The effect of the use of computer-aided design (CAD) and a 3D printer on the child’s competence in mathematics

References

• Aldosemani, T. 2019. “‘Inservice Teachers’ Perceptions of a Professional Development Plan Based on SAMR Model: A Case Study’.” The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology 18 (3): 46–53.
   Google Scholar
• Alkhattabi, M. 2017. “‘Augmented Reality as E-Learning Tool in Primary Schools’ Education: Barriers to Teachers’ Adoption’.” International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning 12 (02): 91–100.
   Google Scholar
• Altrichter, H., P. Posch, and B. Somekh. 1993. Teachers Investigate Their Work: An Introduction to the Methods of Action Research. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brace, N., R. Kemp, and R. Snelgar. 2016. SPSS for Psychologists (and Everybody Else). 6th ed. New York: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Bressler, D. M., A. M. Bodzin, and M. S. Tutwiler. 2019. “Engaging Middle School Students in Scientific Practice with a Collaborative Mobile Game.” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 35 (2): 197–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canavan, L. 2014. ‘The Impact of Homework on Children's Creativity and Their Attitudes Towards School’, M.Ed. Limerick: Mary Immaculate College.
   Google Scholar
• Ching, Y. H., Y. C. Hsu, and S. Baldwin. 2018. “Developing Computational Thinking with Educational Technologies for Young Learners.” TechTrends 62 (6): 563–573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., L. Manion, and K. Morrison. 2011. Research Methods in Education. 7th ed. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Covington, M. V. 1992. Making the Grade: A Self-Worth Perspective on Motivation and School Reform. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Covington, M. 2000. “Goal Theory, Motivation, and School Achievement: An Integrative Review.” Annual Review of Psychology 51 (1): 171–200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J., and V. Clark. 2011. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. 2nd ed. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., and J. D. Creswell. 2018. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. 5th ed. Los Angeles: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Crotty, M. 1998. The Foundations of Social Research: Meaning and Perspective in the Research Process. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Education and Skills. 2015. Digital Strategy for Schools 2015–2020. Dublin: Department of Education and Skills.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Education and Skills. 2017. STEM Education Policy Statement 2017–2026. Dublin: Department of Education and Skills.
   Google Scholar
• Di Serio, A., M. Ibáñez, and C. Delgado Kloos. 2013. “‘Impact of an Augmented Reality System on Students’ Motivation for a Visual art Course’.” Computers & Education 68: 586–596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dockett, S., B. Perry, E. Kearney, A. Hampshire, J. Mason, and V. Schmied. 2009. “Researching with Families: Ethical Issues and Situations.” Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood 10 (4): 353–365.
   Google Scholar
• Elrod, E. 2016. “Classroom Innovation Through 3D Printing.” Library Hi Tech News 33 (3): 5–7.
   Google Scholar
• Field, A. 2018. Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics. 5th ed. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Ganley, C., and M. Vasilyeva. 2011. “Sex Differences in the Relation Between Math Performance, Spatial Skills, and Attitudes.” Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 32 (4): 235–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gebler, M., A. Uiterkamp, and C. Visser. 2014. “A Global Sustainability Perspective on 3D Printing Technologies.” Energy Policy 74: 158–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gersmehl, P., and C. Gersmehl. 2007. “Spatial Thinking by Young Children: Neurologic Evidence for Early Development and “Educability”.” Journal of Geography 106 (5): 181–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, E. R., J. M. Rosenberg, and M. Akcaoglu. 2016. “The Substitution Augmentation Modification Redefinition (SAMR) Model: a Critical Review and Suggestions for its Use.” TechTrends 60 (5): 433–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennick, M., I. Hutter, and A. Bailey. 2012. ‘Qualitative Research Methods’. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Hesse-Biber, S. N. 2016. The Practice of Qualitative Research: Engaging Students in the Research Process. 3rd Ed. Los Angeles: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Ho, C., C. Eastman, and R. Catrambone. 2006. “An Investigation of 2D and 3D Spatial and Mathematical Abilities.” Design Studies 27 (4): 505–524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holbrook, A., K. Dally, C. Avery, T. Lovat, and H. Fairbairn. 2017. “Research Ethics in the Assessment of PhD Theses: Footprint or Footnote?” Journal of Academic Ethics 15 (5): 321–340.
   Google Scholar
• Hourigan, M., and A. Leavy. 2019. “‘Learning from Teaching: pre-Service Primary Teachers’ Perceived Learning from Engaging Informal Lesson Study’.” Irish Educational Studies 38 (3): 283–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howitt, D., and D. Cramer. 2014. Introduction to Statistics in Psychology. 6th ed. London: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, W., W. Huang, and J. Tschopp. 2010. “Sustaining Iterative Game Playing Processes in DGBL: The Relationship Between Motivational Processing and Outcome Processing.” Computers & Education 55 (2): 789–797.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huffaker, D. 2007. “Spinning Yarns Around the Digital Fire: Storytelling and Dialogue among Youth on the Internet.” Information Technology in Childhood Education Annual 2004 (1): 63–75.
   Google Scholar
• Kamberelis, G., and G. Dimitriadis. 2005. “Focus Groups: Strategic Articulations of Pedagogy, Poltics and Inquiry.” In The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, 3rd ed., edited by N. Denzin, and Y. Lincoln. London: SAGE, pp. 887–909.
   Google Scholar
• Keane, T., W. F. Keane, and A. S. Blicblau. 2016. “Beyond Traditional Literacy: Learning and Transformative Practices Using ICT.” Education and Information Technologies 21 (4): 769–781.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kebritchi, K., and A. Hirumi. 2008. “Examining the Pedagogical Foundations of Modern Educational Computer Games.” Computers & Education 51 (4): 1729–1743.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelley, T., and J. Knowles. 2016. “A Conceptual Framework for Integrated STEM Education.” International Journal of STEM Education 3 (11): 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Kihoza, P. 2016. “Classroom ICT Integration in Tanzania: Opportunities and Challenges from the Perspectives of TPACK and SAMR Models.” International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology 12 (1): 107–129.
   Google Scholar
• Kostakis, V., N. Vasilis, and V. Giotitsat. 2015. “Open Source 3D Printing as a Means of Learning: An Educational Experiment in two High Schools in Greece.” Telematics and Informatics 32 (1): 118–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kudryavtsev, V. 2011. “The Phenomenon of Child Creativity.” International Journal of Early Years Education 19 (1): 45–53.
   Google Scholar
• Landers, R. 2014. “Developing a Theory of Gamified Learning: Linking Serious Games and Gamification of Learning.” Simulation & Gaming 45 (6): 752–768.
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S., and E. Helsper. 2007. “Gradations in Digital Inclusion: Children, Young People and the Digital Divide.” New Media & Society 9 (4): 671–696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowe, H. 2009. “‘Children’s Independence and ICT’.” In The Really Useful Book of ICT in the Early Years, edited by P. Harriet. Oxon: Routledge, pp. 25–37.
   Google Scholar
• Loy, J. 2014. “eLearning and eMaking: 3D Printing Blurring the Digital and the Physical.” Education Sciences 4 (1): 108–121.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, R., and O. McGarr. 2016. “‘Negotiating Subject Hierarchies: Neo-Liberal Influences on the Comprehensive Curriculum in Ireland’.” An Interdisciplinary Journal of Educational Policy, Policy and Practice 30 (5): 721–739.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malone, M. J. 2012. ‘Exploring the use of a Virtual ELearning Environment for the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics in a Primary Classroom’, M.Ed. Limerick: Mary Immaculate College.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, G. 2019. “The Effect of Augmented Reality Use on Achievement, Misconception and Course Engagement.” Early Human Development 133: 72–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. 2019. “Computer Games in Education.” Annual Review of Psychology 70 (1): 531–549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayeza, E. 2017. “Doing Child-Centered Ethnography: Unravelling the Complexities of Reducing the Perceptions of Adult Male Power During Fieldwork.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 16 (1): 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeay, H. 2006. “Imagery, Spatial Ability and Problem Solving.” Mathematics Teaching 195: 36–38.
   Google Scholar
• McMillan, J., and S. Schumacher. 2014. Research in Education Evidence-Based Enquiry. 7th ed. Essex: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• McNiff, J., and J. Whitehead. 2010. You and Your Action Research Project. 3rd ed. Oxfordshire: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Meisel, N., and C. William. 2015. “Design and Assessment of a 3D Printing Vending Machine.” Rapid Prototyping Journal 21 (5): 471–481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mellinger, C., and T. Hanson. 2017. Quantitative Research Methods in Translation and Interpreting Studies. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Meredith, A. 2016. “Building Blocks of the Imagination: Children, Creativity, and the Limits of Disney Infinity.” The Velvet Light Trap 78: 53–64.
   Google Scholar
• Mertens, D. 2015. Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology. 4th ed. Los Angeles: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Mertler, C. A. 2016. Introduction to Educational Research. Los Angeles: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Messer, T., and K. Holliman. 2018. “Evaluating the Effectiveness of an Educational Programming Intervention on Children’s Mathematics Skills, Spatial Awareness and Working Memory.” Education and Information Technology 23 (6): 2879–2888.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulligan, J., and M. Mitchelmore. 2009. “Awareness of Pattern and Structure in Early Mathematical Development.” Mathematics Educational Research Journal 21 (2): 33–49.
   Google Scholar
• National Council for Curriculum and Assessment. 1999. Mathematics Primary School Curriculum. Dublin: National Council for Curriculum and Assessment.
   Google Scholar
• Pallant, J. 2010. SPSS Survival Manual. 4th ed. Berkshire: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Paraskeva, C., A. Koulieris, M. Coxon, and K. Mania. 2012. “Gender Differences in Spatial Awareness in Immersive Virtual Environments: A Preliminary Investigation.” Proceedings of the 11th ACM SIGGRAPH International Conference on Virtual-Reality Continuum and its Applications in Industry, pp. 95–98.
   Google Scholar
• Phelan, S., and E. Kinsella. 2013. “Picture This … Safety, Dignity, and Voice- Ethical Research With Children: Practical Considerations for the Reflexive Researcher.” Qualitative Inquiry 19 (2): 81–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plowman, L., J. McPake, and C. Stephen. 2008. “Just Picking it up? Young Children Learning with Technology at Home.” Cambridge Journal of Education 38 (3): 303–319.
   Google Scholar
• Prendergast, M., L. Harbison, S. Miller, and N. Trakulphadetkrai. 2019. “‘Pre-Service and in-Service Teachers’ Perceptions on the Integration of Children’s Literature in Mathematics Teaching and Learning in Ireland’.” Irish Educational Studies 38 (2): 157–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royte, E. 2013. ‘What lies ahead for 3-D printing?’ Smithsonian Magazine [online], available: http://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/what-lies-ahead-for-3-d-printing-37498558/?no-ist [accessed 12th November 2016].
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Ariza, A., R. Casuso, S. Suarez-Manzano, and E. Martínez-López. 2018. “Effect of Augmented Reality Game Pokémon GO on Cognitive Performance and Emotional Intelligence in Adolescent Young.” Computers & Education 116: 49–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salomon, A., and Y. Kolikant. 2016. “‘High-School Students’ Perceptions of the Effects of non-Academic Usage of ICT on Their Academic Achievements’.” Computers in Human Behaviour 64: 143–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scalabre, O. 2016. ‘The next manufacturing revolution is here’, Ted Talks [video online] available: https://www.ted.com/talks/olivier_scalabre_the_next_manufacturing_revolution_is_here#t-55651 [accessed 12th November 2016].
   Google Scholar
• Schubert, C., M. Van Langeveld, and L. Donoso. 2014. “Innovations in 3D Printing: a 3D Overview from Optics to Organs.” British Journal of Ophthalmology 98 (2): 159–161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A., and A. Price. 2012. Mathematics in Early Years Education. 3rd ed. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, G. 2013. How to do Your Research Project a Guide for Students in Education and Applied Social Sciences. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Thornburg, D., N. Thornburg, and S. Armstrong. 2014. “The Next Dimension: The Pros and Cons of 3D Printing.” Tech and Learning 32 (2): 22–24.
   Google Scholar
• Treacy, M. 2017. “Spoon-feeding to Tongue-Biting and Beyond: Factors That Contributed to Changes in Irish Primary School Teachers’ Mathematics Practice.” Irish Educational Studies 36 (3): 375–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogt, P. 2007. Quantitative Research Methods for Professionals. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Warin, J. 2011. “Ethical Mindfulness and Reflexivity: Managing a Research Relationship With Children and Young People in a 14-Year Qualitative Longitudinal Research (QLR) Study.” Qualitative Inquiry 17 (9): 805–814.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheeler, S., P. Yeomans, and D. Wheeler. 2008. “The Good, the bad and the Wiki: Evaluating Student-Generated Content for Collaborative Learning.” British Journal of Educational Technology 39 (6): 987–995.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, H., S. Lee, H. Chang, and J. Liang. 2013. “Current Status, Opportunities and Challenges of Augmented Reality in Education.” Computers & Education 62: 41–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. 2011. Qualitative Research from Start to Finish. New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar