Academic capitalism, competition and competence: the impact on student recruitment and research assessment

References

• Abramo, G., and C.A. D’Angelo. 2021. “The Different Responses of Universities to Introduction of Performance-based Research Funding.” ResearchGate Pre-print. Accessed 20 January 2021. https://arvix.org/abs/2102.0537
   Google Scholar
• Adams, J., and K. Gurney. 2010. Funding Selectivity, Concentration and Excellence – How Good is the UK’s Research? Oxford: HE Policy Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Adams, J., K. Gurney, T. Loach, and M. Szonszor. 2020. “Evolving Document Patterns in UK Research Assessment Cycles.” Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics 5: 2. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2020.00002.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ARC (Australian Research Council). 2014. “The Excellence in Research in Australia (ERA) Initiative.” Accessed January 2015. www.arc.gov.au/era/
   Google Scholar
• Auranen, O. 2014. “University Research Performance: Influence of Funding Competition, Policy Steering and Micro-level Factors.” Doctoral thesis, University of Tampere.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, C. 1986. The Audit of War: The Illusion and Reality of Britain as a Great Nation. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bhopal, K. 2016. The Experiences of Black and Minority Ethnic Academics: A Comparative Study of the Unequal Academy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Boliver, V., and M. Powell. 2021. Fair Admissions to Universities in England: Improving Policy and Practice. London: Nuffield Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Borrelli, D., I. McNay, and B. Vidaillet. 2020. “Lo Scenario Internazionale: I Casi Britannico E Francese.” In Consequenze della valutazione: Idee e pratiche dei docenti universitari nelle scienze sociali, edited by R. Fontani and E. Valentini. Milan: Franco Angeli.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1991. Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourke, P. 1997. Evaluating University Research: The British Research Assessment Exercise and Australian Practice. Canberra: NBEET.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, R., and H. Carasso with. 2013. Everything for Sale? The Marketisation of UK Higher Education. London: SRHE/Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chaytor, S., G. Gottlieb, and G. Reid. 2021. Regional Policy and R+D: Evidence Experiments and Expectations. London: HEPI.
   Google Scholar
• Cuthbert, R. 2020. “Editorial: Policymaking in a Panic.” SRHE News 42, October. Society for Research into Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• DBIS (Department of Business Innovation and Skills). 2015. Fulfilling Our Potential: Teaching Excellence, Social Mobility and Student Choice. Cm 9141. London: Department of Business Innovation and Skills.
   Google Scholar
• Deem, R., and J.-A. Baird. 2019. “The English Teaching Excellence (And Student Outcomes) Framework: Intelligent Accountability in Higher Education?” Journal of Educational Change. Online. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-019-09356-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DfE (Department for Education). 2020. Introduction of Temporary Student Number Controls in Response to COVID-19 Non-healthcare Places. London: DfE.
   Google Scholar
• Donovan, C. 2006. “The Chequered Career of a Cryptic Concept.” The Political Quarterly 77 (s1): 61–72. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-923X.2006.00781.x.
   Google Scholar
• Fazackerley, A. 2020. “Women’s Research Plummets during Lockdown – But Articles from Men Increase.” Guardian Online, May 12. Accessed 13 May 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Franco-Santos, M., P. Rivera, and M. Bourne. 2014. Performance Management in UK Higher Education Institutions: The Need for a Hybrid Approach. London: Leadership Foundation for Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Gorard, S. 2020. “Where Next for Improving the Use of Good Evidence: The Story of the Book so Far.” In Getting Evidence into Education. Evaluating the Routes to Policy and Practice, edited by S. Gorard. London: Routledge 234–241 .
   Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh, T. 2015. “Research Impact in the Community-based Health Sciences: What Would Good Look Like?” Dissertation, MBA in HE Management, UCL Institute of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Grichting, W.L. 1996. “Do Our Research Unis Give Value for Money?” Campus Review (6), February, 29.
   Google Scholar
• Grove, J. 2020. “Half of Researchers Seek or Desire Counselling, Says Wellcome Poll.” Times Higher Education, January 16, 8.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, R. 2020. “UK Universities Drop down International Ranking Again.” The Guardian, June, 10, 19.
   Google Scholar
• Hamman, J. 2016. “The Invisible Hand of Research Performance Assessment.” Higher Education 72 (6): 761–799. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9974-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HEFCE (Higher Education Funding Council for England). 1999. Research Assessment Exercise, 2001: Assessment Panels’ Criteria and Working Methods. Bristol: Higher Education Funding Council for England.
   Google Scholar
• HEFCE (Higher Education Funding Council for England). 2004. RAE 2008: Units of Assessment and Recruitment of Panel Members. Bristol: Higher Education Funding Council for England.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, R. 2008. “On Structuring Subjective Judgements: Originality, Significance and Rigour in RAE 2008.” Higher Education Quarterly 62 (1–2): 120–147. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/.1468-2273-2008.00378.x.
   Google Scholar
• Kandiko Howson, C.B. 2019. “Final Evaluation of the Office for Students’ Learning Gain Pilot Projects.”
   Google Scholar
• King, A., and I. Crewe. 2014. The Blunders of Our Governments. London: Oneworld.
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, L. 2006. The Research Game in Academic Life. Buckingham: SRHE/OpenUP.
   Google Scholar
• Marques, M., Powell, J.J.W., Zapp, M., and Biesta, G. (2017) How does research evaluation impact educational research? Exploring intended and unintended consequences of research assessment in the United Kingdom, 1986-2014. Europen Educational Research Journal, 16(6), 820–842
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, B.R. 2011. “The Research Excellence Framework and the ‘Impact Agenda’: Are We Creating a Frankenstein Monster?” Research Evaluation 20 (3): 247–254. doi:https://doi.org/10.3152/095820211X13118583635693.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNay, I. 1997. The Impact of the 1992 RAE on Institutional and Individual Behaviour in English HE: The Evidence from a Research Project. Bristol: HEFCE.
   Google Scholar
• McNay, I. 2015a. “Learning from the UK Research Excellence Framework: Ends and Means in Research Quality Assessment and the Reliability of Results in Education.” Higher Education Review 47 (3): 2:24–47.
   Google Scholar
• McNay, I. 2015b. “Does Research Quality Assessment Increase Output and Give Value for Money?” Public Money and Management 35 (1): 67–68. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2015.986888.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNay, I. 2016. “Imbalancing the Academy: The Impact of Research Quality Assessment.” Sociologia Italiana, - AIS Journal of Sociology 8 (7): 119–125.
   Google Scholar
• McNay, I. 2017. “TEF: Why and How? Ideological and Operational Imperatives Driving Policy.” Compass 10 (2): 54–59. https://journals.gre.ac.uk/index.php/compass/issue/view/51
   Google Scholar
• McNay, I. 2019. “Governance, Leadership and University Cultures: Do Universities Critique Social Norms, or Copy Them?” In Values of the University in a Time of Uncertainty, edited by P. Gibbs, J. Jameson, and A. Elwick. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature 89–105 .
   Google Scholar
• Metcalfe, J., K. Wheat, M. Munafo, and J. Parry. 2020. Research Integrity: A Landscape Study. Swindon: UKRI.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education. 2014. Review of the Performance-based Research Fund. Auckland: Ministry of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Naidoo, R. 2018. “The Competition Fetish in Higher Education: Shamans, Mind Snares and Consequences.” European Educational Research Journal 17 (5): 605–620. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904118784839.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NAO (National Audit Office). 2017. “The Higher Education Market.” Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General. National Audit Office.
   Google Scholar
• Neate, R. 2021. “Oxford Vaccine Scientists in Line for £20m Payday with US Flotation.” Guardian, April 8, 6.
   Google Scholar
• Neyland, D., V. Ehrenstein, and S. Milyaeva. 2019. Can Markets Solve Problems? London: Goldsmiths Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oancea, A. 2016. “Research Impacts: Networks and Narratives.” Presentation to Launch Seminar, Centre for Global Higher Education, UCL Institute of Education, February 3. www.researchcghe.org
   Google Scholar
• Pearce, S. 2021. “The Value of a National TEF Is in Enhancing University Learning and Teaching.” WonkHE, February 8.
   Google Scholar
• RAE. 2006. RAE 2008. Panel Criteria and Working Methods. Bristol: HEFCE. www.rae.ac.uk/pubs
   Google Scholar
• REF. 2014. The Research Excellence Framework, 2014: The Results. Bristol: HE Funding Council for England.
   Google Scholar
• REF. 2019. “Guidance on Submissions.” REF. January.
   Google Scholar
• REF. 2020. “REF Assessment Phase Panels Confirmed.” [ Press Release]. December 4.
   Google Scholar
• Research England. 2021. Future Research Assessment Programme. Bristol: UKRI.
   Google Scholar
• Robbins, L. ( chair). 1963. Higher Education. A Report. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, B. 2020. “Fearful England Need to Play with Autonomy if They Don’t Want to See Paris Repeated.” The Guardian, February 6, 37.
   Google Scholar
• Schafer, L.O. 2016. “Performance Assessment in Science and Academia: Effects of RAE/REF on Academic Life.” Working Paper No. 7. Centre for Global Higher Education. www.researchcghe.org
   Google Scholar
• Sharp, S., and S. Coleman. 2005. “Ratings in the Research Assessment Exercise 2001 – The Patterns of University Status and Panel Membership.” Higher Education Quarterly 59 (2): 153–171. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2273.2008.00288x.
   Google Scholar
• Shu, F., C.R. Sugimoto, and V. Lariviere. 2021. “The Institutional Stratification of the Chinese Higher Education System.” Quantitative Sciences Studies 2 (1) 327–344 doi:https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00104.
   Google Scholar
• Simmons, J. 2020. “The Political Environment around Research, Presentation to HEPI Webinar.” The Research Landscape, October 20. www.hepi.ac.uk
   Google Scholar
• Solloway, A. 2020. “Science Minister on ‘The Research Landscape’.” Transcript of Speech to HEPI Webinar, October 20. www.gov.uk/government/speeches/science-minister-on-the-research-landscape
   Google Scholar
• Stern, N. 2016. Building on Success and Learning from Experience. An Independent Review of the Research Excellence Framework. London: Department of Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy.
   Google Scholar
• UniversitiesUK. 2020. HE in Facts and Figures, 2019. London. https://universitiesuk.ac.uk/factsandstats
   Google Scholar
• Westwood, A. 2021. What Does ‘Levelling Up’ R+D Look Like? London: HEPI.
   Google Scholar
• Wieczoric, O., and D. Schubert. 2020. “The Symbolic Power of the Research Excellence Framework.” Preprint on ResearchGate. Accessed 2 January 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Willetts, D. 2017. A University Education. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, B. 1993. “Research Management for Selectivity and Concentration.” Higher Education Quarterly 47 (1): 4–16. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468.2273.1993.tb01610.x.
   Google Scholar
• Young, M. 1958. The Rise of the Meritocracy. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
   Google Scholar