Teacher Disposition Scale (TDS): construction and psychometric validation

References

• AITSL [Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership]. 2015. Action Now: Selection of Entrants into Initial Teacher Education, Guidelines. Melbourne, Australia: AITSL [Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership]. https://www.aitsl.edu.au/tools-resources/resource/action-now-selection-of-entrants-into-initial-teacher-education—guidelines.
   Google Scholar
• Almerico, G., P. Johnson, D. Henriott, and M. Shapiro. 2011. “Dispositions Assessment in Teacher Education: Developing an Assessment Instrument for the College Classroom and the Field.” Research in Higher Education Journal 11: 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Andrich, D., B. Sheridan, and G. Luo. 2010. RUMM2030: A Windows Program for the Rasch Unidimensional Measurement Model. Perth, Australia: RUMM Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Barber, M., and M. Mourshed. 2007. How the World’s Best Performing School Systems Come Out on Top. New York, NY: McKinsey and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Borko, H., D. Liston, and J. A. Whitcomb. 2007. “Apples and Fishes: The Debate over Dispositions in Teacher Education.” Journal of Teacher Education 58 (5): 359–364. doi:10.1177/0022487107309977.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CESE (Centre for Education Statistics and Evaluation). 2013. Great Teaching, Inspired Learning: What Does the Evidence Tell Us about Effective Teaching? Sydney, Australia: CESE.
   Google Scholar
• Chamorro-Premuzic, T. 2011. Personality and Individual Differences. 2nd ed. Chichester West Sussex: John Wiley and Sons Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Cornelius-White, J. 2007. “Learner-Centred Teacher-Student Relationships are Effective: A Meta-Analysis.” Review of Educational Research 77 (1): 113–143. doi:10.3102/003465430298563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damon, W. 2007. “Dispositions and Teacher Assessment: The Need for a More Rigorous Definition.” Journal of Teacher Education 58 (5): 365–369. doi:10.1177/0022487107308732.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. 2006. “Constructing 21st-Century Teacher Education.” Journal of Teacher Education 57 (3): 300–314. doi:10.1177/0022487105285962.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eccles, J. S., and A. Wigfield. 2002. “Motivational Beliefs, Values and Goals.” Annual Review of Psychology 53 (1): 109–132. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ertmer, P. A., A. T. Ottenbreit-Leftwich, O. Sadik, E. Sendurur, and P. Sendurur. 2012. “Teacher Beliefs and Technology Integration Practices: A Critical Relationship.” Computers and Education 59 (2): 423–435. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.02.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernet, C., F. Guay, C. Senécal, and S. Austin. 2012. “Predicting Intra-Individual Changes in Teacher Burnout: The Role of Perceived School Environment and Motivational Factors.” Teaching and Teacher Education 28 (4): 514–525. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2011.11.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishbein, M., and I. Ajzen. 2010. Predicting and Changing Behavior: The Reasoned Action Approach. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garner, C. M., B. J. Freeman, and L. Lee. 2016. “Assessment of Student Dispositions: The Development and Psychometric Properties of the Professional Disposition Competence Assessment (PDCA).” Ideas and Research You Can Use: VISTAS 52: 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Hagell, P. 2014. “Testing Rating Scale Unidimensionality Using the Principal Component Analysis (Pca)/T-Test Protocol with the Rasch Model: The Primacy of Theory over Statistics.” Open Journal of Statistics 4: 456–465. doi:10.4236/ojs.2014.46044.
   Google Scholar
• Krosnick, A., and S. Presser 2010. “Question and Questionnaire Design.” In Handbook of Survey Research, 2nd ed., edited by P. V. Marsden and J. D. Wright, 263–312. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Kyriacou, C., and R. Kunc. 2007. “Beginning Teachers’ Expectations of Teaching.” Teaching and Teacher Education 23 (8): 1246–1257. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2006.06.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, S. W., and J. R. Wilkerson 2008. “Measuring Teacher Disposition with Different Item Structures: An Application of the Rasch Model to a Complex Accreditation Requirement.” Online submission to the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New York: American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Linacre, J. 2011. WINSTEPS Rasch Measurement Computer Program [Computer Software]. Chicago, IL: Winsteps.
   Google Scholar
• Masters, G. N. 1982. “A Rasch Model for Partial Credit Scoring.” Psychometrika 47: 149–174. doi:10.1007/BF02296272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McConney, A., A. Price, and A. Woods-McConney. 2012. Fast Track Teacher Education: A Review of the Research Literature on ‘Teach for All’ Schemes. Perth, WA: Murdoch University Centre for Learning, Change and Development.
   Google Scholar
• NCATE [National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education]. 2008. Professional Standards for the Accreditation of Schools, Colleges, and Departments of Education. Washington, DC: NCATE.
   Google Scholar
• NSW DEC [New South Wales Department of Education and Communities]. 2013. Initial Teacher Education: A Blueprint for Action. Sydney, Australia: NSW DEC.
   Google Scholar
• NSW DEC [New South Wales Department of Education and Communities]. 2015. 2015 Teaching Workforce Supply and Demand. Sydney, Australia: NSW DEC.
   Google Scholar
• NSW DEC [New South Wales Department of Education and Training]. 2009. Smarter Schools National Partnership on Improving Teacher Quality: Highly Accomplished Teachers in NSW Government Schools Guidelines. Sydney: NSW DET.
   Google Scholar
• O’Neill, J., S. Hansen, and E. Lewis. 2014. Dispositions to Teach: Review and Synthesis of Current Components and Applications, and Evidence of Impact. Wellington. New Zealand: Massey University, Institute of Education.
   Google Scholar
• OECD [Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development]. 2005. Teachers Matter: Attracting, Developing and Retaining Effective Teachers. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Paris, L. 2010. “Reciprocal Mentoring Residencies: Better Transitions to Teaching.” Australian Journal of Teacher Education 35 (3): 14–26. doi:10.14221/ajte.2010v35n3.2.
   Google Scholar
• Rice, K. G., F. G. Lopez, and C. M. E. Richardson. 2013. “Perfectionism and Performance among STEM Students.” Journal of Vocational Behavior 82 (2): 124–134. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2012.12.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice, S., V. Volkoff, and N. Dulfer. 2015. “’Teach For’/’Teach First’ Candidates: What Conclusions Do They Draw from Their Time in Teaching?” Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice 21 (5): 497–513. doi:10.1080/13540602.2014.995474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rockoff, J., B. Jacob, T. Kane, and D. Staiger. 2011. “Can You Recognize an Effective Teacher When You Recruit One?” Education Finance and Policy 6 (1): 43–74. doi:10.1162/EDFP_a_00022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schussler, D. L. 2006. “Defining Dispositions: Wading through Murky Waters.” The Teacher Educator 41 (4): 251–267. doi:10.1080/08878730609555387.
   Google Scholar
• Schussler, D. L., L. A. Bercaw, and L. M. Stooksberry. 2008. “The Fabric of Teacher Candidate Dispositions: What Case Studies Reveal about Teacher Thinking.” Action in Teacher Education 29 (4): 39–52. doi:10.1080/01626620.2008.10463468.
   Google Scholar
• Shao, K., and R. Tamashiro. 2013. “Comparing Teacher Dispositions in China and the USA.” Research in Higher Education 21: 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair, C. 2008. “Initial and Changing Student Teacher Motivation and Commitment to Teaching.” Asia Pacific Journal of Teacher Education 36 (2): 79–104. doi:10.1080/13598660801971658.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stronge, J. H., T. J. Ward, and L. W. Grant. 2011. “What Makes Good Teachers Good? A Cross-Case Analysis of the Connection between Teacher Effectiveness and Student Achievement.” Journal of Teacher Education 62 (4): 339–355. doi:10.1177/0022487111404241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TEMAG [Teacher Education Ministerial Advisory Group]. 2014. Action Now: Classroom Ready Teachers. Canberra, Australia: Australian Government Department of Education and Training.
   Google Scholar
• Tennant, A., and P. G. Conaghan. 2007. “The Rasch Measurement Model in Rheumatology: What Is It and Why Use It? When Should It Be Applied, and What Should One Look for in a Rasch Paper?” Arthritis Care & Research 57 (8): 1358–1362. doi:10.1002/art.23108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasicsko, M., P. Wirtz, and C. Resor. 2009. “Using Dispositions in the Teacher Admission Process.” Journal of the Southeastern Regional Association of Teacher Educators 18 (2): 19–26.
   Google Scholar
• Welch, F. C., R. E. Pitts, K. J. Tenini, M. G. Kuenlen, and S. G. Wood. 2010. “Significant Issues in Defining and Assessing Teacher Dispositions.” The Teacher Educator 45 (3): 179–201. doi:10.1080/08878730.2010.489992.
   Google Scholar
• White, P., S. Gorard, and B. H. See. 2006. “What are the Problems with Teacher Supply?” Teaching and Teacher Education 22 (3): 315–326. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2005.11.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, B. D. 1997. “A History of Social Science Measurement.” Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 16 (4): 33–45. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.1997.tb00606.x.
   Google Scholar
• Young, A., and E. Wilkins. 2008. “Dispositional Statements on Student Teacher Evaluation Instruments: Commonalities across Institutions.” The Teacher Educator 43 (3): 198–215. doi:10.1080/08878730802055115.
   Google Scholar