The Consideration of Animals Within Australian Social Work Curriculum

References

• Adams, C. J. (2010). The sexual politics of meat: A feminist-vegetarian critical theory. The Continuum International Publishing Group Inc. (Original work published 1990).
   Google Scholar
• Adams, C. J., & Donovan, J. (1995). Animals and women: Feminist theoretical explorations. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers. (2019). Code of ethics 2019. https://anzasw.nz/wp-content/uploads/ANZASW-Code-of-Ethics-Final-1-Aug-2019.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ascione, F. R., & Shapiro, K. (2009). People and animals, kindness and cruelty: Research directions and policy implications. Journal of Social Issues, 65(3), 569–587. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01614.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Association of Social Workers. (2010). Code of ethics. https://www.aasw.asn.au/practitioner-resources/code-of-ethics
   Google Scholar
• Australian Association of Social Workers. (2020a). AASW accredited programs. https://www.aasw.asn.au/careers-study/accredited-courses
   Google Scholar
• Australian Association of Social Workers. (2020b). Australian social work education and accreditation standards. https://www.aasw.asn.au/document/item/6073
   Google Scholar
• Australian Association of Social Workers. (2020c). Code of ethics. https://www.aasw.asn.au/document/item/1201
   Google Scholar
• Boisseau, W. (2019). Animal liberation. In R. Kinna, & U. Gordon (Eds.), Routledge handbook of radical politics (pp. 42–52). Taylor and Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Bretzlaff-Holstein, C. (2018). The case for humane education in social work education. Social Work Education, 37(7), 924–935. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2018.1468428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budgar, L. (2017). Veganism on the rise. Gale Academic Onefile, 22(1), 38–39. https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A512288950/AONE?u = griffith&sid = AONE&xid = 69cfdf7a
   Google Scholar
• Chenoweth, L., & McAuliffe, D. (2017). The road to social work and human services practice (5th ed.). Cengage Learning Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Cheung, C., & Kwong Kam, P. (2018). Conditions for pets to prevent depression in older adults. Aging & Mental Health, 22(2), 1627–1633. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2017.1385723
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Crist, E., & Kopnina, H. (2014). Unsettling anthropocentrism. Dialectical Anthropology, 38(1), 387–396. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10624-014-9362-1
   Google Scholar
• Curtin, D. (1991). Toward an ecological ethic of care. Hypatia, 6(1), 60–74. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3810033?seq = 1
   Google Scholar
• Dhont, K., Gordon, H., & Leite, A. C. (2016). Common ideological roots of speciesism and generalized ethnic prejudice: The social dominance human–animal relations model (SD–HARM). European Journal of Personality, 30(6), 507–522. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, M., & Coates, J. (2012). Environmental ethics for social work: Social work's responsibility to the non-human world. International Journal of Social Welfare, 21(3), 239–247. https://doi-org.libraryproxy.griffith.edu.au/10.1111/j.1468-2397.2011.00852.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanrahan, C. (2014). Integrated health thinking and the one health concept: Is social work all for ‘one’ or ‘one’ for all? In T. Ryan (Ed.), Animals in social work: Why and how they matter (pp. 64–80). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hsiao, T. (2015). In defense of eating meat. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 28(2), 277–291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-015-9534-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, L. M. (2019). Speciesism predicts prejudice against low-status and hierarchy-attenuating human groups. Anthrozoös, 32(4), 445–458. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927936.2019.1621514
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen, M., Busch, C., Rodiger, M., & Hamm, U. (2016). Motives of consumers following a vegan diet and their attitudes towards animal agriculture. Appetite, 105, 643–651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2016.06.039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karnilowicz, W., Ali, L., & Phillimore, J. (2014). Community research within a social constructionist epistemology: Implications for “scientific rigor”. Community Development, 45(4), 353–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330.2014.936479
   Google Scholar
• Macias-Mayo, A. R. (2018). The link between animal abuse and child abuse. American Journal of Family Law, 32(2), 130–136. https://go-gale-com.libraryproxy.griffith.edu.au/ps/i.do?p = ITOF&u = griffith&id = GALE|A555588863&v = 2.1&it = r&sid = summon
   Google Scholar
• Mallon, R. (2016). The construction of human kinds. Oxford Scholarship Online. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198755678.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Matheny, G. (2006). Utilitarianism and animals. In P. Singer (Ed.), In defence of animals: The second wave (pp. 13–25). Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Matsuoka, A., & Sorenson, J. (2013). Human consequences of animal exploitation: Needs for redefining social welfare. The Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare, 40(4), 7–32. https://heinonline-org.libraryproxy.griffith.edu.au/HOL/SelectPage?handle = hein.journals/jrlsasw40&collection = journals&page = 7&lname = 
   Google Scholar
• Matsuoka, A., & Sorenson, J. (2014). Social justice beyond human beings: Trans-species social justice. In T. Ryan (Ed.), Animals in social work: Why and how they matter (pp. 64–80). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Morley, C., Ablett, P., & Macfarlane, S. (2019). Engaging with social work: A critical introduction (2nd ed). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nibert, D. (2014). Foreword. In A. J. Nocella, J. Sorenson, K. Socha, & A. Matsuoka (Eds.), Defining critical social work studies: An intersectional social justice approach for liberation (pp. ix–xii). Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Nocella, I. I., & J, A. (2019). Unmasking the animal liberation front using critical pedagogy: Seeing the ALF for who they really are. In A. J. Nocella II, C. Drew, A. E. George, S. Ketenci, J. Lupinacci, I. Purdy, & J. Leeson-Schatz (Eds.), Education for total liberation (pp. 15–26). Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Nocella II, A. J., Sorenson, J., Socha, K., & Matsuoka, A. (2014). The emergence of critical animal studies: The rise of intersectional animal liberation. In A. J. Nocella, J. Sorenson, K. Socha, & A. Matsuoka (Eds.), Defining critical social work studies: An intersectional social justice approach for liberation (pp. ix–xii). Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, T. (2014). The moral priority of vulnerability and dependency: Why social work should respect both animals and humans. In T. Ryan (Ed.), Animals in social work: Why and how they matter (pp. 80–101). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ryder, R. D. (2011). Speciesism, pianism and happiness: A morality for the twenty-first century. Imprint Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Sable, P. (2013). The pet connection: An attachment perspective. Clinical Social Work Journal, 41(1), 93–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-012-0405-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simkins, R. A. (2014). The Bible and anthropocentrism: Putting humans in their place. Dialectical Anthropology, 38(1), 397–413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10624-014-9348-z
   Google Scholar
• Socha, K., & Mitchell, L. (2014). Critical animal studies as an interdisciplinary field: A holistic approach to confronting oppression. In A. J. Nocella, J. Sorenson, K. Socha, & A. Matsuoka (Eds.), Defining critical social work studies: An intersectional social justice approach for liberation (pp. 110–132). Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Sorenson, J. (2020). Humane hypocrisies: Making killing acceptable. In K. Dhont, & G. Hodson (Eds.), Why we love and exploit animals: Bridging insights from academia and advocacy (pp. 209–228). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, N., & Fraser, H. (2019). Companion animals and domestic violence: Rescuing me, rescuing you. Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Twine, R. (2010). Intersectional disgust? Animals and (eco)feminism. Feminism & Psychology, 20(3), 397–406. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353510368284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, P., Aimers, J., & Perry, C. (2015). Animals and social work: An emerging field of practice for Aotearoa New Zealand. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work, 27(1/2), 24–35. https://search-informit-org.libraryproxy.griffith.edu.au/doi/10.3316INFORMIT.186948731049252
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, F. (2009). Human-animal bonds I: The relational significance of companion animals. Family Process, 48(4), 462–480. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.2009.01296.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, L. (1967). The historical roots of our ecologic crisis. Science, 155(3767), 1203–1207. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.155.3767.1203
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf, D. B. (2000). Social work and speciesism. Social Work, 45(1), 88–93. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23718726.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyckoff, J. (2014). Linking sexism and speciesism. Hypatia, 29(4), 721–737. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24542099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zalta, E. N. (Ed.) (2017). The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. (Fall 2017 ed.) https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moral-animal/
   Google Scholar