How to incorporate theory in (urban) field trips: the built environment as concrete abstraction

References

• Allen, C. D., & Barbour, J. M. (2016). Geography by Rail®: A new twist on a romantic concept. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 40(4), 479–508. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2016.1201801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anđelković, S., Dedjanski, V., & Pejic, B. (2017). Pedagogical benefits of fieldwork of the students at the faculty of geography in the light of the Bologna Process. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2017.1379058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baeten, G. (2012). Normalising neo-liberal planning: The case of Malmö, Sweden. In G. Baeten & T. Tasan-Kok (Eds.), The contradictions of neoliberal planning: Cities, policies and politics (pp. 21–42). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Billing, P., & Stigendal, M. (1994). Hegemonins decennier: Lärdomar från Malmö om den svenska modellen. Möllevångens samhällsanalys.
   Google Scholar
• Blackwell, T. (2019). Manufacturing debt: the co-evolution of housing and finance systems in Sweden [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Sussex.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, B. S., Englehart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook 1: Cognitive domain. David McKay.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, K. (2009). Just environments: Politicising sustainable urban development. School of Architecture and Built Environment, Royal Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Danemark, B., Ekstrom, M., Jakobsen, L., & Karlsson, J. C. (2002). Explaining society: Critical realism in the social sciences. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Danielsen, H. (2006). Med barn i byen. Foreldreskap, plass og identitet [Doctoral dissertation]. The University of Bergen.
   Google Scholar
• Derakhti, L., & Baeten, G. (2020). Contradictions of transit-oriented development in low-income neighborhoods: The case study of Rosengård in Malmö, Sweden. Urban Science, 4(2), 20. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci4020020
   Google Scholar
• Drangsland, K. A., & Holgersen, S. (2008). The production of Bergen. International Planning Studies, 13(2), 161–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563470802292042
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, K. (2000). Interviewing. In I. Hay (Ed.), Qualitative research methods in human geography (pp. 50-82). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fagan, J. B., & Sturm, S. (2015). “Drawing in the sand” as a tool for teaching coastal geography. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 39(3), 478–484. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2015.1038700
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuller, I. (2012). Taking students outdoors to learn in high places. Area, 44(1), 7–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2010.00990.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuller, I., Edmondson, S., France, D., Higgitt, D., & Ratinen, I. (2006). International perspectives on the effectiveness of geography fieldwork for learning. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 30(1), 89–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098260500499667
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glass, M. R. (2015). International geography field courses: Practices and challenges. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 39(4), 485–490. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2015.1108044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golubchikov, O. (2015). Negotiating critical geographies through a “feel-trip”: Experiential, affective and critical learning in engaged fieldwork. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 39(1), 143–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2014.1003800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grundström, K., & Molina, I. (2016). From Folkhem to lifestyle housing in Sweden: Segregation and urban form, 1930s–2010s. International Journal of Housing Policy, 16(3), 316–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616718.2015.1122695
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegel, C. G. W. F. (1808/1966). Who thinks abstractly? Anchor Books. https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/hegel/works/se/abstract.html
   Google Scholar
• Holgersen, S. (2012). Urban development in Malmö city through discourses on change. In K. Sjöberg & K. Jacobsson (Eds.), Pondering on methods. A plethora of methodological concerns (pp. 139–152). Lund University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holgersen, S. (2014a). The rise (and fall?) of post-industrial Malmö. Investigations of city-crisis dialectics [Doctoral dissertation]. Lund University, Department of Human Geography.
   Google Scholar
• Holgersen, S. (2014b). Urban responses to the economic crisis: Confirmation of urban policies as crisis management in Malmö. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38(1), 285–301. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holgersen, S. (2017). Staden och Kapitalet. Malmö i krisernas tid. Daidalos.
