The effects of school social mix: unpacking the differences

References

• Auwarter, A., and M. Aruguete. 2008. “Effects of Student Gender and Socioeconomic Status on Teacher Perceptions.” Journal of Educational Research 101 (4): 242–246. doi:10.3200/JOER.101.4.243-246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benabou, R., F. Kramarz, and C. Prost. 2005. The French Zones D'Education Prioritaire: Much Ado about Nothing? London: CEPR Discussion Paper No. 5086.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P., and J. Passeron. 1977. Reproduction in Education, Society and Culture. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Breen, R., and J. H. Goldthorpe. 1997. “Explaining Educational Differentials: Towards a Formal Rational Action Theory.” Rationality and Society 9 (3): 275–305. doi:10.1177/104346397009003002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, D., and E. Smyth. 2011. Behind the Scenes? A Study of Parental Involvement in Post-Primary Education. Dublin: The Liffey Press in association with the ESRI, the National Council for Curriculum and Assessment and the Department of Education and Skills.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. 2003. “Keeping Good Teachers: Why It Matters, What Leaders Can Do.” Educational Leadership 80 (8): 6–13.
   Google Scholar
• Darmanin, M. 2003. “When Students Are Failed: ‘Love’ as an Alternative Education Discourse?” International Studies in Sociology of Education 13: 141–170. doi:10.1080/09620210300200108.
   Google Scholar
• Darmody, M., and E. Smyth. 2011. Job Satisfaction and Occupational Stress among Primary School Teachers and School Principals in Ireland. Dublin: The Teaching Council.
   Google Scholar
• Darmody, M., E. Smyth, and C. Doherty. 2010. Designing Primary Schools for the Future. Dublin: ESRI.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Education and Science. 2005. Delivering Equality of Opportunity in Schools: An Action Plan for Educational Inclusion. Dublin: The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Dumay, X., and V. Dupriez. 2007. “Accounting for Class Effect Using the TIMMS 2003 Eight-grade Database: Net Effect of Group Composition, Net Effect of Class Process and Joint Effect.” School Effectiveness and School Improvement 18 (4): 383–408. doi:10.1080/09243450601146371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Educational Research Centre. 2007a. Drumcondra Primary Reading Test – Revised. Dublin: ERC.
   Google Scholar
• Educational Research Centre. 2007b. Drumcondra Primary Mathematics Test – Revised. Dublin: ERC.
   Google Scholar
• Estyn. 2009. The Impact of RAISE 2008-2009: Evaluation of the Impact of RAISE Funding on Raising the Levels of Performance of Disadvantaged Pupils. Cardiff: Estyn.
   Google Scholar
• Fredericks, J. A., P. C. Blumenfeld, and A. H. Paris. 2004. “School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence.” Review of Educational Research 74 (1): 59–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenlea, B., and J. J. Brown. 2009. “Retaining Teachers in Challenging Schools.” Education 130 (1): 96–109.
   Google Scholar
• Guin, K. 2004. “Chronic Teacher Turnover in Urban Elementary Schools.” Education Policy Analysis Archives 12 (42): 1–30.
   Google Scholar
• Harker, R., and P. Tymms. 2004. “The Effects of Student Composition on School Outcomes.” School Effectiveness and School Improvement 15 (2): 177–199. doi:10.1076/sesi.15.2.177.30432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyriakides, L., and B. P. M. Creemers. 2008. “A Longitudinal Study on the Stability Over Time of School and Teacher Effects on Student Outcomes.” Oxford Review of Education 34 (5): 521–545. doi:10.1080/03054980701782064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupton, R. 2004. Schools in Disadvantaged Areas: Recognising Context and Raising Performance (CASE paper 76). London: Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, London School of Economics and Political Science.
   Google Scholar
• Luyten, H., K. Schildkamp, and E. Folmer. 2009. “Cognitive Development in Dutch Primary Education, the Impact of Individual Background and Classroom Composition.” Educational Research and Evaluation 15 (3): 265–283. doi:10.1080/13803610902955333.
   Google Scholar
• Luyten, H., A. Visscher, and B. Witziers. 2005. “School Effectiveness Research: From a Review of the Criticism to Recommendations for Further Development.” School Effectiveness and School Improvement 16 (3): 249–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCoy, S., J. Banks, and M. Shevlin. 2012. “School Matters: How Context Influences the Identification of Different Types of Special Educational Needs.” Irish Educational Studies 32 (2): 119–138. doi:10.1080/03323315.2012.669568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCoy, S., and E. Smyth. 2011. “Higher Education Expansion and Differentiation in the Republic of Ireland.” Higher Education 61 (3): 243–260. doi:10.1007/s10734-010-9375-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCoy, S., E. Smyth, and J. Banks. 2012. The Primary Classroom: Insights from the ‘Growing Up in Ireland’ Study. Dublin: ESRI and NCCA.
   Google Scholar
• McCoy, S., E. Smyth, D. Watson, and M. Darmody. 2014. Leaving School in Ireland: A Longitudinal Study of Post-School Transitions. Dublin: ESRI Research Series Number 36.
   Google Scholar
• McNally, S. 2005. Economic Evaluation of the Pupil Learning Credits Pilot Scheme (Research Brief RB696). London: Department for Education and Skills.
   Google Scholar
• Mortimore, P., P. Sammons, L. Stoll, D. Lewis, and R. Ecob. 1988. School Matters. Wells: Open Books.
   Google Scholar
• Nash, R. 2003. “Is the School Composition Effect Real? A Discussion with Evidence from the UK PISA Data.” School Effectiveness and School Improvement 14 (4): 441–457. doi:10.1076/sesi.14.4.441.17153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opdenakker, M. C., and J. Van Damme. 2007. “Do School Context, Student Composition and School Leadership Affect School Practice and Outcomes in Secondary Education?” British Educational Research Journal 33 (2): 179–206. doi:10.1080/01411920701208233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, L. B., and A. McConney. 2010. “Does the SES of the School Matter? An Examination of Socioeconomic Status and Student Achievement Using PISA 2003.” Teachers College Record 112 (4): 1137–1162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rangvid, B. S. 2007. “School Composition Effects in Denmark: Quantile Regression Evidence from PISA 2000.” Empirical Economics 33 (2): 359–388. doi:10.1007/s00181-007-0133-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasbash, J., F. Steele, W. J. Browne, and H. Goldstein. 2012. A User's Guide to MLwiN, V2.26. Centre for Multilevel Modelling, University of Bristol.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, D., and E. Harrison. 2009. Social Class in Europe: An Introduction to the European Socio-economic Classification. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rumberger, R. W., and G. J. Palardy. 2005. “Does Segregation Still Matter? The Impact of Student Composition on Academic Achievement in High School.” Teachers College Record 107 (9): 1999–2045. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9620.2005.00583.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutter, M., B. Maughan, P. Mortimore, and J. Ouston. 1979. Fifteen Thousand Hours: Secondary Schools and Their Effects on Children. London: Open Books.
   Google Scholar
• Slee, R., and G. Weiner. 1998. School Effectiveness for Whom? London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smyth, E. 1999. Do Schools Differ? Dublin: ESRI/Oak Tree Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smyth, E., A. Dunne, M. Darmody, and S. McCoy. 2007. Gearing Up for the Exam?: The Experience of Junior Certificate Students. The Liffey Press in association with the ESRI.
   Google Scholar
• Smyth, E., M. Darmody, F. McGinnity, and D. Byrne. 2009. Adapting to Diversity: Irish Schools and Newcomer Students. Dublin: ESRI Research Series No. 8.
   Google Scholar
• Sofroniou, N., P. Archer, and S. Weir. 2004. “An Analysis of the Association between Socioeconomic Context, Gender and Achievement.” Irish Journal of Education xxxv: 58–72.
   Google Scholar
• Solon, G., S. J. Haider, and J. Wooldridge. 2013. What Are We Weighting for. Cambridge, MA: NBER Working Paper No. 18859.
   Google Scholar
• Thrupp, M. 1999. Schools Making a Difference: Let's Be Realistic! Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thrupp, M. 2006. “Taking School Contexts More Seriously: The Social Justice Challenge.” British Journal of Educational Studies 54 (3): 308–328. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8527.2006.00348.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Klaauw, W. 2008. “Breaking the Link between Poverty and Low Student Achievement: An Evaluation of Title I.” Journal of Econometrics 142 (2): 731–756. doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weir, S., P. Archer, and D. Millar. 2009. Educational Disadvantage in Primary Schools in Rural Areas. Report No. 1: Analysis of English Reading and Mathematics Achievement in Schools in the Rural Dimension of the School Support Programme (Report to the Department of Education and Science). Dublin: Educational Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Weir, S., and S. Denner. 2013. The Evaluation of the School Support Programme Under DEIS. Dublin: Educational Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, I. A. G. 2002. “Introduction: Peer Influences on Learning: Where Are They?” International Journal of Educational Research 37: 395–401. doi:10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00012-0.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J., S. Greene, E. Doyle, E. Harris, R. Layte, S. McCoy, C. McCrory, et al. 2009. Growing Up in Ireland – National Longitudinal Study of Children: The lives of 9-year-olds part 1. Dublin: The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Willms, J. D. 1986. “Social Class Segregation and Its Relationship to Pupils’ Examination Results in Scotland.” American Sociological Review 51 (2): 224–241. doi:10.2307/2095518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar