Most-favoured-nation treaty in service of trade? Case: early trade policy relations between Finland and Japan and their impact on the sales networks of the Finnish forest industry

References

• Accominotti, O., & Flandreau, M. (2008). Bilateral trade treaties and the most-favored-nation clause: The myth of trade liberalization in the mid-nineteenth century. World Politics, 60(2), 147–188. doi: 10.1353/wp.0.0010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barabási, A.-L. (2002). Linkit. Verkostojen uusi teoria [Linked. The new science of networks]. Helsinki: Terra Cognita.
   Google Scholar
• Bohlin, J. (2005). Tariff protection in Sweden, 1885–1914. Scandinavian Economic History Review, 53(2), 7–29. doi: 10.1080/03585522.2005.10414244
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J. C. (1995). Imperfect competition and Anglo-German trade rivalry: Markets for cotton textiles before 1914. Journal of Economic History, 55(3), 494–527. doi: 10.1017/S0022050700041619
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capie, F. (1978). The British tariff and industrial protection in the 1930s. Economic History Review, 31(3), 399–409. doi: 10.2307/2598761
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casson, M. (2010). Networks: A theory of connectivity and interdependence. In M. Casson, P. J. Buckley, K. Dark, M. D. Giusta, A. Godley, M. Azzim Gulamhussen, … N. Wadeson (Eds.), Entrepreneurship: Theory, networks, history (pp. 115–149). Northampton: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Dent, C. M. (2006). New free trade agreements in the Asia-pacific. Economic & Social Research Council, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Dong, Q. H. (2000). The welfare effects of U.S. most-favored-nation tariff treatment of exports from China: An empirical inquiry. International Economic Journal, 14(1), 85–97. doi: 10.1080/10168730000080006
   Google Scholar
• Eichengreen, B., & Irwin, D. A. (1996). The role of history in bilateral trade flows (NBER Working Paper Series, Working Paper 5565). Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Fält, O. K. (1982). Eksotismista realismiin. Perinteinen Japanin-kuva Suomessa 1930-luvun murroksessa [From exoticism to realism. The traditional image of Japan in Finland in the transition years of the 1930’s]. Rovaniemi: Pohjois-Suomen Historiallinen Yhdistys.
   Google Scholar
• Grove, L., & Sugiyama, S. (2001). Introduction. In S. Sugiyama & L. Grove (Eds.), Commercial networks in modern Asia (pp. 1–14). Richmond: Curzon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harjula, J. (1969). Vientikaupan jakelutiet. In J. Harjula & K. Aaltola (Eds.), Ulkomaankaupan käsikirja (pp. 133–140). Porvoo: WSOY.
   Google Scholar
• Heikkinen, S. (2000). Paperia maailmalle. Suomen Paperitehtaitten Yhdistys – Finnpap 1918–1996. Helsinki: Otava.
   Google Scholar
• Honma, R. (Ed.). (1999). Nihon-keizai tōkei-shū 1868–1945 [Japanese economic statistics 1868–1945]. Tokyo: Nichigai Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Ikeda, M. (2008). Japan in trade isolation 1926–37 & 1948–85. Tokyo: I-House Press.
   Google Scholar
• Irwin, D. A. (1993). Multilateral and bilateral trade policies in the world trading system: An historical perspective. In J. De Melo & A. Panagariya (Eds.), New dimensions in regional integration (pp. 90–119). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Irwin, D. A. (2000a). Tariffs and growth in late nineteenth century America (NBER Working Paper Series, Working Paper 7639). Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Irwin, D. A. (2000b). Did late-nineteenth-century U.S. tariffs promote infant industries? Evidence from the tinplate industry. Journal of Economic History, 60(2), 335–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irwin, D. A. (2002a). Interpreting the tariff-growth correlation of the late nineteenth century (NBER Working Paper Series, Working Paper 8739). Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Irwin, D. A. (2002b). Did import substitution promote growth in the late nineteenth century? (NBER Working Paper Series, Working Paper 8751). Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Irwin, D. A. (2012). Trade policy disaster. Lessons from the 1930s. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Järvinen, K. (1935). Kauppapolitiikan olemus ja uusimmat ongelmat. Kansantaloudellinen aikakauskirja VII (XXXI) (pp. 410–436). Helsinki: Kansantaloudellinen Yhdistys.
   Google Scholar
• Johanson, J., & Wiedersheim-Paul, F. (1994). The internationalization of the firm: Four Swedish cases. In J. Johanson and Associates, Internationalization, Relationships and Networks (pp. 33–49). Uppsala University: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis, Studia Oeconomiae Negotiorum 36.
   Google Scholar
• Jussila, O. (2004). Suomen suuriruhtinaskunta. Helsinki: WSOY.
   Google Scholar
• Kauppila, J. (2008). Impact of tariffs on industries and prices in Finland during the interwar period. Scandinavian Economic History Review, 56(3), 176–191. doi: 10.1080/03585520802431233
   Google Scholar
• Kirchner, W. (1981). Russian tariffs and foreign industries before 1914: The German entrepreneur’s perspective. Journal of Economic History, 41(2), 361–379. doi: 10.1017/S0022050700043618
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitson, M., Solomou, S., & Weale, M. (1991). Effective protection and economic recovery in the United Kingdom during the 1930s. Economic History Review, 44(2), 328–338. doi: 10.2307/2598300
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kjeldsen-Kragh, S. (2001). International trade policy. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuisma, M. (1993). Metsäteollisuuden maa. Suomi, metsät ja kansainvälinen järjestelmä 1620–1920 [The land of forest industry. Finland, forests and the international system 1620–1920]. Helsinki: SHS.
   Google Scholar
• Kurosawa, T., & Hashino, T. (2012). From the non-European tradition to a variation on the Japanese competitiveness model: The modern Japanese paper industry since the 1870s. In J.-A. Lamberg, J. Ojala, M. Peltoniemi, & T. Särkkä (Eds.), The evolution of global paper industry 1800–2050. A comparative analysis (pp. 135–166). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kuuse, J. (1999). Den osynliga länken. Handelshusen i Göteborg under 1900-talet. Stockholm: Atlantis.
   Google Scholar
• Lamberg, J.-A. (2000). Case-tutkimus ulkomaankaupan pelisääntöjen muotoutumisesta: Suomen taloudelliset suhteet Espanjan kanssa 1920–1930-luvulla. Publications of Finnish History 26, Department of History, University of Jyväskylä.
   Google Scholar
• Lamberg, J.-A., & Skippari, M. (2001). Endogenous and exogenous variables in trade agreement policy: Finnish trade agreement policy between 1930 and the 1960s. Scandinavian Economic History Review, 49(3), 28–45. doi: 10.1080/03585522.2001.10419851
   Google Scholar
• Lampe, M. (2009). Effects of bilateralism and the MFN clause on international trade: Evidence for the Cobden-Chevalier network, 1860–1875. Journal of Economic History, 69(4), 1012–1040. doi: 10.1017/S0022050709001363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lampe, M., & Sharp, P. (2011). Something rational in the state of Denmark? The case of an outsider in the Cobden-Chevalier network, 1860–1875. Scandinavian Economic History Review, 59(2), 128–148. doi: 10.1080/03585522.2011.572584
   Google Scholar
• Lemberg, M. (1994). Hjalmar J. Procopé: Isänmaanystävä ja maailmankansalainen. Helsinki: Alea-Kirja Oy.
   Google Scholar
• Lensen, G. A. (1955). Russia’s Japan expedition 1852–1855. Gainesville: University of Florida Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lensen, G. A. (1959). The Russian push toward Japan: Russo-Japanese relations, 1697–1875. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marrison, A. (1998). Insular free trade, retaliation, and the most-favoured-nation treaty 1880–1914. In A. Marrison (Ed.), Free trade and its reception 1815–1960: Freedom and trade volume I (pp. 224–242). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Momose, H. (1973). Japan’s relations with Finland 1919–1944. As Reflected by Japanese Source Materials. Surabu Kenkyū, 17, Bessatsu.
   Google Scholar
• Murase, S. (1976). The most-favored-nation treatment in Japan’s treaty practice during the period 1854–1905. American Journal of International Law, 70(2), 273–297. doi: 10.2307/2200073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nye, J. V. (1991). The myth of free-trade Britain and fortress France: Tariffs and trade in the nineteenth century. Journal of Economic History, 51(1), 23–46. doi: 10.1017/S0022050700038341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ojala, J., & Luoma-aho, V. (2008). Stakeholder relations as social capital in early modern international trade. Business History, 50(6), 749–764. doi: 10.1080/00076790802420310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pahre, R. (2001). Most-favored-nation clauses and clustered negotiations. International Organization, 55(4), 859–890. doi: 10.1162/002081801317193628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pahre, R. (2008). Politics and trade cooperation in the nineteenth century: The ‘agreeable customs’ of 1815–1914. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pantzer, P. (1973). Japan und Österreich-Ungarn. Die diplomatischen, wirtschaftlichen und kulturellen Beziehungen von ihrer Aufnahme bis zum Ersten Weltkrieg. Wien: Veröffentlichungen des Instituts für Japanologie der Universität, Band XI.
   Google Scholar
• Pihkala, E. (1978). Suomen kauppapolitiikka vuosina 1918–1944. In L. Haataja (Ed.), Suomen ulkomaankauppapolitiikka (pp. 9–37). Keuruu: Otava.
   Google Scholar
• Prokhorov, A. M., & Waxman, M. (Eds.). (1979). The Great Soviet encyclopedia (Vol. 22, 3rd ed.). New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Rooth, T. J. T. (1984). Limits of leverage: The Anglo-Danish trade agreement of 1933. Economic History Review, 37(2), 211–228. doi: 10.2307/2596882
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahi, J. (2015). Hunting for new markets: Networks of trade between Finland and Japan during the interwar period. In K. Alenius & V.-P. Lehtola (Eds.), Transcultural encounters (pp. 29–43). Rovaniemi: Pohjois-Suomen Historiallinen Yhdistys.
   Google Scholar
• Sahi, J. (2016). Verkostot kaukaiseen itään. Suomen kauppasuhteet Japaniin 1919–1974 [Networking with the distant east. Finland’s trade relations with Japan 1919–1974]. Oulu: Oulun yliopisto.
   Google Scholar
• Sahi, J., & Igawa, K. (2015). Finnish-Japanese trade relations from protectionism to free trade, 1919–2010. In Y. Tanaka, T. Tamaki, J. Ojala, & J. Eloranta (Eds.), Comparing post-war Japanese and Finnish economies and societies: Longitudinal perspectives (pp. 157–194). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sajasalo, P., & Igawa, K. (2015). Growth of an industry: A comparison of paper industry in Japan and Finland. In Y. Tanaka, T. Tamaki, J. Ojala, & J. Eloranta (Eds.), Comparing post-war Japanese and Finnish economies and societies: Longitudinal perspectives (pp. 195–215). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sourander, I., & Solitander, E. (1943). Suomen Puuhiomoyhdistys 1892–1942. Lisävalaistusta Suomen hioke- ja kartonkiteollisuuden historiaan. Helsinki: Frenckellin Kirjapaino Osakeyhtiö.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, K. (2015). Implementation of non-tariff measures in Estonia in the 1930s. Scandinavian Economic History Review, 63(2), 178–202. doi: 10.1080/03585522.2015.1008565
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka, Y., Tamaki, T., Ojala, J., & Eloranta, J. (Eds.). (2015). Comparing post-war Japanese and Finnish economies and societies: Longitudinal perspectives. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tena-Junguito, A., Lampe, M., & Tâmega Fernandes, F. (2012). How much trade liberalization was there in the world before and after Cobden-Chevalier? Journal of Economic History, 72(3), 708–740.
   Google Scholar
• The New Encyclopædia Britannica. (1991). Vol. 8, 15th ed. Encyclopædia Britannica.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, G. F. (2003). Between hierarchies and markets: The logic and limits of network forms of organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Törngren, R. (1937). Finska Pappersföreningen 1892–1918. Helsingfors: Frenckellska Tryckeri Aktiebolaget.
   Google Scholar