UK programmes for HE physical geography

References

• Augar Report. (2019). Review of post-18 education and funding. London: Department for Education.
   Google Scholar
• Benfield, C., Britton, J., Buscha, F., Dearden, L., Dickson, M., Van Der Erve, L., … Zhu, Y. (2018a). The relative labour market returns to different degrees. London: Institute of Fiscal Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Benfield, C., Britton, J., Buscha, F., Dearden, L., Dickson, M., Van Der Erve, L., … Zhu, Y. (2018b). The impact of undergraduate degrees on early-career earnings. London: Institute of Fiscal Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Betts, M., & Smith, R. (1998). Developing the credit-based modular curriculum in higher education. London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university (4th ed.). Maidenhead: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Blake, N., Smeyers, P., Smith, R., & Standish, P. (Eds.). (2003). The Blackwell Guide to the philosophy of education. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, E. H., & Mead, W. R. (1992). ***Curriculum development in universities. In Naish, M. (ed.) Geography and Education, national and international perspectives.University of London, Institute of Education, 51–60.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, M., & Barnett, R. (Eds.). (2015). The Palgrave handbook of critical thinking in higher education. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Fallows, S., & Steven, C. (Eds.). (2000). Integrating key skills in higher education. London: Kogan Page.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira, J. (2018). Facilitating the transition: Doing more than bridging the gap between school and university geography. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 42, 372–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finnegan, D. A. (2017). Finding a scientific voice: Performing science, space and speech in the 19th century. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 42, 192–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• France, D., & Haigh, M. (2018). Fieldwork@40: Fieldwork in geography in higher education. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 42, 498–514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freitag, C., & Hillman, N. (2018). How different is Oxbridge? ( Higher Education Policy Institute Report 107). Oxford: HEPI.
   Google Scholar
• Fry, H. (Ed.). (2015). A handbook for teaching & learning in higher education (4th ed.). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fuller, I. C. (2012). Taking students outdoors to learn in high places. Area, 44, 7–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, P., & Barnett, R. (2014). Thinking about higher education. Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gregory, K. J. (1988). Curriculum development in geomorphology. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 12, 21–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregory, K. J. (2000). The changing nature of physical geography. London: Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Gregory, K. J. (2017). Putting physical environments in their place: The next chapter? The Canadian Geographer/Le Géographe Canadien, 61, 11–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, X., Loy, K., & Banow, R. (2018). Can first-year undergraduate geography students do individual research? Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 42, 412–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harland, T., & Pickering, N. (2011). Values in higher education teaching. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• HECOS. (2017). Implementation guide. HESA (Higher Education Statistics Agency), Cheltenham.
   Google Scholar
• HEQC. (1997). Managing flexible curricula in higher education: The architecture of modularity. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Hovorka, A. J., & Wolf, P. A. (2009). Activating the classroom: Geographical fieldwork as pedagogical practice. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 33, 89–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, B. (2010). The first year at university: Teaching students in transition. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, R., Biermann, C., & Lane, S. N. (Eds.). (2018). The Palgrave handbook of critical physical geography. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan, Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lea, J. (Ed.). (2015). Enhancing learning and teaching in higher education. Maidenhead: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Lewin, J., & Gregory, K. J. (2019). Evolving curricula and syllabi – Challenges for physical geography. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 43, 7–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martí, C., Feliu, J., & Varga, D. (2014). Geographic information technology and innovative teaching: Keys to geography degree curriculum reform. Journal of Geography, 113, 118–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neves, J., & Hillman, N. (2019). Student academic experience survey 2019. Oxford: Higher Education Policy Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. C. (2013). Creating capabilities: The human development approach. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Popovic, C., & Green, D. A. (2012). Understanding undergraduates. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• QAA. (2014). Subject benchmark statement geography. Draft for consultation. Gloucester: Quality Assurance Agency for Higher education.
   Google Scholar
• Readings, B. (1996). The university in ruins. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sperlinger, T., McLennan, J., & Pettigrew, R. (2018). Who are universities for? Bristol: Bristol University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, D., Ashworth, P., Nield, J., & Souch, C. (2017). International benchmarking review of UK physical geography. London: Royal Geographical Society [with IBG].
   Google Scholar
• Walkington, H., Dyer, S., Solem, M., Haigh, M., & Waddington, S. (2018). A capabilities approach to higher education: Geocapabilities and implications for geography curricula. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 42, 7–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whalley, B., Saunders, A., Lewis, R. A., Buenemann, M., & Sutton, P. C. (2011). Curriculum development: Producing geographers for the 21st century. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 35, 379–393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (Eds.). (2009). Methods of critical discourse analysis. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar