Using co-creation to facilitate PhD supervisory relationships

References

• Ali, A, and F. Kohun. 2007. “Dealing with Social Isolation to Minimize Doctoral Attrition – A Four Stage Framework.” International Journal of Doctoral Studies 2: 33–49. doi:10.28945/56.
   Google Scholar
• Baik, S. H., R. S. Fox, S. D. Mills, S. C. Roesch, G. R. Sadler, E. A. Klonoff, and V. L. Malcarne. 2019. “Reliability and Validity of the Perceived Stress Scale-10 in Hispanic Americans with English or Spanish Language Preference.” Journal of Health Psychology 24 (5): 628–639. doi:10.1177/1359105316684938.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastalich, W. 2017. “Content and Context in Knowledge Production: A Critical Review of Doctoral Supervision Literature.” Studies in Higher Education 42 (7): 1145–1157. doi:10.1080/03075079.2015.1079702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovill, C., A. Cook-Sather, P. Felten, L. Millard, and N. Moore-Cherry. 2016. “Addressing Potential Challenges in Co-creating Learning and Teaching: Overcoming Resistance, Navigating Institutional Norms and Ensuring Inclusivity in Student-staff Partnerships.” Higher Education 71 (2): 195–208. doi:10.1007/s10734-015-9896-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovill, C., G. Aitken, J. Hutchison, F. Morrison, K. Roseweir, A. Scott, and S. Sotannde. 2010. “Experiences of Learning through Collaborative Evaluation from a Postgraduate Certificate in Professional Education.” International Journal for Academic Development 15 (2): 143–153. doi:10.1080/13601441003738343.
   Google Scholar
• Bovill, C. 2020. “Co-creation in Learning and Teaching: The Case for a Whole-class Approach in Higher Education.” Higher Education 79 (6): 1023–1037. doi:10.1007/s10734-019-00453-w.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V, and V. Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
   Google Scholar
• Brough, P, C Timms, M O’Driscoll, and T. Kalliath. 2014. “Work-life Balance: A Longitudinal Evaluation of A New Measure across Australia and New Zealand Workers.” The International Journal of Human Resource Management 25 (19): 2724–2744.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browning, L, D Dawson, and K. Thompson. 2014. “Developing Future Research Leaders.” International Journal of Product Development 5 (12): 123–134.
   Google Scholar
• Buckley, A. 2014. “How Radical Is Student Engagement? (And What Is It For?).” Student Engagement and Experience Journal 3 (2). doi:10.7190/seej.v3i2.95.
   Google Scholar
• Burkett, I. 2020. “An Introduction to Co-design’ Centre for Social Impact” accessed 10th August 2020. http://ingridburkett.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Introduction-to-Codesign-2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Carter, S, and V. Kumar. 2017. “Ignoring Me Is Part of Learning’: Supervisory Feedback on Doctoral Writing.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 54 (1): 68–75. doi:10.1080/14703297.2015.1123104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catalyst Fund. 2020. “Supporting Mental Health and Wellbeing for Postgraduate Research Students” Catalyst Fund. October 2020. accessed 9 November 2020. https://re.ukri.org/documents/2020/catalyst-fund-programme-evaluation/
   Google Scholar
• Clothier, A, and D. Matheson. 2019. “Using Co-creation as a Pedagogic Method for the Professional Development of Students Undertaking a BA (Hons) in Education Studies.” Journal of Further and Higher Education 43 (6): 826–838. doi:10.1080/0309877X.2017.1409344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, S. 1994. “Perceived Stress Scale” Mind Garden. accessed 15th July 2020. https://www.mindgarden.com/documents/PerceivedStressScale.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cook-Sather, A, C Bovill, and P. Felten. 2014. Engaging Students as Partners in Learning and Teaching: A Guide for Faculty. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Deeley, S. J., and C. Bovill. 2017. “Staff-student Partnership in Assessment: Enhancing Assessment Literacy through Democratic Practices.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 42 (3): 463–477. doi:10.1080/02602938.2015.1126551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delpish, A., A. Holmes, M. Knight-mckenna, R. Mihans, A. Darby, K. King, and P. Felten. 2010. “Equalizing Voices: Student-faculty Partnership in Course Design.” In Engaging Student Voices in the Study of Teaching and Learning, edited by C. Werder and M. Otis, 96–114. Sterling: Stylus.
   Google Scholar
• Dericks, G, E Thompson, M Roberts, and F. Phua. 2019. “Determinants of PhD Student Satisfaction: The Roles of Supervisor, Department, and Peer Qualities.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 44 (7): 1053–1068. doi:10.1080/02602938.2019.1570484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diener, E, R Emmons, R Larson, and S. Griffin. 1985. “The Satisfaction With Life Scale.” Journal of Personality Assessment 49 (1): 71–75. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dinkel, A., and F. Balck. 2005. “An Evaluation of the German Relationship Assessment Scale.” Swiss Journal of Psychology/Schweizerische Zeitschrift Für Psychologie/Revue Suisse de Psychologie 64 (4): 259–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dollinger, M, J Lodge, and H. Coates. 2018. “Co-creation in Higher Education: Towards a Conceptual Model.” Journal of Marketing for Higher Education 28 (2): 210–231. doi:10.1080/08841241.2018.1466756.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunne, E. 2016. “Design Thinking: A Framework for Student Engagement? A Personal View.” Preface. Journal of Educational Innovation, Partnership and Change 2 (1). https://journals.gre.ac.uk/index.php/studentchangeagents/article/view/317
   Google Scholar
• Dysthe, O. 2002. “Professors as Mediators of Academic Text Cultures: An Interview Study with Advisors and Master’s Degree Students in Three Disciplines in a Norwegian University.” Written Communication 19 (4): 493–544. doi:10.1177/074108802238010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finn, J. 2005. “Getting a PhD: An Action Plan to Help Manage Your Research, Your Supervisor and Your Project”, Routledge Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Frow, P., S. Nenonen, A. Payne, and K. Storbacka. 2015. “Managing Co-creation Design: A Strategic Approach to Innovation.” British Journal of Management 26 (3): 463–483. doi:10.1111/1467-8551.12087.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatfield, T. 2005. “An Investigation into PhD Supervisory Management Styles: Development of a Dynamic Conceptual Model and Its Managerial Implications.” Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 27 (3): 311. doi:10.1080/13600800500283585.
   Google Scholar
• Greenhaus, J.H., and T.D. Allen. 2011. “Work-Family Balance: A Review and Extension of the Literature.” In Handbook of Occupational Health Psychology, edited by J.C. Quick and L.E. Tetrick, 165–183. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Gurr, G. M. 2001. “Negotiating the ‘Rackety Bridge’ ─A Dynamic Model for Aligning Supervisory Style with Research Student Development.” Higher Education Research and Development 20 (1): 81–92.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, S., and C. Grant. 2015. “Exploring of New Models of Research Pedagogy: Time to Let Go of Master-apprentice Style Supervision?” Teaching in Higher Education 20 (5): 556–566. doi:10.1080/13562517.2015.1036732.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemer, S. 2012. “Informality, Power and Relationships in Postgraduate Supervision: Supervising PhD Candidates over Coffee.” Higher Education Research & Development 31 (6): 827–839. doi:10.1080/07294360.2012.674011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendrick, S, A Dicke, and C. Hendrick. 1998. “The Relationship Assessment Scale.” Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 15 (1): 137–142. doi:10.1177/0265407598151009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hockey, J. 1994. “Establishing Boundaries: Problems and Solutions in Managing PhD Supervisor’s Role.” Cambridge Journal of Education 24 (2): 293–305. doi:10.1080/0305764940240211.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, A, and E. Blass. 2019. “The Impact of Institutional Power on Higher Degree Research Supervision: Implications for the Quality of Doctoral Outcomes.” Universal Journal of Educational Research 7 (7): 1485–1494. doi:10.13189/ujer.2019.070702.
   Google Scholar
• Kiley, M. 2011. “Developments in Research Supervisor Training: Causes and Responses.” Studies in Higher Education 36 (5): 585–599. doi:10.1080/03075079.2011.594595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, N. 2004. “Using Templates in the Thematic Analysis of Text.” In Essential Guide to Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research, 256-270. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lategan, L. O. K. 2008. “Why the Fuss about Research and Postgraduate Supervision?” In An Introduction to Postgraduate Supervision, edited by L. O. K. Lategan, 1-4, 2008. Stellenbosch, South Africa: African Sun Media.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, A. 2008. “How are Doctoral Students Supervised? Concepts of Doctoral Research Supervision.” Studies in Higher Education 33 (3): 267–281. doi:10.1080/03075070802049202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levecque, K., F. Anseel, A. De Beuckelaer, J. Van der Heyden, and Gisle L. 2017. ”Work Organization and Mental Health Problems in PhD Students.” Research Policy 46 (4): 868–879.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lister, K., J. Seale, and C. Douce. 2021. “Mental Health in Distance Learning: A Taxonomy of Barriers and Enablers to Student Mental Wellbeing.” Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning 1–15. doi:10.1080/02680513.2021.1899907.
   Google Scholar
• Mainhard, T., R. Van Der Rijst, J. Tartwijk, and T. Wubbels. 2009. “A Model for the Supervisor–doctoral Student Relationship.” Higher Education Journal 58 (3): 359–373. doi:10.1007/s10734-009-9199-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manathunga, C. 2005. “The Development of Research Supervision: “Turning the Light on a Private Space” International Journal for Academic Development 10 (1): 17–30. doi:10.1080/13601440500099977.
   Google Scholar
• Marais, G. A. B., R. Shankland, P. Haag, R. Fiault, and B. Junipter. 2018. “A Survey and A Positive Psychology Intervention on French PhD Student Wellbeing.” International Journal of Doctoral Studies 13: 109–139.
   Google Scholar
• Margolis, S., E. Schwitzgebel, D. J. Ozer, and S. Lyubomirsky. 2019. “A New Measure of Life Satisfaction: The Riverside Life Satisfaction Scale.” Journal of Personality Assessment 101 (6): 621–630. doi:10.1080/00223891.2018.1464457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAlpine, L. 2013. “Doctoral Supervision: Not an Individual but a Collective Institutional Responsibility.” Journal for the Study of Education and Development 36 (3): 259–280. doi:10.1174/021037013807533061.
   Google Scholar
• McCallina, A., and S. Nayar. 2012. “Postgraduate Research Supervision: A Critical Review of Current Practice.” Teaching in Higher Education 17 (1): 63–74. doi:10.1080/13562517.2011.590979.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer-Mapstone, L., and C. Bovill. 2020. ”Equity and diversity in institutional approaches to student–staff partnership schemes in higher education.” Studies in Higher Education, 45 (12): 2541–2557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer-Mapstone, L., S. L. Dvorakova, K. E. Matthews, S. Abbot, B. Cheng, P. Felten, C. Knorr, E. Marquis, R. Shammas, and K. Swaim. 2017. “A Systematic Literature Review of Students as Partners in Higher Education.” International Journal for Students as Partners 1 (1): 1–23. doi:10.15173/ijsap.v1i1.3119.
   Google Scholar
• Moxham, L., T. Dwyer, and K. Reid-Searl. 2013. “Articulating Expectations for the PhD Candidature upon Commencement: Ensuring Supervisor/student ‘Best Fit’.” Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 35 (4): 345–354. doi:10.1080/1360080X.2013.812030.
   Google Scholar
• Nowell, L., J. Norris, D. White, and N. Moules. 2017. “Thematic Analysis: Striving to Meet the Trustworthiness Criteria.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 16 (1): 1–13. doi:10.1177/1609406917733847.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyumba, T, K Wilson, C Derrick, N. Mukherjee, and D. Geneletti. 2018. “The Use of Focus Group Discussion Methodology: Insights from Two Decades of Application in Conservation.” Methods in Ecology and Evolution 9 (1): 20–32. doi:10.1111/2041-210X.12860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oxford English Dictionary Online Database.(2013) accessed 2nd July 2020
   Google Scholar
• Parker, A, and J. Tritter. 2006. “Focus Group Method and Methodology: Current Practice and Recent Debate.” International Journal of Research and Method in Education 29 (1): 23–37. doi:10.1080/01406720500537304.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, E., and D. Pugh. 2010. How to Get A PhD: A Handbook for Students and Their Supervisors (5th Ed.). New York, NY:McGraw-Hill, Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Piper, R., and T. Emmanuel 2019 “Co-producing Mental Health Strategies with Students: A Guide for the Higher Education Sector” Student Minds. accessed 14th July 2020. https://www.studentminds.org.uk/uploads/3/7/8/4/3784584/cpdn_document_artwork.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Prazeres, F. 2017. “PhD Supervisor-student Relationship.” Journal of Advanced Medical Education Prof 5 (3): 213–214.
   Google Scholar
• Raffing, R, T Jensen, and H. Tønnesen. 2017. “Self-reported Needs for Improving the Supervision Competence of PhD Supervisors from the Medical Sciences in Denmark.” BMC Medical Education 17 (188): 1–9. doi:10.1186/s12909-017-1023-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberti, J. W., L. N Harrington, and E. A. Storch. 2006. “Further Psychometric Support for the 10-item Version of the Perceived Stress Scale.” Journal of College Counseling 9 (2): 135–147. doi:10.1002/j.2161-1882.2006.tb00100.x.
   Google Scholar
• Rock, R., E. Foster, and S. Lamb. 2015. Putting Students at the Heart of the Curriculum Change Process. York: Higher Education Academy.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, M., and E. Hansson. 2018. “Doctoral Students’ Well-being: A Literature Review.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being 13 (1): 1–14. doi:10.1080/17482631.2018.1508171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sisson, and P. Jackman 2019. “From Enrolment to Completion: An Exploration of Psychological Wellbeing in Doctoral Students during the PhD Journey” International Conference on the Mental Health & Wellbeing of Postgraduate Researchers, Brighton UK, 16-17th May 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Tanggaard, L., and C. Wegener. 2016. A Survival Kit for Doctoral Students and Their Supervisors: Traveling the Landscape of Research. Sage. https://methods.sagepub.com/book/a-survival-kit-for-doctoral-students-and-their-supervisors.
   Google Scholar
• Universities UK. 11 March 2018. “Minding Our Future: Starting a Conversation about the Support of Student Mental Health” Universities UK. accessed 15th August 2020. https://www.universitiesuk.ac.uk/minding-our-future
   Google Scholar
• van Rooij, E., M. Fokkens-Bruinsma, and E. Jansen. 2020. “Factors that Influence PhD Candidates’ Success: The Importance of PhD Project Characteristics.” Studies in Continuing Education 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughn, M. J., and M. E. Matyastik Baier. 1999. “Reliability and Validity of the Relationship Assessment Scale.” American Journal of Family Therapy 27 (2): 137–147. doi:10.1080/019261899262023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., S. A. Brown, and H. Bala. 2013. “Bridging The Qualitative-Quantitative Divide: Guidelines For Conducting Mixed Methods Research In Information Systems.” MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems 37 (1): 21–54. doi:10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.1.02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar