Banks efficiency and productivity in Togo after the financial liberalization: a combined Malmquist index approach

References

• Aly HY, Grabowski R, Pasurka C, Rangan N. 1990. Technical, scale, and allocative efficiencies in US banking: an empirical investigation. Rev Econ Stat. 30:211–218.
   Google Scholar
• Berg SA, Forsund FR, Jansen ES. 1992. Malmquist indexes of productivity growth during the deregulation of Norwegian banking, 1980–89. Scand J Econ. 94:S211–S228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger AN, Hunter WC, Timme SG. 1993. The efficiency of financial institutions: a review and preview of research past, present and future. J Bank Fin. 17:221–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger AN, Leusner JH, Mingo JJ. 1997. The efficiency of bank branches. J Mon Econ. 40:141–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger AN, Mester LJ. 1997. Inside the black box: what explains differences in the efficiencies of financial institutions? J Bank Fin. 21:895–947.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonaccorsi di Patti EB, Hardy DC. 2005. Financial sector liberalization, bank privatization, and efficiency: evidence from Pakistan. J Bank Fin. 29:2381–2406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burki AA, Niazi GSK. 2003. The effects of privatization, competition and regulation on banking efficiency in Pakistan, 1991–2000. In: Regulatory impact assessment: strengthening regulation policy and practice; Nov 26–27; Manchester: Chancellors Conference Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Chang T-P, Hu J-L, Chou RY, Sun L. 2012. The sources of bank productivity growth in China during 2002–2009: a disaggregation view. J Bank Fin. 36:1997–2006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E. 1978. Measuring the efficiency of decision-making units. Eur J Oper Res. 2:429–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper WW, Seiford LM, Tone K. 2000. Data envelopment analysis: a comprehensive text with models-applications, references and DEA-solver software. Boston (MA): Kluwer Academic Publishers, p. 252.
   Google Scholar
• Din M, Ghani E, Qureshi SK. 1996. Scale and scope economies in banking: a case study of the Agricultural Development Bank of Pakistan. Pak Dev Rev. 35:203–213.
   Google Scholar
• Favero CA, Papi L. 1995. Technical efficiency and scale efficiency in the Italian banking sector: a non-parametric approach. Appl Econ. 27:385–395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grigorian DA, Manole V. 2006. Determinants of commercial bank performance in transition: an application of data envelopment analysis. Comp Econ Stud. 48:497–522.
   Google Scholar
• Hodonou Dannon M. 2009. Efficiency and productivity of WAEMU's banks in financial reform context, an application of DEA model.
   Google Scholar
• Igue CB. 2006. Reform of the financial system, productive efficiency and economic growth: a reference to the WAEMU zone [PhD thesis]. Burkina Faso: Union of Training and Research in Economics and Management, University of Ouagadougou; p. 278.
   Google Scholar
• Iimi A. 2003. Efficiency in the Pakistani banking industry: empirical evidence after the structural reform in the late 1990s. Pak Dev Rev. 42:41–57.
   Google Scholar
• Joseph A. 2002. Financial sector reform in Africa. ( Technical Paper produced as part of the research program on emerging Africa, OECD) 19:71.
   Google Scholar
• Kablan S. 2007. Measuring bank efficiency in developing countries: the case of WAEMU (West African economic monetary union). African Economic Research Consortium November; p. 113–138.
   Google Scholar
• Kablan S. 2009. Measurement of the performance of banks in a zone of monetary anchoring: case of France and WAEMU countries. Economix working paper from University of Paris west, No 2009-06.
   Google Scholar
• Kirikal L, Sorg M, Vensel V. 2004. Estonian banking sector performance analysis using Malmquist indexes and DuPoint financial ratio analysis. Int Bus Econ Res J. 3:21–36.
   Google Scholar
• Leightner JE, Lovell CAK. 1988. The impact of financial liberalization on the performance of Thai banks. J Econ Bus. 50:115–131.
   Google Scholar
• Liu W, Li X, Qi L, Zhang D. 2007. DEA analysis based on both efficient and anti-efficient frontiers. Working paper No. 144. Canterbury: Kent Business School, University of Kent.
   Google Scholar
• Malmquist S. 1953. Index numbers and indifference surfaces. Trabajos Estadistica. 4:209–242.
   Google Scholar
• Nathan A, Neave EH. 1992. Operating efficiency of Canadian banks. J Fin Serv Res. 6:265–276.
   Google Scholar
• Rizvi SFA, Khan AH. 2001. Post-liberalization efficiency and productivity of the banking sector in Pakistan [with Comments]. Pak Dev Rev. 4:605–632.
   Google Scholar
• Sastrosuwito S, Suyuki Y. 2012. The determinants of post _crisis Indonesian banking system profitability. Economics and Finance Review 1:48–57.
   Google Scholar
• Shephard RW. 1970. Theory of cost and production functions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wang K, Huang W, Wu J, Liu Y-N. 2014. Efficiency measures of the Chinese commercial banking system using an additive two-stage DEA. Omega. 44:5–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zoma IA. 2010. The analysis of the total factors productivity growth in WAEMU banks: the x efficiency approach. MPRA paper from 24470 from University Library from Munich, Germany.
   Google Scholar