133
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

An exploration of hybrid instruction intentions amongst higher education teachers in post-Covid-19 times

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 344-358 | Received 27 Nov 2022, Accepted 28 Feb 2024, Published online: 30 Apr 2024

References

  • Ajzen, I. 1991. “The Theory of Planned Behaviour.” Organisational Behaviour & Human Decision Processes 50 (2): 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.
  • Al-Azawei, A., and A. Alowayr. 2020. “Predicting the Intention to Use and Hedonic Motivation for Mobile Learning: A Comparative Study in Two Middle Eastern Countries.” Technology in Society 62: 101325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101325.
  • Álvarez-Marín, A., J. Á. Velázquez-Iturbide, and M. Castillo-Vergara. 2021. “The Acceptance of Augmented Reality in Engineering Education: The Role of Technology Optimism and Technology Innovativeness.” Interactive Learning Environments 31 (6): 3409–3421. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1928710.
  • Anderson, J. C., and D. W. Gerbing, 1988. “Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach.” Psychological Bulletin 103 (3): 411–423.
  • Anthony, B., A. Kamaludin, and A. Romli. 2021. “Predicting Academic Staffs Behaviour Intention and Actual Use of Blended Learning in Higher Education: Model Development and Validation.” Technology, Knowledge & Learning 28 (3): 1223–1269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-021-09579-2.
  • Azizi, S. M., N. Roozbahani, and A. Khatony. 2020. “Factors Affecting the Acceptance of Blended Learning in Medical Education: Application of UTAUT2 Model.” BMC Medical Education 20 (1): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02302-2.
  • Black, W. C., B. J. Babin, and R. E. Anderson. 2010. Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Perspective. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
  • Bustamante, J. C., M. Segura-Berges, M. Lizalde-Gil, and C. Peñarrubia-Lozano. 2022. “Qualitative Analyses of E-Learning Implementation and Hybrid Teaching During the COVID-19 Pandemic at Spanish Universities.” Sustainability 14 (19): 12003. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912003.
  • Byrne, B. M. 1994. “Testing for the Factorial Validity, Replication, and Invariance of a Measuring Instrument: A Paradigmatic Application Based on the Maslach Burnout Inventory.” Multivariate Behavioural Research 29 (3): 289–311. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr2903_5.
  • Chao, C.-M. 2019. “Factors Determining the Behavioural Intention to Use Mobile Learning: An Application and Extension of the UTAUT Model.” Frontiers in Psychology 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01652.
  • Chen, B. H., and H. H. Chiou. 2014. “Learning Style, Sense of Community and Learning Effectiveness in Hybrid Learning Environment.” Interactive Learning Environments 22 (4): 485–496. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2012.680971.
  • Cohen, A., R. T. Nørgård, and M. Mor. 2020. “Hybrid Learning Spaces – Design, Data, Didactics.” British Journal of Educational Technology 51 (4): 1039–1044. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12964.
  • Daim, T. U., A. Ha, S. Reutiman, B. Hughes, U. Pathak, W. Bynum, and A. Bhatla. 2012. “Exploring the Communication Breakdown in Global Virtual Teams.” International Journal of Project Management 30 (2): 199–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.06.004.
  • Dhir, S. K., D. Verma, M. Batta, and D. Mishra. 2017. “E-Learning in Medical Education in India.” Indian Pediatrics 54 (10): 871–877. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-017-1152-9.
  • Dutton, W. H., P. H. Cheong, and N. Park. 2004. “An Ecology of Constraints on E‐Learning in Higher Education: The Case of a Virtual Learning Environment.” Prometheus 22 (2): 131–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/0810902042000218337.
  • Dwivedi, Y. K., N. P. Rana, A. Jeyaraj, M. Clement, and M. D. Williams. 2019. “Re-Examining the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT): Towards a Revised Theoretical Model.” Information Systems Frontiers 21 (3): 719–734. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-017-9774-y.
  • Dwivedi, Y. K., N. P. Rana, K. Tamilmani, and R. Raman. 2020. “A Meta-Analysis Based Modified Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (Meta-UTAUT): A Review of Emerging Literature.” Current Opinion in Psychology 36: 13–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.03.008.
  • El-Masri, M., and A. Tarhini. 2017. “Factors Affecting the Adoption of E-Learning Systems in Qatar and USA: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2 (UTAUT2).” Educational Technology Research & Development 65 (3): 743–763. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9508-8.
  • Evans, J. R., and A. Mathur. 2005. “The Value of Online Surveys.” Internet Research 15 (2): 195–219. https://doi.org/10.1108/10662240510590360.
  • Faqih, K. M., and M.-I. R. M. Jaradat. 2021. “Integrating TTF and UTAUT2 Theories to Investigate the Adoption of Augmented Reality Technology in Education: Perspective from a Developing Country.” Technology in Society 67: 101787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101787.
  • Fornell, C., and D. F. Larcker. 1981. “Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics.” Journal of Marketing Research XVIII (3): 382–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800313.
  • Gruzd, A., K. Staves, and A. Wilk. 2012. “Connected Scholars: Examining the Role of Social Media in Research Practices of Faculty Using the UTAUT Model.” Computers in Human Behaviour 28 (6): 2340–2350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.07.004.
  • Hu, S., K. Laxman, and K. Lee. 2020. “Exploring Factors Affecting academics’ Adoption of Emerging Mobile Technologies-An Extended UTAUT Perspective.” Education and Information Technologies 25 (5): 4615–4635. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10171-x.
  • Ibrahim, R., N. Leng, R. Yusoff, G. Samy, S. Masrom, and Z. Rizman. 2017. “E-Learning Acceptance Based on Technology Acceptance Model (TAM).” Journal of Fundamental & Applied Sciences 9 (4S): 871–889. https://doi.org/10.4314/jfas.v9i4S.50.
  • Iglesias-Pradas, S., Á. Hernández-García, J. Chaparro-Peláez, and J. L. Prieto. 2021. “Emergency Remote Teaching and students’ Academic Performance in Higher Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Case Study.” Computers in Human Behaviour 119: 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106713.
  • Khechine, H., B. Raymond, and M. Augier. 2020. “The Adoption of a Social Learning System: Intrinsic Value in the UTAUT Model.” British Journal of Educational Technology 51 (6): 2306–2325. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12905.
  • Kosiba, J. P. B., R. Odoom, H. Boateng, K. K. Twum, and I. K. Abdul-Hamid. 2022. “Examining students’ Satisfaction with Online Learning During the COVID-19 Pandemic-An Extended UTAUT2 Approach.” Journal of Further and Higher Education 46 (7): 988–1005. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2022.2030687.
  • Lambert, C. G., and A. E. Rennie. 2021. “Experiences from COVID-19 and Emergency Remote Teaching for Entrepreneurship Education in Engineering Programmes.” Education Sciences 11 (6): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11060282.
  • Lefever, S., M. Dal, and Á. Matthíasdóttir. 2007. “Online Data Collection in Academic Research: Advantages and Limitations.” British Journal of Educational Technology 38 (4): 574–582. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00638.x.
  • Lemay, D., T. Doleck, and P. Bazelais. 2021. “Transition to Online Teaching During the COVID-19 Pandemic.” Interactive Learning Environments 4: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2021.100130.
  • Linder, K. E. 2017. “Fundamentals of Hybrid Teaching and Learning.” In Hybrid Teaching and Learning: New Directions for Teaching and Learning, edited by L. K. E, 11–18. Vol. 2017. USA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Liu, Q., W. Peng, F. Zhang, R. Hu, Y. Li, and W. Yan. 2016. “The Effectiveness of Blended Learning in Health Professions: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” Journal of Medical Internet Research 18 (1): e4807. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4807.
  • Masalimova, A. R., E. L. Ryazanova, L. I. Tararina, E. G. Sokolova, Y. B. Ikrennikova, S. V. Efimushkina, and T. I. Shulga. 2021. “Distance Learning Hybrid Format for University Students in Post-Pandemic Perspective: Collaborative Technologies Aspect.” Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences 16 (1): 389–395. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v16i1.5536.
  • Mittal, A., A. Mantri, U. Tandon, and Y. K. Dwivedi. 2022. “A Unified Perspective on the Adoption of Online Teaching in Higher Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic.” Information Discovery and Delivery 50 (2): 117–132. https://doi.org/10.1108/IDD-09-2020-0114.
  • Ndzinisa, N., and R. Dlamini. 2022. “Responsiveness Vs. Accessibility: Pandemic-Driven Shift to Remote Teaching and Online Learning.” Higher Education Research & Development 41 (7): 2262–2277. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2021.2019199.
  • Nichols, M. 2008. “Institutional Perspectives: The Challenges of E‐Learning Diffusion.” British Journal of Educational Technology 39 (4): 598–609. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00761.x.
  • Ninnemann, K., B. Liedtke, A. den Heijer, K. Gothe, C. Loidl-Reisch, S. Nenonen, and C. Wallenborg. 2020. Hybrid Environments for Universities. Münster: Waxmann Verlag.
  • Nørgård, R. T., and C. Hilli. 2022. “Hyper-Hybrid Learning Spaces in Higher Education.” In Hybrid Learning Spaces, edited by E. Gil, Y. Mor, Y. Dimitriadis, and C. Koppe, 25–41, Cham: Springer.
  • Park, M. J., H. Choi, S. K. Kim, and J. J. Rho. 2015. “Trust in government’s Social Media Service and citizen’s Patronage Behaviour.” Telematics and Informatics 32 (4): 629–641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2015.02.006.
  • Pynoo, B., P. Devolder, J. Tondeur, J. Van Braak, W. Duyck, and P. Duyck. 2011. “Predicting Secondary School teachers’ Acceptance and Use of a Digital Learning Environment: A Cross-Sectional Study.” Computers in Human Behaviour 27 (1): 568–575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.10.005.
  • Raes, A. 2022. “Exploring Student and Teacher Experiences in Hybrid Learning Environments: Does Presence Matter?” Postdigital Science and Education 4 (1): 138–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-021-00274-0.
  • Raes, A., L. Detienne, I. Windey, and F. Depaepe. 2020. “A Systematic Literature Review on Synchronous Hybrid Learning: Gaps Identified.” Learning Environments Research 23 (3): 269–290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-019-09303-z.
  • Raman, A., and R. Thannimalai. 2021. “Factors Impacting the Behavioural Intention to Use E-Learning at Higher Education Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic: UTAUT2 Model.” Psychological Science and Education 26 (3): 82–93. https://doi.org/10.17759/pse.2021260305.
  • Rauniar, R., G. Rawski, J. Yang, and B. Johnson. 2014. “Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and Social Media Usage: An Empirical Study on Facebook.” Journal of Enterprise Information Management 27 (1): 6–30. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-04-2012-0011.
  • Raza, S. A., W. Qazi, K. A. Khan, and J. Salam. 2021. “Social Isolation and Acceptance of the Learning Management System (LMS) in the Time of COVID-19 Pandemic: An Expansion of the UTAUT Model.” Journal of Educational Computing Research 59 (2): 183–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633120960421.
  • Selwyn, N. 2016. Is Technology Good for Education?. Cambridge: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Singh, J., K. Steele, and L. Singh. 2021. “Combining the Best of Online and Face-To-Face Learning: Hybrid and Blended Learning Approach for COVID-19, Post Vaccine and Post-Pandemic World.” Journal of Educational Technology Systems 50 (2): 140–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472395211047865.
  • Solihati, N., and H. Mulyono. 2017. “A Hybrid Classroom Instruction in Second Language Teacher Education (SLTE): A Critical Reflection of Teacher Educators.” International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET) 12 (5): 169–180. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v12i05.6989.
  • Swan, G. 2009. “Information Systems in Teacher Preparation Programs: What Can We Learn from a 5-Year Longitudinal Case Study of an Electronic Portfolio Database?” Journal of Educational Computing Research 41 (4): 431–451. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.41.4.c.
  • Tamilmani, K., N. P. Rana, S. F. Wamba, and R. Dwivedi. 2021. “The Extended Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT2): A Systematic Literature Review and Theory Evaluation.” International Journal of Information Management 57: 102269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102269.
  • Tandon, U. 2021. “Factors Influencing Adoption of Online Teaching by School Teachers: A Study During COVID‐19 Pandemic.” Journal of Public Affairs 21 (4): e2503. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2503.
  • Tandon, U., and R. Kiran. 2019. “Factors Impacting Customer Satisfaction: An Empirical Investigation into Online Shopping in India.” Journal of Information Technology Case & Application Research 21 (1): 13–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228053.2019.1609779.
  • Tarhini, A., T. Teo, and T. Tarhini. 2016. “A Cross-Cultural Validity of the E-Learning Acceptance Measure (ElAM) in Lebanon and England: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis.” Education and Information Technologies 21 (5): 1269–1282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9381-9.
  • Turnbull, D., R. Chugh, and J. Luck. 2021. “Transitioning to E-Learning During the COVID-19 Pandemic: How Have Higher Education Institutions Responded to the Challenge?” Education and Information Technologies 26 (5): 6401–6419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10633-w.
  • Ulla, M. B., and W. F. Perales. 2022. “Hybrid Teaching: Conceptualization Through Practice for the Post COVID-19 Pandemic Education.” Frontiers in Education 7: 924594. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.924594.
  • UNESCO. (2020). Covid-19 Impact on Education. https://en.unesco.org/covid19/educationresponse.
  • Venkatesh, V. 2021. “Adoption and Use of AI Tools: A Research Agenda Grounded in UTAUT.” Annals of Operations Research 308 (1–2): 641–652. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03918-9.
  • Venkatesh, V., M. G. Morris, G. B. Davis, and F. D. Davis. 2003. “User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View.” MIS Quarterly 27 (3): 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540.
  • Venkatesh, V., J. Y. Thong, and X. Xu. 2012. “Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology.” MIS Quarterly 36 (1): 157–178. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412.
  • Weilage, C., and E. Stumpfegger. 2022. “Technology Acceptance by University Lecturers: A Reflection on the Future of Online and Hybrid Teaching.” On the Horizon: The International Journal of Learning Futures 30 (2): 112–121. https://doi.org/10.1108/OTH-09-2021-0110.
  • Williams, M. D., N. P. Rana, and Y. K. Dwivedi. 2015. “The Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT): A Literature Review.” Journal of Enterprise Information Management 28 (3): 443–488. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-09-2014-0088.
  • Wong, G. K. 2016. “The Behavioural Intentions of Hong Kong Primary Teachers in Adopting Educational Technology.” Educational Technology Research & Development 64 (2): 313–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9426-9.
  • Xie, J., and M. F. Rice. 2021. “Instructional designers’ Roles in Emergency Remote Teaching During COVID-19.” Distance Education 42 (1): 70–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2020.1869526.
  • Zhao, L., J. Yin, and Y. Song. 2016. “An Exploration of Rumor Combating Behaviour on Social Media in the Context of Social Crises.” Computers in Human Behaviour 58: 25–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.054.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.