Changing Contexts of Practice: Challenges for Social Work and Community Development

References

• Allen, K., & O’Boyle, B. (2013). Austerity Ireland: The failure of Irish capitalism. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Council of Social Service. (2015). Community sector funding cuts. Retrieved from https://www.acoss.org.au/community-sector-funding-cuts/
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. (2018). Global education policy: Reform and profit. Revista de Estudios Teoricos y Epistemologicos en Politica Educativa, 3, 1–15. doi: 10.5212/retepe.v.3.015
   Google Scholar
• Collins, P. (2010). The new politics of community. American Sociological Review, 75(1), 7–30. doi: 10.1177/0003122410363293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Community Work Ireland. (2015). In whose interests? Exploring the impact of competitive tendering and procurement on social inclusion and community development in Ireland. Galway: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Considine, M., & Dukelow, F. (2012). From financial crisis to welfare retrenchment: Assessing the challenges to the Irish welfare state. Social Policy Review 24, Analysis and Debate in Social Policy. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cullen, B. (1994). A programme in the making: A review of the community development programme. Dublin: Combat Poverty Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Department of the Environment, Community and Local Government. (2015). SICAP programme requirements: Social inclusion and community activation programme. Dublin: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Forde, C., & Lynch, D. (2015). Social work and community development: A critical practice perspective. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Forde, C., O’Byrne, D., & Ó hAdhmaill, F. (2016). Community development in Ireland under austerity and local government change: Policy and practice. In ISS21 Local and Community Development Working Group (Eds.), Proceedings of the conference the changing landscape of local and community development in Ireland (pp. 7–14). Cork: University College Cork, Centre for Co-operative Studies and School of Applied Social Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Fung, A. (2015). Putting the public back into governance: The challenges of citizen participation and its future. Public Administration Review, 75(4), 513–522. doi: 10.1111/puar.12361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geoghegan, M., & Powell, F. (2009). Community development and the contested politics of the late modern agora: Of, alongside or against neoliberalism? Community Development Journal, 44(4), 430–447. doi: 10.1093/cdj/bsn020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilchrist, A. (2009). The well-connected community: A networking approach to community development (2nd ed.). Bristol, UK: The Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, J., O’Connor, R., Power, C., & Brady, W. (2016). New structures for local government in Ireland: Evaluating the impact on community participation in the planning process. In ISS21 Local and Community Development Working Group (Eds.), Proceedings of the conference the changing landscape of local and community development in Ireland (pp. 45–63). Cork: University College Cork, Centre for Co-operative Studies and School of Applied Social Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, B. (2016). Local and community development in Ireland: An overview. In ISS21 Local and Community Development Working Group (Eds.), Proceedings of the conference the changing landscape of local and community development in Ireland (pp. 7–14). Cork: University College Cork, Centre for Co-operative Studies and School of Applied Social Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Hearne, R. (2017, June 7). Why government response to housing crisis has failed. The Irish Times.
   Google Scholar
• Ife, J. (2016). Community development in an uncertain world: Vision, analysis and practice (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Independent Commission Against Corruption [ICAC]. (2012). Funding NGO delivery of human services in NSW: A period of transition. Sydney, NSW: Author.
   Google Scholar
• International Association of Schools of Social Work (IASSW), International Council on Social Welfare (ICSW), & the International Federation of Social Workers (IFSW). (2018). Global Agenda for Social Work and Social Development: 3rd Report. Promoting Community and Environmental Sustainability. Rheinfelden: International Federation of Social Workers. Retrieved from http://www.iassw-aiets.org/wp/content/uploads/2018/07/Global-Agenda-3rd-Report-PDF.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, A., & Westoby, P. (2018). Participatory development practice: Using traditional and contemporary frameworks. Warwickshire: Practical Action.
   Google Scholar
• Meade, R., Shaw, M., & Banks, S. (2016). Politics, power and community development: An introductory essay. In R. Meade, M. Shaw, & S. Banks (Eds.), Politics, power and community development (pp. 1–20). Bristol, UK: Policy Press Scholarship Online.
   Google Scholar
• Munoz Arce, G., & Pantazis, C. (2019). Social exclusion, neoliberalism and resistance: The role of social workers in implementing social policies in Chile. Critical Social Policy, 39(1), 127–146. doi: 10.1177/0261018318766509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neville, P. (2016). Organised voluntarism in Ireland. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 27(2), 724–745. doi: 10.1007/s11266-015-9668-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Byrne, D. (2012). Investigating the de-politicisation of community development: What happened? Where do we go now? In A. Jackson & C. O’Doherty (Eds.), Community development in Ireland: Theory, policy and practice (pp. 14–35). Dublin: Gill and Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor, N., & Ketola, M. (2018). Enabling citizens: Powering civil society. Active citizenship supported by a thriving, independent community, voluntary and charity sector. Dublin: The Wheel.
   Google Scholar
• Pawar, M. (2019). Social work and social policy practice: Imperatives for political engagement. The International Journal of Community and Social Development, 1(1), 15–27. doi: 10.1177/2516602619833219
   Google Scholar
• Queensland Council of Social Service. (2019). Place-based approaches. Retrieved from https://www.qcoss.org.au/our-work/place-based-approaches
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, M. (2008). Community development and the politics of community. Community Development Journal, 43(1), 24–36. doi: 10.1093/cdj/bsl035
   Google Scholar
• Shevellar, L., & Westoby, P. (2018). Wicked problems and community development: An introductory essay. In L. Shevellar & P. Westoby (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of community development research (pp. 3–19). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Working Group on Citizen Engagement with Local Government. (2014). Working group report on citizen engagement with local government. Dublin: Department of the Environment, Community and Local Government.
   Google Scholar
• Worrall, R., & O’Leary, F. (2019). Towards greater collective impact: Developing the collaborative capability of the Local Community Development Committees (LCDCs). Administration, 67(1), 73–83. doi: 10.2478/admin-2019-0009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar