Innovation trends and industrial renewal in Finland and Sweden 1970–2013

References

• Acs, Z. J., & Audretsch, D. B. (1990). Innovation and small firms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aghion, P., & Howitt, P. (1998). Endogenous growth theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alegre-Vidal, J., Lapiedra-Alcamí, R., & Chiva-Gómez, R. (2004). Linking operations strategy and product innovation: An empirical study of Spanish ceramic tile producers. Research Policy, 33(5), 829–839. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali-Yrkkö, J., Kalm, M., Pajarinen, M., Rouvinen, P., Seppälä, T., & Tahvanainen, A. (2013). Microsoft acquires Nokia: implications for the two companies and Finland. ETLA Brief No 16. Retrieved from http://pub.etla.fi/ETLA-Muistio-Brief-16.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ang, B. W. (2004). Decomposition analysis for policymaking in energy: Which is the preferred method? Energy Policy, 32(9), 1131–1139. doi: 10.1016/S0301-4215(03)00076-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ang, B. W. (2005). The LMDI approach to decomposition analysis: A practical guide. Energy Policy, 33(7), 867–871. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2003.10.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archibugi, D. (1988). In search of a useful measure of technological innovation (to make economists happy without) discontenting technologists. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 34(3), 253–277. doi: 10.1016/0040-1625(88)90071-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archibugi, D., & Pianta, M. (1996). Innovation surveys and patents as technology indicators: The state of the art. In Innovation, patents and technological strategies (pp. 17–56). Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Arundel, A., & Kabla, I. (1998). What percentage of innovations are patented? Empirical estimates for European firms. Research Policy, 27(2), 127–141. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00033-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bank of Finland. (2015). A brief history of Finnish foreign trade. Bank of Finland Bulletin 5/2015. Bank of Finland publications. Helsinki: Government Printing Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, N., Jones, C. I., Van Reenen, J., & Webb, M. (2017). Are ideas getting harder to find? (National Bureau of Economic Research No. 23782). Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w23782
   Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2011). Race against the machine: How the digital revolution is accelerating innovation, driving productivity, and irreversibly transforming employment and the economy. Lexington, MA: Digital Frontier Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The second machine age: Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. New York: WW Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Carlsson, B. (1995). Technological systems and economic performance: The case of factory automation. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, W. M., Nelson, R. R., & Walsh, J. P. (2000). Protecting their intellectual assets: appropriability conditions and why US manufacturing firms patent (or not). (NBER working paper No. 7552). Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w7552
   Google Scholar
• Coombs, R., Narandren, P., & Richards, A. (1996). A literature-based innovation output indicator. Research Policy, 25(3), 403–413. doi: 10.1016/0048-7333(95)00842-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowen, T. (2011). The great stagnation: How America ate all the low-hanging fruit of modern history, got sick, and will (eventually) feel better. New York: Dutton.
   Google Scholar
• Dong, J., Li, W., Cao, Y., & Fang, J. (2016). How does technology and population progress relate? An empirical study of the last 10,000 years. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 103, 57–70. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2015.11.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edquist, C., & Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, J. M. (2015). The Innovation Union Scoreboard is flawed: the case of Sweden–not the innovation leader of the EU–updated version. Papers in Innovation Studies 2015/16. Lund University, CIRCLE. Retrieved from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hhs/lucirc/2015_016.html
   Google Scholar
• Edvinsson, R. (2005). Growth, accumulation, crisis: With new macroeconomic data for Sweden 1800–2000 (Doctoral dissertation). Stockholm: Stockholm University.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, K. L., & Gordon, T. J. (1984). Characterization of innovations introduced on the US market in 1982. Glastonbury: Futures Group.