   Google Scholar
• Holgersen, S., & Malm, A. (2015). “Green fix” as crisis management. Or, In which world is Malmö the world’s greenest city? Geografiska Annaler. Series B, Human Geography, 97(4), 275–290. https://doi.org/10.1111/geob.12081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt-Jensen, A. (1999). Geography-history and concepts: A student’s guide. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Jönsson, E., & Holgersen, S. (2017). Malmö’s Western Harbour as spectacular, realisable and ‘everyday’: Exploring the particularities of a sustainable urban landscape. City: Analysis of Urban Trends, Culture, Theory, Policy, Action, 21(3–4), 253–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2017.1325186
   Google Scholar
• Kitchin, R., & Tate, N. (2000). Conducting research in human geography: Theory, methodology and practice. Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Listerborn, C. (2017). The flagship concept of the ‘4th urban environment. Branding and visioning in Malmö, Sweden. Planning Theory & Practice, 18(1), 11–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2016.1264615
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann, R. D. (2006). The teacher´s role in experimental learning. In W. McKeachie & M. Svinicki (Eds.), McKeachie’s teaching tips (pp. 278–287). Houghton Mifflin Company.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, D. G. (2003). Observing metropolitan Atlanta, Georgia: Using an urban field study to enhance student experiences and instructor knowledge in urban geography. Journal of Geography, 102(1), 35–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221340308978518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marx, K. (1976). Capital Volume I. Penguin Books Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• McDowell, L. (1992). Doing gender: Feminism, feminists and research methods in human geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 17(4), 399–416. https://doi.org/10.2307/622707
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKeachie, W., & Svinicki, M. (eds). (2006). McKeachie’s teaching tips. Houghton Mifflin Company.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, D. (1995). There’s no such thing as culture: Towards a reconceptualization of the idea of culture in geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 20(1), 102–116. https://doi.org/10.2307/622727
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moss, P. (ed.). (2002). Feminist geography in practice. Research and methods. Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Mukhtar-Landgren, D. (2012). Planering för framsteg och gemenskap: Om den kommunala utvecklingsplaneringens idémässiga förutsättningar [Doctoral dissertation]. Lund University.
   Google Scholar
• Nairn, K. (2002). Doing feminist fieldwork about geography fieldwork. In P. Moss (Ed.), Feminist geography in practice. Research and Methods (pp. 146–159). Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Nairn, K., Higgitt, D., & Vanneste, D. (2000). International perspectives on fieldcourses. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 24(2), 246–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/713677382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ollman, B. (2003). Dance of the Dialectic: Steps in Marx’s Method. University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peet, R. (1998). Modern geographic thought. Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Pries, J. (2017). Social neoliberalism through urban planning: Bureaucratic Formations and Contradictions in Malmö since 1985 [Doctoral dissertation]. Lund University.
   Google Scholar
• Ristilammi, P.-M. (1994). Rosengärd och den svarta poesin: En studie av modern annorlundahet. Brutus Östlings Bokförlag.
   Google Scholar
• Rodenstedt, A. (2014). Living in the calm and safe part of the city: The socio-spatial reproduction of upper-middle class neighbourhoods in Malmö [Doctoral dissertation]. Department of Social and Economic Geography, Uppsala University.
   Google Scholar
• Sayer, A. (1992). Method in social science: A realist approach. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sayer, A. (2000). Realism and Social Science. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Simonsen, K., & Hansen, F. (2004). Geografiens videnskabsteori: En introducerende diskussion. Roskilde Universitetsforlag.
   Google Scholar
• Staffansson Pauli, K. (2014). Fastighetsbranchen ur ett genusperspektiv. In H. Bohman, S. Westerdahl, & E. Öresjö (Eds.), Perspektiv på fastigheter (Vol. 17, pp. 133–144). Malmö University Publications in Urban Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Stanek, L. (2008). Space as concrete abstraction: Hegel, Marx and modern urbanism. In K. Goonewardena, S. Kipfer, R. Milgrom, & C. Schmid (Eds.), Space, difference, everyday life: Reading Henri Lefebvre (pp. 62–80). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Trygg, K., & Köhler, H. (2015). Exkursion – Varför då? Geografiska Notiser, 73(1), 16–22. http://geografitorget.se.levonlinepreview.net/gn/nr/2015/bil/1-06.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Winchester, H. P. M. (2000). Qualitative research and its place in human geography. In I. Hay (Ed.), Qualitative research methods in human geography (pp. 4–25). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods. Sage.
   Google Scholar