Review of the Leaving Certificate biology examination papers (1999–2008) using Bloom’s taxonomy – an investigation of the cognitive demands of the examination

References

• Allen, K., and K. Tanner. 2005. “Approaches to Biology Teaching and Learning: Understanding the Wrong Answers – Teaching Towards Conceptual Change.” Life Science Education 4 (2): 112–117. doi: 10.1187/cbe.05-02-0068
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, L. W., D. R. Krathwohl, P. W. Airasian, K. A. Cruikshank, R. E. Mayer, P. R. Pintrich, J. Raths, and M. C. Wittrock. 2001. A Taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: a revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Abridged Edition. New York: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Baird, J., T. N. Hopfenbeck, J. Elwood, D. Caro, and A. Ahmed. 2014. “Predictability in the Irish Leaving Certificate.” OUCEA Report 14/1 commissioned by the State Examinations Commission, Dublin, Ireland.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, J., and D. Kennedy. 2004. “Practical Work at the Upper High School Level: The Evaluation of a New Model of Assessment.” International Journal of Science Education 23 (1): 97–110. doi: 10.1080/09500690119244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, P., and D. Wiliam. 1998. “Assessment and classroom learning.” Assessment in Education. Principles, Policy & Practice 5 (1): 7–74. doi: 10.1080/0969595980050102
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, B., M. Englehart, E. Furst, W. Hill, and D. Krathwohl. 1956. Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York, Toronto: Longmans, Green.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D. Ed. 1988. Developing Student Autonomy in Learning. London: Kogan Page, Second Edition.
   Google Scholar
• Bybee, R. W. 2000. “Teaching Science as Inquiry.” In Inquiring into Inquiry Learning and Teaching Science, edited by E. H. van Zee, 20–46. Washington, DC: AAAS.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., L. Manion, and K. Morrison. 2007. Research Methods in Education, 6th ed. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. 1994. Research Design: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Crooks, T. J. 1988. “The Impact of Classroom Evaluation Practices on Students.” Review of Educational Research 58: 438–481. doi: 10.3102/00346543058004438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton, J., and D. Smith. 1986. Extending Children’s Special Abilities - Strategies for Primary Classrooms. http://www.teachers.ash.org.au/researchskills/dalton.htm
   Google Scholar
• Department of Education and Science. 2001. Leaving Certificate Biology Syllabus. Dublin: The Stationary Office.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Education and Science. 2004. A Brief Description of the Irish Education System. Accessed October 10, 2013. http://www.most.ie/webreports/Fatima%20reports/School/dept_education_system04.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Department of Education and Skills. 2010a. ‘Speech by the Minister for Education and Science, Batt O’Keeffe TD, at the launch of the 2010 Agricultural Science Farm Talk ’n Walk Series’, Accessed March 10, 2011. http://www.education.ie/en/Press-Events/Speeches/2010-Speeches/SP10-02-22.html
   Google Scholar
• Department of Education and Skills. 2010b. The National Strategy for Higher Education to 2030. Report of the Strategy Group. Dublin: Government Publication Office.
   Google Scholar
• Desmond, T., and M. Desmond. 2008. “Large scale Assessment – Maintaining Public Confidence in High Stakes state examinations.” In Proceedings 34th Annual Conference of the International Association for Educational Assessment, Cambridge, September.
   Google Scholar
• Donnelly, K. 2015. “Teachers to picket every second-level school again.” The Irish Independent, 23 April, Accessed July 8, 2015. http://www.independent.ie/irish-news/education/teachers-to-picket-every-secondlevel-school-again-31165491.html.
   Google Scholar
• Engineers Ireland. 2010. Report of Taskforce on Education of Mathematics and Science at Second Level. Dublin: Department of Education and Science.
   Google Scholar
• Erduran, S., and Z. R. Dagher. 2014. “Regaining focus in Irish Junior Cycle Science: Potential New Directions for Curriculum and Assessment on Nature of Science.” Irish Educational Studies 33 (4): 335–350. doi: 10.1080/03323315.2014.984386
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forfás. 2009. Health Life Sciences in Ireland – An Enterprise Outlook. Dublin: Forfás.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, J., Harlen, W., Hayward, L., Stobart, G., and M. Montgomery. 2010. Developing Teacher Assessment. Berkshire: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Geiser, S., and M. V. Santelices. 2007. “Validity Of High-School Grades In Predicting Student Success Beyond The Freshman Year: High-School Record vs. Standardized Tests as Indicators of Four-Year College Outcomes.” Center for Studies in Higher Education: Research & Occasional Paper Series 6: 1–35.
   Google Scholar
• Government of Ireland. 2006. Strategy for Science, Technology & Innovation, 2006–2013. Dublin: Government of Ireland.
   Google Scholar
• Government of Ireland. 2008. Building Ireland’s Smart Economy: A Framework for Sustainable, Economic Renewal. Dublin: Government of Ireland.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, L., B. M. Stecher, and S. P. Klein. 2002. Making Sense of Test-based Accountability in Education. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
   Google Scholar
• Harlen, W. 2005. “‘Teachers’ Summative Practices and Assessment for Learning – Tensions and Synergies.” The Curriculum Journal 16 (2): 207–223. doi: 10.1080/09585170500136093
   Google Scholar
• Harlen, W., and M. James. 1997. “Assessment and Learning: Differences and Relationships Between Formative and Summative Assessment.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 4 (3): 365–379. doi: 10.1080/0969594970040304
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, A. 2011. “ Entry to Higher Education in Ireland in the 21st Century.” NCCA/HEA Seminar, September 21, 1–24. Dublin: Higher Education Authority.
   Google Scholar
• IBM. 2008. Global CEO Survey: The Enterprise of the Future, Life Sciences Industry Edition, August.
   Google Scholar
• Kellaghan, T. 2000. “Using Assessment to Improve the Quality of Education.” In International Working Group on Education, Florence, June 14–16, 2000, 1–34.
   Google Scholar
• Linn, M. C., E. A. Davis, and P. Bell, Eds. 2004. Internet Environments for Science Education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Linn, M. C., E. A. Davis, and B. S. Eylon. 2004. “The Scaffolded Knowledge Integration Framework for Instruction.” In Internet Environments for Science Education, edited by M. C. Linn, E. A. Davis, and P. Bell, 47–72. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Linn, M. C., H. S. Lee, R. Tinker, F. Husic, and J. L. Chiu. 2006. “Inquiry Learning: Teaching and Assessing Knowledge Integration in Science.” Science 313 (5790): 1049–1050. doi: 10.1126/science.1131408
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Looney, A. 2006. “Assessment in the Republic of Ireland.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice 13 (3): 345–353. doi: 10.1080/09695940601035544
   Google Scholar
• Marzano, R. J., and Kendall, J. S. 2007. The New Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
   Google Scholar
• McCoy, S., Smyth, E., Watson, D., and Darmody, M. 2014. Leaving School in Ireland: A Longitudinal Study of Post-School Transitions, 36. Dublin: The Economic and Social Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• NCCA. 2002. Biology Leaving Certificate Ordinary Level and Higher Level Guidelines for Teachers. Dublin: Government Publications.
   Google Scholar
• NCCA. 2003. Junior Certificate Curriculum, Department of Science and Education. Dublin: The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• NCCA. 2008. “National Council for Curriculum and Assessment.” Accessed December 2008. www.ncca.ie.
   Google Scholar
• NCCA. 2011. Leaving Certificate Biology: Draft Curriculum for Consultation. Dublin: Government Publications.
   Google Scholar
• NRC. 2009. A New Biology for the 21st Century: Ensuring the United States Leads the Coming Biology Revolution. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. Accessed December 5, 2009. www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id_12764.
   Google Scholar
• Ó' Buachalla, S. 1988. Education Policy in the Twenty Century Ireland. Dublin: Wolfhound Press.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2006. Evolution of Student Interest in Science and Technology Studies. May 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Orlich, C., R. Harder, R. Callahan, M. Trevisian, and A. Brown. 2004. Teaching Strategies: A Guide to Effective Instruction. 7th ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
   Google Scholar
• Orpwood, G. 2001. “The Role of Assessment in Science Curriculum Reform.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 8 (2): 135–151. doi: 10.1080/09695940125120
   Google Scholar
• O’Sullivan, D. 1985. “Science Teaching in Ireland Today.” Unpublished final year dissertation thesis Thomond College, Limerick.
   Google Scholar
• Page, G., and M. Reiss. 2010. “Biology Education Research.” Journal of Biological Education 44 (2): 51–52. doi: 10.1080/00219266.2010.9656193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollitt, A., C. Huchinson, N. Entwistle, and C. De Luca. 1985. What Makes Exam Questions Difficult? Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, N. R. 2007. “NanoScience in Veterinary Medicine.” Veterinary Research Communications 31 (Suppl. 1): 139–144. doi: 10.1007/s11259-007-0083-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• State Examination Commission (SEC). 2013. “Leaving Certificate Examination 2013 Biology Chief Examiner’s Report.” State Examination Commission. https://www.examinations.ie/archive/examiners_reports/Chief_Examiners_Report_Biology_2013.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Stecher, B., and S. Barron. 1999. “Test Based Accountability: The Perverse Consequences of Milepost Testing.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Supovitz, J. 2009. “Can High-Stakes Testing Leverage Educational Improvement? Prospects from the Last Decade of Testing and Accountability Reform.” Journal of Educational Change 10 (Anniversary Issue): 211–227. doi: 10.1007/s10833-009-9105-2
   Google Scholar
• Swart, A. J. 2010. “Evaluation of Final Examination Papers in Engineering: A Case Study Using Bloom’s Taxonomy.” IEEE Transactions on Education 53 (2): 257–264. doi: 10.1109/TE.2009.2014221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Task Force on the Physical Sciences. 2002. Report and Recommendations of the Task Force on the Physical Sciences. Dublin: Department of Education and Science.
   Google Scholar
• Teagasc. 2011. “Agricultural Education: supporting Economic Recovery.” Accessed October 12, 2014. http://www.teagasc.ie/news/2011/201101–26.asp.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, J. W., L. Bol, R. W. Warkentin, M. Wilson, A. Strage, and W.D. Rohwer. 1993. “Interrelationships Among Students’ Study Activities, Self-Concept of Academic Ability, and Achievement as a Function of Characteristics of High-School Biology Courses.” Applied Cognitive Psychology 7: 499–532. doi: 10.1002/acp.2350070605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobias, S., and T. M. Duffy. 2009. Constructivist Instruction: Success or Failure. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wideen, M. F., T. O’Shea, I. Pye, and G. Ivany. 1997. “High-Stakes Testing and the Teaching of Science.” Canadian Journal of Education 22 (4): 428–444. doi: 10.2307/1585793
   Google Scholar
• Williams, K. 1992. “Assessment: A Discussion Paper, Dublin Association of Secondary Teachers.” Ireland.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, L., D. Pornpattananangkul, C.-M. J. Hu, and C.-M. Huang. 2010. “Development of Nanoparticles for Antimicrobial Drug Delivery.” Current Medicinal Chemistry 17: 585–594. doi: 10.2174/092986710790416290
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar