Inquiry-based learning with young learners: a Peirce-based model employed to critique a unit of inquiry on maps and mapping

References

• Alberta Learning. 2004. Focus on Inquiry: A Teacher’s Guide to Implementing Inquiry-Based Learning. Edmonton: Learning Resources Center.
   Google Scholar
• Audet, R. 2005. “Inquiry: A Continuum of Ideas, Issues and Practices.” In Integrating Inquiry across the Curriculum, edited by R. Audet and L. K. Jordan, 5–15. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barrows, H. S. 1985. How to Design a Problem-based Curriculum for the Preclinical Years. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Blumenfeld, P. C., E. Soloway, R. W. Marx, S. Krajcik, M. Guzdial, and A. Palincsar. 1991. “Motivating Project-based Learning: Sustaining the Doing, Supporting the Learning.” Educational Psychologist 26 (3–4): 369–398. doi:10.1080/00461520.1991.9653139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin, C., and L. Chia. 2004. “Problem-based Learning: Using Students' Questions to Drive Knowledge Construction.” Science Education 88 (5): 707–727. doi:10.1002/sce.10144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colapietro, V., T. Midtgarden, and T. Strand. 2005. “Introduction: Peirce and Education: The Conflicting Processes of Learning and Discovery.” Studies in Philosophy and Education 24: 167–177. doi:10.1007/s11217-005-3842-3.
   Google Scholar
• Costa, A. L., and B. Kallick, eds. 2009. Habits of Mind across the Curriculum. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
   Google Scholar
• Crick, R., and K. Grusha. 2009. “Signs, Symbols and Metaphor: Linking Self with Text in Inquiry-based Learning.” The Curriculum Journal 20 (4): 447–464. doi:10.1080/09585170903425069.
   Google Scholar
• Driver, R., P. Newton, and J. Osborne. 2000. “Establishing the Norms of Scientific Argumentation in Classrooms.” Science Education 84 (3): 287–312. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200005)84:3<287::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-A.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erickson, L. 2008. Stirring the Head, Heart and Soul – Redefining Curriculum, Instruction, and Concept-based Learning. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evenson, D. H., and C. E. Hmelo. 2000. Problem-based Learning: A Research Perspective on Learning Interactions. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Fielding, M. 2012. “Beyond Student Voice. Patterns of Partnership and the Demands of Deep Democracy.” Revista de Educacion 359: 45–65.
   Google Scholar
• Gijlers, H., and T. de Jong. 2005. “The Relation between Prior Knowledge and Students' Collaborative Discovery Learning Processes.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 42 (3): 264–282. doi:10.1002/tea.20056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldenberg, P. E. 1996. “Habits of Mind as an Organizer for the Curriculum.” Journal of Education 178 (1): 13–34.
   Google Scholar
• Groves, S., and B. Doig. 2004. “Progressive Discourse in Mathematics Classes – The Task of the Teacher.” Proceedings of the 28th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education 2: 495–502.
   Google Scholar
• Houser, N. 1992. “Introduction.” In The Essential Peirce: Selected Philosophical Writings, edited by H. Houser and C. Kloesel, xix–xli. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hume, A., and R. Coll. 2010. “Authentic Student Inquiry: The Mismatch between the Intended Curriculum and the Student-experienced Curriculum.” Research in Science & Technological Education 28 (1): 43–62. doi:10.1080/02635140903513565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IBO (International Baccalaureate Organization) 2007. Making the PYP Happen: A Curriculum Framework for International Primary Education. Cardiff: IBO.
   Google Scholar
• Knodt, J. 2010. “Teaching for Creativity: Building Innovation through Open-inquiry Learning.” School Library Monthly XXVI (9): 41–44.
   Google Scholar
• Lindfors, J. W. 1999. Children’s Inquiry. Using Language to Make Sense of the World. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liszka, J. 2013. “Charles Peirce's Rhetoric and the Pedagogy of Active Learning.” Educational Philosophy and Theory 45 (7): 781–788. doi:10.1111/j.1469-5812.2011.00763.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loxley, A., and A. Seery. 2008. “Some Philosophical and Other Related Issues of Insider Research” In Researching Education from the Inside. Investigations from wthin, edited by P. Sikes and A. Potts, 15–32. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McNeill, D. 2000. Language and Gesture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• NCCA. 1999. Primary School Curriculum – Introduction. Dublin: The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, D. 2007. Planning for Inquiry. It’s Not an Oxymoron! Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
   Google Scholar
• Pataray-Ching, J., and M. Roberson. 2002. “Misconceptions about a Curriculum-as-inquiry Framework.” Language Arts 79 (6): 498–505.
   Google Scholar
• Peirce, C. S. [1893] 1992a. “Evolutionary Love.” In The Essential Peirce: Selected Philosophical Writings, edited by H. Houser and C. Kloesel, 352–371. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peirce, C. S. [1893] 1992b. “Questions Concerning Certain Faculties Claimed for Man.” In The Essential Peirce: Selected Philosophical Writings, edited by H. Houser and C. Kloesel, 11–27. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. 1948. The Moral Judgement of the Child. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Short, K. G., and C. Burke. 2001. “Curriculum as Inquiry”. In Critiquing Whole Language and Classroom Inquiry, edited by S. Boran and B. Comber, 18–41. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
   Google Scholar
• Walcott, H. F. 1995. The Art of Fieldwork. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wolk, S. 2008. “School as Inquiry.” The Phi Delta Kappan 90 (2): 115–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worth, K. 1999. Exploratorium: Institute for Inquiry. Accessed July 2, 2013. www.exploratorium.edu.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. 2009. Case Study Research. Design and Methods. 4th ed. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar