A Linear Value Function In Mixed Mcdm Problems With Incomplete Preference Data: An Extreme Point Approach

References

• I. Ali, W. Cook, and M. Kress. On the minimum violations ranking of a tournament, Management Science, 32(6): 660–672, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• J. Barzilai. W. Cook, and B. Golany. Consistent weights for judgements matrices of the relative importance of alternatives. Operations Research Letters, 6(3): 131–134, 1987.
   Google Scholar
• A. Chames, W. W. Cooper, and E. L. Rhodes. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6): 429–444, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• W. Cook, J. Doyle, R. Green, and M. Kress. Multiple criteria modelling and ordinal data: Evaluation in terms of subsets of criteria. European Journal of Operational Research, 89: 602–609. 1996.
   Google Scholar
• W. Cook and M. Kress. Deriving weights from pairwise comparison ratio matrices: An axiomatic approach. European Journal of Operations Research, 37: 355–362, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• W. Cook and M. Kress. An mth generation model for weak ranking of players in a tournament. Journal of the Operational Society, 41(12): 1111–1119, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• W. Cook and M. Kress. A multiple criteria decision model with ordinal preference data. European Journal of Operational Research, 54(2): 191–198, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• W. Cook and M. Kress. Ordinal Information and Preference Structures: Decision Models and Applications. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs. N.J., 1992.
   Google Scholar
• W. Cook and M. Kress. A multiple-criteria composite index model for quantitative and qualitative data. European Journal of Operational Research, 78(23), 1994.
   Google Scholar
• W. Cook and M. Kress. An extreme-point approach for obtaining weighted ratings in qualitative multicriteria decision making. Naval Research Logistics, 43: 519–531, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• W. Cook, M. Kress, and L. Seiford. An axiomatic approach to distance on partial orders. Review Automatique, Informatique et Recherche Operationelle, 20(2), 1986.
   Google Scholar
• W. Cook, M. Kress, and L. Seiford. Information and preference in partial orders: A bimatrix representation. Psychomelrika, 51(2), 1986.
   Google Scholar
• W. Cook and A. Saipe. Committee approach to priority planning: The median ranking method. Cahiers du Centre d’Etude de Recherche Opérationnelle, 18(3): 337–351, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• M. Fishbein. A behavioral theory approach to the relations between beliefs about an object and the attitude towards the object. Readings in Attitude and Theory Measurement, 42: 389–399, 1967.
   Google Scholar
• R. L. Keeney and H. Raiffa. Decisions with multiple objectives, preferences, and value tradeoffs, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• J. G. Kemeny and L. J. Snell. Preference ranking: An axiomatic approach. Mathematical Models in the Social Sciences, pages 9–23, 1962.
   Google Scholar
• M. Koksalan, M. H. Karwan, and S. Zionts. An approach for solving discrete alternative multiple criteria problems involving ordinal criteria. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 35: 625–642, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• P. Korhonen and J. Wallenius. Using qualitative data in multiple objective linear programming. European Journal of Operational Research, 48: 81–87. 1990.
   Google Scholar
• E. Nievergelt. Ein beitrag zur losung von entscheidungsproblemen mit mehrfachter zielsetzung. Die Unternehmung, 25: 101–126, 1971.
   Google Scholar
• P. Rietvetd and H. Ouwersloot. Ordinal data in multicriteria decision making, a stochastic dominance approach to siting nuclear power plants. European Journal of Operational Research, 56: 249–262, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• M. Roubens. Preference relations on actions and criteria in multicriteria decision making. European Journal of Operational Research, 10:51–55, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• B. Roy. Classement et choix en presence de points de vue multiples (la methode electre). Revue Francaise Automatique, informatique et Recherche Operationnelle, 8: 21–27, 1968.
   Google Scholar
• T. L. Saaty. A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 15: 234–281, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• T. L. Saaty. The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• V. Srinivasan and A. D. Shocker. Estimating the weights for multiple attributes in a composite criterion setting using pairwise judgements, Psychometrika, 38: 473–493, 1973.
   Google Scholar