Preparing Manuscripts that Report Qualitative Research: Avoiding Common Pitfalls and Illegitimate Questions

References

• Alston, M., & Bowles, W. (2012). Research for social workers: An introduction to methods (3rd ed.). Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Anfara, V. A., Jr, & Mertz, N. T. (Eds.). (2006). Theoretical frameworks in qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Journal of Social Issues. (2011). Guidelines for the use of qualitative research material. Retrieved 25 January 2015, from http://www.aspa.org.au/publications/ajsi-qual-guidelines.html
   Google Scholar
• Becker, H. (1986). Writing for the social sciences: How to start and finish your thesis, book, or article. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bigby, C., Clement, T., Mansell, J., & Beadle-Brown, J. (2009). “It's pretty hard with our ones, they can’t talk, the more able bodied can participate”: Staff attitudes about the applicability of disability policies to people with severe and profound intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 53, 363–376. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2788.2009.01154.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigby, C., & Frawley, P. (2010). Reflections on doing inclusive research in the “Making Life Good in the Community” study in Australia. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 35(2), 53–61. doi:10.3109/13668251003716425
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigby, C., Webber, R., & Bowers, B. (2014). Sibling roles in the lives of older group home residents with intellectual disability: Working with staff to safeguard wellbeing. Australian Social Work. Advanced online publication.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birks, M., & Mills, J. (2011). Grounded theory: A practical guide. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Craig, D. (2013). “She's been involved in everything as far as I can see”: Supporting the active participation of people with intellectual disabilities in community groups ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation, La Trobe University, Bundoora, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Craig, D., & Bigby, C. (2015a). “She's been involved in everything as far as I can see”: Supporting the active participation of people with intellectual disabilities in community groups. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 40(1), 12–25. doi:10.3109/13668250.2014.977235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig, D., & Bigby, C. (2015b). Critical realism in social work research: Examining participation of people with intellectual disability. Australian Social Work, 68(3), 309–323. doi:10.1080/0312407X.2015.1024268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. (2013). 10 questions to help you make sense of qualitative research. Qualitative Research Checklist. Retrieved 25 January 2015, from http://www.caspinternational.org/mod_product/uploads/CASP%20Qualitative%20Research%20Checklist%2031.05.13.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. Sydney, NSW: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2011). The Sage handbook of qualitative research (4th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Guba, E., & Lincoln, Y. (2005). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions and emerging confluences. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 191–216). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hartmann, A. (1990). Editorial: Many ways of knowing. Social Work, 35(1), 3–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Letts, L., Wilkins, S., Law, M., Stewart, D., Bosch, J., & Westmorland, M. (2007). Guidelines for critical review form: Qualitative studies (Version 2.0). Qualitative Review Form Guidelines. Retrieved 25 January 2015, from http://www.srs-mcmaster.ca/Portals/20/pdf/ebp/qualguidelines_version2.0.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1986). But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. In D. D. Williams (Ed.), Naturalistic evaluation (pp. 73–84). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Orme, J., & Powell, J. (2008). Building research capacity in social work: Process and issues. British Journal of Social Work, 38, 988–1008. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcm122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padgett, D. K. (2008). Qualitative methods in social work research (vol. 36). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Two decades of developments in qualitative inquiry: A personal, experiential perspective. Qualitative Social Work, 1, 261–283. doi:10.1177/1473325002001003636
   Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sandelowski, M. (2001). Real qualitative researchers do not count: The use of numbers in qualitative research. Research in Nursing and Health, 24, 230–240. doi:10.1002/nur.1025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, G., & Lord, B. (2015). Enhancing the reporting quantitative research methods in Australian Social Work. Australian Social Work, 68(3), 377–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Social Science and Medicine. (2010). Guidelines for qualitative papers. Retrieved 25 January 2015, from http://www.journals.elsevier.com/social-science-and-medicine/policies/guidelines-for-qualitative-papers/
   Google Scholar
• Staller, K. M. (2013). Epistemological boot camp: The politics of science and what every qualitative researcher needs to know to survive in the academy. Qualitative Social Work, 12, 395–413. doi:10.1177/1473325012450483
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wendt, S., & Baker, J. (2013). Aboriginal women’s perceptions and experiences of a family violence transitional accommodation service. Australian Social Work, 66, 511–527. doi:10.1080/0312407X.2012.754915
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar