An exploration into the criteria used in assessing design activities with adaptive comparative judgment in technology education

References

• Bartholomew, S., E. Reeve, R. Veon, W. Goodridge, V. Lee, and L. Nadelson. 2017. “Relationships between Access to Mobile Devices, Student Self-Directed Learning, and Achievement.” Journal of Technology Education 29 (1): 2–24. doi: https://doi.org/10.21061/jte.v29i1.a.1
   Google Scholar
• Bartholomew, S., G. Strimel, and A. Jackson. 2018. “A Comparison of Traditional and Adaptive Comparative Judgment Assessment Techniques for Freshmen Engineering Design Projects.” International Journal of Engineering Education 34 (1): 20–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartholomew, S., G. Strimel, and E. Yoshikawa. 2018. “Using Adaptive Comparative Judgment for Student Formative Feedback and Learning during a Middle School Design Project.” International Journal of Technology and Design Education, doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-018-9442-7.
   Google Scholar
• Bartholomew, S., and E. Yoshikawa-Ruesch. 2018. “A Systematic Review of Research around Adaptive Comparative Judgement (ACJ) in K-16 Education.” In CTETE – Research Monograph Series, edited by John Wells, 1:6–28. Virginia: Council on Technology and Engineering Teacher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Bartholomew, S., E. Yoshikawa, E. Hartell, and G. Strimel. 2019. “Identifying Design Values across Countries through Adaptive Comparative Judgment.” International Journal of Technology and Design Education, doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-019-09506-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canty, D., N. Seery, and P. Phelan. 2012. “Democratic Consensus on Student Defined Assessment Criteria as a Catalyst for Learning in Technology Teacher Education.” In PATT2012: Technology Education in the 21st Century, edited by Thomas Ginner, Jonas Hallström, and Magnus Hultén, 119–125. Stockholm, Sweden: PATT.
   Google Scholar
• Carty, A., and P. Phelan. 2006. “The Nature and Provision of Technology Education in Ireland.” Journal of Technology Education 18 (1): 7–26. doi: https://doi.org/10.21061/jte.v18i1.a.1
   Google Scholar
• Coertjens, L., M. Lesterhuis, S. Verhavert, R. Van Gasse, and S. De Maeyer. 2017. “Judging Texts with Rubrics and Comparative Judgement: Taking into Account Reliability and Time Investment.” Pedagogische Studien 94 (4): 283–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, I., M. Swan, and A. Pollitt. 2015. “Assessing Mathematical Problem Solving Using Comparative Judgement.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 13 (1): 151–177. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9497-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimbell, R. 2007. “E-Assessment in Project e-Scape.” Design and Technology Education: An International Journal 12 (2): 66–76.
   Google Scholar
• Kimbell, R. 2012. “Evolving Project E-Scape for National Assessment.” International Journal of Technology and Design Education 22 (2): 135–155. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-011-9190-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimbell, R., G. Martin, W. Wharfe, T. Wheeler, D. Perry, S. Miller, T. Shepard, P. Hall, and J. Potter. 2005. E-Scape Portfolio Assessment: Phase 1 Report. London: Goldsmiths, University of London.
   Google Scholar
• Kimbell, R., T. Wheeler, S. Miller, J. Bain, R. Wright, and K. Stables. 2004. Assessing Design Innovation: Final Report. London: Goldsmiths, University of London.
   Google Scholar
• Kimbell, R., T. Wheeler, S. Miller, and A. Pollitt. 2007. E-Scape Portfolio Assessment: Phase 2 Report. London: Goldsmiths, University of London.
   Google Scholar
• Kimbell, R., T. Wheeler, K. Stables, T. Shepard, F. Martin, D. Davies, A. Pollitt, and G. Whitehouse. 2009. E-Scape Portfolio Assessment: Phase 3 Report. London: Goldsmiths, University of London.
   Google Scholar
• Kurz, A., S. Elliott, J. Wehby, and J. Smithson. 2010. “Alignment of the Intended, Planned, and Enacted Curriculum in General and Special Education and Its Relation to Student Achievement.” Journal of Special Education 44 (3): 131–145. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466909341196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NCCA. 2018a. Junior Cycle Applied Technology. Dublin, Ireland: Department of Education and Skills.
   Google Scholar
• NCCA. 2018b. Junior Cycle Engineering. Dublin, Ireland: Department of Education and Skills.
   Google Scholar
• NCCA. 2018c. Junior Cycle Wood Technology. Dublin, Ireland: Department of Education and Skills.
   Google Scholar
• NCCA. 2019. Junior Cycle Graphics. Dublin, Ireland: Department of Education and Skills.
   Google Scholar
• Newhouse, C. P. 2014. “Using Digital Representations of Practical Production Work for Summative Assessment.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice 21 (2): 205–220.
   Google Scholar
• Nicol, D., and D. Macfarlane-Dick. 2006. “Formative Assessment and Self-Regulated Learning: A Model and Seven Principles of Good Feedback Practice.” Studies in Higher Education 31 (2): 199–218. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollitt, A. 2012a. “Comparative Judgement for Assessment.” International Journal of Technology and Design Education 22 (2): 157–170. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-011-9189-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollitt, A. 2012b. “The Method of Adaptive Comparative Judgement.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 19 (3): 281–300.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. 2009. “Transforming Holistic Assessment and Grading Into a Vehicle for Complex Learning.” In Assessment, Learning and Judgement in Higher Education, edited by Gordon Joughin, 45–63. Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Seery, N., J. Buckley, T. Delahunty, and D. Canty. 2018. “Integrating Learners into the Assessment Process Using Adaptive Comparative Judgement with an Ipsative Approach to Identifying Competence Based Gains Relative to Student Ability Levels.” International Journal of Technology and Design Education, doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-018-9468-x.
   Google Scholar
• Seery, N., D. Canty, and P. Phelan. 2012. “The Validity and Value of Peer Assessment Using Adaptive Comparative Judgement in Design Driven Practical Education.” International Journal of Technology and Design Education 22 (2): 205–226. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-011-9194-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seery, N., R. Kimbell, J. Buckley, and J. Phelan. 2019. “Considering the Relationship between Research and Practice in Technology Education: A Perspective on Future Research Endeavours.” Design and Technology Education: An International Journal 24 (2): 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Steedle, J. T., and S. Ferrara. 2016. “Evaluating Comparative Judgment as an Approach to Essay Scoring.” Applied Measurement in Education 29 (3): 211–223. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2016.1171769
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thurstone, L. L. 1927. “A Law of Comparative Judgement.” Psychological Review 34 (4): 273–286. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0070288
   Google Scholar
• Williams, P. J. 2000. “Design: The Only Methodology of Technology?” Journal of Technology Education 11 (2): 48–60. doi: https://doi.org/10.21061/jte.v11i2.a.4
   Google Scholar