Virtual reality in the HE classroom: feasibility, and the potential to embed in the curriculum

References

• Alhalabi, W. S. (2016). Virtual reality systems enhance students’ achievements in engineering education. Behaviour & Information Technology, 35(11), 919–925.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, J. T., & Fogler, H. S. (2004). The application of virtual reality to chemical engineering education. Virtual Reality, 4, 217–218.
   Google Scholar
• Bodekaer, M. (2016) The virtual lab will revolutionize science class. Retrieved from https://www.ted.com/talks/michael_bodekaer_this_virtual_lab_will_revolutionize_science_class
   Google Scholar
• Bonde, M. T., Makransky, G., Wandall, J., Larsen, M. V., Morsing, M., Jarmer, H., & Sommer, M. O. A. (2014). Improving biotech education through gamified laboratory simulations. Nature Biotechnology, 32(7), 694–697.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brade, J., Lorenz, M., Busch, M., Hammer, N., Tscheligi, M., & Klimant, P. (2017). Being there again—Presence in real and virtual environments and its relation to usability and user experience using a mobile navigation task. International Journal of Human-computer Studies, 101, 76–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Bridge, G. (2013). Territory, now in 3D! Political Geography, 34, 55–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryson, C. (Ed.). (2014). Understanding and developing student engagement. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, W., Chen, J. Z., & So, R. H. Y. (2011). Visually induced motion sickness: Effects of translational visual motion along different axes. Contemporary Ergonomics and Human Factors, 2011, 281–287.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, B. D., Tanner-Smith, E. E., & Killingsworth, S. S. (2016). Digital games, design, and learning: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 86(1), 79–122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2014). Thematic analysis. In A. C. Michalos (Ed.), Encyclopaedia of quality of life and well-being research (pp. 6626–6628). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Dalgarno, B., Hedberg, J., & Harper, B. (2002). The contribution of 3D environments to conceptual understanding. Paper presented at the ASCILITE 2002, Auckland, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Dommett, E. J. (2018). Learner ownership of technology-enhanced learning. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 15(1), 79–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fagan, J., & Sturm, S. (2015). Drawing in the sand as a tool for teaching coastal geography. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 39(3), 478–484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassenzahl, M., & Tractinsky, N. (2006). User experience – A research agenda. Behaviour & Information Technology, 25(2), 91–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HEA. (2014). Framework for partnership in teaching and learning. Higher Education Academy. Retrieved from www.heacademy.ac.uk/students-as-partners
   Google Scholar
• Hussein, M., & Nätterdal, C. (2015). The benefits of virtual reality in education: A comparison study (BSc thesis). University of Gothenburg, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Krause, K., & Coates, H. (2008). Students’ engagement in first-year university. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(5), 493–505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuh, G. D., Kinzie, J., Buckley, J. A., Bridges, B. K., & Hayek, J. C. (2007) Piecing together the student success puzzle: Research, propositions, and recommendations (ASHE Higher Education Report, Vol 32, No 5). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
   Google Scholar
• Lee, E. A.-L., Wong, K. W., & Fung, C. C. (2010). How does desktop virtual reality enhance learning outcomes? A structural equation modeling approach. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1424–1442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Limniou, M., Roberts, D., & Papadopoulos, N. (2008). Full immersive virtual environment CAVETM in chemistry education. Computer & Education, 51, 584–593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makransky, G., Terkildsena, T. S., & Mayerb, R. E. (2019). Adding immersive virtual reality to a science lab simulation causes more presence but less learning. Learning and Instruction, 60, 225–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makransky, G., Thisgaard, M. W., & Gadegaard, H. (2016). Virtual simulations as preparation for lab exercises: Assessing learning of key laboratory skills in microbiology and improvement of essential non-cognitive skills. PloS One, 11(6), e0155895.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mays, N., & Pope, C. (1995). Rigor and qualitative research. BMJ ( Clinical research ed.), 311, 109–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merchant, Z., Goetz, E. T., Cifuentes, L., Kenney-Kennicutt, W., & Davis, T. J. (2014). Effectiveness of virtual reality-based instruction on students’ learning outcomes in K-12 and higher education. Computers & Education, 70, 29–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2000). A coherence effect in multimedia learning: The case for minimizing irrelevant sounds in the design of multimedia messages. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 117–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholson, D. T., Chalk, C., Funnell, W. R. J., & Daniel, S. J. (2006). Can virtual reality improve anatomy education? A randomised controlled study of a computer generated three-dimensional anatomical ear model. Medical Education, 40(11), 1081–1087.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Passig, D., Tzuriel, D., & Eshel-Kedmi, G. (2016). Improving children’s cognitive modifiability by dynamic assessment in 3D immersive virtual reality environments. Computers & Education, 95, 296–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patiar, A., Ma, E., Kensbock, S., & Cox, R. (2017). Students’ perceptions of quality and satisfaction with virtual field trips of hotels. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, 31, 134–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pawson, E., Fournier, E., Haigh, M., Muniz, O., Trafford, J., & Vajoczki, S. (2006). Problem-based learning in geography: Towards a critical assessment of its purposes, benefits and risks. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 30(1), 103–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rebenitsch, L., & Owen, C. (2016). Review on cybersickness in applications and visual displays. Virtual Reality, 20(2), 101–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards, D., & Taylor, M. (2015). A comparison of learning gains when using a 2D simulation tool versus a 3D virtual world: An experiment to find the right representation involving the marginal value theorem. Computers & Education, 86, 157–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutten, N., van Joolingen, W. R., & van der Veen, J. T. (2012). The learning effects of computer simulations in science education. Computers & Education, 58(1), 136–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheyvens, R., Griffin, A., Jocoy, C., Liu, Y., & Bradford, M. (2008). Experimenting with active learning in geography: Dispelling the myths that perpetuate resistance. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 32(1), 51–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinclair, B., & Gunhouse, G. (2016). The promise of virtual reality in higher education. Educause Review. Retrieved from http://er.educause.edu/articles/2016/3/the-promise-of-virtual-reality-in-higher-education
   Google Scholar
• Stojšić, I. ;., Ivkov-Dzigurski, A., Maričić, O., Ivanović, L., & Vučković, S. Đ. (2017). Possible application of virtual reality in geography teaching. Journal of Subject Didactics, 1, 83–96.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995). Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 144–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thisgaard, M., & Makransky, G. (2017). Virtual learning simulations in high school: Effects on cognitive and non-cognitive outcomes and implications on the development of STEM academic and career choice. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 805.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster, R. (2016). Declarative knowledge acquisition in immersive virtual learning environments. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(6), 1319–1333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weech, S., Kenny, S., & Barnett-Cowan, M. (2019). Presence and cybersickness in virtual reality are negatively related: A review. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar