891
Views
19
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Examining students’ satisfaction with online learning during the Covid-19 pandemic - an extended UTAUT2 approach

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , &
Pages 988-1005 | Received 22 Dec 2020, Accepted 11 Jan 2022, Published online: 14 Feb 2022

References

  • Ain, NoorUl, Kiran Kaur, and Mehwish Waheed. 2016. “The Influence of Learning Value on Learning Management System Use: An Extension of UTAUT2.” Information Development 32 (5): 1306–1321. doi:10.1177/0266666915597546.
  • Andersson, Annika, and Åke Grönlund. 2009. ”A conceptual framework for e‐learning in developing countries: A critical review of research challenges.” The electronic Journal of information systems in developing Countries 38, no. 1: 1–16.
  • Asoodar, Maryam, Shahin Vaezi, and Balal Izanloo. 2016. “Framework to Improve E-Learner Satisfaction and Further Strengthen E-Learning Implementation.” Computers in Human Behavior 63: 704–716. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.060.
  • Baabdullah, Abdullah, Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi, and Michael D. Williams. 2014. Adopting An Extended UTAUT2 To Predict Consumer Adoption OfM-Technologies In Saudi Arabia UK Academy for Information Systems Conference Proceedings 2014. 5. http://aisel.aisnet.org/ukais2014/5.
  • Baganzi, R., and A.K. Lau. 2017. “Examining Trust and Risk in Mobile Money Acceptance in Uganda.” Sustainability 9 (12): 2233. doi:10.3390/su9122233.
  • Baptista, Gonçalo, and Tiago Oliveira. 2015. “Understanding Mobile Banking: The Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology Combined with Cultural Moderators.” Computers in Human Behavior 50: 418–430. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.024.
  • Bharati, V. Jayendra, and R. Srikanth. 2018. “Modified UTAUT2 Model for M-Learning among Students in India.” International Journal of Learning and Change 10 (1): 5–20. doi:10.1504/IJLC.2018.089532.
  • Blaine, Andrew M. 2019. “Interaction and Presence in the Virtual Classroom: An Analysis of the Perceptions of Students and Teachers in Online and Blended Advanced Placement Courses.” Computers & Education 132: 31–43. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.01.004.
  • Boateng, Richard, Alfred Sekyere Mbrokoh, Lovia Boateng, Prince Kwame Senyo, and Eric Ansong. 2016. “Determinants of E-Learning Adoption among Students of Developing Countries.” The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology 33: 248–262. doi:10.1108/IJILT-02-2016-0008.
  • Bøe, Tove, Kåre Sandvik, and Boge Gulbrandsen. 2021. “Continued Use of E-Learning Technology in Higher Education: A Managerial Perspective.” Studies in Higher Education 46(12) : 2664–2679. doi:10.1080/03075079.2020.1754781.
  • Brown, Ann L., and Joseph C. Campione. 1996. Psychological theory and the design of innovative learning environments: On procedures, principles, and systems Schauble, L., and Glaser, R. (Eds.) Innovations in learning: New environments for education. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc, 289–325.
  • Bryman, A., and E. Bell. 2011. “Ethics in Business Research.” Business Research Methods 7 (5): 23–56.
  • Chen, Yining, Hao Lou, and Wenhong Luo. 2002. “Distance Learning Technology Adoption: A Motivation Perspective.” Journal of Computer Information Systems 42 (2): 38–43. doi:10.1080/08874417.2002.11647485.
  • Costa, Carlos J., Edgar Ferreira, Fernando Bento, and Manuela Aparicio. 2016. “Enterprise Resource Planning Adoption and Satisfaction Determinants.” Computers in Human Behavior 63: 659–671. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.090.
  • Davis, Fred D., Richard P. Bagozzi, and Paul R. Warshaw. 1989. “User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models.” Management Science 35 (8): 982–1003. doi:10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982.
  • de Luna, Iviane Ramos, Francisco Liébana-Cabanillas, Juan Sánchez-Fernández, and Francisco Muñoz-Leiva. 2019. “Mobile Payment is Not All the Same: The Adoption of Mobile Payment Systems Depending on the Technology Applied.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 146: 931–944. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2018.09.018.
  • Delone, William H., and Ephraim R. McLean. 2003. “The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update.” Journal of Management Information Systems 19 (4): 9–30. doi:10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748.
  • Diep, Nguyet A., Celine Cocquyt, Chang Zhu, Tom Vanwing, and Maurice de Greef. 2017. “Effects of Core Self-Evaluation and Online Interaction Quality on Adults’ Learning Performance and Bonding and Bridging Social Capital.” The Internet and Higher Education 34: 41–55. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.05.002.
  • Dwivedi, Yogesh K., Nripendra P. Rana, Anand Jeyaraj, Marc Clement, and Michael D. Williams. 2019. “Re-Examining the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT): Towards a Revised Theoretical Model.” Information Systems Frontiers 21 (3): 719–734. doi:10.1007/s10796-017-9774-y.
  • Dwivedi, Yogesh K., Nripendra P. Rana, Anand Jeyaraj, Marc Clement, and Michael D. Williams. 2019 ”Re-examining the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT): Towards a revised theoretical model.” Information Systems Frontiers 21, no. 3: 719–734.
  • El-Masri, Mazen, and Ali Tarhini. 2017. “Factors Affecting the Adoption of E-Learning Systems in Qatar and USA: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2 (UTAUT2).” Educational Technology Research and Development 65 (3): 743–763. doi:10.1007/s11423-016-9508-8.
  • Fishbein, Martin, and Icek Ajzen. 1975. Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading MA: Addison-Wesley .
  • Gunasinghe, Asanka, Junainah Abd Hamid, Ali Khatibi, and S.M. Ferdous Azam. 2019. “The Adequacy of UTAUT-3 in Interpreting Academician’s Adoption to E-Learning in Higher Education Environments.” Interactive Technology and Smart Education 17 (1): 86–106. doi:10.1108/ITSE-05-2019-0020.
  • Hair, Joseph F., Marko Sarstedt, Christian M. Ringle, and Siegfried P. Gudergan. 2018. Advanced Issues in Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  • Hussein, Zuhal. 2017. “Leading to Intention: The Role of Attitude in Relation to Technology Acceptance Model in E-Learning.” Procedia Computer Science 105: 159–164. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2017.01.196.
  • Joksimović, S., V. Kovanović, O. Skrypnyk, D. Gašević, S. Dawson, and G. Siemens. 2015. The History and State of Online Learning.” Preparing for the Digital University: 93–122 Siemens, G., D., Gašević, and S., Dawson (Eds.) . Preparing for the digital university: A review of the history and current state of distance, blended, and online learning: 93–122 Retrieved from. http://linkresearchlab.org/PreparingDigitalUniversity.pdf
  • Lee, Ming-Chi. 2010. “Explaining and Predicting Users’ Continuance Intention toward E-Learning: An Extension of the Expectation–Confirmation Model.” Computers & Education 54 (2): 506–516. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.002.
  • Lu, Yaobin, Long Zhang, and Bin Wang. 2009. “A Multidimensional and Hierarchical Model of Mobile Service Quality.” Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 8 (5): 228–240. doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2009.04.002.
  • Macedo, Isabel Maria. 2017. “Predicting the Acceptance and Use of Information and Communication Technology by Older Adults: An Empirical Examination of the Revised UTAUT2.” Computers in Human Behavior 75: 935–948. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.06.013.
  • Maqsood, A., J. Abbas, G. Rehman, and R. Mubeen. 2021. “The Paradigm Shift for Educational System Continuance in the Advent of COVID-19 Pandemic: Mental Health Challenges and Reflections.” Current Research in Behavioral Sciences 2: 100011. doi:10.1016/j.crbeha.2020.100011.
  • Mehta, Ashwin, Neil P. Morris, Bronwen Swinnerton, and Matt Homer. 2019. “The Influence of Values on E-Learning Adoption.” Computers & Education 141: 103617. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103617.
  • Narh, N., R. Boateng, E. Afful-Dadzie, and A. Owusu. 2019. “Virtual Platforms: Assessing the Challenges of E-Learning in Ghana.” In Twenty-Fifth Americas Conference on Information Systems, Cancun.
  • Nawaz, Samsudeen Sabraz, and Rusith Mohamed. (2020) ”Acceptance of mobile learning by higher educational institutions in Sri Lanka: an UTAUT2 approach.” Journal of Critical Reviews 7, no. 12: 1036–1049.
  • Newell, Stephen J., Joseph J. Belonax, Michael W. McCardle, and Richard E. Plank. 2011. “The Effect of Personal Relationship and Consultative Task Behaviors on Buyer Perceptions of Salesperson Trust, Expertise, and Loyalty.” Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 19 (3): 307–316. doi:10.2753/MTP1069-6679190304.
  • Ngwacho, G.A. 2021. “Virtual Teaching and Learning Paradigm Shift Implications on Access, Equity and Quality in Higher Education in Kenya.” The Cradle of Knowledge: African Journal of Educational and Social Science Research 9 (1): 8–14.
  • Ogunnaike, O.O., B. Ayeni, B. Olorunyomi, M. Olokundun, O. Ayoade, and T. Borishade. 2018. “Data Set on Interactive Service Quality in Higher Education Marketing.” Data in Brief 19: 1403–1409. doi:10.1016/j.dib.2018.05.082.
  • Pask, Gordon. 1975. The Cybernetics of Human Learning and Performance: A Guide to Theory and Research. Hutchinson: Hutchinson Educational.
  • Raza, S.A., W. Qazi, K.A. Khan, and J. Salam. 2021. “Social Isolation and Acceptance of the Learning Management System (LMS) in the Time of COVID-19 Pandemic: An Expansion of the UTAUT Model.” Journal of Educational Computing Research 59 (2): 183–208. doi:10.1177/0735633120960421.
  • Renda dos Santos, Luiz Miguel, and Shintaro Okazaki. 2016. “Planned E-Learning Adoption and Occupational Socialisation in Brazilian Higher Education.” Studies in Higher Education 41 (11): 1974–1994. doi:10.1080/03075079.2015.1007940.
  • Ringle, Christian M, Sven Wende, and Jan-Michael Becker. 2015. SmartPLS 3. Boenningstedt: SmartPLS GmbH.
  • Salloum, S.A., Ahmad Qasim Mohammad Alhamad, Mostafa Al-Emran, Azza Abdel Monem, and Khaled Shaalan. 2019. “Exploring Students’ Acceptance of E-Learning through the Development of a Comprehensive Technology Acceptance Model.” IEEE Access 7: 128445–128462. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2939467.
  • Samsudeen, S.N., and R. Mohamed. 2019. “University Students’ Intention to Use E-Learning Systems.” Interactive Technology and Smart Education 16 (3): 219–238. doi:10.1108/ITSE-11-2018-0092.
  • Senyo, P.K., and E.L. Osabutey. 2020. “Unearthing Antecedents to Financial Inclusion through FinTech Innovations.” Technovation 98: 102155. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2020.102155.
  • Sharif, Arshian, Sahar Afshan, and Muhammad Asif Qureshi. 2019. “Acceptance of Learning Management System in University Students: An Integrating Framework of Modified UTAUT2 and TTF Theories.” International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning 11 (2): 201–229. doi:10.1504/IJTEL.2019.098810.
  • Sharma, Sujeet Kumar, Ankita Joshi, and Himanshu Sharma. 2016 ”A multi-analytical approach to predict the Facebook usage in higher education.” Computers in Human Behavior 55: 340–353. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.020
  • Sultana, Jakia. 2020. “Determining the Factors that Affect the Uses of Mobile Cloud Learning (MCL) Platform Blackboard-A Modification of the UTAUT Model.” Education and Information Technologies 25 (1): 223–238. doi:10.1007/s10639-019-09969-1.
  • Taghizadeh, Mahboubeh, and Fatemeh Hajhosseini. 2021. “Investigating a Blended Learning Environment: Contribution of Attitude, Interaction, and Quality of Teaching to Satisfaction of Graduate Students of TEFL.” The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 30(5) : 1–11 doi:10.1007/s40299-020-00531-z.
  • Tamilmani, Kuttimani, Nripendra P. Rana, and Yogesh K. Dwivedi. 2021. “Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: A Meta-Analytic Evaluation of UTAUT2.” Information Systems Frontiers 23(4) : 1–19 doi:10.1007/s10796-020-10007-6.
  • Tandon, Urvashi, Ravi Kiran, and Ash N. Sah. 2016. “Understanding Online Shopping Adoption in India: Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2 (UTAUT2) with Perceived Risk Application.” Service Science 8 (4): 420–437. doi:10.1287/serv.2016.0154.
  • Tarhini, Ali, Kamla Ali Al-Busaidi, Ashraf Bany Mohammed, and Mahmoud Maqableh. 2017. “Factors Influencing Students’ Adoption of E-Learning: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach.” Journal of International Education in Business 10: 164–182. doi:10.1108/JIEB-09-2016-0032.
  • Thongsri, Nattaporn, Liang Shen, Yukun Bao, and Ibraheem Mubarak Alharbi. 2018. “Integrating UTAUT and UGT to Explain Behavioural Intention to Use M-Learning.” Journal of Systems and Information Technology 20: 278–297. doi:10.1108/JSIT-11-2017-0107.
  • Thusi, Philile, and Daniel K. Maduku. 2020. “South African Millennials’ Acceptance and Use of Retail Mobile Banking Apps: An Integrated Perspective.” Computers in Human Behavior 111: 106405. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2020.106405.
  • Venkatesh, Viswanath, Michael G. Morris, Gordon B. Davis, and Fred D. Davis. 2003. “User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View.” MIS Quarterly 27: 425–478. doi:10.2307/30036540.
  • Venkatesh, Viswanath, James Y.L. Thong, Frank K.Y. Chan, and Paul J.H. Hu. 2016. “Managing Citizens’ Uncertainty in E-Government Services: The Mediating and Moderating Roles of Transparency and Trust.” Information Systems Research 27 (1): 87–111. doi:10.1287/isre.2015.0612.
  • Venkatesh, Viswanath, James Y.L. Thong, and Xin Xu. 2012. “Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology.” MIS Quarterly 36: 157–178. doi:10.2307/41410412.
  • Wang, Yi-Shun, and Yi-Wen Liao. 2008. “Assessing EGovernment Systems Success: A Validation of the DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success.” Government Information Quarterly 25 (4): 717–733. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2007.06.002.
  • Yakubu, M Nasiru, and Salihu Ibrahim Dasuki. 2019. “Factors Affecting the Adoption of E-Learning Technologies among Higher Education Students in Nigeria: A Structural Equation Modelling Approach.” Information Development 35 (3): 492–502. doi:10.1177/0266666918765907.
  • Zeufack, Albert G., Cesar Calderon, Gerard Kambou, Calvin Z. Djiofack, Megumi Kubota, Vijdan Korman, and Catalina Cantu Canales. 2020. Africa’s Pulse, No. 21, Spring 2020: An Analysis of Issues Shaping Africa’s Economic Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. © World Bank. License: CC BY 3.0 IGO. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/33541
  • Zheng, F., N.A. Khan, and S. Hussain. 2021. “The COVID 19 Pandemic and Digital Higher Education: Exploring the Impact of Proactive Personality on Social Capital through Internet Self-Efficacy and Online Interaction Quality.” Children and Youth Services Review 119: 105694. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105694.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.