Strategy analysis of the producer considering product design and collection effort under take-back legislation

References

• Alamdar SF, Rabbani M, Heydari J. 2018. Pricing, collection, and effort decisions with coordination contracts in a fuzzy, three-level closed-loop supply chain. Expert Stat Appl. 104:261–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atasu A, Özdemir Ö, Van Wassenhove LN. 2013. Stakeholder perspectives on e‐waste take‐back legislation. Prod Oper Manag. 22 (2):382–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldé CP, Forti V, Gray V, Kuehr R, Stegmann P. 2017. The Global E-Waste Monitor-2017. United Nations University (UNU), International Telecommunication Union (ITU) & International Solid Waste Association (ISWA), Bonn/Geneva/Vienna.
   Google Scholar
• Choi T, Chow P, Lee CH, Shen B. 2018. Used intimate apparel collection programs: a game-theoretic analytical study. Transp Res Part E Logist Transp. 109:44–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esenduran G, Kemahlıoğlu Ziya E, Swaminathan JM. 2016. Take-back legislation: consequences for remanufacturing and environment. Decis Sci. 47 (2):219–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esenduran G, Kemahlıoğlu-Ziya E, Swaminathan JM. 2017. Impact of take-back regulation on the remanufacturing industry. Prod Oper Manag. 26 (5):924–944.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrer G, Swaminathan JM. 2010. Managing new and differentiated remanufactured products. Eur J Oper Res. 203 (2):370–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao J, Han H, Hou L, Wang H. 2016. Pricing and effort decisions in a closed-loop supply chain under different channel power structures. J Clean Prod. 112:2043–2057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giri BC, Chakraborty A, Maiti T. 2017. Pricing and return product collection decisions in a closed-loop supply chain with dual-channel in both forward and reverse logistics. J Manuf Syst. 42:104–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu W, Chhajed D, Petruzzi NC, Yalabik B. 2015. Quality design and environmental implications of green consumerism in remanufacturing. Int J Prod Econ. 162:55–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong X, Govindan K, Xu L, Du P. 2017. Quantity and collection decisions in a closed-loop supply chain with technology licensing. Eur J Oper Res. 256 (3):820–829.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong X, Xu L, Du P, Wang W. 2015. Joint advertising, pricing and collection decisions in a closed-loop supply chain. Int J Prod Econ. 167:12–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hua Z, Zhang X, Xu X. 2011. Product design strategies in a manufacturer–retailer distribution channel. Omega. 39 (1):23–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs BW, Subramanian R. 2012. Sharing responsibility for product recovery across the supply chain. Prod Oper Manag. 21 (1):85–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karakayali I, Boyacı T, Verter V, Wassenhove LNV. 2011. On the incorporation of remanufacturing in recovery targets. Desautels Faculty of Management, McGill University.
   Google Scholar
• Kerr W, Ryan C. 2001. Eco-efficiency gains from remanufacturing: A case study of photocopier remanufacturing at Fuji Xerox Australia. J Clean Prod. 9(1):75–81.
   Google Scholar
• Liu L, Wang Z, Xu L, Hong X, Govindan K. 2017. Collection effort and reverse channel choices in a closed-loop supply chain. J Clean Prod. 144:492–500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Z, Li KW, Li B, Huang J, Tang J. 2019. Impact of product-design strategies on the operations of a closed-loop supply chain. Transp Res Part E Logist Transp. 124:75–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazahir S, Verter V, Boyaci T, Van Wassenhove LN. 2019. Did Europe move in the right direction on E-waste Legislation? Prod Oper Manag. 28(1):121–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raz G, Ovchinnikov A, Blass V. 2017. Economic, environmental, and social impact of remanufacturing in a competitive setting. IEEE Trans Eng Manage. 64 (4):476–490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raz G, Souza GC. 2018. Recycling as a Strategic Supply Source. Prod Oper Manag. 27 (5):902–916.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi T, Gu W, Chhajed D, Petruzzi NC. 2016. Effects of remanufacturable product design on market segmentation and the environment. Decis Sci. 47(2):298–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subramanian R, Gupta S, Talbot B. 2009. Product design and supply chain coordination under extended producer responsibility. Prod Oper Manag. 18(3):259–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundin E. 2004. Product and process design for successful remanufacturing. Norrköping: Linköping University.
   Google Scholar
• Webster S, Mitra S. 2007. Competitive strategy in remanufacturing and the impact of take-back laws. J Oper Manag. 25 (6):1123–1140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu C. 2012. Product-design and pricing strategies with remanufacturing. Eur J Oper Res. 222 (2):204–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu C. 2013. OEM product design in a price competition with remanufactured product. Omega. 41 (2):287–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiong Y, Zhou Y, Li G, Chan H, Xiong Z. 2013. Don’t forget your supplier when remanufacturing. Eur J Oper Res. 230 (1):15–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yenipazarli A. 2016. Managing new and remanufactured products to mitigate environmental damage under emissions regulation. Eur J Oper Res. 249(1):117–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar