An Audit of Literature Reviews Published in Australian Social Work (2007–2017)

References

• Abdelkerim, A., & Grace, M. (2012). Challenges to employment in newly emerging African communities in Australia: A review of the literature. Australian Social Work, 65(1), 104–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alston, M., & Bowles, W. (2012). Research for social workers an introduction to methods. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8, 19–32.
   Google Scholar
• Attanasio, O. P. (2014). Evidence on public policy: Methodological issues, political issues and examples. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 42, 28–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Journal of Social Issues. (2011). Guidelines for the use of qualitative research material. Retrieved from http://www.aspa.org.au/publications/ajsi-qual-guidelines.htm
   Google Scholar
• Azri, S., Larmar, S., & Cartmel, J. (2014). Social work’s role in prenatal diagnosis and genetic services: Current practice and future potential. Australian Social Work, 67(3), 348–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigby, C. (2010). Rankings, ratings, and reviews. Australian Social Work, 63, 371–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bondas, T., & Hall, E. O. (2007). Challenges in approaching metasynthesis research. Qualitative Health Research, 17(1), 113–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borrell, J., Lane, S., & Fraser, S. (2010). Integrating environmental issues into social work practice: Lessons learnt from domestic energy auditing. Australian Social Work, 63(3), 315–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brough, M., Wagner, I., & Farrell, L. (2013). Review of Australian health related social work research 1990–2009. Australian Social Work, 66(4), 528–539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, C., & Booth, A. (2015). Quality assessment of qualitative evidence for systematic review and synthesis: Is it meaningful, and if so, how should it be performed? Research Synthesis Methods, 6, 149–154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coughlan, M., & Cronin, P. (2017). Doing a literature review in nursing, health and social care. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, R., Skouteris, H., Hemmingsson, E., Fuller-Tyszkiewicz, M., & Hardy, L. L. (2016). Problematic eating and food-related behaviours and excessive weight gain: Why children in out-of-home care are at risk. Australian Social Work, 69(3), 338–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crisp, B. R. (2015). Systematic reviews: A social work perspective. Australian Social Work, 68(3), 284–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dellemain, J., & Warburton, J. (2013). Case management in rural Australia: Arguments for improved practice understandings. Australian Social Work, 66(2), 297–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon-Woods, M., Booth, A., & Sutton, A. J. (2007). Synthesizing qualitative research: A review of published reports. Qualitative Research, 7(3), 375–422.
   Google Scholar
• Downs, S. H., & Black, N. (1998). The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 52, 377–384.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fawcett, B., & Pockett, R. (2015). Turning ideas into research: Theory, design and practice. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Finfgeld-Connett, D. (2014). Use of content analysis to conduct knowledge-building and theory-generating qualitative systematic reviews. Qualitative Research, 14(3), 341–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 26, 91–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, M., Joy, E., Plath, D., & Webb, S. A. (2013). Implementing evidence-based practice: A review of the empirical literature. Research on Social Work Practice, 23, 157–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannes, K., & Macaitis, K. (2012). A move to more systematic and transparent approaches in qualitative evidence synthesis: Update on a review of published papers. Qualitative Research, 12(4), 402–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, J. P., Altman, D. G., Gøtzsche, P. C., Jüni, P., Moher, D., Oxman, A. D., … Sterne, J. A. (2011). The Cochrane collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. British Medical Journal, 343, d5928.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter, S. V. (2008). Child maltreatment in remote Aboriginal communities and the Northern Territory emergency response: A complex issue. Australian Social Work, 61(4), 372–388.
   Google Scholar
• Katrak, P., Bialocerkowski, A. E., Massy-Westropp, N., Kumar, V. S., & Grimmer, K. A. (2004). A systematic review of the content of critical appraisal tools. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 4(1), 22.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kiraly, M., & Humphreys, C. (2013). Family contact for children in kinship care: A literature review. Australian Social Work, 66(3), 358–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levac, D., Colquhoun, H., & O’Brien, K. (2010). Scoping studies: Advancing the methodology. Implementation Science, 5, 69–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, A. (2001). The Cochrane collaboration. Annals of Internal Medicine, 135, 309–312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Littell, J. H., Corcoran, J., & Pillai, V. (2008). Systematic reviews and meta-analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lockwood, C., Munn, Z., & Porritt, K. (2015). Qualitative research synthesis: Methodological guidance for systematic reviewers utilizing meta-aggregation. International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare, 13(3), 179–187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maple, M., Pearce, T., Sanford, R. L., & Cerel, J. (2017). The role of social work in suicide prevention, Intervention, and postvention: A scoping review. Australian Social Work, 70(3), 289–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCalman, J., Bridge, F., Whiteside, M., Bainbridge, R., Tsey, K., & Jongen, C. (2014). Responding to Indigenous Australian sexual assault: A systematic review of the literature. SAGE Open, 4(1), 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• McDermott, F. (2017). Celebrating 70 years and reflecting on the challenges ahead. Australian Social Work, 70(4), 387–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McPherson, L., Atkins, P., Cameron, N., Long, M., Nicholson, M., & Morris, M. E. (2016). Children’s experience of sport: What do we really know? Australian Social Work, 69(3), 348–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151(4), 264–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery, P., Grant, S., Hopewell, S., Macdonald, G., Moher, D., & Mayo-Wilson, E. (2013). Developing a reporting guideline for social and psychological intervention trials. British Journal of Social Work, 43, 1024–1038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munro, A., & Allan, J. (2011). Can family-focussed interventions improve problematic substance use in Aboriginal communities? A role for social work. Australian Social Work, 64(2), 169–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, S., & Goddard, J. (2014). Life after growing up in care: Informing policy and practice through research. Australian Social Work, 67(1), 102–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuman, W. L. (2014). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Harrow: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• O’Neal, P., Jackson, A., & McDermott, F. (2014). A review of the efficacy and effectiveness of cognitive-behaviour therapy and short-term psychodynamic therapy in the treatment of major depression: Implications for mental health social work practice. Australian Social Work, 67(2), 197–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozanne, E. (2009). Negotiating identity in late life: Diversity among Australian baby boomers. Australian Social Work, 62(2), 132–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrosino, A. (2013). Reflections on the genesis of the Campbell collaboration. The Experimental Criminologist, 8(2), 9–12.
   Google Scholar
• Pickering, C., & Byrne, J. (2014). The benefits of publishing systematic quantitative literature reviews for PhD candidates and other early-career researchers. Higher Education Research and Development, 33, 534–548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plath, D. (2006). Evidence-based practice: Current issues and future directions. Australian Social Work, 59, 56–72.
   Google Scholar
• Reed, M., & Harding, K. E. (2015). Do family meetings improve measurable outcomes for patients, carers, or health systems? A systematic review. Australian Social Work, 68(2), 244–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson, M. (2008). Suicidal ideation in the palliative care patient: Considerations for health care practice. Australian Social Work, 61(2), 150–167.
   Google Scholar
• Shea, B. J., Hamel, C., Wells, G. A., Bouter, L. M., Kristjansson, E., Grimshaw, J., … Boers, M. (2009). Amstar is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62(10), 1013–1020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shlonsky, A., Noonan, E., Littell, J. H., & Montgomery, P. (2011). The role of systematic reviews and the Campbell collaboration in the realization of evidence-informed practice. Clinical Social Work Journal, 39, 362–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, G. K., & Lord, B. (2015). Enhancing the reporting of quantitative research methods in Australian Social Work. Australian Social Work, 68, 375–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skouteris, H., McCabe, M., Fuller-Tyszkiewicz, M., Henwood, A., Limbrick, S., & Miller, R. (2011). Obesity in children in out-of-home care: A review of the literature. Australian Social Work, 64(4), 475–486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilbury, C., Walsh, P., & Osmond, J. (2016). Child aware practice in adult social services: A scoping review. Australian Social Work, 69(3), 260–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torgerson, C. (2003). Systematic reviews. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Toye, F., Seers, K., Allcock, N., Briggs, M., Carr, E., Andrews, J., & Barker, K. (2013). ‘Trying to pin down jelly’: Exploring intuitive processes in quality assessment for meta-ethnography. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 13(1), 46.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Trevor, M., & Boddy, J. (2013). Transgenderism and Australian Social Work: A literature review. Australian Social Work, 66(4), 555–570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whelan, J., & Gent, H. (2013). Viewings of deceased persons in a hospital mortuary: Critical reflection of social work practice. Australian Social Work, 66(1), 130–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willis, P. (2007). “Queer eye” for social work: Rethinking pedagogy and practice with same-sex attracted young people. Australian Social Work, 60(2), 181–196.
   Google Scholar