Biocontrol by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria against black scurf and stem canker disease of potato caused by Rhizoctonia solani

References

• Baker , KF . 1987 . Evolving concepts of biological control of plant pathogens . Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. , 25 : 67 – 85 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bashan , Y and Levanony , H . 1991 . Alterations in membrane potential and in proton efflux in plant roots induced by Azospirillum brasilense . Plant Soil , 137 : 99 – 103 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertrand , H , Plassard , C , Pinochet , X , Toraine , B , Normand , P and Cleyet-Marel , JC . 2000 . Stimulation of the ionic transport system in Brassica napus by a plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium (Achromobacter sp.) . Can. J. Microbiol. , 46 : 229 – 236 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloemberg , GV and Lugtenberg , BJJ . 2001 . Molecular basis of plant growth promotion and biocontrol by rhizobacteria . Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. , 4 : 343 – 350 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen , GD and Roviera , MD . 1999 . The rhizosphere and its management to improve plant growth . A D V. Agronomy , 66 : 1 – 102 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia de Salamone , IE , Hynes , RK and Nelson , LM . 2001 . Cytokinin production by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria and selected mutants . Can. J. Microbiol. , 47 : 404 – 411 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glick , BR . 1995 . The enhancement of plant growth by free-living bacteria . Can. J. Microbiol. , 41 : 109 – 117 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregerson , T. 1978 . Rapid method for distinction of gram-negative from gram-positive bacteria . Eur. J. Apple. Microbiol. Biotechnol. , 5 : 123 – 127 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herman , MAB , Mault , BA and Smart , CD . 2008 . Effects of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on bell pepper production and green peach aphid infestations in New York . Crop Protection , 27 : 996 – 1002 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jetiyanon , J and Kloepper , JW . 2002 . Mixtures of plant growth promoting rhizobateria for induction of systemic resistance against in biological control of soil borne diseases and potential extension to systemic and foliar diseases . Australas. Plant Pathol. , 28 : 21 – 26 .
   Google Scholar
• Kaushal , M , Kaushal , R , Thakur , BS and Spehia , RS . 2011 . Effects of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria at varying levels of N and P fertilizers on growth and yield of cauliflower in mid hills of Himachal Pradesh . J Farm Sci. , 1 : 19 – 26 .
   Google Scholar
• Kempe , J and Sequeira , L . 1983 . Biological control of bacterial wilt of potatoes: attempts to induce resistance by treating tubers with bacteria . Plant Dis. , 67 : 499 – 503 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kloepper , JW , Ryu , CM and Zhang , SA . 2004 . Induced systemic resistance and promotion of plant growth by Bacillus spp . Phytopathology , 94 : 1259 – 1266 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubeck , PS , Hansen , M and Sorensen , J . 2000 . Simultaneous detection of the establishment of seed inoculated Pseudomonas fluorescens strains DR-54 and native soil bacteria on sugarbeet root surfaces using fluorescence antibody and its in situ hybridization techniques . FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. , 33 : 11 – 19 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansouri , H , Petit , A , Oger , P and Dessaux , Y . 2002 . Engineered rhizophere: the trophic bias generated by opinion-producing plants is independent of the opinion type, the soil origin and the plant species . Appl. Environ. Microbiol. , 68 : 2562 – 2566 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McSpadden Gardener BB, Fravel DR. 2002. Biological control of plant pathogens: research, commercialization and application in the USA. Online Plant Health Progress. doi:10.1094/PHP-2002–0510-01-RV.
   Google Scholar
• Minorsky , PV . 2008 . On the inside . Plant Physiol. , 146 : 323 – 324 .
   Google Scholar
• Montealgre , JR , Reyes , R , Perez , LM , Herrera , R , Silva , P and Besoain , X . 2003 . Selection of bioantagonistic bacteria to be used in biological control of Rhizoctonia solani in tomato . Electron. J. Biotechnol. , 16 : 115 – 127 .
   Google Scholar
• Nelson ML. 2004. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria(PGPR) prospects for new inoculants. Online Crop Management. doi:10;1094/CM-2004–0301-05-RV.
   Google Scholar
• Persello-Cartieaux , F , Nussaume , L and Robaglia , C . 2003 . Tales from the underground: molecular plant-rhizobacteria interactions . Plant, Cell Environ. , 26 : 189 – 199 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siddiqui , IA and Shaukat , SS . 2002 . Resistance against damping of fungi, Rhizobaeria solani systematically induced by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria Pseudomonas aeruginosa (1E–6S(+)) and P. fluorescens (CHAO) . J. Phytopathol. , 150 : 500 – 506 .
   Google Scholar
• Sunaina , V . 2005 . Bacterial metabolites from Bacillus cereus B4 responsible for plant growth . Journal of the Indian Potato Association , 32 ( 3–4 ) : 187 – 188 .
   Google Scholar
• Weller , DM , Raaijmakers , JM , McSpadden Gardener , BB and Thomashow , LS . 2002 . Microbial populations responsible for specific soil suppressiveness to plant pathology . Ann. Rev. Phytopathol. , 40 : 309 – 348 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar