Exploring a pedagogical model to support teaching new literacy skills in English education – an Irish study

References

• Alvermann, D. 2002. “Effective Literacy Instruction for Adolescents.” Journal of Literacy Research 34 (2): 189–208. doi:10.1207/s15548430jlr3402_4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvermann, D. 2008. “Why Bother Theorizing Adolescents’ Online Literacies for Classroom Practice and Research?” Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy 52 (1): 8–19. doi:10.1598/JAAL.52.1.2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apperley, T., and C. Beavis. 2011. “Literacy into Action: Digital Games as Action and Text in the English and Literacy Classroom.” Pedagogies: An International Journal 6 (2): 130–143. doi:10.1080/1554480X.2011.554620.
   Google Scholar
• Barton, D., and M. Hamilton. 2000. “Literacy Practices.” In Situated Literacies: Reading and Writing in Context, edited by D. Barton, M. Hamilton, and R. Ivanič, 7–15. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, C., A. Devitt, and B. Tangney. 2015. “The Alignment of CMC Language Learning Methodologies with the Bridge21 Model of 21C Learning.” In Critical CALL – Proceedings of the 2015 EUROCALL Conference, Padova, Italy, edited by F. Helm, L. Bradley, M. Guarda and S. Thouësny, 44–50. Dublin: Research Publishing.net. doi:10.14705/rpnet2015.000308.
   Google Scholar
• Borsheim, C., K. Merritt, and D. Reed. 2008. “Beyond Technology for Technology's Sake: Advancing Multiliteracies in the Twentyfirst Century.” The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas 82 (2): 87–90. doi:10.3200/TCHS.82.2.87-90.
   Google Scholar
• Bray, A., and B. Tangney. 2016. “Enhancing Student Engagement through the Affordances of Mobile Technology: A 21st Century Learning Perspective on Realistic Mathematics Education.” Mathematics Education Research Journal 28 (1): 173–197. doi:10.1007/s13394-015-0158-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke, P., and J. Welsch. 2018. “Literacy in a ‘Broad and Balanced’ Primary School Curriculum: The Potential of a Disciplinary Approach in Irish Classrooms.” Irish Educational Studies 37 (1): 33–49. doi:10.1080/03323315.2017.1421088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnett, C., and G. Merchant. 2015. “The Challenge of 21st-Century Literacies.” Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy 59 (3): 271–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, J., S. Kearney, and K. Sullivan. 2019. “Technology-Mediated Collaborative Learning: The Bridge21 Activity Model in Theory and Practice.” In Didactics of Smart Pedagogy, edited by L. Daniela. Cham: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-01551-0_16.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, J., K. O’Sullivan, and K. Sullivan. 2017. “An IoT and Wearable Technology Hackathon for Promoting Careers in Computer Science.” IEEE Transactions on Education 60 (1): 50–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, D., and L. Archambault. 2013. “Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge and Teaching Poetry: Preparing Preservice Teachers to Integrate Content with VoiceThread Technology.” Teacher Education and Practice 26 (1): 117–142.
   Google Scholar
• Chung, Vicky. 2018. “Teaching & Learning.” https://dschool.stanford.edu/programs/teaching-learning.
   Google Scholar
• Conneely, C., C. Girvan, J. Lawlor, and B. Tangney. 2013. “Technology, Teamwork and 21st Century Skills in the Irish Classroom.” In Shaping Our Future: How the Lessons of the Past Can Shape Educational Transformation, edited by D. Butler, K. Marshall, and M. Leahy, 348–381. Dublin: Liffey Press.
   Google Scholar
• Curwood, J., and L. Cowell. 2011. “iPoetry: Creating Space for New Literacies in the English Curriculum.” Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy 55 (2): 110–120. doi:10.1002/JAAL.00014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DES (Department of Education and Skills). 2011. Literacy and Numeracy for Learning and Life: The National Strategy to Improve Literacy and Numeracy among Children and Young People 2011-2020. Dublin, Ireland. https://assets.gov.ie/24521/9e0e6e3887454197a1da1f9736c01557.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• DES (Department of Education and Skills). 2012. A Framework for Junior Cycle. Dublin, Ireland. https://www.education.ie/en/Publications/Policy-Reports/A-Framework-for-Junior-Cycle-Full-Report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Dierking, R. 2015. “Using Nooks to Hook Reluctant Readers.” Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy 58 (5): 407–416. doi:10.1002/jaal.366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dockter, J., D. Haug, and C. Lewis. 2010. “Redefining Rigor: Critical Engagement, Digital Media, and the New English/Language Arts.” Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy 53 (5): 418–420. doi:10.1598/JAAL.53.5.7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dwyer, Bernadette. 2016. “Engaging all Students in Internet Research and Inquiry.” The Reading Teacher 69 (4): 383–389. doi:10.1002/trtr.1435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egan, A., A. FitzGibbon, and E. Oldham. 2013. “Teacher Identified Uses of Technology in the Classroom—An Irish Cohort.” In Proceedings of SITE 2013—Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, edited by R. McBride and M. Searson, 5034-5039. New Orleans, LA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/48930/.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2013. Survey of Schools: ICT in Education. Benchmarking Access, Use and Attitudes to Technology in Europe’s Schools. Belgium. https://ec.europa.eu/digital-agenda/sites/digital-agenda/files/KK-31-13-401-EN-N.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ezzy, D. 2002. Qualitative Analysis: Practice and Innovation. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Flanagan, E., and T. Hall. 2017. “Digital Ensemble: The EN.” English in Education 51 (1): 76–99. doi:10.1111/17548845.2017.11912597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flanagan, S., and M. Shoffner. 2013. “Teaching with (out) Technology: Secondary English Teachers and Classroom Technology Use.” Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education 13 (3): 242–261. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/42121/.
   Google Scholar
• Fredricks, J., P. Blumenfeld, and A. Paris. 2004. “School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence.” Review of Educational Research 74 (1): 59–109. doi:10.3102/00346543074001059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fullan, M., and M. Langworthy. 2014. A Rich Seam: How New Pedagogies Find Deep Learning. London: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J., and A. Wigfield. 2000. “Engagement and Motivation in Reading.” In Handbook of Reading Research (Vol. 3), edited by M. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, P. Pearson, and R. Barr, 403–422. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hammersley, M., and P. Atkinson. 1983. Ethnology: Principles in Practice. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, R., and E. Honan. 2008. “Digital Literacies in Two Low Socioeconomic Classrooms: Snapshots of Practice.” English Teaching: Practice and Critique 7 (2): 85–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh, H.-F., and S. Shannon. 2005. “Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis.” Qualitative Health Research 15 (9): 1277–1288. doi:10.1177/1049732305276687.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hundley, M., and T. Holbrook. 2013. “Set in Stone or Set in Motion?: Multimodal and Digital Writing with Preservice English Teachers.” Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy 56 (6): 500–509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchison, A., and D. Reinking. 2010. “A National Survey of Barriers to Integrating Information and Communication Technologies into Literacy Instruction.” Paper presented at the Fifty-ninth yearbook of the National Reading Conference, Milwaukee, WI, 230–243.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchison, A. and L. Woodward. 2014. “A Planning Cycle for Integrating Digital Technology into Literacy Instruction.” The Reading Teacher. 67 (6): 455-464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, L. 2016. “Writing 2.0: How English Teachers Conceptualize Writing with Digital Technologies.” English Education 49 (1): 28–62. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26492609.
   Google Scholar
• Kearney, S., S. Gallagher, and B. Tangney. 2020. “ETAS: An Instrument for Measuring Attitudes Towards Learning English with Technology.” Technology, Pedagogy and Education 29 (4): 445–461. doi:10.1080/1475939X.2020.1764381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knobel, M., and C. Lankshear. 2014. “Studying New Literacies.” Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy 58 (2): 97–101. doi:10.1002/jaal.314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lankshear, C., and M. Knobel. 2006. New Literacies: Everyday Practices and Classroom Learning. 2nd ed. New York: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lankshear, C., and M. Knobel. 2007. “Sampling ‘the New’ in New Literacies.” A new Literacies Sampler 29: 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Lawlor, J., C. Conneely, E. Oldham, K. Marshall, and B. Tangney. 2018. “Bridge21: Teamwork, Technology and Learning. A Pragmatic Model for Effective Twenty-First- Century Team-Based Learning.” Technology, Pedagogy and Education 27 (2): 211–232. doi:10.1080/1475939X.2017.1405066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawlor, J., K. Marshall, and B. Tangney. 2016. “Bridge21 – Exploring the Potential to Foster Intrinsic Student Motivation Through a Team-Based, Technology Mediated Learning Model.” Technology, Pedagogy and Education 25 (2): 187–206. doi:10.1080/1475939X.2015.1023828.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leu, D., C. Kinzer, J. Coiro, and D. Cammack. 2004. “Toward a Theory of New Literacies Emerging from the Internet and Other Information and Communication Technologies.” Theoretical Models and Processes of Reading 5 (1): 1570–1613.
   Google Scholar
• Leu, D., C. Kinzer, J. Coiro, J. Castek, and L. Henry. 2017. “New Literacies: A Dual- Level Theory of the Changing Nature of Literacy, Instruction, and Assessment.” Journal of Education 197 (2): 1–18. doi:10.1177/002205741719700202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maclellan, E. 2014. “How Might Teachers Enable Learner Self-Confidence? A Review Study.” Educational Review 66 (1): 59–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, J. 2020. “Voice and New Literacies: Student Perceptions of Writing Instruction in a Secondary English Classroom.” Teaching/Writing: The Journal of Writing Teacher Education 8 (1): Article 7. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/wte/vol8/iss1/7.
   Google Scholar
• McGarr, O., and K. Johnston. 2019. “Exploring the Evolution of Educational Technology Policy in Ireland: From Catching-Up to Pedagogical Maturity.” Educational Policy. doi:10.1177/0895904819843597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrail, E. 2005. “Teachers, Technology, and Change: English Teachers’ Perspectives.” Journal of Technology & Teacher Education 13 (1): 5–24.
   Google Scholar
• McWilliams, J., D. Hickey, M. Hines, J. Conner, and S. Bishop. 2013. “Using Collaborative Writing Tools for Literary Analysis: Twitter, Fan Fiction and The Crucible in the Secondary English Classroom.” Journal of Media Literacy Education 2 (3): 238–245. https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/jmle/vol2/iss3/5.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, K. 2010. “Shrek Meets Vygotsky: Rethinking Adolescents’ Multimodal Literacy Practices in Schools.” Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy 54 (1): 35–45. doi:10.1598/JAAL.54.1.4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra, P., and M. Koehler. 2006. “Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge.” Teachers College Record 108 (6): 1017–1054. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/99246/.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NCCA (National Council for Curriculum and Assessment). 2017. Curriculum Online: English. The Leaving Certificate English Syllabus. Dublin, Ireland. www.curriculumonline.ie/getmedia/79aab7be-cdd3-4bf1-937f34e203b1b915/SCSEC14_English_Syllabus.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• NCCA (National Council for Curriculum and Assessment). 2018. Junior Cycle English. Dublin, Ireland. https://curriculumonline.ie/getmedia/d14fd46d-5a10-46fc-9002-83df0b4fc2ce/JuniorCycle_-English_-specification_amended_2018.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• NCTE (National Council of Teachers of English). 2013. NCTE Framework for 21st Century Curriculum and Assessment. Retrieved from https://cdn.ncte.org/nctefiles/resources/positions/framework_21stcent_curr_assessment.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• The New London Group. 1996. “A Pedagogy of Multiliteracies: Designing Social Futures.” Harvard Educational Review 66 (1): 60–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, S., and J. McClay. 2012. “Assumptions and Practices in Using Digital Technologies to Teach Writing in Middle-Level Classrooms Across Canada.” Literacy 46 (3): 140–146. doi:10.1111/j.1741-4369.2012.00665.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierce, R., K. Stacey, and A. Barkatsas. 2007. “A Scale for Monitoring Students’ Attitudes to Learning Mathematics with Technology.” Computers & Education 48 (2): 285–300. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2005.01.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, D., and A. Meyer. 2002. Teaching Every Student in the Digital Age: Universal Design for Learning. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD).
   Google Scholar
• Street, B. 2003. “What’s “new” in New Literacy Studies? Critical Approaches to Literacy in Theory and Practice.” Current Issues in Comparative Education 5 (2): 77–91.
   Google Scholar
• Sulkunen, S. 2013. “Adolescent Literacy in Europe - An Urgent Call for Action.” European Journal of Education 48 (4): 528–542. doi:10.1111/ejed.12052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, G., and R. Feinn. 2012. “Using Effect Size—or Why the P Value is Not Enough.” Journal of Graduate Medical Education 4 (3): 279–282. doi:10.4300/JGME-D-12-00156.1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tondeur, J., A. Forkosh-Baruch, S. Prestridge, P. Albion, and S. Edirisinghe. 2016. “Responding to Challenges in Teacher Professional Development for ICT Integration in Education.” Journal of Educational Technology & Society 19 (3): 110–120. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/jeductechsoci.19.3.110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voogt, J., and N. Roblin. 2012. “A Comparative Analysis of International Frameworks for 21st Century Competences: Implications for National Curriculum Policies.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 44 (3): 299–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar