Floating in space: teaching atmosphere in human geography

References

• Adams-Hutcheson, G. (2019). Farming in the troposphere: Drawing together affective atmospheres and elemental geographies. Social & Cultural Geography, 20(7), 1004–1023. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2017.1406982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adey, P. (2015). Air’s affinities: Geopolitics, chemical affect and the force of the elemental. Dialogues in Human Geography, 5(1), 54–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/2043820614565871
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aerocene. (2015). Gemini free flight. LRaunch information available at: http://aerocene.org/aug-27-schoenfelde-germany Last Retrieved July 3, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed, S. (2014). Atmospheric walls. Feminist Killjoys [blog]. Available at: https://feministkilljoys.com/2014/09/15/atmospheric-walls/
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, B. (2009). Affective atmospheres. Emotion, Space and Society, 2(2), 77–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emospa.2009.08.005
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. (2013). Evaluating student-generated film as a learning tool for qualitative methods: Geographical “drifts” and the city. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 37(1), 136–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2012.694070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2021). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Ash, J., & Anderson, B. (2015). Atmospheric methods. In P. Vannini (Ed.), Non-representational methodologies (pp. 44–61). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bagelman, J., & Bagelman, C. (2016). ZINES: Crafting change and repurposing the Neoliberal University. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies, 15(2), 365–392. https://acme-journal.org/index.php/acme/article/view/1257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birtchnell, T., & Gibson, C. (2015). Less talk more drone: Social research with UAVs. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 39(1), 182–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2014.1003799
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bissell, D. (2010). Passenger mobilities: Affective atmospheres and the sociality of public transport. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 28(2), 270–289. https://doi.org/10.1068/d3909
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom, B., Englehart, M., Furst, E., Hill, W., & Krathwohl, D. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. In Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York, Toronto: Longmans.
   Google Scholar
• Bonastra, Q., & Jové, G. (2022). Rethinking learning contexts through the concept of atmosphere and through contemporary art. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 46(3), 383–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyle, A., Maguire, S., Martin, A., Milsom, C., Nash, R., Rawlinson, S., Conchie, S., Turner, A., & Wurthmann, S. (2007). Fieldwork is good: The student perception and the affective domain. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 31(2), 299–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098260601063628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bremner, L. (Ed.). (2022). Monsoon as method: Assembling monsoonal multiplicities. Actar Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Brigstocke, J. (2020). Experimental authority in the lecture theatre. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 44(3), 370–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2019.1698527
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, V. (2008). The field as a ‘pedagogical resource’? A critical analysis of students’ affective engagement with the field environment. Environmental Education Research, 14(5), 507–517. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620802204395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Data, S. (2018). A student survey in Atmospheres: Nature, Culture, Politics. Royal Holloway University of London.
   Google Scholar
• Dummer, T. J., Cook, I. G., Parker, S. L., Barrett, G. A., & Hull, A. P. (2008). Promoting and assessing ‘deep learning’ in geography fieldwork: An evaluation of reflective field diaries. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 32(3), 459–479. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098260701728484
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edensor, T. (2012). Illuminated atmospheres: Anticipating and reproducing the flow of affective experience in Blackpool. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 30(6), 1103–1122. https://doi.org/10.1068/d12211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engelmann, S. (2017). The Cosmological Aesthetics of Tomás Saraceno’s Atmospheric Experiments. ( Doctoral Dissertation) Available from the Oxford University Research Archive.
   Google Scholar
• Engelmann, S. (2018). Marking criteria for practice portfolio assessments. Royal Holloway University.
   Google Scholar
• Engelmann, S. (2020). Sensing art in the atmosphere: Elemental lures and aerosolar practices. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Engelmann, S. (2021). Floating feelings: Emotion in the affective-meteorological atmosphere. Emotion, Space and Society, 40, 100803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emospa.2021.100803
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, M. (2005). Linking research and teaching to benefit student learning. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 29(2), 183–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098260500130387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hefferan, K. P., Heywood, N. C., & Ritter, M. E. (2002). Integrating field trips and classroom learning into a capstone undergraduate research experience. Journal of Geography, 101(5), 183–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221340208978498
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrick, C. (2010). Lost in the field: Ensuring student learning in the “threatened” geography fieldtrip. Area, 42(1), 108–116. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2009.00892.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holton, M. (2017). “It was amazing to see our projects come to life!” Developing affective learning during geography fieldwork through tropophilia. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 41(2), 198–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2017.1290592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingold, T. (2007). Comment. In V. O. Jorge & J. Thomas (Eds.), Overcoming the modern invention of material culture (pp. 313–317). ADECAP.
   Google Scholar
• Ingold, T. (2010). The textility of making. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34(1), 91–102. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bep042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, M., & Fannin, M. (2011). Letting geography fall where it may—aerographies address the elemental. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 29(3), 435–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lave, J. (2009). The practice of learning. In K. Illeris (Ed.), Contemporary theories of learning: Learning theorists … in their own words (pp. 200–208). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., Wenger, E., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation (Vol. 521423740). Cambridge university press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355
   Google Scholar
• Luchetta, S. (2018). Going beyond the grid: Literary mapping as creative reading. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 42(3), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2018.1455172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manning, E. (2016). The minor gesture. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCormack, D. P. (2008). Engineering affective atmospheres on the moving geographies of the 1897 Andrée expedition. Cultural Geographies, 15(4), 413–430. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474474008094314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCormack, D. P. (2010). Fieldworking with atmospheric bodies. Performance Research, 15(4), 40–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/13528165.2010.539878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCormack, D. P. (2014). Atmospheric things and circumstantial excursions. Cultural Geographies, 21(4), 605–625. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474474014522930
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCormack, D. P. (2018). Atmospheric things: On the allure of elemental envelopment. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moon, J. (2005). Guide for busy academics no. 4: Learning through reflection. Higher Education Academy.
   Google Scholar
• Mountrakis, G., & Triantakonstantis, D. (2012). Inquiry-based learning in remote sensing: A space balloon educational experiment. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 36(3), 385–401. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2011.638707
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nairn, K., Higgitt, D., & Vanneste, D. (2000). International perspectives on fieldcourses. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 24(2), 246–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/713677382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nassar, A. (2022). Bridges, billboards and kites: Glitches and infrastructures in cairo’s curfews. [Paper presented at the Global Mobilities and Humanities Conference] Konkuk University, South Korea, 27-29 October 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Pánek, J., Pászto, V., & Perkins, C. (2018). Flying a kite: Playful mapping in a multidisciplinary field-course. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2018.1515190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peer Observer. (2018) . Reviewer teaching feedback form. Royal Holloway University.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, R. (2015). Playful and multi-sensory fieldwork: Seeing, hearing and touching New York. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 39(4), 617–629. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2015.1084496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pink, S., Leder Mackley, K., & Moroşanu, R. (2015). Researching in atmospheres: Video and the ‘feel’of the mundane. Visual Communication, 14(3), 351–369. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357215579580
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, M. (2013). The challenge of enquiry-based learning. Teaching Geography, 38(2), 50. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/challenge-enquiry-based-learning/docview/1412593682/se-2
   Google Scholar
• Sander, L. (2014). Kite aerial photography (KAP) as a tool for field teaching. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 38(3), 425–430. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2014.919443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saraceno, T. (Ed.). (2015). Aerocene newspaper. Studio Tomás Saraceno.
   Google Scholar
• Savin-Baden, M. (2008). Learning spaces: Creating opportunities for knowledge creation in academic life. Society for Research into Higher Education/Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, N. (2015). Attuning to the chemosphere: Domestic formaldehyde, bodily reasoning, and the chemical sublime. Cultural Anthropology, 30(3), 368–393. https://doi.org/10.14506/ca30.3.02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simm, D., & Marvell, A. (2015). Gaining a “sense of place”: Students’ affective experiences of place leading to transformative learning on international fieldwork. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 39(4), 595–616. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2015.1084608
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spronken-Smith, R. A., Bullard, J., Ray, W., Roberts, C., & Keiffer, A. (2008). Where might sand dunes be on Mars? Engaging students through inquiry-based learning in geography. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 32(1), 71–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098260701731520
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stengers, I. (2013). Introductory notes on an ecology of practices. Cultural Studies Review, 11(1), 183–196. https://doi.org/10.5130/csr.v11i1.3459
   Google Scholar
• Sumartojo, S., & Pink, S. (2018). Atmospheres and the experiential world: Theory and methods. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Thoms, J. (2018). Personal communication during floating workshop.
   Google Scholar
• Verlie, B. (2019). “Climatic-affective atmospheres”: A conceptual tool for affective scholarship in a changing climate. Emotion, Space and Society, 33, 100623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emospa.2019.100623
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, J. Y. (2010). Grassroots mapping: Tools for participatory and activist cartography. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Last Retrieved July 3rd, 2018: <http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/65319>
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, V. (2020). Noisy field exposures, or what comes before attunement. Cultural Geographies, 27(4), 647–664. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474474020909494
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar