Professional development for out-of-field post-primary teachers of mathematics: an analysis of the impact of mathematics specific pedagogy training

References

• An, Shuhua, Gerald Kulm, and Zhonghe Wu. 2004. “The Pedagogical Content Knowledge of Middle School, Mathematics Teachers in China and the U.S..” Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 7 (2): 145–172.
   Google Scholar
• Anghileri, Julia. 2006. “Scaffolding Practices That Enhance Mathematics Learning.” Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 9 (1): 33–52.
   Google Scholar
• Anthony, Glenda, and Margaret Walshaw. 2009. “Characteristics of Effective Teaching of Mathematics: A View from the West.” Journal of Mathematics Education 2 (2): 147–164.
   Google Scholar
• Armor, David, Patricia Conroy-Osequera, Millicent Cox, Nicelma King, Lorraine McDonnell, Anthony Pascal, Edward Pauley, and Gail Zellman. 1976. Analysis of the School Preferred Reading Programs in Selected Los Angeles Minority Schools. California: Rand Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, Deborah L. 2001. Developing a Mathematically Proficient American Public: What are the problems, what do we know about them, and what would it take to solve them Paper prepared for the Aspen Institute Congessional Conference on ‘Promoting Excellence in the New Economy: The Challenges to National Policy’, St. Petersburg, Florida, 16–19.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, Deborah L., and Hyman Bass. 2000. “Interweaving Content and Pedagogy in Teaching and Learning to Teach: Knowing and Using Mathematics.” In Multiple Perspectives on the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics, edited by Jo Boaler, 83–104. London: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, Deborah L., and Francesca Forzani. 2011. “Building a Common Core for Learning to Teach and Connecting Professional Learning to Practice.” American Educator 35 (2): 17–21.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, Deborah L., Mark Hoover Thames, and Geoffrey Phelps. 2008. “Content Knowledge for Teaching: What Makes it Special.” Journal of Teacher Education 59 (5): 389–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, Albert. 1986. Social Foundations of Thought and Action. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, Alan B., Nancy Latham, and Jin-ah Kim. 2011. “Linking Preservice Teachers' Mathematics Self-efficacy and Mathematics Teaching Efficacy to Their Mathematical Performance.” School Science and Mathematics 111 (7): 325–333.
   Google Scholar
• Baumert, J., M. Kunter, W. Blum, M. Brunner, T. Voss, A. Jordan, U. Klusmann, S. Krauss, M. Neubrand, and Y. M. Tsai. 2010. “Teachers’ Mathematical Knowledge, Cognitive Activation in the Classroom, and Student Progress.” American Educational Research Journal 47 (1): 133–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanton, Maria L., and James J. Kaput. 2005. “Characterizing a Classroom Practice That Promotes Algebraic Reasoning.” Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 36 (5): 412–446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blömeke, Sigrid, and Seán Delaney. 2012. “Assessment of Teacher Knowledge Across Countries: A Review of the State of Research.” In International Perspectives on Teacher Knowledge, Beliefs and Opportunities to Learn, edited by Sigrid Blömeke, Feng-Jui Hsieh, Gabriele Kaiser, and William Schmidt, 541–585. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bosse, Marc, and Gunther Törner. 2013. “Out-of-field teaching mathematics teachers and the ambivalent role of beliefs–A first report from interviews.” In Current state of research on mathematical beliefs XVIII. Proceedings of the MAVI-18 Conference, edited by Hannula, Mako, Paivi Portaankorva-Koivisto, Anu Laine, and Liisa Naveri, 341-355. Finland: Finnish Research Association for Subject Didactics.
   Google Scholar
• Brookover, Wilbur B., John H. Schweitzer, Jeffrey M. Schneider, Charles H. Beady, Patricia K. Flood, and Joseph M. Wisenbaker. 1978. “Elementary School Social Climate and School Achievement.” American Educational Research Journal 15 (2): 301–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coetzer, Izak. 2001. “A Survey and Appraisal of Outcomes-based Education (OBE) in South Africa with Reference to Progressive Education in America.” Educare 30 (1): 73–93.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, Jacob. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd edition). New York: Laurence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Collinson, Vivienne. 2000. “Staff Development by any Other Name: Changing Words or Changing Practices?” The Educational Forum 64 (2): 124–132.
   Google Scholar
• Czerniak, Charlene M. 1990. “A Study of Self-efficacy, Anxiety, And Science Knowledge In Preservice Elementary Teachers.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Atlanta, Georgia, April 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Day, Christopher, and Judith Sachs. 2004. “Professionalism, Performativity and Empowerment: Discourses in the Politics, Policies and Purposes of Continuing Professional Development.” In International Handbook on the Continuing Professional Development of Teachers, edited by Christopher Sachs and Judith Sachs, 3–32. Berkshire: Mc-Graw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• De Mesquita, Paul B., and Jeffery C. Drake. 1994. “Educational Reform and the Self-efficacy Beliefs of Teachers Implementing Nongraded Primary School Programs.” Teaching and Teacher Education 10 (3): 291–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enochs, Larry G., Phillip L. Smith, and DeAnn Huinker. 2000. “Establishing Factorial Validity of the Mathematics Teaching Efficacy Beliefs Instrument.” School Science and Mathematics 100 (4): 194–202.
   Google Scholar
• Galbraith, Peter, Gloria Stillman, Jill Brown, and Ian Edwards. 2007. “Facilitating Middle Secondary Modelling Competencies.” In Mathematical Modelling: Education, Engineering and Economics, edited by Christopher Haines, Peter Galbraith, Werner Blum, and Sanower Khan, 130–140. Chichester: Horwood.
   Google Scholar
• Green, Wendy, and Patricie Mertova. 2016. “Transformalists and Transactionists: Towards a More Comprehensive Understanding of Academics’ Engagement with ‘Internationalisation of the Curriculum’.” Research in Comparative and International Education 11 (3): 229–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grouws, Douglas A., and Kathleen Cramer. 1989. “Teaching Practices and Student Affect in Problem-solving Lessons of Select Junior-high Mathematics Teachers.” In Affect and Mathematical Problem Solving, edited by Mc Leod, B. Douglas, and Verna M. Adams, 149–161. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Guskey, Thomas R. 2000. Evaluating Professional Development. California: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heid, M. Kathleen, Patricia S. Wilson, and Glendon W. Blume. 2015. Mathematical Understanding for Secondary Teaching: A Framework and Classroom Based Situations. Charlotte, NC: IAP.
   Google Scholar
• Hemmi, Kirsti, and Andreas Ryve. 2015. “Effective Mathematics Teaching in Finnish and Swedish Teacher Education Discourses.” Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 18: 501–521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobbs, Linda. 2013. “Teaching ‘Out-of-Field’as a Boundary-Crossing Event: Factors Shaping Teacher Identity.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 11 (2): 271–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobbs, Linda, and Günter Törner. 2019. Examining the Phenomenon of “Teaching out-of-Field”: International Perspectives on Teaching as a non-Specialist. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, Lars, and Dirk Richter. 2015. “Aspekte der Aus-und Fortbildung von Deutsch-und Englischlehrkräften im Ländervergleich.” In IQB-Bildungstrend 2015. Sprachliche Kompetenzen am Ende der 9. Jahrgangsstufe im Zweiten Ländervergleich, edited by Petra Stanat, Bohme Katrin, Stefan Schipolowski, and Nicole Haag, 481–507. Münster: Waxmann.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, Mary M. 1999. “The Role of Preservice Teacher Education.” In Teaching as the Learning Profession: Handbook of Policy and Practice, edited by Linda Darling-Hammond and Gary Sykes, 54–85. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Klassen, R. M., and V. M. Tze. 2014. “Teachers’ Self-Efficacy, Personality, and Teaching Effectiveness: A Meta-analysis.” Educational Research Review 12: 59–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krauss, Stefan, Martin Brunner, Mareike Kunter, Jürgen Baumert, Werner Blum, Michael Neubrand, and Alexander Jordan. 2008. “Pedagogical Content Knowledge and Content Knowledge of Secondary Mathematics Teachers.” Journal of Educational Psychology 100: 716–725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lessing, Ansie, and Marike De Witt. 2007. “The Value of Continuous Professional Development: Teachers’ Perceptions.” South African Journal of Education 27 (1): 53–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mata, M. D. L., V. Monteiro, and F. Peixoto. 2012. Attitudes Towards Mathematics: Effects of Individual, Motivational, and Social Support Factors. Child Development Research. http://downloads.hindawi.com/archive/2012/876028.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• McConney, Andrew, and Anne Price. 2009. “Teaching Out-of-Field in Western Australia.” Australian Journal of Teacher Education 34 (6): 86–100.
   Google Scholar
• Muijs, Daniel, Christopher Day, Alma Harris, and Geoff Lindsay. 2004. “Evaluating CPD: An Overview.” In International Handbook on the Continuing Professional Development of Teachers, edited by Christopher Day and Judith Sachs, 291–310. Berkshire: Mc-Graw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• National Council for Curriculum and Assessment (Ireland). 2005. Review of Mathematics in Post-primary Education: Discussion Paper. Dublin: NCCA.
   Google Scholar
• Ní Ríordáin, Máire, and Ailish Hannigan. 2009. Out-of-field Teaching in Post-primary Mathematics Education: an Analysis of the Irish Context: A Research Report. Limerick: National Centre for Excellence in Mathematics and Science Teaching and Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Ní Ríordáin, Máire, Catherine Paolucci, and Terry Lyons. 2019. “Teacher Professional Competence: What Can Be Learned About the Knowledge and Practices Needed for Teaching?” In Examining the Phenomenon of “Teaching Out-of-Field”, edited by Linda Hobbs and Gunter Torner, 129–149. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Noddings, Nel. 1995. Philosophy of Education. Oxford: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• O'Meara, Niamh, Patrick Johnson, and Aisling Leavy. 2019. "A Comparative Study Investigating the Use of Manipulatives at the Transition from Primary to Post-Primary Education." International Journal of Mathematics Education for Science and Technology 51 (6): 835–857.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, Jonathan, Paul Black, Jo Boaler, M. Brown, R. Driver, R. Murray, and S. Simon. 1997. Attitudes to Science, Mathematics and Technology: A Review of Research. London: King's College.
   Google Scholar
• O’Shea, John, and Aisling M Leavy. 2013. “Teaching Mathematical Problem-solving from an Emergent Constructivist Perspective: The Experiences of Irish Primary Teachers.” Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 16: 293–318.
   Google Scholar
• Price, Anne, Colleen Vale, Raphaela Porsch, Esti Rahayu, Fiona Faulkner, Máire Ní Ríordáin, Cosette Crisan, and Julie A Luft. 2019. “Teaching out-of-Field Internationally.” In Examining the Phenomenon of “Teaching Out-of-Field”, edited by Linda Hobbs and Gunter Torner, 53–83. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Randall, Donna M., and Maria F. Fernandes. 1991. “The Social Desirability Response Bias in Ethics Research.” Journal of Business Ethics 10 (11): 805–817.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds, David, and Daniel Muijs. 1999. “The Effective Teaching of Mathematics: A Review of Research.” School Leadership & Management 19 (3): 273–288.
   Google Scholar
• Rowland, Tim, Peter Huckstep, and Anne Thwaites. 2005. “Elementary Teachers’ Mathematics Subject Knowledge: The Knowledge Quartet and the Case of Naomi.” Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 8 (3): 255–281.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. 1986. “Those who Understand: A Conception of Teacher Knowledge.” American Educator 10 (1).
   Google Scholar
• Steyn, Gertruida M., and Anna Elizabeth Du Plessis. 2007. “The Implications of the Out-of-Field Phenomenon for Effective Teaching, Quality Education and School Management.” Africa Education Review 4 (2): 144–158.
   Google Scholar
• Stigler, James W., and James Hiebert. 2004. “Improving Mathematics Teaching.” Educational Leadership 61 (5): 12–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swars, Susan, Lynn C. Hart, Stephanie Z. Smith, Marvin E. Smith, and Tammy Tolar. 2007. “A Longitudinal Study of Elementary Pre-service Teachers' Mathematics Beliefs and Content Knowledge.” School Science and Mathematics 107 (8): 325–335.
   Google Scholar
• Timperley, Helen S., and Gwenneth Phillips. 2003. “Changing and Sustaining Teachers’ Expectations Through Professional Development in Literacy.” Teaching and Teacher Education 19 (6): 627–641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tschannen-Moran, Megan, and Peggy McMaster. 2009. “Sources of Self-efficacy: Four Professional Development Formats and Their Relationship to Self-efficacy and Implementation of a New Teaching Strategy.” The Elementary School Journal 110 (2): 228–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weldon, Paul R. 2016. “Out-of-field Teaching in Australian Secondary Schools.” Policy Insights 6: 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, Patricia S, Thomas J Cooney, and David W Stinson. 2005. “What Constitutes Good Mathematics Teaching and How it Develops: Nine High School Teachers’ Perspectives.” Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 8: 83–111.
   Google Scholar
• Zakaria, Yaya. 2014. “Analisis kelayakan dan kesesuaian antara latar belakang pendidikan guru sekolah dasar dengan mata pelajaran yang diampu.” Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan 20: 499–514.
   Google Scholar