Student perceptions of predictability of examination requirements and relationship with outcomes in high-stakes tests in Ireland

References

• Anastasi, A. 1981. “Coaching, Test Sophistication and Developed Abilities.” American Psychologist 36 (10): 1086–1093. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.36.10.1086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arendasy, M., and M. Somer. 2013. “Quantitative Differences in Retest Effects Across Different Methods Used to Construct Alternate Test Forms.” Intelligence 41 (3): 181–192. doi: 10.1016/j.intell.2013.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Au, W. 2007. “High-Stakes Testing and Curricular Control: A Qualitative Metasynthesis.” Educational Researcher 36 (5): 258–267. doi: 10.3102/0013189X07306523
   Google Scholar
• Baird, J., T. Hopfenbeck, J. Elwood, D. Caro, and A. Ahmed. 2014. Predictability in the Irish Leaving Certificate. Oxford University Centre for Educational Assessment Report. OUCEA/14/1. http://oucea.education.ox.ac.uk/research/recent-research-projects/investigation-into-the-predictability-of-the-irish-leaving-certificate-examinations/.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, R. 2011. “Assessment Trends in Hong Kong: Seeking to Establish Formative Assessment in an Examination Culture.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 18 (2): 199–211. doi: 10.1080/0969594X.2010.527701
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. B. 2003. Teaching for Quality Learning at University. 2nd ed. Buckingham: Open University Press. Society for Research into Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., and D. Wiliam. 1998. “Assessment and Classroom Learning.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice 5 (1): 7–74. doi: 10.1080/0969595980050102
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, M., and P. Willis. 2001. “The Revised Second Level Accounting Syllabus: A New Beginning or Old Habits Retained.” The Irish Accounting Review 8 (2): 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, M., and P. Willis. 2004. “Leaving Certificate Accounting: Measuring Students’ Perceptions with the Course Experience Questionnaire.” Irish Educational Studies 23 (1): 49–64. doi: 10.1080/0332331040230107
   Google Scholar
• Caro, D., and T. Hopfenbeck. 2014. Predictability in the Irish Leaving Certificate Examination. Working Paper 3: Student Questionnaire. http://oucea.education.ox.ac.uk/research/recent-research-projects/investigation-into-the-predictability-of-the-irish-leaving-certificate-examinations/.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, L. M., J. L. Schafer, and C. M. Kam. 2001. “A Comparison of Inclusive and Restrictive Strategies in Modern Missing Data Procedures.” Psychological Methods 6 (4): 330–351. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.6.4.330
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craik, F. I. M., and R. S. Lockhart. 1972. “Levels of Processing: A Framework for Memory Research.” Journal of verbal learning and verbal behaviour 11: 671–684. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(72)80001-X
   Google Scholar
• Daly, A., J. Baird, S. Chamberlain, and M. Meadows. 2012. “Assessment Reform: Students’ and Teachers’ Responses to the Introduction of Stretch and Challenge at A-Level.” The Curriculum Journal 23 (2): 139–155. doi: 10.1080/09585176.2012.678683
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. 2010. The Flat World and Education: How America’s Commitment to Equity Will Determine Our Future. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Diseth, Å, and Ø. Martinsen. 2003. “Approaches to Learning, Cognitive Style, and Motives as Predictors of Academic Achievement.” Educational Psychology 23 (2): 195–207. doi: 10.1080/01443410303225
   Google Scholar
• Elwood, J., T. Hopfenbeck, and J. Baird. 2015. “ Predictability in High-Stakes Examinations: Students’ Perspectives on a Perennial Assessment Dilemma.” Research Papers in Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/02671522.2015.1086015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entwistle, N. J. 1988. “Motivational Factors in Students’ Approaches to Learning.” In Learning Strategies and Learning Styles, edited by R. R. Schmeck, 21–51. New York: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Entwistle, N., and A. Entwistle. 1991. “Contrasting Forms of Understanding for Degree Examinations: The Student Experience and Its Implications.” Higher Education 22 (3): 205–227. doi: 10.1007/BF00132288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K. A., and W. Kintsch. 1995. “Long-Term Working Memory.” Psychological Review 102 (2): 211–245. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.102.2.211
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frederiksen, N. 1984. “The Real Test Bias: Influences of Testing on Teaching and Learning.” American Psychologist 39: 193–202. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.39.3.193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frederiksen, J. R., and A. Collins. 1989. “A Systems Approach to Educational Testing.” Educational Researcher 18 (9): 27–32. doi: 10.3102/0013189X018009027
   Google Scholar
• Freund, P. A., and H. Holling. 2011. “How to Get Really Smart: Modeling Retest and Training Effects in Ability Testing Using Computer-Generated Figural Matrix Items.” Intelligence 39 (4): 233–243. doi: 10.1016/j.intell.2011.02.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gobet, F. 2005. “Chunking Models of Expertise: Implications for Education.” Applied Cognitive Psychology 19 (2): 183–204. doi: 10.1002/acp.1110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greatorex, J., and E. Malacova. 2006. “Can Different Teaching Strategies or Methods of Preparing Pupils Lead to Greater Improvements from GCSE to a Level Performance?” Research Papers in Education 21 (3): 255–294. doi: 10.1080/02671520600793757
   Google Scholar
• Hausknecht, J. P., J. A. Halpert, N. T. Di Paolo, and M. O. Moriarty Gerrard. 2007. “Retesting in Selection: A Meta-analysis of Coaching and Practice Effects for Tests of Cognitive Ability.” Journal of Applied Psychology 92: 373–385. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.2.373
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyland, A. 2011. Entry to Higher Education in Ireland in the 21st Century. http://www.transition.ie/files/Entry_to_Higher_Education_in_Ireland_in_the_21st_Century%20.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Jonsson, A. 2010. “The use of Transparency in the ‘Interactive Examination’ for Student Teachers.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 17 (2): 183–197. doi: 10.1080/09695941003694441
   Google Scholar
• Karabenick, S. A., M. E. Woolley, J. M. Friedel, B. V. Ammon, J. Blazevski, C. R. Bonney, E. de Groot, et al. 2007. “Cognitive Processing of Self-report Items in Educational Research: Do They Think What We Mean?” Educational Psychologist 42 (3): 139–151. doi: 10.1080/00461520701416231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, A. E. & A. Leavy (2013). The Design Space of Student Learning: Who Is Accountable and Accountable for What? Irish Educational Studies, 32(1), 1–6. doi: 10.1080/03323315.2013.773229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick, R. 2011. “The Negative Influences of Exam-Oriented Education on Chinese High School Students: Backwash from Classroom to Child.” Language Testing in Asia 1 (3): 36–45. doi: 10.1186/2229-0443-1-3-36
   Google Scholar
• Kleinmann, M., C. Kuptsch, and O. Köller. 1996. “Transparency: A Necessary Requirement for the Construct Validity of Assessment Centres.” Applied Psychology: An International Review 45 (1): 67–84. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-0597.1996.tb00849.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulik, J. A., R. L. Bangert-Drowns, and C.-L. Kulik. 1984. “Effectiveness of Coaching for Aptitude Tests.” Psychological Bulletin 95 (2): 179–188. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.95.2.179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madaus, G. G. 1988. “The Distortion of Teaching and Testing: High-Stakes Testing and Instruction.” Peabody Journal of Education 65 (3): 29–46. doi:10.1080/01619568809538611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madaus, G. F., M. K. Russell, and J. Higgins. 2009. The Paradoxes of High Stakes Testing: How They Affect Students, Their Parents, Teachers, Principals, Schools, and Society. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, B., and D. Boud. 2003. “The Impact of Self-Assessment on Achievement: The Effects of Self-assessment Training on Performance in External Examinations.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 10 (2): 209–220. doi: 10.1080/0969594032000121289
   Google Scholar
• Mizutani, S., C. Rubie-Davies, J. Hattie, and J. Philp. 2012. “Do Beliefs about NCEA and Its Washback Effects Vary Depending on Subject?” New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies 46 (2): 47–59.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, R., G. Stobart, J. Baird, and J. Winkley. 2012. Investigating the Predictability of GCSE Examinations. Pearson Internal Report.
   Google Scholar
• Ofqual. 2008. Predictability Studies Report on GCSE and GCE Level Examinations. Office of the Qualifications and Examinations Regulator. http://dera.ioe.ac.uk/id/eprint/9242.
   Google Scholar
• O’Shea, M. 1983. “A Study of Leaving Certificate Students’ Perceptions of Teachers’ Attitudes to Leaving Certificate.” Irish Educational Studies 3 (2): 256–272. doi: 10.1080/0332331830030219
   Google Scholar
• Popham, J. 1987. “Two-Plus Decades of Educational Objectives.” International Journal of Educational Research 11 (1): 31–41.
   Google Scholar
• Powers, D. E., and M. E. Fowles. 1998. “Effects of Preexamination Disclosure of Essay Topics.” Applied Measurement in Education 11 (2): 139–157. doi: 10.1207/s15324818ame1102_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsden, P. 1988. Improving Learning: New Perspectives. New York: Nichols.
   Google Scholar
• Reiter, H. I., P. Salvatori, J. Rosenfeld, K. Trinh, and K. W. Eva. 2006. “The Effect of Defined Violations of Test Security on Admissions Outcomes Using Multiple Mini-interviews.” Medical Education 40 (1): 36–42. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02348.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Revelle, W. 2014. Psych: Procedures for Personality and Psychological Research. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych Version = 1.4.8.
   Google Scholar
• Rosseel, Y. 2012. “lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling.” Journal of Statistical Software 48 (2): 1–36. doi: 10.18637/jss.v048.i02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepard, L. 1993. “The Place of Testing Reform in Educational Reform: A Reply to CiZek.” Educational Researcher 22: 10–13. doi: 10.3102/0013189X022004010
   Google Scholar
• Shepard, L., K. Hammerness, L. Darling-Hammond, F. Rust, J. Baratz Snowden, E. Gordon, C. Gutierrez, et al. 2005. “Assessment.” In Preparing Teachers for a Changing World: What Teachers Should Learn and Be Able to Do, edited by L. Darling-Hammond and J. Bransford, 275–321. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Sirin, S. R. 2005. “Socioeconomic Status and Academic Achievement: A Meta-analytic Review of Research.” Review of Educational Research 75 (3): 417–453. doi: 10.3102/00346543075003417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smyth, E. 2009. “Buying Your Way into College? Private Tuition and the Transition to Higher Education in Ireland.” Oxford Review of Education 35 (1): 1–22. doi: 10.1080/03054980801981426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• State Examinations Commission. 2012. “ Draft Report of the SEC Working Group on Predictability in the Leaving Certificate Examination.” Unpublished.
   Google Scholar
• Torrance, H. 2007. “Assessment as Learning? How the Use of Explicit Learning Objectives, Assessment Criteria and Feedback in Post-secondary Education and Training Can Come to Dominate Learning.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 14 (3): 281–294. doi: 10.1080/09695940701591867
   Google Scholar
• Volante, L. 2004. “Teaching to the Test: What Every Educator and Policy-Maker Should Know.” Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy 35. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ848235.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Wigfield, A., and J. S. Eccles. 2000. “Expectancy-Value Theory of Achievement Motivation.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 25: 68–81. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1999.1015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, T. J., S. Fontaine, and T. Egan. 2003. “Was a Breach of Examination Security Unfair in an Objective Structured Clinical Examination? A Critical Incident.” Medical Teacher 25 (1): 42–46. doi: 10.1080/0142159021000061413
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar