Investigating student engagement in Malaysian higher education: a self-determination theory approach

References

• Anderson, R. C., M. Graham, P. Kennedy, N. Nelson, M. Stoolmiller, S. K. Baker, and H. Fien. 2019. “Student Agency at the Crux: Mitigating Disengagement in Middle and High School.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 56: 205–217. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.12.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aziz, M. I. A., and D. Abdullah. 2014. “Malaysia: Becoming an Education Hub to Serve National Development.” In International Education Hubs: Student, Talent, Knowledge-Innovation Models, edited by Jane Knight, 101–119. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Barkley, E. F. 2018. Terms of Engagement: Understanding and Promoting Student Engagement in Today’s College Classroom. In Deep Active Learning, edited by Kayo Matsushita, 35–57. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, M. D., P. R. Melugin, and J. Hernandez. 2018. “Time Perspective, Intended Academic Engagement, and Academic Performance.” Current Psychology 1–7. doi: 10.1007/s12144-017-9771-9 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumeister, R. F., and M. R. Leary. 1995. “The Need to Belong: Desire for Interpersonal Attachments as a Fundamental Human Motivation.” Psychological Bulletin 117 (3): 497. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., and V. Plano Clark. 2010. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. 2nd ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E., R. Koestner, and R. Ryan. 1999. “A Meta-analytic Review of Experiments Examining the Effects of Extrinsic Rewards on Intrinsic Motivation.” Psychological Bulletin 125 (6): 627–668. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.627.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci, E., and R. Ryan. 1985. Instrinsic Motivation and Self-determination in Human Behavior. New York: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, R. 2018. “Quality Assurance for University Teaching: Issues and Approaches.” In Handbook of Quality Assurance for University Teaching, edited by R. Ellis and E. Hogard, 21–36. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Farr-Wharton, B., M. B. Charles, R. Keast, G. Woolcott, and D. Chamberlain. 2018. “Why Lecturers Still Matter: The Impact of Lecturer-Student Exchange on Student Engagement and Intention to Leave University Prematurely.” Higher Education 75 (1): 167–185. doi:10.1007/s10734-017-0190-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fotinatos, N., and E. Sabo. 2018. “Impact of Centrally Coordinated Higher Education Pre-commencement of Teaching Student Support Initiative (Fedready) on Student Engagement: A Regional University Case Study.” Student Engagement in Higher Education Journal 2 (1): 86–92.
   Google Scholar
• Green, A. 2018. “The Influence of Involvement in a Widening Participation Outreach Program on Student Ambassadors’ Retention and Success.” Student Success 9 (3): 25–37. doi:10.5204/ssj.v9i3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez, M., and J. M. Tomás. 2019. The role of perceived autonomy support in predicting university students’ academic success mediated by academicself-efficacy and school engagement, Educational Psychology, 39:6, 729–748, doi:10.1080/01443410.2019.1566519
   Google Scholar
• Hagenauer, G., M. Gläser-Zikuda, and B. Moschner. 2018. “University Students’ Emotions, Life-satisfaction and Study Commitment: A Self-determination Theoretical Perspective.” Journal of Further and Higher Education 42 (6): 808–826. doi:10.1080/0309877X.2017.1323189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, L. 2010. “Delivering, Modifying or Collaborating? Examining Three Teacher Conceptions of How to Facilitate Student Engagement.” Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice 16 (1): 131–151. doi:10.1080/13540600903478037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassan, A., and I. Al-Jubari. 2016. “Motivation and Study Engagement: A Study of Muslim Undergraduates in Malaysia.” Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities 24 (3): 937–951.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henri, D., L. Morrell, and G. Scott. 2018. “Student Perceptions of Their Autonomy at University.” Higher Education 75 (3): 507–516. doi:10.1007/s10734-017-0152-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornstra, L., K. Stroet, E. van Eijden, J. Goudsblom, and C. Roskamp. 2018. “Teacher Expectation Effects on Need-supportive Teaching, Student Motivation, and Engagement: A Self-determination Perspective.” Educational Research and Evaluation 24 (3–5): 324–345. doi:10.1080/13803611.2018.1550841.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hospel, V., and B. Galand. 2016. “Are Both Classroom Autonomy Support and Structure Equally Important for Students’ Engagement? A Multilevel Analysis.” Learning and Instruction 41: 1–10. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.09.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, Y.-C., S. J. Backman, K. F. Backman, F. A. McGuire, and D. Moore. 2019. “An Investigation of Motivation and Experience in Virtual Learning Environments: A Self-determination Theory.” Education and Information Technologies 24 (1): 591–611. doi:10.1007/s10639-018-9784-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivankova, N. V., J. W. Creswell, and S. L. Stick. 2006. “Using Mixed-methods Sequential Explanatory Design: From Theory to Practice.” Field Methods 18 (1): 3–20. doi:10.1177/1525822X05282260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamil, H., A. F. Ahmad Shabudin, S. R. Raman, and O. P. Ling. 2019. “Changing Landscape of the Malaysian Higher Education: An Overview of Women’s Glass Ceiling.” In Gender and the Changing Face of Higher Education in Asia Pacific, edited by D. E. Neubauer and S. Kaur, 145–165. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Jang, H., E. J. Kim, and J. Reeve. 2016. “Why Students Become More Engaged or More Disengaged during the Semester: A Self-determination Theory Dual-process Model.” Learning and Instruction 43: 27–38. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.01.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahn, P. E. 2014. “Theorising Student Engagement in Higher Education.” British Educational Research Journal 40 (6): 1005–1018. doi:10.1002/berj.3121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahu, E., and K. Nelson. 2018. “Student Engagement in the Educational Interface: Understanding the Mechanisms of Student Success.” Higher Education Research & Development 37 (1): 58–71. doi:10.1080/07294360.2017.1344197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiew, P. 2018. “Women on Track to Gender Equality.” The Borneo Post, August 17. https://www.theborneopost.com/2018/08/17/women-on-track-to-attain-gender-equality/
   Google Scholar
• Knight, J., and S. Morshidi. 2011. “The Complexities and Challenges of Regional Education Hubs: Focus on Malaysia.” Higher Education 62 (5): 593. doi:10.1007/s10734-011-9467-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause, K.-L., and H. Coates. 2008. “Students’ Engagement in First-year University.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 33 (5): 493–505. doi:10.1080/02602930701698892.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause, K.-L. 2012. “Student engagement: a messy policy challenge in higher education.” In Engaging with learning in higher education, edited by A. Reid Solomonides and P. Petocz, 457–474. Oxfordshire: Libri.
   Google Scholar
• Leach, L., and N. Zepke. 2011. “Engaging Students in Learning: A Review of a Conceptual Organiser.” Higher Education Research & Development 30 (2): 193–204. doi:10.1080/07294360.2010.509761.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mainhard, T., S. Oudman, L. Hornstra, R. J. Bosker, and T. Goetz. 2018. “Student Emotions in Class: The Relative Importance of Teachers and Their Interpersonal Relations with Students.” Learning and Instruction 53: 109–119. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.07.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masika, R., and J. Jones. 2016. “Building Student Belonging and Engagement: Insights into Higher Education Students’ Experiences of Participating and Learning Together.” Teaching in Higher Education 21 (2): 138–150. doi:10.1080/13562517.2015.1122585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matos, L., J. Reeve, D. Herrera, and M. Claux. 2018. “Students’ Agentic Engagement Predicts Longitudinal Increases in Perceived Autonomy-supportive Teaching: The Squeaky Wheel Gets the Grease.” The Journal of Experimental Education 86 (4): 579–596. doi:10.1080/00220973.2018.1448746.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maunder, R. E. 2018. “Students’ Peer Relationships and Their Contribution to University Adjustment: The Need to Belong in the University Community.” Journal of Further and Higher Education 42 (6): 756–768. doi:10.1080/0309877X.2017.1311996.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “Minister Concerned about Low Number of Students Qualified for Science Stream in S’wak.” 2018. The Borneo Post, February 25. https://www.theborneopost.com/2018/02/25/minister-concerned-about-low-number-of-students-qualified-for-science-stream-in-swak/
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education Malaysia. 2015. “Malaysia Education Blueprint 2015–2025.” https://www.studymalaysia.com/education/higher-education-in-malaysia/the-malaysian-higher-education-system-an-overview
   Google Scholar
• Niemiec, C. P., and R. M. Ryan. 2009. “Autonomy, Competence, and Relatedness in the Classroom: Applying Self-determination Theory to Educational Practice.” School Field 7 (2): 133–144.
