The Production and Dissemination of Australian Social Work Scholarship: A Citation Analysis

References

• Asmar, C., & Page, S. (2018). Pigeonholed, peripheral or pioneering? Findings from a national study of Indigenous Australian academics in the disciplines. Studies in Higher Education, 43(9), 1679–1691. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1281240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2008). Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification 2008 (Cat. No. 1297.0).
   Google Scholar
• Australian Research Council (ARC). (2012). Excellence in Research for Australia 2012 National Report. https://www.arc.gov.au/excellence-research-australia
   Google Scholar
• Australian Research Council (ARC). (2015). State of Australian University research 2015–16: Volume 1 ERA National Report. https://www.arc.gov.au/excellence-research-australia
   Google Scholar
• Australian Research Council (ARC). (2018). State of Australian University research 2018–19: ERA national report. https://www.arc.gov.au/excellence-research-australia
   Google Scholar
• Barner, J. R., Holosko, M. J., & Thyer, B. A. (2013). American social work and psychology faculty members’ scholarly productivity: A controlled comparison of citation impact using the H-Index. British Journal of Social Work, 44(8), 2448–2458. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bct161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornmann, L., & Hans-Dieter, D. (2008). What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behaviour. Journal of Documentation, 64(1), 45–80. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410810844150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauléa, P., & Maystreb, N. (2011). Getting cited: Does open access help? Research Policy, 40(10), 1332–1338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.05.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hicks, D. (1999). The difficulty of achieving full coverage of international social science literature and the bibliometric consequences. Scientometrics, 44(2), 193–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02457380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hicks, D., Wouters, P., Waltman, L., de Rijcke, S., & Rafols, I. (2015). The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics. Nature, 520(7548), 429–431. https://doi.org/10.1038/520429a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(46), 16569–16572. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodge, D., Lacasse, J., & Benson, O. (2012). Influential publications in social work discourse: The 100 most highly cited articles in disciplinary journals 2008–09. British Journal of Social Work, 42(4), 765–782. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcr093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreisberg, N., & Marsh, J. C. (2016). Social work knowledge production and utilisation: An international comparison. British Journal of Social Work, 46(3), 599–618. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcu147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacasse, J. R., Hodge, D. R., & Bean, K. F. (2011). Evaluating the productivity of social work scholars using the h-index. Research on Social Work Practice, 21(5), 599–607. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731511405069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasda Bergman, E. M. (2012). Finding citations to social work literature: The relative benefits of using Web of Science, Scopus, or Google Scholar. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 38(6), 370–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2012.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marson, S. M. (2020). Editorial: Is the impact factor (IF) ethical to use for promotion and tenure decisions? Journal of Social Work Values and Ethics, 17(1), 2–5.
   Google Scholar
• Nederhof, A. J. (2006). Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the social sciences and the humanities: A review. Scientometrics, 66(1), 81–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0007-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, M. (2016). Citation classics in social policy journals. Social Policy & Administration, 50(6), 648–672. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puckett, T. (2003). Australia's leading social work authors. Australian Social Work, 56(3), 267–274. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0312-407x.2003.00074.x
   Google Scholar
• Slater, T., Scourfield, J., & Sloan, L. (2012). Who is citing whom in social work? A response to Hodge, Lacasse and Benson. British Journal of Social Work, 42(8), 1626–1633. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcs190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staller, K. M. (2017). Accountability metrics, politics, and qualitative inquiry: Demystifying bibliometrics. Qualitative Social Work: Research and Practice, 16(4), 437–445. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325017713881
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thyer, B. A., Smith, T. E., Osteen, P., & Carter, T. (2019). The 100 most influential contemporary social work faculty as assessed by the H-index. Journal of Social Service Research, 45(5), 696–600. https://doi.org/10.1080/01488376.2018.1501793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilbury, C. (2016). Repositioning prevention using performance indicators. Policy Studies, 37(6), 583–596. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2015.1110236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilbury, C., Hughes, M., Bigby, C., Fisher, M., & Vogel, L. (2017). A comparative study of Australian social work research. The British Journal of Social Work, 47(8), 2217–2237. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcw135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Victor, B. G., Hodge, D. R., Perron, B. E., Vaughn, M. G., & Salas-Wright, C. P. (2017). The rise of co-authorship in social work scholarship: A longitudinal study of collaboration and article quality 1989–2013. British Journal of Social Work, 47(8), 2201–2216. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcw059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilsdon, J., Allen, L., Belfiore, E., Campbell, P., Curry, S., Hill, S., Jones, R., Kain, R., Kerridge, S., Thelwall, M., Tinkler, J., Viney, I., Wouters, P., Hill, J., & Johnson, B. (2015). The Metric Tide: Report of the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4929.1363
   Google Scholar