkley, B. (2016). Geography, GIS and employability in Turkey. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 40(2), 238–253.
  • Şenol, E. (2018). Uygulamaların ardından “arazi çalışmalarının önemi” üzerine nitel ve nicel değerlendirmeler [Qualitative and quantitative evaluations on fieldwork after some implementations]. International Symposium on Geography Education, Proceedings Book. pp. 423–434. Nevşehir, Turkey.
  • Smith, D. (2004). Issues and trends in higher education biology fieldwork. Journal of Biological Education, 39(1), 6–10.
  • Stainfield, J., Fisher, P., Ford, B., & Solem, M. (2000). International virtual field trips: A new direction? Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 24(2), 255–262.
  • Stoddart, D. R. (1986). On geography and its history. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Stokes, A., & Boyle, A. P. (2009). The undergraduate geosciences fieldwork experience: Influencing factors and implications for learning. The Geological Society of America Special Paper No.461, 291-311.
  • Stokes, A., Magnier, K., & Weaver, R. (2011). What is the use of fieldwork? Conceptions of students and staff in geography and geology. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 35(1), 121–141.
  • Tağrikulu, P., & Yılmaz, C. (2019). Investigation of contribution of outdoor education to spatial problems and their solutions. International Journal of Geography and Geography Education (IGGE), 40, 23–39.
  • Tal, T., & Morag, O. (2009). Reflective practice as a means for preparing to teach outdoors in an ecological garden. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 20(3), 245–262.
  • Taylor, R. (2005). It’s virtually fieldwork! Teaching Geography, 30(3), 157–160.
  • Tilling, S. (2004). Fieldwork in UK secondary schools: Influences and provision. Journal of Biological Education, 38(2), 54–58.
  • Tonts, M. (2011). Using problem-based learning in large undergraduate fieldwork classes: An Australian example. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 20(2), 105–119.
  • Ünlü, M., & Özdemir, F. (2018). Ortaöğretimde fiziki coğrafya kazanımlarına uygun arazi çalışmalarının planlanması (İstanbul ili örneği) [Planning a field study conforming physical geography learning outcomes of secondary education: An example from Istanbul]. Marmara Coğrafya Dergisi, 37, 49–62.
  • Wall, G. P., & Speake, J. (2012). European geography higher education fieldwork and the skills agenda. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 36(3), 421–435.
  • Welsh, K. E., Mauchline, A. L., France, D., Powell, V., Whalley, W. B., & Park, J. (2018). Would Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) be welcomed by undergraduate students to support their learning during fieldwork? Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 42(3), 356–371.
  • Welsh, K. E., Mauchline, A. L., Park, J. R., Whalley, W. B., & France, D. (2013). Enhancing fieldwork learning with technology: Practitioner’s perspectives. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 37(3), 399–415.
  • Wilson, H., Leydon, J., & Wincentak, J. (2017). Fieldwork in geography education: Defining or declining? The state of fieldwork in Canadian undergraduate geography programs. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 41(1), 94–105.
  • Yavan, N., & Kurtar Anlı, C. (2017). (Un)Making human geography in Turkey under the dominance of environmental determinism. Posseible Düşünme Dergisi, 13, 77–98.
  • Yıldırım, T., & Arıbaş, K. (2018). Coğrafya öğretiminde gezi gözlem yöntemi: örnek bir rota çalışması [Field teaching in geography education: A study for an exemplary route]. Marmara Coğrafya Dergisi, 37, 16–29.
  • Yılmaz, C. (1997). Coğrafya eğitiminde arazi tatbikatlarının önemi ve bir uygulama örneği [The importance of field teaching in geography education and an example]. Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 10(1), 287–307.
  • Yılmaz, C., & Bilgi, M. G. (2011). Aday öğretmenlerin coğrafya arazi çalışmalarına bakışı [Candidate teachers’ view on fieldwork]. Kuram Ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 11(2), 961–983.
  • YOK. (2019). Turkish higher education board. YOK Atlas. Retrieved from https://yokatlas.yok.gov.tr/
  • Zelinsky, W. (2001). The geographer as voyeur. The Geographical Review, 91(1), 1–8.
  • Zeren, M. G. (2015). Üniversite öğrencilerinin gözü ile coğrafya eğitimcisi: Bir olgubilim araştırması [Geograhy educator from the perspective of university students: A phenomenological study]. Doğu Coğrafya Dergisi, 20(33), 189–208.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.