   Google Scholar
• Núñez, J. L., and J. León. 2019. “Determinants of Classroom Engagement: A Prospective Test Based on Self-determination Theory.” Teachers and Teaching 25 (2): 147–159. doi:10.1080/13540602.2018.1542297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrides, K. V., and N. Frederickson. 2011. “An Application of Belief-importance Theory in the Domain of Academic Achievement.” British Journal of Educational Psychology 81 (1): 97–111. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.2010.02010.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quality Assurance Agency. 2018. UK Quality Code for Higher Education. Part B: Assuring and Enhancing Academic Quality. Chapter B5: Student Engagement. Southgate, Gloucester: Southgate House.
   Google Scholar
• Reeve, J. 2012. “A Self-determination Theory Perspective on Student Engagement.” In Handbook of Research on Student Engagement, edited by S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, and C. Wylie, 149–172. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Reyes, M. R., M. A. Brackett, S. E. Rivers, M. White, and P. Salovey. 2012. “Classroom Emotional Climate, Student Engagement, and Academic Achievement.” Journal of Educational Psychology 104 (3): 700. doi:10.1037/a0027268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards, C. 2019. “Higher Education Privatisation, Internationalisation and Marketisation: Singaporean versus Malaysian Models of Asian Education Hub Policy.” Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education 49 (3): 375–392. doi:10.1080/03057925.2017.1413638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruzek, E. A., C. A. Hafen, J. P. Allen, A. Gregory, A. Y. Mikami, and R. C. Pianta. 2016. “How Teacher Emotional Support Motivates Students: The Mediating Roles of Perceived Peer Relatedness, Autonomy Support, and Competence.” Learning and Instruction 42: 95–103. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.01.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, R., and E. Deci. 2000. “Self-determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-being.” American Psychologist 55 (1): 68–78. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sammons, P. 2010. “The Contribution of Mixed Methods to Recent Research on Educational Effectiveness.” In Sage Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral research, edited by A. Tashakkori and C. Teddlie, 697–723. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sirat, M., and C. D. Wan. 2016. “Higher Education in Malaysia.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Asia Pacific Higher Education, edited by C. S. Collins, M. N. N. Lee, J. N. Hawkins, and D. E. Neubauer, 469–482. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US.
   Google Scholar
• Tanaka, M. 2019. Student Engagement and Quality Assurance in Higher Education. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tashakkori, A., and C. Teddlie. 2003. Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioural Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wan, C. D., D. Chapman, S. Hutcheson, M. Lee, A. Austin, and A. N. Md. Zain. 2016. “Changing Higher Education Practice in Malaysia: The Conundrum of Incentives.” Studies in Higher Education 1–19. doi:10.1080/03075079.2015.1134475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wellborn, J. G. 1993. “Engaged and Disaffected Action: The Conceptualization and Measurement of Motivation in the Academic Domain.” Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY
   Google Scholar
• Won, S., C. A. Wolters, and S. A. Mueller. 2018. “Sense of Belonging and Self-regulated Learning: Testing Achievement Goals as Mediators.” The Journal of Experimental Education 86 (3): 402–418. doi:10.1080/00220973.2016.1277337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodard, B. R., and J. B. Fatzinger. 2018. “Student Engagement with Other Students.” New Directions for Teaching and Learning 2018 (154): 99–107. doi:10.1002/tl.2018.2018.issue-154.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, W., and M. Hammond. 2011. “Challenges of University Adjustment in the UK: A Study of East Asian Master’s Degree Students.” Journal of Further and Higher Education 35 (3): 423–438. doi:10.1080/0309877x.2011.569016.
   Google Scholar
• Zainuddin, Z., and C. J. Perera. 2019. “Exploring Students’ Competence, Autonomy and Relatedness in the Flipped Classroom Pedagogical Model.” Journal of Further and Higher Education 43 (1): 115–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zepke, N. 2018. “Student Engagement in Neo-liberal Times: What Is Missing?” Higher Education Research & Development 37 (2): 433–446. doi:10.1080/07294360.2017.1370440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zepke, N., L. Leach, and P. Butler. 2013. “Student Engagement: Students’ and Teachers’ Perceptions.” Higher Education Research & Development 33 (2): 386–398. doi:10.1080/07294360.2013.832160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhoc, K. C., B. J. Webster, R. B. King, J. C. Li, and T. S. Chung. 2018. “Higher Education Student Engagement Scale (HESES): Development and Psychometric Evidence.” Research in Higher Education 60 (2): 219–244. doi:10.1007/s11162-018-9510-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar