Towards a language based view of teaching and learning in Irish primary schools: explicating the gap between linguistic research and teaching and learning

References

• Bell, J. 1999. Doing Your Research Project: A Guide for First-Time Researchers in Education and Social Science. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berman, R. A., and D. I. Slobin. 1994. Relating Events in Narrative: A Crosslinguistic Developmental Study. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Chamot, A. U., and J. M. O’Malley. 1994. The CALLA Handbook: Implementing the Cognitive Academic Language Learning Approach. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Christie, F. 1995. “Pedagogic Discourse in the Primary School.” Linguistics and Education 7 (3): 221–242. doi: 10.1016/0898-5898(95)90024-1
   Google Scholar
• Christie, F. 2002. Classroom Discourse Analysis: A Functional Perspective. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Christie, F. 2012. “Early Childhood: The Initial Challenges of School Learning.” Language Learning 62 (1): 33–70.
   Google Scholar
• Clay, M. M. 1994. Reading Recovery: A Guidebook for Teachers in Training. Portsmouth: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., L. Manion, and K. Morisson. 2011. Research Methods in Education. 7th Ed. USA: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cope, B., and M. Kalantzis. 1993. “The Power of Literacy and the Literacy of Power.” Powers of Literacy: A Text-Type Approach to Teaching Writing 113: 63–89.
   Google Scholar
• Courtney, A., and M. Gleeson. 2010. Building Bridges of Understanding. Mary Immaculate College: Curriculum Development Unit.
   Google Scholar
• Curriculum Online. n.d. In Curriculum Online. Accessed 10 July 2018. https://www.curriculumonline.ie/getmedia/524b871d1e20-461f-a28c-bbca5424112d/Primary-Language-Curriculum_1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Cregan, A. 2007. From Difference to Disadvantage Talking Posh: sociolinguistic linguistic perspectives on the context of schooling in Ireland. Accessed 15 January 2014. http://www.combatpoverty.ie/publications/workingpapers/2007-03_WP_TalkingPosh.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Dare, B. 2010. “Learning About Language: the Role of Metalanguage.” In Language Support in EAL Contexts. Why Systemic Functional Linguists?(Special Issue of NALDIC Quarterly, edited by C. Coffin, 18–26. Reading: NALDIC.
   Google Scholar
• Denscombe, M. 2010. The Good Research Guide for Small Scale Social Research Projects. New York: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Paola, T. 1978. Pancakes for Breakfast. New York: Houghton Mifflin Hardcourt Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Derewianka, B. 2012. A New Grammar Companion For Teachers. Sydney: Primary English Teaching Association.
   Google Scholar
• Derewianka, B., and P. Jones. 2010. “From Traditional Grammar to Functional Grammar: Bridging the Divide.” In Language Support in EAL Contexts. Why Systemic Functional Linguistics, edited by C. Coffin, 6–18. Reading: NALDIC.
   Google Scholar
• DES (Department of Education and Skills). 1999. Teacher Guidelines English. Dublin: Stationary Office.
   Google Scholar
• DES (Department of Education and Skills). 2011. Literacy and Numeracy for Learning and Life The National Strategy to Improve Literacy and Numeracy among Children and Young People 2011–2020. Dublin: Stationary Office.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. 2001. Language and Power (Second Edition). Pearson Education Ltd. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Glenn-Applegate, K., A. Breit-Smith, L. M. Justice, and S. B. Piasta. 2010. “Artfulness in Young Children’s Spoken Narratives.” Early Education and Development 21 (3): 468–493. doi: 10.1080/10409280903440620
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Government of South Australia. 2004. Language & Literacy: Classroom Applications of Functional Grammar. South Australia: DECS Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. 2007. Language and Education. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Hammond, J., and M. Macken-Horiak. 2001. “Teachers’ Voices, Teachers’ Practices: Insider Perspectives on Literacy Education.” Australian Journal of Language and Literacy 24 (2): 112–132.
   Google Scholar
• Harper, H., and J. Rennie. 2009. “‘I had to go out and get Myself a Book on Grammar’: a Study of pre-Service Teachers’ Knowledge About Language.” The Australian Journal of Language and Literacy 32 (1): 22–37.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, P. 2010. Learning to teach grammar: orchestral moves and virtuoso moments.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, P. T., and H. Chen. 2012. Teachers’ knowledge about language: Issues of pedagogy and expertise.
   Google Scholar
• Justice, L. M., J. N. Kaderavek, X. Fan, A. Sofka, and A. Hunt. 2009. “Accelerating Preschoolers’ Early Literacy Development Through Classroom-Based Teacher-Child Storybook Reading and Explicit Print Referencing.” Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools 40 (1): 67–85. doi: 10.1044/0161-1461(2008/07-0098)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labov, W. 1972. Academic ignorance and black intelligence. na.
   Google Scholar
• Lefstein, A., and J. Snell. 2014. Better Than Best Practice Developing Teaching and Learning Through Dialogue. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Leonard, S. 2014. Language and Literacy across the curriculum. Unpublished dissertation.
   Google Scholar
• Lyle, S. 2000. “Narrative Understanding: Developing a Theoretical Context for Understanding how Children Make Meaning in Classroom Settings.” Curriculum Studies 32 (1): 45–63. doi: 10.1080/002202700182844
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch, K. 1999. Equality in Education. Dublin: Gill & Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald, A. 1998. Beware of the Bears. United Kingdom: Little Tiger Press.
   Google Scholar
• Macken-Horarik, M., K. Love, and L. Unsworth. 2011. “A Grammatics’ Good Enough for School English in the 21st Century: Four Challenges in Realising the Potential.” The Australian Journal of Language and Literacy 34 (1): 9–23.
   Google Scholar
• MacRuairc, G. 1997. ‘Big Mad Words’. Perceptions of Language Variation in Schools: A Sociological Analysis. M.Ed. Thesis. University College Dublin.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J. R. 2000. “Analysing Genre: Functional Parameters.” In Genre and Institutions Social Processes in the Workplace and School, edited by F. Christie, and J. R. Martin, 60–89. New York: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, M. 1969. Frog, Where Are You? New York: Dial Books for Young Readers.
   Google Scholar
• Michaels, S. 1986. “Narrative Presentations: An Oral Preparation for Literacy with First Graders.” In The Social Construction of Literacy, edited by J. Cook-Gumperz, 94–116. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Myhill, D. 2005. “Ways of Knowing: Writing with Grammar in Mind.” English Teaching 4 (3): 77–96.
   Google Scholar
• NCCA (National Council for Curriculum and Assessment). 2012. Consultation on the Draft Primary Language Curriculum Junior Infants to Second Class. Dublin: Stationary Office.
   Google Scholar
• Plum, G. A. 1998. Text and Contextual Conditioning in Spoken English: A Genre-based Approach (Monographs in SystemicLinguistics, no. 10). Nottingham: Department of English Studies, University of Nottingham.
   Google Scholar
• Reznitskaya, A. 2012. “Dialogic Teaching Rethinking Language Use During Literature Discussions.” The Reading Teacher 65 (7): 446–456. doi: 10.1002/TRTR.01066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarcella, R. 2003. Academic English: A Conceptual Framework. The University of California Linguistic Minority Research Institute Technical Report.
   Google Scholar
• Schick, A., and G. Melzi. 2010. “The Development of Children’s Oral Narratives Across Contexts.” Early Education and Development 21 (3): 293–317. doi: 10.1080/10409281003680578
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schleppegrell, M. J. 2004. The Language of Schooling: A Functional Linguistics Perspective. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Schleppegrell, M. 2010. “Supporting a “Reading to Write” Pedagogy with Functional Grammar.” In Language Support in EAL Contexts. Why Systemic Functional Linguistics (Special Issue of NALDIC Quarterly), edited by C. Coffin, 26–31. NALDIC: Reading.
   Google Scholar
• Shelvin, M., H. Kearns, M. Ranaghan, M. Twomey, R. Smith, and E. Winter. 2009. Creating Inclusive learning environments in Irish Schools: Teachers’ Perspectives Report preparedfor the National Council of Special Education.
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair, J. M. H., and R. M. Coulthard. 1975. Towards an Analysis of Discourse: the English Used by Teachers and Pupils. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, C. E., and P. Uccelli. 2009. “The Challenge of Academic Language.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Literacy, edited by D. R. Olson, and N. Torrance, 112–133. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thwaite, A. 2006. “Genre Writing in Primary School: From Theory to the Classroom via First Steps (1).” The Australian Journal of Language and Literacy 29 (2): 95–114.
   Google Scholar
• Underhill, N. 1987. Testing Spoken Language A Handbook of Oral Testing Techniques. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Unsworth, L. 2000. “Investigating Subject-Specific Literacies in School Learning.” In Researching Language in Schools and Communities Functional Linguistic Perspectives (2000), edited by L. Unsworth, 245–275. London: Wellington House.
   Google Scholar
• Valdez, G., G. Bunch, C. Snow, and C. Lee. 2005. “Enhancing the Development of Students’ Language.” In Preparing Teachers for a Changing World, edited by L. Darling Hammond, and J. Bransford, 126–167. San Francisco: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, R. 2002. “Literacy and Oral Language: Implications for Early Literacy Acquisition.” In Handbook of Early Literacy Research, edited by S. B. Neuman and D. K. Dickinson, 43–53. London: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, G. 1993. “Using Systemic Grammar in Teaching Young Learners.” In Literacy, Learning and Teaching: Language as a Social Practice in the Primary School, edited by L. Unsworth, 197–255. South Melbourne: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, G. 2000. “Children’s Literature, Children and Uses of Language Description.” In Researching Language in Schools and Communities Functional Linguistic Perspectives, edited by L. Unsworth, 111–130. London: Wellington House.
   Google Scholar