Experiential learning in physical geography using arduino low-cost environmental sensors

References

• Ali, M., Vlaskamp, J. H. A., Eddin, N. N., Falconer, B., & Oram, C. (2013, September). Technical development and socioeconomic implications of the raspberry pi as a learning tool in developing countries. In 2013 5th Computer Science and Electronic Engineering Conference (CEEC) (pp. 103–108). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Al Mamun, M. R., Jackson, T., & White, G. (2015). Does the geography major fit in STEM? Journal of Geography and Geology, 7(1), 27. https://doi.org/10.5539/jgg.v7n1p27
   Google Scholar
• Altbach, P. G., Reisberg, L., & Rumbley, L. E. (2019). Trends in global higher education: Tracking an academic revolution. Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Beishline, M. J., & Holmes, C. B. (1997). Student preferences for various teaching styles. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 24(2), 95. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/student-preferences-various-teaching-styles/docview/1416362579/se-2
   Google Scholar
• Beringer, J. (2007). Application of problem based learning through research investigation. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 31(3), 445–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098260701514033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does. McGraw-Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• Blum, J. (2019). Exploring Arduino: Tools and techniques for engineering wizardry. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Burgess, R. (1984). Field Research. Allen Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, K., Schillereff, D. N., Baas, A. C., Chadwick, M. A., Main, B., Mulligan, M., Thompson, J., Pearce, R., Smith, T. E., van Soesbergen, A., Tebbs, E., & Thompson, J. (2021). Low-cost electronic sensors for environmental research: Pitfalls and opportunities. Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment, 45(3), 305–338. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133320956567
   Google Scholar
• Codina, N., Castillo, I., Pestana, J. V., & Balaguer, I. (2020). Preventing procrastination behaviours: Teaching styles and competence in university students. Sustainability, 12(6), 2448. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12062448
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuomo, F., Mibuari, E., Weldemariam, K., & Stewart, O. (2013, December). Leveraging Raspberry Pi for interactive education. In Proceedings of the 4th annual symposium on computing for development (pp. 1–2).
   Google Scholar
• Day, T. (2012). Undergraduate teaching and learning in physical geography. Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment, 36(3), 305–332. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133312442521
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1897). My pedagogical creed. School Journal, 54, 77–80.
   Google Scholar
• Dougherty, D. (2012). The maker movement. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 7(3), 11–14. https://doi.org/10.1162/INOV_a_00135
   Google Scholar
• Duffy, A., Saunders, K. E., Malhi, G. S., Patten, S., Cipriani, A., McNevin, S. H., Geddes, J., & Geddes, J. (2019). Mental health care for university students: A way forward? The Lancet Psychiatry, 6(11), 885–887. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30275-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erickson, R. A. (2012). Geography and the changing landscape of higher education. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 36(1), 1, 9–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2012.651350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, M., & Boucher, A. R. (2015). Optimizing the power of choice: Supporting student autonomy to foster motivation and engagement in learning. Mind, Brain, and Education, 9(2), 87–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferdoush, S., & Li, X. (2014). Wireless sensor network system design using raspberry pi and arduino for environmental monitoring applications. Procedia Computer Science, 34, 103–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2014.07.059
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, S. (2005). Review of ‘engaging students in active learning: case studies in geography, environment and related disciplines’. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 29(2), 313–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098260500130684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• France, D., & Haigh, M. (2018). Fieldwork@ 40: Fieldwork in geography higher education. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 42(4), 498–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2018.1515187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galadima, A. A. (2014, September). Arduino as a learning tool. In 2014 11th International Conference on Electronics, Computer and Computation (ICECCO) (pp. 1–4). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, H. (1999). The Disciplined Mind: What All Students Should Understand. Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, G. (1988). Learning by doing: A guide to teaching and learning methods. Further Education Unit.
   Google Scholar
• Head, L., & Rutherfurd, I. (2021). The state of geography in Australian universities. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 47(1), 41–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12456 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, M., & Jenkins, A. (2000). Kolb’s experiential learning theory and its application in geography in higher education. Journal of Geography, 99(5), 185–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221340008978967
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, M., & Roberts, J. (Eds.). (2004). Engaging Students in Active Learning: Case studies in geography, environment and related disciplines. Geography Discipline Network.
   Google Scholar
• Hodges, S., Taylor, S., Villar, N., Scott, J., Bial, D., & Fischer, P. T. (2013). Prototyping connected devices for the internet of things. Computer, 46(2), 26–34. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2012.394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Idkhan, A. M., & Idris, M. M. (2021). Dimensions of students learning styles at the university with the kolb learning model. International Journal of Environment, Engineering and Education, 3(2), 75–82. https://doi.org/10.55151/ijeedu.v3i2.60
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, L., Becker, S. A., Cummins, M., Estrada, V., Freeman, A., & Hall, C. (2016). NMC Horizon Report: 2016 Higher Education Edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/171478/
   Google Scholar
• Karvinen, T., & Karvinen, K. (2011). Make: Arduino Bots and Gadgets: Six Embedded Projects with Open Source Hardware and Software. O’Reilly Media Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Kemp, K. K., Goodchild, M. F., & Dodson, R. F. (1992). Teaching GIS in geography. The Professional Geographer, 44(2), 181–191. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0033-0124.1992.00181.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keselman, A. (2003). Supporting inquiry learning by promoting normative understanding of multivariable causality. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(9), 898–921. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, P. (2003). Active learning strategies and assessment in world geography classes. Journal of Geography, 102(4), 146–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221340308978539
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kneale, P. (1996). Organizing student-centred group fieldwork and presentations. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 20(1), 65–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098269608709346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2017). Experiential learning theory as a guide for experiential educators in higher education. Experiential Learning & Teaching in Higher Education, 1(1). https://nsuworks.nova.edu/elthe/vol1/iss1/7
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, S., & Jasuja, A. (2017, May). Air quality monitoring system based on IoT using Raspberry Pi. In 2017 International conference on computing, communication and automation (ICCCA) (pp. 1341–1346). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Kushner, D. (2011). The making of arduino. IEEE spectrum, 26.
   Google Scholar
• Lewin, J., & Gregory, K. J. (2019). Evolving curricula and syllabi – Challenges for physical geography. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 43(1), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2018.1554631
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maltese, A. V., Simpson, A., & Anderson, A. (2018). Failing to learn: The impact of failures during making activities. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 30, 116–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayhew, K., Deer, C., & Dua, M. (2004). The move to mass higher education in the UK: Many questions and some answers. Oxford Review of Education, 30(1), 65–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305498042000190069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molloy, D. (2019). Exploring BeagleBone: Tools and techniques for building with embedded Linux. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, T. H. (2020). Experiential learning–a systematic review and revision of Kolb’s model. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(8), 1064–1077. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1570279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulligan, M., Douglas, C., Van Soesbergen, A., Shi, M., Burke, S., Van Delden, H., & Scrieciu, A. (2021, September). environmental intelligence for more sustainable infrastructure investment. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Information Technology for Social Good (pp. 225–229).
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, R. R. (2008). Bounded rationality, cognitive maps, and trial and error learning. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 67(1), 78–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2007.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pathirana, A., Koster, J. H., De Jong, E., & Uhlenbrook, S. (2012). On teaching styles of water educators and the impact of didactic training. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 16(10), 3677–3688. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-3677-2012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pawson, E., & Teather, E. K. (2002). ’Geographical expeditions’: Assessing the benefits of a student-driven fieldwork method. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 26(3), 275–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309826022000019864
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce, R. H. (2018). “Do-it-yourself”: evaluating the potential of Arduino technology in monitoring water quality. Unpublished Bachelor’s dissertation. doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.31105.33127.
   Google Scholar
• Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (1999). Understanding learning and teaching: The experience in higher education. UK: McGraw-Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• Quality Assurance Agency for UK Higher Education. (2019). Subject Benchmark Statement: Geography. QAA. https://www.qaa.ac.uk/docs/qaa/subject-benchmark-statements/subject-benchmark-statement-geography.pdf?sfvrsn=4ae2cb81_4
   Google Scholar
• Race, P. (2001). The lecturer’s toolkit: A practical guide to learning, teaching & assessment. Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Revell, A., & Wainwright, E. (2009). What makes lectures ‘unmissable’? Insights into teaching excellence and active learning. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 33(2), 209–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098260802276771
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossiter, J. A., Barnett, L., Cartwright, E., Patterson, J., Shorten, N., & Taylor, J. (2017). Encouraging student learning of control by embedding freedom into the curriculum: Student perspectives and products. iFAC-PapersOnLine, 50(1), 12149–12154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2017.08.2155
   Google Scholar
• Royal Geographic Society. (2011). Higher Education in STEM subjects. https://www.rgs.org/geography/advocacy-and-impact/consultations/higher-education-in-stem-subjects/#:~:text=These%20include%20physical%20geography%2C%20environmental,and%20research%20in%20Higher%20Education
   Google Scholar
• Saleiro, M., Carmo, B., Rodrigues, J. M., & du Buf, J. H., 2013, October. A low-cost classroom-oriented educational robotics system. In International Conference on social robotics (pp. 74–83). Springer, Cham.
   Google Scholar
• Scheyvens, R., Griffin, A. L., Jocoy, C. L., Liu, Y., & Bradford, M. (2008). Experimenting with active learning in geography: Dispelling the myths that perpetuate resistance. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 32(1), 51–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098260701731496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seaman, J. (2008). Experience, reflect, critique: the end of the “learning cycles” era. Journal of Experiential Education, 31(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/105382590803100103
   Google Scholar
• Simm, D. J., & David, C. A. (2002). Effective teaching of research design in physical geography: A case study. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 26(2), 169–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098260220144694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, D., Sandhu, A., Sharma Thakur, A., & Priyank, N. (2020). An Overview of IoT Hardware Development Platforms. International Journal on Emerging Technologies, 11(5), 155–163. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344207338_An_Overview_of_IoT_Hardware_Development_Platforms
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., & Zhang, L. F. (Eds.). (2014). Perspectives on thinking, learning, and cognitive styles. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ting, Y. L., Lin, Y. C., Tsai, S. P., & Tai, Y., (2020, July). Using arduino in service learning to engage pre-service stem teachers into collaborative learning. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (544–559). Springer, Cham.
   Google Scholar
• Tomkins, L., & Ulus, E. (2016). ‘Oh, was that “experiential learning”?!’ Spaces, synergies and surprises with Kolb’s learning cycle. Management Learning, 47(2), 158–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507615587451
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Schee, J., Trimp, H., Béneker, T., & Favier, T. (2015). Digital geography education in the twenty-first century: needs and opportunities. In O. Muñiz Solari, A. Demirci, & J. Schee (Eds.), Geospatial Technologies and Geography Education in a Changing World. Advances in Geographical and Environmental Sciences (pp.11–20). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Vince, R. (1998). Behind and beyond Kolb’s Learning Cycle. Journal of Management Education, 22(3), 304–319. https://doi.org/10.1177/105256299802200304
   Google Scholar
• Walshe, N., & Healy, G. (2020). Geography education in the digital world. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, L. F. (2004). Do university students’ thinking styles matter in their preferred teaching approaches? Personality and Individual Differences, 37(8), 1551–1564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2004.02.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, L. F. (2006). Preferred teaching styles and modes of thinking among university students in mainland China. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 1(2), 95–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2006.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., & Wildemuth, B. M. (2009). Unstructured Interviews. In, B. M. Wildemuth (Eds.), Applications of Social Research Methods to Questions in Information and Library Science (pp. 222–231). California: ABC-CLIO.
   Google Scholar