Corporate governance, women's participation and firm performance: empirical analysis using a non-parametric evaluation methodology

References

• Adams RB, Ferreira D. 2009. Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. ‎J Financial Econ. 94(2):291–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams RB, Gray S, Nowland J. 2011. Does gender matter in the boardroom? Evidence from the market reaction to mandatory new director announcements. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1953152.
   Google Scholar
• Agrawal A, Knoeber CR. 2001. Do some outside directors play a political role? ‎J Law Econ. 44(1):179–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahern KR, Dittmar AK. 2012. The changing of the boards: the impact on firm valuation of mandated female board representation. Q J Econ. 127(1):137–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altman EI, Iwanicz-Drozdowska M, Laitinen EK, Suvas A. Forthcoming 2017. Financial distress prediction in an international context: a review and empirical analysis of Altman's Z-score model. J Int Financial Manag Acc. 28(2):131–171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson RC, Reeb DM, Upadhyay A, Zhao W. 2011. The economics of director heterogeneity. Financial Manag. 40(1):5–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bear S, Rahman N, Post C. 2010. The impact of board diversity and gender composition on corporate social responsibility and firm reputation. J Bus Ethics. 97(2):207–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohren O, Strom RO. 2010. Governance and politics: regulating independence and diversity in the board room. J Bus Finance Acc. 37(9–10):1281–1308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd JH, Graham SL, Hewitt RS. 1993. Bank holding company mergers with nonbank financial firms: effects on the risk of failure. ‎J Bank Finance. 17(1):43–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brammer S, Millington A, Pavelin S. 2009. Corporate reputation and women on the board. Br J Manag. 20(1):17–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell K, Mínguez-Vera A. 2007. The influence of gender on Spanish boards of directors: an empirical analysis. IVIE Working paper, WP-EC2007-08. Spain: Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell K, Vera AM. 2010. Female board appointments and firm valuation: short and long-term effects. J Manag Gov. 14(1):37–59.
   Google Scholar
• Carter DA, D'Souza F, Simkins BJ, Simpson WG. 2010. The gender and ethnic diversity of US boards and board committees and firm financial performance. Corp Gov. 18(5):396–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter DA, Simkins BJ, Simpson WG. 2003. Corporate governance, board diversity, and firm value. Financial Rev. 38(1):33–53.
   Google Scholar
• Charles A, Redor E, Zopounidis C. 2015. The determinants of the existence of a critical mass of women on boards: a discriminant analysis. Econ Bull. 35(3):185–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherchye L, Moesen W, Rogge N, Van Puyenbroeck T. 2007. An introduction to “Benefit of the Doubt” composite indicators. Soc Indic Res. 82(1):111–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi I. 2001. Unit root tests for panel data. J Int Money Finance. 20(2):249–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper WW, Seiford LM, Tone K. 2007. Data envelopment analysis. Boston (MA): Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Dezsö CL, Ross DG. 2012. Does female representation in top management improve firm performance? A panel data investigation. Strat Mgmt J. 33(9):1072–1089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobbin F, Jung J. 2011. Board diversity and corporate performance: filling in the gaps: corporate board gender diversity and stock performance: the competence gap or institutional investor bias? NCL Rev. 89:809–2228.
   Google Scholar
• Doyle JR, Gree RH, Cook WD. 1995. Upper and lower bound evaluation of multiattribute objects: comparison models using linear prohtamming. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 64(3):261–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2012. Women on boards: commission proposes 40% objective. (11/14). https://goo.gl/851psR
   Google Scholar
• Fama EF, Jensen MC. 1983. Separation of ownership and control. ‎J Law Econ. 26(2):301–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell KA, Hersch PL. 2005. Additions to corporate boards: the effect of gender. J Corp Finance. 11(1):85–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foerster SR, Huen BC. 2004. Does corporate governance matter to Canadian investors? Can Invest Rev. 17(3):19–23.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman M. 1970. The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York (NY): Times; p. 122–126. September 13.
   Google Scholar
• Harjoto M, Laksmana I, Lee R. 2015. Board diversity and corporate social responsibility. J Bus Ethics. 132(4):641–660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermalin BE, Weisbach MS. 2001. Boards of directors as an endogenously determined institution: a survey of the economic literature (No. w8161). Cambridge (MA): National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Hillman AJ, Cannella AA, Harris IC. 2002. Women and racial minorities in the boardroom: how do directors differ? ‎J Manag. 28(6):747–763.
   Google Scholar
• Horváth R, Spirollari P. 2012. Do the board of directors’ characteristics influence firm's performance? The US evidence. Prague Econ Pap. 21:470–486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isidro H, Sobral M. 2015. The effects of women on corporate boards on firm value, financial performance, and ethical and social compliance. J Bus Ethics. 132(1):1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Porta R, Lopez-de-Silanes F, Shleifer A, Vishny R. 2000. Investor protection and corporate governance. ‎J Financial Econ. 58(1):3–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laeven L, Levine R. 2009. Bank governance, regulation and risk taking. ‎J Financial Econ. 93:259–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larkin MB, Bernardi RA, Bosco SM. 2012. Board gender diversity, corporate reputation and market performance. Int ‎J Bank Finance. 9(1):1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Wei Z, Xie F. 2014. Do women directors improve firm performance in China? J Corp Finance. 28:169–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller T, Del Carmen Triana M. 2009. Demographic diversity in the boardroom: mediators of the board diversity – firm performance relationship. J Manag Stud. 46(5):755–786.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J, Salancik GR. 1978. The external control of organizations: a resource dependence perspective. New York (NY): Harper and Row Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Pletzer JL, Nikolova R, Kedzior KK, Voelpel SC. 2015. Does gender matter? Female representation on corporate boards and firm financial performance – a meta-analysis. PloS One. 10(6):e0130005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Post C, Byron K. 2015. Women on boards and firm financial performance: a meta-analysis. Acad Manag J. 58(5):1546–1571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabatier M. 2015. A women's boom in the boardroom: effects on performance? Appl Econ. 47(26):2717–2727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmid T, Urban D. 2017. The economic consequences of a ‘glass-ceiling’: women on corporate boards and firm value. AFA 2016 San Francisco Meetings Paper. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2344786
   Google Scholar
• Sila V, Gonzalez A, Hagendorff J. 2016. Women on board: does boardroom gender diversity affect firm risk? J Corp Finance. 36:26–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomon J. 2007. Corporate governance and accountability. Chichester (UK): Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Strøm RØ, D'Espallier B, Mersland R. 2014. Female leadership, performance, and governance in microfinance institutions. ‎J Bank Finance. 42:60–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terjesen S, Sealy R, Singh V. 2009. Women directors on corporate boards: a review and research agenda. Corp Gov. 17(3):320–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tinsley CH, Wade J, Main BG, O'Reilly CA. 2016. Gender diversity on U.S. corporate boards - are we running in place? ILR Review. 70(1):160–189.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Statistics Division. 2015. The world's women 2015: trends and statistics. New York (NY): United Nations Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Wooldridge JM. 2010. Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang JQ, Zhu H, Ding HB. 2013. Board composition and corporate social responsibility: an empirical investigation in the post Sarbanes–Oxley era. J Bus Ethics. 114(3):381–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar