120
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Developing geographic computer modeling competencies in higher education

, &
Pages 345-367 | Received 05 May 2021, Accepted 19 Aug 2023, Published online: 30 Aug 2023

References

  • Aditomo, A., Goodyear, P., Bliuc, A. M., & Ellis, R. A. (2013). Inquiry-based learning in higher education: Principal forms, educational objectives, and disciplinary variations. Studies in Higher Education, 38(9), 1239–1258. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.616584
  • Alexander, C. (1975). The Oregon Experiment. Center for Environmental Structure. III. Oxford University Press.
  • Ammoneit, R., Reudenbach, C., Turek, A., Nauss, T., & Peter, C. (2019). Geographische Modellierkompetenz – Modellierung von Raum konzeptualisieren. GW-Unterricht, (4), 19–29. https://doi.org/10.1553/gw-unterricht156s19
  • Anthes, K., Peter, C., & Nauss, T. (2021). Geographische Fachlichkeit – didaktische Erschließung durch Basiskonzepte. GW-Unterricht, 1, 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1553/gw-unterricht161s5
  • Bodine, E. N., Panoff, R. M., Voit, E. O., & Weisstein, A. E. (2020). Agent-based modeling and simulation in mathematics and biology education. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, 82(8), 101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-020-00778-z
  • Bossel, H. (2004). Systeme, Dynamik, Simulation: Modellbildung, Analyse und Simulation komplexer Systeme. BoD–Books on Demand.
  • Bowlick, F. J., Goldberg, D. W., & Bednarz, S. W. (2017). Computer Science and programming courses in Geography departments in the United States. The Professional Geographer, 69(1), 138–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/00330124.2016.1184984
  • Bundy, A. (2007). Computational thinking is pervasive. Journal of Scientific and Practical Computing, 1(2), 67–69. http://www.spclab.com/publisher/journals/Vol1No2/N1.pdf
  • Burt, T., & Butcher, D. (1986). Stimulation from simulation? A teaching model of hillslope hydrology for use on microcomputers. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 10(1), 23–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098268608708953
  • Bush, D., Sieber, R., Chandler, M. A., & Sohl, L. E. (2019). Teaching anthropogenic global climate change (AGCC) using climate models. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 43(4), 527–543. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2019.1661370
  • Bybee, R. W. (2014). NGSS and the Next generation of Science teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(2), 211–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-014-9381-4
  • Charrad, M., Ghazzali, N., Boiteau, V., & Niknafs, A. (2014). nbclust: An r package for determining the relevant number of clusters in a data set. Journal of Statistical Software, 61(6), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v061.i06
  • Cheng, M. F., & Lin, J. L. (2015). Investigating the relationship between students’ views of scientific models and their development of models. International Journal of Science Education, 37(15), 2453–2475. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1082671
  • Chen, M., Lv, G., Zhou, C., Lin, H., Ma, Z., Yue, S., Wen, Y., Zhang, F., Wang, J., Zhu, Z., Xu, K., & He, Y. (2021). Geographic modeling and simulation systems for geographic research in the new era: Some thoughts on their development and construction. Science China Earth Sciences, 64(8), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-020-9759-0
  • Chiu, M. H., & Lin, J. W. (2019). Modeling competence in science education. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-019-0012-y
  • Crawford, B. A., & Cullin, M. J. (2004). Supporting prospective teachers’ conceptions of modelling in science. International Journal of Science Education, 26(11), 1379–1401. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690410001673775
  • Creamer, E. (2018). An introduction to fully integrated mixed methods research. SAGE Publications, Inc.
  • D’Angelo, C., Rutstein, D. W., Harris, C., Haertel, G., Bernard, R., & Borokhovski, E. (2014). Simulations for STEM learning: Systematic review and meta-analysis. https://www.sri.com/wp-content/uploads/pdf/simulations-for-stem-learning-brief.pdf
  • DGfG. (2020). Bildungsstandards im Fach Geographie für den Mittleren Schulabschluss. https://geographie.de/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Bildungsstandards_Geographie_2020_Web.pdf
  • Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
  • Etherington, T. R. (2016). Teaching introductory GIS programming to geographers using an open source python approach. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 40(1), 117–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2015.1086981
  • Ferguson, R., & Clow, D. (2015). Examining engagement: Analysing learner subpopulations in massive open online courses (MOOCs). Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Learning Analytics And Knowledge (LAK ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1145/2723576.2723606
  • Gläser, J., & Laudel, G. (2013). Life with and without coding: Two methods for early-stage data analysis in qualitative research aiming at causal explanations. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-14.2.1886
  • Göhner, M., & Krell, M. (2020). Preservice Science teachers’ strategies in scientific reasoning: The case of modeling. Research in Science Education, 52(2), 395–414. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09945-7
  • Gray, R., & Rogan-Klyve, A. (2018). Talking modelling: Examining secondary science teachers’ modelling-related talk during a model-based inquiry unit. International Journal of Science Education, 40(11), 1345–1366. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1479547
  • Grider, R., & Wilensky, U. (2015). NetLogo paths model [computer software]. Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling, Northwestern University. http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/models/Paths
  • Hassanpour, S., & Rassafi, A. A. (2021). Agent-based simulation for pedestrian evacuation behaviour using the affordance concept. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 25(4), 1433–1445. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-021-0206-7
  • Heffron, S., & Downs, R. M. (2012). Geography for life: National Geography standards (Second ed.). National Council for Geographic Education.
  • Helbing, D., Keltsch, J., & Molnár, P. (1997). Modelling the evolution of human trail systems. Nature, 388(6637), 47–50. https://doi.org/10.1038/40353
  • Henderson, L. F. (1974). On the fluid mechanics of human crowd motion. Transportation Research, 8(6), 509–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/0041-1647(74)90027-6
  • Justi, R., & Gilbert, J. (2003). Teachers’ views on the nature of models. International Journal of Science Education, 25(11), 1369–1386. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000070324
  • Ke, L., & Schwarz, C. V. (2021). Supporting students’ meaningful engagement in scientific modeling through epistemological messages: A case study of contrasting teaching approaches. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 58(3), 335–365. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21662
  • King, G. P., Bergan-Roller, H., Galt, N., Helikar, T., & Dauer, J. T. (2019). Modelling activities integrating construction and simulation supported explanatory and evaluative reasoning. International Journal of Science Education, 41(13), 1764–1786. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1640914
  • Klahr, D., Triona, L. M., & Williams, C. (2007). Hands on what? The relative effectiveness of physical versus virtual materials in an engineering design project by middle school children. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(1), 183–203. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20152
  • Kodinariya, T. M., & Makwana, P. R. (2013). Review on determining number of cluster in K-Means clustering. International Journal, 1(6), 90–95.
  • Koh, K. H., Basawapatna, A. R., Bennett, V. E., & Repenning, A. (2010). Towards the automatic recognition of computational thinking for adaptive visual language learning. 2010 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing, 21-25 September 2010, Leganés-Madrid, Spain, 59–66.
  • Krell, M., Walzer, C., Hergert, S., & Krüger, D. (2019). Development and application of a category System to describe pre-service Science teachers’ activities in the process of scientific modelling. Res Sci Educ, 49(5), 1319–1345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9657-8
  • Lin, Y. T., Yeh, M. K. C., & Hsieh, H. L. (2021). Teaching computer programming to science majors by modelling. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 29(1), 130–144. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22247
  • Liu, Z., & Xia, J. (2021). Enhancing computational thinking in undergraduate engineering courses using model‐eliciting activities. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 29(1), 102–113. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22357
  • Livingstone, D., & Lynch, K. (2002). Group project work and student-centred active learning: Two different experiences. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 26(2), 217–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098260220144748
  • Meister, N., Hericks, U., Kreyer, R., & Laging, R. (Eds.). (2020). Edition Fachdidaktiken. Zur Sache. Die Rolle des Faches in der universitären Lehrerbildung: Das Fach im Diskurs zwischen Fachwissenschaft, Fachdidaktik und Bildungswissenschaft Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-29194-5
  • Mislevy, R. J., Haertel, G., Risconscente, M., Rutstein, D. W., & Ziker, C. (2017). Assessing model-based reasoning using evidence-centred design. Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52246-3
  • Moffatt, I. (1986). Teaching environmental systems modelling using computer simulation. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 10(1), 53–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098268608708955
  • Muller, C. L., & Kidd, C. (2014). Debugging geographers: Teaching programming to non-computer scientists. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 38(2), 175–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2014.908275
  • NGSS. (2013). Next generation Science standards: For states, by states. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/18290
  • OECD. (2019). Program for International student assessment (PISA). Results from PISA 2018. Country note – Germany. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/publications/PISA2018_CN_DEU.pdf
  • Papaevripidou, M., Nicolaou, C., & Contantiniou, C. (2014). On defining and assessing learners’ modeling competence in science teaching and learning. Paper to be presented at the annual meeting of AERA 2014, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Pease, M., Pérez-Lapeña, B., & Lant, C. (2019). Energy and water resource simulations for U.S. geography undergraduates. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 43(1), 40–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2018.1554629
  • Peter, C., & Nauss, T. (2020). Der Raum im System. In N. Meister, U. Hericks, R. Kreyer, & R. Laging (Eds.), Edition Fachdidaktiken. Zur Sache. Die Rolle des Faches in der universitären Lehrerbildung: Das Fach im Diskurs zwischen Fachwissenschaft, Fachdidaktik und Bildungswissenschaft (pp. 101–115). Springer VS.
  • Pluchino, A., Garofalo, C., Inturri, G., Rapisarda, A., & Ignaccolo, M. (2014). Agent-based simulation of pedestrian behaviour in closed spaces: A museum case study. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 17(1). Article 16. https://doi.org/10.18564/jasss.2336.
  • Procházka, J., & Olševičová, K. (2014). Data-Driven Pedestrian Model: From OpenCV to NetLogo. In D. Hwang, J. J. Jung, & N.-T. Nguyen (Eds.), Computational collective intelligence. Technologies and Applications (pp. 322–331). Springer International Publishing.
  • R Core Team. (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical [computer software]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
  • Rickles, P., & Ellul, C. (2015). A preliminary investigation into the challenges of learning GIS in Interdisciplinary research. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 39(2), 226–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2014.956297
  • Schell, E. M., Mohan, A., & Pro, T. I. M. A. (2013). Road Map for 21st century geographic Education: Instructional materials and professional development. The Geography Teacher, 10(1), 6–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/19338341.2012.758597
  • Schiefner-Rohs, M. (2019). Scheitern als Ziel – Ambivalenzen forschungsorientierter Lehre im Studieneingang. In G. Reinmann, E. Lübcke, & A. Heudorfer (Eds.), Forschendes Lernen in der Studieneingangsphase: Empirische Befunde (pp. 79–91). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
  • Schwarz, C. V., Reiser, B. J., Davis, E. A., Kenyon, L., Achér, A., Fortus, D., Shwartz, Y., Hug, B., & Krajcik, J. (2009). Developing a learning progression for scientific modeling: Making scientific modeling accessible and meaningful for learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(6), 632–654. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20311
  • Sins, P. H. M., Savelsbergh, E. R., & van Joolingen, W. R. (2005). The difficult process of scientific modelling: An analysis of novices’ reasoning during computer‐based modelling. International Journal of Science Education, 27(14), 1695–1721. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500206408
  • Sins, P. H. M., Savelsbergh, E. R., van Joolingen, W. R., & van Hout‐Wolters, B. H. A. M. (2009). The relation between students’ epistemological understanding of computer models and their cognitive processing on a modelling task. International Journal of Science Education, 31(9), 1205–1229. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802192181
  • Smetana, L. K., & Bell, R. L. (2012). Computer simulations to support Science instruction and learning: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 34(9), 1337–1370. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.605182
  • Spronken-Smith, R., Bullard, J. O., Ray, W., Roberts, C., & Keiffer, A. (2008). Where might sand dunes be on mars? Engaging students through inquiry-based learning in Geography. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 32(1), 71–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098260701731520
  • Tian, J., Ren, C., Lei, Y., & Wang, Y. (2020). Designing MATLAB course for undergraduates in cartography and geographic information science: Linking research and teaching. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 44(1), 25–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2019.1694873
  • Upmeier Zu Belzen, A., & Krüger, D. (2010). Modellkompetenz im Biologieunterricht. Zeitschrift Für Didaktik Der Naturwissenschaft, 16, 41–57. http://archiv.ipn.uni-kiel.de/zfdn/index.html
  • Upmeier zu Belzen, A., Krüger, D., & van Driel, J. (Eds.). (2019). Models and modeling in Science Education: V.12. Towards a competence-based view on models and modeling in science education [electronic resource]. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30255-9
  • Vahidi, H., & Yan, W. (2016). How is an informal transport infrastructure system formed? Towards a spatially explicit conceptual model. Open Geospatial Data, Software and Standards, 1(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40965-016-0009-9
  • Vasconcelos, L., Arslan-Ari, I., & Ari, F. (2020). Early childhood pre-service teachers’ debugging block-based programs: An eye tracking study. Journal of Childhood, Education & Society, 1(1), 63–77. https://doi.org/10.37291/2717638X.20201132
  • Vasconcelos, L., & Kim, C. (2020). Coding in scientific modeling lessons (CS-ModeL). Educational Technology Research & Development, 68(3), 1247–1273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09724-w
  • Walkington, H., Griffin, A. L., Keys-Mathews, L., Metoyer, S. K., Miller, W. E., Baker, R., & France, D. (2011). Embedding research-based learning early in the undergraduate geography curriculum. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 35(3), 315–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2011.563377
  • Werner, L., Denner, J., Campe, S., & Chizuru, D. K. (2012). The fairy performance assessment: Measuring computational thinking in middle school. In Proceedings of the 43rd ACM technical symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 215–220). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2157136.2157200
  • Wilensky, U. (1999). NetLogo [computer software]. Center for connected learning and computer-based modeling. Northwestern University. http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/
  • Xiang, L., & Passmore, C. (2015). A framework for model-based inquiry through agent-based programming. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(2–3), 311–329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-014-9534-4
  • Zhan, Y., & Wan, Z. H. (2016). Appreciated but constrained: Reflective practice of student teachers in learning communities in a Confucian heritage culture. Teaching in Higher Education, 21(6), 669–685. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2016.1183622

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.