Service Users in Social Work Student Supervision: A Scoping Review

References

• Anghel, R., & Ramon, S. (2009). Service users and carers’ involvement in social work education: Lessons from an English case study. European Journal of Social Work, 12(2), 185–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691450802567416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arksey, H., & O'Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
   Google Scholar
• Australian Association of Social Workers. (2020a). Australian social work education and accreditation standards. https://www.aasw.asn.au/document/item/12845
   Google Scholar
• Australian Association of Social Workers. (2020b). Code of ethics. https://www.aasw.asn.au/document/item/1201
   Google Scholar
• Beddoe, L., & Davys, A. (2016). Challenges in professional supervision: Current themes and models for practice. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Beresford, P. (2002). User involvement in research and evaluation: Liberation or regulation? Social Policy and Society, 1(2), 95–105. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746402000222
   Google Scholar
• Bogo, M. (2015). Field education for clinical social work practice: Best practices and contemporary challenges. Clinical Social Work Journal, 43(3), 317–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-015-0526-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charles, G., Alexander, C., & Oliver, C. (2014). Overcoming isolation: Making the case for the development of blended service learning and social work interprofessional field education experiences to improve university-community engagement. Currents, 13(1), 1–17. https://search.proquest.com/docview/1667324823?accountid=10382
   Google Scholar
• Cornish, S., & White, J. (2014). Innovation in practice learning: Messages from the review of a student-centred unit. Practice, 26(3), 181–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/09503153.2014.914161
   Google Scholar
• Cornwall, A. (2008). Unpacking ‘participation': Models, meanings and practices. Community Development Journal, 43(3), 269–283. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsn010
   Google Scholar
• Crisp, B. R., Lister, P. G., & Dutton, K. (2006). Not just social work academics: The involvement of others in the assessment of social work students. Social Work Education, 25(7), 723–734. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615470600905952
   Google Scholar
• Davis, A., & Reber, D. (2016). Advancing human rights and social and economic justice: Developing competence in field education. Journal of Human Rights and Social Work, 1(3), 143–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41134-016-0016-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daya, I., Hamilton, B., & Roper, C. (2020). Authentic engagement: A conceptual model for welcoming diverse and challenging consumer and survivor views in mental health research, policy, and practice. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 29(2), 299–311. https://doi.org/10.1111/inm.12653
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Health. (2002). Requirement for social work training. https://www.scie.org.uk/publications/guides/guide04/files/requirements-for-social-work-training.pdf?res=true
   Google Scholar
• Duffy, J., Das, C., & Davidson, G. (2013). Service user and carer involvement in role-plays to assess readiness for practice. Social Work Education, 32(1), 39–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2011.639066
   Google Scholar
• Gregory, M., & Holloway, M. (2005). Language and the shaping of social work. British Journal of Social Work, 35(1), 37–53. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bch161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Happell, B., Scholz, B., Gordon, S., Bocking, J., Ellis, P., Roper, C., Liggins, J., & Platania-Phung, C. (2018). “I don't think we've quite got there yet”: The experience of allyship for mental health consumer researchers. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 25(8), 453–462. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpm.12476
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, M. (2017). What difference does it make? Findings of an impact study of service user and carer involvement on social work students’ subsequent practice. Social Work Education: Service Users in Social Work Education – Part 2, 36(2), 203–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2016.1274725
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IAP2 Federation. (2014). Public participation spectrum. https://www.iap2.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/IAP2_Public_Participation_Spectrum.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Leonard, K., Yates, J., Nanhoo, F., McLeish, S., Little, J., St Louis, R., & Stewart, W. (2015). Speed mentoring in teaching and learning: Young people with experience of the care system mentor social work students. Social Work Education, 34(6), 666–681. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2015.1040385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levac, D., Colquhoun, H., & O'Brien, K. (2010). Scoping studies: Advancing the methodology. Implementation Science, 5(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-69
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, E. (2004). Involving service users and carers in social work education. Social Care Institute of Excellence.
   Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, H. (2009). What's in a name: ‘client’, ‘patient’, ‘customer’, ‘consumer’, ‘expert by experience’, ‘service user'—what's next? British Journal of Social Work, 39(6), 1101–1117. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcm155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morley, L., & Ife, J. (2002). Social work and a love of humanity. Australian Social Work, 55(1), 69–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/03124070208411673
   Google Scholar
• Neden, J., Townsend, R., & Zuchowski, I. (2018). Towards sustainability in Australian social work field education. Australian Social Work, 71(3), 345–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/0312407X.2018.1465576
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearl, R., Williams, H., Williams, L., Brown, K., Brown, B., Hollington, L., Gruffydd, M., Jones, R., Yorke, S., & Statham, G. (2018). Service user and carer feedback: Simply pass/fail or a genuine learning tool? Social Work Education, 37(5), 553–564. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2017.1420768
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reamer, F. (2012). Essential ethics education in social work field instruction. Field Educator, 2(2), https://search.proquest.com/docview/1609362916?accountid=10382
   Google Scholar
• Rebeiro Gruhl, K. L., Lacarte, S., & Calixte, S. (2016). Authentic peer support work: Challenges and opportunities for an evolving occupation. Journal of Mental Health, 25(1), 78–86. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638237.2015.1057322
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rehn, M., & Kalman, H. (2018). Social work students’ reflections on challenges during field education. Journal of Social Work, 18(4), 451–467. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017316654362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridley, S., Martin, R., & Mahboub, L. (2017). Learning from mental health lived experience and the influence on students’ practice. Australian Social Work, 70(3), 372–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/0312407X.2016.1235718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roper, C., Grey, F., & Cadogan, E. (2018). Co-production: Putting principles into practice in mental health contexts. Victorian Mental Health Interprofessional Leadership Network. https://www.vmhiln.org.au/news/2018/10/31/co-production-resource
   Google Scholar
• Skilton, C. J. (2011). Involving experts by experience in assessing students’ readiness to practise: The value of experiential learning in student reflection and preparation for practice. Social Work Education, 30(3), 299–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2010.482982
   Google Scholar
• Skoura-Kirk, E., Backhouse, B., Bennison, G., Cecil, B., Keeler, J., Talbot, D., & Watch, L. (2013). Mark my words! Service user and carer involvement in social work academic assessment. Social Work Education, 32(5), 560–575. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2012.690388
   Google Scholar
• Slay, J., & Stephens, L. (2013). Co-producation in mental health: A literature review. New Economics Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, D., Cleak, H., & Vreugdenhil, A. (2014). “What are they really doing?” An exploration of student learning activities in field placement. Australian Social Work, 68(4), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/0312407X.2014.960433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Social Work England. (2019). Qualifying education and training standards 2019. https://www.socialworkengland.org.uk/media/1641/socialworkengland_ed-training-standards-2019_final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sokol, R., & Fisher, E. (2016). Peer support for the hardly reached: A systematic review. American Journal of Public Health, 106(7), e1–e8. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2016.303180
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steen, J. A., Mann, M., Restivo, N., Mazany, S., & Chapple, R. (2017). Human rights: Its meaning and practice in social work field settings. Social Work, 62(1), 9–17. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/sww075
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strandberg, T., & Simpson, G. K. (2020). An audit of literature reviews published in Australian Social Work (2007-2017). Australian Social Work, 73(1), 18–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/0312407X.2019.1571619
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Surbeck, B. (2013). An ethical dilemma in field education. Field Educator, 3(1), 1–9. https://search.proquest.com/docview/1438556334?accountid=10382
   Google Scholar
• Tapp, K., Macke, C., & McLendon, T. (2012). Assessing student performance in field education. Field Educator, 2(2), 1–14. https://search.proquest.com/docview/1761686454?accountid=10382
   Google Scholar
• Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O'Brien, K. K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., Moher, D., Peters, M. D. J., Horsley, T., Weeks, L., Hempel, S., Akl, E. A., Chang, C., McGowan, J., Stewart, L., Hartling, L., Aldcroft, A., Wilson, M. G., Garritty, C., … Straus, S. E. (2018). PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(7), 467–473. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tseris, E. (2020). The expansion of the peer adviser workforce: Opportunities and challenges for social work. Australian Social Work, 73(2), 162–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/0312407X.2019.1675734
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaviršek, D., & Videmšek, P. (2009). Service users’ involvement in research and teaching: Is there a place for it in eastern European social work. Ljetopis Socijalnog Rada, 16(2), 207–222. https://doaj.org/article/3379a94561e44f5fba035d793acbcfaf
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuchowski, I. (2016). Getting to know the context: The complexities of providing off-site supervision in social work practice learning. The British Journal of Social Work, 46(2), 409–426. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcu133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar