Integrated STEM – a step too far in primary education contexts?

References

• Anderson, D., and M. Clark. 2012. “Development of Syntactic Subject Matter Knowledge and Pedagogical Content Knowledge for Science by a Generalist Elementary Teacher.” Teachers and Teaching 18 (3): 315–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asghar, A., R. Ellington, E. Rice, F. Johnson, and G. M. Prime. 2012. “Supporting STEM Education in Secondary Science Contexts.” The Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning 6 (2): 85–125.
   Google Scholar
• Berlin, D. F., and A. L. White. 2012. “A Longitudinal Look at Attitudes and Perceptions Related to the Integration of Mathematics, Science, and Technology Education.” School Science and Mathematics 112 (1): 20–30.
   Google Scholar
• Breiner, J. M., C. J. Carla, S. S. Harkness, and C. M. Koehler. 2012. “What is STEM? A Discussion About Conceptions of STEM in Education and Partnerships.” School Science and Mathematics 112 (1): 3–11.
   Google Scholar
• Chamberlin, S. A., and N. Pereira. 2017. “Differentiating Engineering Activities for use in a Mathematics Setting.” In Engineering Instruction for High-Ability Learners in K-8 Classrooms, edited by D. Dailey and A. Cotabish, 45–55. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
   Google Scholar
• Costello, E., P. Girme, M. McKnight, M. Brown, E. McLoughlin, and S. Kaya. 2020. Government Responses to the Challenge of STEM Education: Case Studies from Europe. ATS STEM Report #2. Dublin: Dublin City University (DCU). http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3673600.
   Google Scholar
• Cotabish, A., A. Robinson, D. Dailey, and G. Hughes. 2013. “The Effects of a STEM Intervention on Elementary Students’ Science Knowledge and Skills.” School Science and Mathematics 113 (5): 215–226.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. 2009. Research Design- Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. 3rd ed. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• DeJarnette, N. K. 2012. “America’s Children: Providing Early Exposure to STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math) Initiatives.” Education 133 (1): 77–84.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Education and Skills (DES). 2011. Literacy and Numeracy for Learning and Life: The National Strategy to improve Literacy and Numeracy among Children and Young People 2011-2020. Dublin: DES.
   Google Scholar
• DES (Department of Education and Science). 1999. Primary School Curriculum: Introduction. Dublin: DES. https://www.curriculumonline.ie/getmedia/93de2707-f25e-4bee-9035-92b00613492e/Introduction-to-primary-curriculum.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• DES (Department of Education and Skills). 2017a. Action Plan for Education. Dublin: DES. https://www.education.ie/en/Publications/Corporate-Reports/Strategy-Statement/Action-Plan-for-Education-2017.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• DES (Department of Education and Skills). 2017b. STEM Education Policy Statement 2017–2026. Dublin: DES. https://www.education.ie/en/The-Education-System/STEM-Education-Policy/stem-education-policy-statement-2017-2026-.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• DES (Department of Education and Skills). 2017c. STEM Education Implementation Plan (2017-2019). Dublin: DES. https://www.education.ie/en/The-Education-System/STEM-Education-Policy/stem-education-implementation-plan-2017-2019-.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• DiFransesca, D., C. Lee, and E. McIntyre. 2014. “Where is the ‘E’ in STEM for Young Children? Engineering Design Education in an Elementary Teacher Preparation Program.” Issues in Teacher Education 23 (1): 49–64.
   Google Scholar
• Dooley, T., E. Dunphy, and G. Shiel. 2014. “Mathematics in Early Childhood and Primary Education.” Research Report 18. Dublin: NCCA. https://ncca.ie/media/2147/ncca_research_report_18.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Dunphy, E., T. Dooley, and G. Shiel. 2014. “Mathematics in Early Childhood and Primary Education.” Research Report 17. Dublin: NCCA. https://ncca.ie/media/1494/maths_in_ecp_education_theories_progression_researchreport_17.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Eivers, E., and A. Clerkin. 2013. National Schools, International Contexts Beyond the PIRLS and TIMSS Test Results. Dublin: Educational Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• English, L. D. 2016. “STEM Education in K-12: Perspectives on Integration.” International Journal of STEM Education 3 (3), doi:10.1186/s40594-016-0036-1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• English, L. D. 2017. “Advancing Elementary and Middle School STEM Education.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 15 (1): S5–S24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erduran, S. 2020. ““Nature of “STEM”?” Science and Education 29: 781–784.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finlayson, O., E. McLoughlin, and D. McCabe. 2015. “Strategies for the Assessment of Inquiry Learning in Science (SAILS).” In A European Project in Science Teachers Education”. In New perspectives in Science Education Conference Proceedings, edited by Pixel, 225–229. https://books.google.ie/books/about/Conference_proceedings_New_perspectives.html?id=hoftCgAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y.
   Google Scholar
• Glancy, A. W., and T. J. Moore. 2013. “Theoretical Foundations for Effective STEM Learning Environments.” School of Engineering Education Working Papers. Paper 1. http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/enewp/1.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G. 1978. Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goos, M., V. Ryan, C. Lane, K. Leahy, G. Walsh, T. O’Connell, J. O’Donoghue, and A. Nizar. 2020. Review of Literature to Identify a Set of Effective Interventions for Addressing Gender Balance in STEM in Early Years, Primary and Post-Primary Education Settings. Dublin: DES. https://www.education.ie/en/Publications/Education-Reports/review-of-literature-to-identify-a-set-of-effective-interventions-for-addressing-gender-balance-in-stem.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Guzey, S. S., M. Harwell, and T. Moore. 2014. “Development of an Instrument to Measure Students’ Attitudes Toward STEM.” School Science and Mathematics 114 (6): 271–279.
   Google Scholar
• Guzey, S. S., T. J. Moore, M. Harwell, and M. Moreno. 2016. “STEM Integration in Middle School Life Science: Student Learning and Attitudes.” Journal of Science Education and Technology 25 (4): 550–560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herro, D., and C. Quigley. 2017. “Exploring Teachers’ Perceptions of STEAM Teaching Through Professional Development: Implications for Teacher Educators.” Professional Development in Education 43: 416–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmlund, T. D., K. Lesseig, and D. Slavit. 2018. “Making Sense of ‘STEM Education’ in K-12 Contexts.” International Journal of STEM Education 5 (32). doi:10.1186/s40594-018-0127-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, C. C. 2019. “Understanding ‘What is STEM?’ a Decade Later.” School Science and Mathematics 119: 367–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelley, T. R., and J. G. Knowles. 2016. “A Conceptual Framework for STEM Education.” International Journal of STEM Education 3 (11). doi:10.1186/s40594-016-0046-z.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kloser, M., M. Wilsey, K. E. Twohy, A. D. Immonen, and A. C. Navotas. 2018. “‘We do STEM’: Unsettled Conceptions of STEM Education in Middle School S.T.E.M. Classrooms.” School Science and Mathematics 118: 335–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasóg Learning. 2019. Mission Moon Initiative with MIC & PDST. https://lasoglearning.com/mission-moon-initiative-with-mic-pdst/.
   Google Scholar
• Leavy, A.M., O'Dwyer, A., Hourigan, M., and E. Corry. 2020. State of the Art Report: Ireland. https://steamingprojecteu/resoures/11-state-of-the-art-reports.html
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J., Y. Hong-biao, Z. Zhong-hua, and J. Yu-le. 2011. “Teacher Empowerment and Receptivity in Curriculum Reform in China.” Chinese Education and Society 44 (4): 64–81.
   Google Scholar
• Lesseig, K., D. Slavit, T. H. Nelson, and R. A. Seidel. 2016. “Supporting Middle School Teachers’ Implementation of STEM Design Challenges.” School Science and Mathematics 116 (4): 177–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livstrom, I. C., A. H. Szostkowski, and G. H. Roehrig. 2018. “Integrated STEM in Practice: Learning from Montessori Philosophies and Practices.” School Science and Mathematics 119: 190–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margot, K. C., and T. Kettler. 2019. “Teachers’ Perceptions of STEM Education and Integration.” International Journal of STEM Education 6 (2). doi:10.1186/s40594-018-0151-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McComas, W. F., and S. R. Burgin. 2020. “A Critique of “STEM” Education.” Science and Education 29: 805–829.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLoughlin, E., D. Butler, S. Kaya, and E. Costello. 2020. “STEM Education in Schools: What can we Learn from the Research?” Report #1. Dublin: DCU. https://castel.ie/ats-stem-report-series-published/.
   Google Scholar
• McLoughlin, E., D. O’Neill, and G. Fagan. 2020. “Improving Gender Balance Ireland (2017-2019): Final Report.” DCU: CASTeL.
   Google Scholar
• MIC (Mary Immaculate College). 2020a. “MA in STEM.” https://www.mic.ul.ie/faculty-of-education/programme/ma-in-stem-education.
   Google Scholar
• MIC (Mary Immaculate College). 2020b. “Robots in Raheen – Primary School Children from across the Mid-West Compete in Vex Robotics Regional Finals.” https://www.mic.ul.ie/news/2020/vex-robotics-regional-finals.
   Google Scholar
• Milner, A. R. 2015. “The Utility and Beauty of STEM Education.” School Science and Mathematics 115 (2): 53–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, T. J., M. S. Stohlmann, H. H. Wang, K. M. Tank, A. Glancy, and G. H. Roehrig. 2014. “Implementation and Integration of Engineering in K-12 STEM Education.” In Engineering in Precollege Settings: Research Into Practice, 35–60 edited by J. Strobel, S. Purzer, and M. Cardella. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, T. P., and G. J. Mancini-Samuelson. 2012. “Graduating STEM Competent and Confident Teachers: The Creation of a STEM Certificate for Elementary Education Majors.” Journal of College Science Teaching 42 (2): 18–23.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, C., and G. Smith. 2012. “The Impact of a Curriculum Course on Pre-Service Primary Teachers’ Science Content Knowledge and Attitudes Towards Teaching Science.” Irish Educational Studies 31 (1): 77–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadelson, L. S., J. Callahan, P. Pyke, A. Hay, M. Dance, and J. Pfiester. 2013. “Teacher STEM Perception and Preparation: Inquiry-Based STEM Professional Development for Elementary Teachers.” The Journal of Educational Research 106: 157–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NCCA (National Council for Curriculum and Assessment). 2016. Background Paper and Brief for the Development of a New Primary Mathematics Curriculum. Dublin: NCCA.
   Google Scholar
• NCCA (National Council for Curriculum and Assessment). 2020. Draft Primary Curriculum Framework. Dublin: NCCA. https://ncca.ie/media/4456/ncca-primary-curriculum-framework-2020.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• O'Dwyer, A., Hourigan, M., Leavy, A.M., and E. Corry. under review. "I Have Seen STEM in Action and It's Quite Do-Able! The Impact of an Extended Professional Development Model on Teacher-Efficacy in STEM Education".
   Google Scholar
• Park, M., D. M. Dimitrov, L. G. Patterson, and D. Park. 2017. “Early Childhood Teachers’ Beliefs About Readiness for Teaching Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics.” Journal of Early Childhood Research 15: 275–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, W., J. Y. Wu, and S. Erduran. 2020. “The Nature of STEM Disciplines in the Science Education Standards Documents from the USA, Korea and Taiwan.” Science and Education 29: 899–927.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PDST (Professional Development Support for Teachers). 2020. “Designing and Integrating STEM.” https://www.pdst.ie/primary/STEM.
   Google Scholar
• Pleasants, J. 2020. “Inquiring Into the Nature of STEM Problems.” Science and Education 29: 831–855.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quigley, C. F., D. Herro, and F. M. Jamil. 2017. “Developing a Conceptual Model of STEAM Teaching Practice.” School Science and Mathematics 117 (1-2): 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RDS (Royal Dublin Society). 2020. “STEM Learning.” https://www.rds.ie/stem.
   Google Scholar
• Reynante, B. M., M. E. Selbach-Allen, and D. R. Pimentel. 2020. “Exploring the Promises and Perils of Integrated STEM Through Disciplinary Practices and Epistemologies.” Science and Education 29: 785–803.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds, K., M. O’Leary, M. Brown, and E. Costello. 2020. “Digital Formative Assessment of Transversal Skills in STEM: A Review of Underlying Principles and Best Practice.” ATS STEM Report #3. Dublin: DCU. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3673365.
   Google Scholar
• Ring, E. A., E. A. Dare, E. A. Crotty, and G. H. Roehrig. 2017. “The Evolution of Teacher Conceptions of STEM Education Throughout an Intensive Professional Development Experience.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 28 (5): 444–467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roycroft, H. 2018. “6 (1): 73–99STEM Learning in Ireland: An Evaluation of An Innovative Primary Science Learning Initiative from the Students' Perspective.” Irish Teachers' Journal.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, M. 2009. “STEM, STEM Education, Stemmania.” The Technology Teacher. 68 (4), 20-26.
   Google Scholar
• SFI (Science Foundation Ireland). 2020. “DPSM/ESERO Continuous Professional Development.” https://www.sfi.ie/engagement/discover-primary-science-and-maths/education/cpd/.
   Google Scholar
• Srikoom, W., D. L. Hanuscin, and C. Faikhamta. 2017. “Perceptions of In-Service Teachers Toward Teaching STEM in Thailand.” Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching 18 (2): 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• STEM Education Review Group. 2016. “STEM Education in the Irish School System: Report of the STEM Education Review Group.” https://www.education.ie/en/Publications/Education-Reports/STEM-Education-in-the-Irish-School-System.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Stohlmann, M. 2019. “Three Modes of STEM Integration for Middle School Mathematics Teachers.” School Science and Mathematics 119: 287–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., and J. Corbin. 1998. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Suter, W. N. 2012. Introduction to Educational Research: A Critical Thinking Approach. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, T. A. 2014. “Elementary Teachers’ Receptivity to Integrated Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Education in the Elementary Grades.” PhD diss., University of Nevada.
   Google Scholar
• Vasquez, J. A., C. Sneider, and M. Comer. 2013. STEM Lesson Essentials, Grades 3-8: Integrating Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar