1,806
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Addressing Women’s Psychosocial Needs Following an Adverse Prenatal Diagnosis: Qualitative Findings Inform SARF Model Development

, &
Pages 284-295 | Received 14 Mar 2022, Accepted 18 Mar 2023, Published online: 30 Apr 2023

References

  • Abeywardana, S., & Sullivan, E. (2008). Congenital anomalies in Australia 2002–2003 (Vol. 3). AIHW National Perinatal Statistics Unit.
  • Australia Association of Social Workers (AASW). (2013). AASW social work practice standards. Author.
  • Azri, S. (2017). Prenatal diagnosis and support: A study on the impact of psychosocial support and women’s wellbeing [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Brisbane: Griffith University.
  • Azri, S., Larmar, S., & Cartmel, J. (2014). Social work's role in prenatal diagnosis & genetic services: Current practice & future potential. Australian Social Work, 67(3), 348–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/0312407X.2013.848914
  • Bijma, H., Van der Heide, A., & Wildschut, H. (2007). Decision-making after ultrasound diagnosis of fetal abnormality. European Clinics in Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 3(2), 89–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11296-007-0070-0
  • Blakeley, C., Smith, D., Johnstone, E., & Wittkowski, A. (2019). Women’s lived experiences of a prenatal diagnosis of fetal growth restriction at the limits of viability. Midwifery, 76(1), 110–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2019.05.015
  • Brown, A., Nielsen, J. D. J., Russo, K., Ayers, S., & Webb, R. (2022). The journey towards resilience following a traumatic birth: A grounded theory. Midwifery, 104, 103204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2021.103204
  • Bui, T., Raymond, F., & Van den Veyver, I. (2013). Current controversies in prenatal diagnosis: Should incidental findings arising from prenatal testing always be reported to patients? Prenatal Diagnosis, 34(1), 12–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.4275
  • Carlsson, T., Bergman, G., Karlsson, A. M., Wadensten, B., & Mattsson, E. (2016). Experiences of termination of pregnancy for a fetal anomaly: A qualitative study of virtual community messages. Midwifery, 41, 54–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2016.08.001
  • Crabtree, B., & Miller, W. (2022). Doing qualitative research. Sage publications. Oxford University Press.
  • Creswell, J. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, & mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications.
  • Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Research, 5(1), 80–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690600500107
  • Gordon, L., Thornton, A., Lewis, S., Wake, S., & Sahhar, M. (2007). An evaluation of a shared experience group for women & their support persons following prenatal diagnosis & termination for a fetal abnormality. Prenatal Diagnosis, 27(9), 835–839. https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.1786
  • Graham, I., Logan, J., Harrison, M., Straus, S., & Tetroe, J. (2006). Lost in knowledge translation: Time for a map? Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 26(1), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/chp.47
  • Hardisty, E., & Vora, N. (2014). Advances in genetic prenatal diagnosis & screening. Current Opinion in Pediatrics, 26(6), 634–638. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOP.0000000000000145
  • Harvey, G., & Kitson, A. (2016). PARIHS revisited: From heuristic to integrated framework for the successful implementation of knowledge into practice. Implementation Science, 11(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-016-0398-2
  • Hawthorne, F., & Ahern, K. (2009). Holding our breath: The experiences of women contemplating nuchal translucency screening. Applied Nursing Research, 22(4), 236–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnr.2008.02.007
  • Hernández-Martínez, A., Rodríguez-Almagro, J., Molina-Alarcón, M., Infante-Torres, N., Rubio-Álvarez, A., & Martínez-Galiano, J. M. (2020). Perinatal factors related to post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms 1-5 years following birth. Women and Birth: Journal of the Australian College of Midwives, 33(2), e129–e135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2019.03.008
  • Hogan, A. (2016). Making the most of uncertainty: Treasuring exceptions in prenatal diagnosis. Studies in History & Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History & Philosophy of Biological & Biomedical Sciences, 57, 24–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2016.02.020
  • Hutti, M. (2005). Social & professional support needs of families after perinatal loss. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, & Neonatal Nursing, 34(5), 630–638. https://doi.org/10.1177/0884217505279998
  • Irani, M., Khadivzadeh, T., Asghari Nekah, S. M., Ebrahimipour, H., & Tara, F. (2019). Emotional and cognitive experiences of pregnant women following prenatal diagnosis of fetal anomalies: A qualitative study in Iran. International Journal of Community-Based Nursing and Midwifery, 7(1), 22–31. https://doi.org/10.30476/IJCBNM.2019.40843
  • Kang, C. (2020). Effects of psychological intervention and relevant influence factors on pregnant women undergoing interventional prenatal diagnosis. Journal of the Chinese Medical Association, 83(2), 202–205. https://doi.org/10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000220
  • Kersting, A., Kroker, K., Steinhard, J., Hoernig-Franz, I., Wesselmann, U., & Luedorff, K. (2009). Psychological impact on women after second & third trimester termination of pregnancy due to fetal anomalies versus women after preterm birth—a 14-month follow up study. Archives of Women's Mental Health, 12(4), 193–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-009-0063-8
  • Korenromp, M., Page-Christiaens, G., Bout, J., Mulder, E., Hunfeld, J., & Potters, C. (2007). A prospective study on parental coping 4 months after termination of pregnancy for fetal anomalies. Prenatal Diagnosis, 27(8), 709–716. https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.1763
  • Lafarge, C., Mitchell, K., & Fox, P. (2013). Women's experiences of coping with pregnancy termination for fetal abnormality. Qualitative Health Research, 23(7), 924–936. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732313484198
  • Lathrop, A., & Van De Vusse, L. (2011). Continuity & change in mothers’ narratives of perinatal hospice. Journal of Perinatal Neonatal Nursing, 25(1), 21–31. https://doi.org/10.1097/JPN.0b013e3181fa9c60
  • Leithner, K., Maar, A., & Maritsch, F. (2002). Experiences with a psychological help service for women following a prenatal diagnosis: Results of a follow-up study. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology, 23(3), 183–192. https://doi.org/10.3109/01674820209074671
  • McKechnie, A., & Pridham, K. (2012). Preparing heart & mind following prenatal diagnosis of complex congenital heart defect. Qualitative Health Research, 22(12), 1694–1706. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732312458371
  • Nowell, W., & Moules, N. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative, 16(1), 20–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691773384
  • Pisnoli, L., O’Connor, A., Goldsmith, L., Jackson, L., & Skirton, H. (2016). Impact of fetal or child loss on parents’ perceptions of non-invasive prenatal diagnosis for autosomal recessive conditions. Midwifery, 32(1), 30–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2015.12.009
  • Pitt, P., McClaren, B., & Hodgson, J. (2016). Embodied experiences of prenatal diagnosis of fetal abnormality & pregnancy termination. Reproductive Health Matters, 24(47), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rhm.2016.04.003
  • Thomson, G., & Downe, S. (2016). Emotions and support needs following a distressing birth: Scoping study with pregnant multigravida women in north-west England. Midwifery, 40, 32–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2016.06.010
  • Watson, K., White, C., Hall, H., & Hewitt, A. (2021). Women’s experiences of birth trauma: A scoping review. Women and Birth, 34(5), 417–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2020.09.016