   Google Scholar
• Eggert, A., Thiesbrummel, C., & Deutscher, C. (2015). Heading for new shores: Do service and hybrid innovations outperform product innovations in industrial companies? Industrial Marketing Management, 45, 173–183. doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.02.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eichengreen, B. (2015). Secular stagnation: The long view. American Economic Review, 105(5), 66–70. doi: 10.1257/aer.p20151104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ejermo, O. A., & Kander, A. (2011). Swedish business research productivity. Industrial and Corporate Change, 20(4), 1081–1118. doi: 10.1093/icc/dtr023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ejermo, O., Kander, A., & Svensson Henning, M. S. (2011). The R&D-growth paradox arises in fast-growing sectors. Research Policy, 40(5), 664–672. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2011.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eliasson, G. (2001). The emergence and the disappearance of a Swedish computer industry: A competence bloc analysis of the chance factor KTH. Stockholm: Stockholm University.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2014). For a European industrial renaissance. Brussels: COM 14/2.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2017). European innovation scoreboard 2017. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/growth/industry/innovation/facts-figures/scoreboards_en
   Google Scholar
• Flor, M. L., & Oltra, M. J. (2004). Identification of innovating firms through technological innovation indicators: An application to the Spanish ceramic tile industry. Research Policy, 33(2), 323–336. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2003.09.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fontana, R., Nuvolari, A., Shimizu, H., & Vezzulli, A. (2013). Reassessing patent propensity: Evidence from a dataset of R&D awards, 1977–2004. Research Policy, 42(10), 1780–1792. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2012.05.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, R. (2012). Is US economic growth over? Faltering innovation confronts the six headwinds (NBER Working Paper No. 18315). Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w18315
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, R. J. (2016). The rise and fall of American growth: The US standard of living since the civil war. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grawe, S. J. (2009). Logistics innovation: A literature-based conceptual framework. International Journal of Logistics Management, 20(3), 360–377. doi: 10.1108/09574090911002823
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greve, H. (2003). A behavioral theory of R&D expenditures and innovations: Evidence from shipbuilding. Academy of Management Journal, 46(6), 685–702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossman, G. M., & Helpman, E. (1991). Innovation and growth in the world economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grossman, G. M., & Helpman, E. (1994). Endogenous innovation in the theory of growth. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(1), 23–44. doi: 10.1257/jep.8.1.23
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hjerppe, R. (1989). The Finnish economy 1860–1985: Growth and structural change. Helsinki: Bank of Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Hjerppe, R. (1990). Kasvun vuosisata. Helsinki: VAPK-Kustannus.
   Google Scholar
• Holmström, B., Korkman, S., & Pohjola, M. (2014). The nature of Finland’s economic crisis and the prerequisites for growth. Memorandum. Retrieved from https://vnk.fi/documents/10616/339615/The+nature+of+Finland%E2%80%99s+economic+crisis+and+the+prerequisites+for+growth+-memorandum/07f3b69a-25cb-4347-a713-b0f91c23a931
   Google Scholar
• Huebner, J. (2005). A possible declining trend for worldwide innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 72(8), 980–986. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2005.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, C. I. (1995). R&D-based models of economic growth. Journal of Political Economy, 103(4), 759–784. doi: 10.1086/262002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonung, L. (1994). 1990-talets ekonomiska kris i historisk belysning: Efterskrift till Erik Lundbergs bok ‘Ekonomiska kriser förr och nu’. Stockholm: SNS.
   Google Scholar
• Jonung, L., Kiander, J., & Vartia, P. (2009). The great financial crisis in Finland and Sweden: The dynamics of boom, bust and recovery, 1985–2000. In L. Jonung, J. Kiander, & P. Vartia (Eds.), Bust and recovery (pp. 19–70). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kasparov, G., & Thiel, P. (2012, November 8). Our dangerous delusion of tech progress. Financial Times.
   Google Scholar
• Kleinknecht, A., & Bain, D. (Eds.). (1993). New concepts in innovation output measurement. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kokkinen, A., Jalava, J., Hjerppe, R., & Hannikainen, M. (2007). Catching up in Europe: Finland’s convergence with Sweden and the EU15. Scandinavian Economic History Review, 55(2), 153–171. doi: 10.1080/03585520701435996
   Google Scholar
• Korkman, S., & Suvanto, A. (2015). Finland and Sweden in cross-country comparison: What are the lessons? In T. M. Andersen, M. Bergman, & S. E. H. Jensen (Eds.), Reform capacity and macroeconomic performance in the Nordic countries (pp. 278–305). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kurzweil, R. (1999). Spiritual machines: The merging of man and machine. The Futurist, 33(9), 16–21.
   Google Scholar
• Kurzweil, R. (2005). The singularity is near: When humans transcend biology. London: Duckworth.
   Google Scholar
• Kurzweil, R. (2013). Augmentation and transcendence [T&S interview]. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 32(1), 5–6. doi: 10.1109/MTS.2013.2247723
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemola, T. (1994). Characteristics of technology policy in Finland. In S. Vuori, & P. Vuorinen (Eds.), Explaining technical change in a small country: The Finnish national innovation system (pp. 184–200). Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Lemola, T. (2003). Country report: Transformation of Finnish science and technology policy. Science Studies, 16(1), 52–67.
   Google Scholar
• Makkonen, T., & van der Have, R. P. (2013). Benchmarking regional innovative performance: Composite measures and direct innovation counts. Scientometrics, 94(1), 247–262. doi: 10.1007/s11192-012-0753-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87. doi: 10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokyr, J. (2014). Secular stagnation? Not in your life. In C. Teulings, & R. Baldwin (Eds.), Secular stagnation: facts, causes and cures (pp. 83–89). London: CEPR Press and VoxEU.org.
   Google Scholar
• Myllyntaus, T. (Ed.). (1998). Economic crises and restructuring in history: Experiences of small countries. St. Katharinen: Scripta Mercaturae Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2005). Innovation policy and performance: A cross-country comparison. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Palmberg, C., Leppälahti, A., Lemola, T., & Toivanen, H. (1999). Towards a better understanding of innovation and industrial renewal in Finland: A new perspective. Espoo: VTT.
   Google Scholar
• van der Panne, G. (2007). Issues in measuring innovation. Scientometrics, 71(3), 495–507. doi: 10.1007/s11192-007-1691-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavitt, K. (1984). Sectoral patterns of technical change: Towards a taxonomy and a theory. Research Policy, 13(6), 343–373. doi: 10.1016/0048-7333(84)90018-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romer, P. M. (1986). Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy, 94(5), 1002–1037. doi: 10.1086/261420
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouvinen, P., & Ylä-Anttila, P. (2003). Case study: Little Finland’s transformation to a wireless giant. In S. Dutta, B. Lanvin, & F. Paua (Eds.), The global information technology report 2003–2004 (pp. 87–108). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saarinen, J. (2005). Innovations and industrial performance in Finland, 1945–1998 (Doctoral dissertation). Lund: Lund University.
   Google Scholar
• Santarelli, E., & Piergiovanni, R. (1996). Analyzing literature-based innovation output indicators: The Italian experience. Research Policy, 25(5), 689–711. doi: 10.1016/0048-7333(95)00849-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schön, L. (2000). Electricity, technological change and productivity in Swedish industry, 1890–1990. European Review of Economic History, 4(2), 175–194. doi: 10.1017/S1361491600000046
   Google Scholar
• Schön, L. (2009). Technological waves and economic growth: Sweden in an international perspective 1850–2005. CIRCLE Working Papers 2009/6. Lund: Lund University.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, L. (2010). Sweden’s road to modernity: An economic history. Stockholm: SNS förlag.
   Google Scholar
• Sjöö, K. (2014). Innovation and transformation in the Swedish manufacturing sector, 1970–2007 (Doctoral dissertation). Lund: Lund University.
   Google Scholar
• Sjöö, K. (2016). Innovation and industrial renewal in Sweden, 1970–2007. Scandinavian Economic History Review, 64(3), 258–277. doi: 10.1080/03585522.2016.1218928
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjöö, K., Taalbi, J., Kander, A., & Ljungberg, J. (2014). SWINNO: A database of Swedish innovations, 1970–2007 (Lund Papers in Economic History. General Issues; No. 133). Lund: Lund University.
   Google Scholar
• Solow, R. (1987, July 12). We’d better watch out [Book review], New York Times.
   Google Scholar
• Statistiska Centralbyrån. (2016). Forskning och utveckling i företag med 1–9 anställda år 2013: En pilotundersökning. Forskning och utveckling inom företagssektorn 2016:1. Stockholm: Statistics Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Strumsky, D., Lobo, J., & Tainter, J. A. (2010). Complexity and the productivity of innovation. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 27(5), 496–509. doi: 10.1002/sres.1057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svanlund, J. (2010). Svensk och finsk upphinnartillväxt: Faktorpris-och produktivitets-utjämning mellan Finland och Sverige 1950–2000 (Doctoral dissertation). Umeå: Umeå University.
   Google Scholar
• Taalbi, J. (2014). Innovation as creative response: Determinants of innovation in the Swedish manufacturing industry, 1970–2007 (Doctoral dissertation). Lund: Lund University.
   Google Scholar
• Taalbi, J. (2017a). Development blocks in innovation networks: The Swedish manufacturing industry, 1970–2007. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 27(3), 461–501. doi: 10.1007/s00191-017-0491-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taalbi, J. (2017b). What drives innovation? Evidence from economic history. Research Policy, 46(8), 1437–1453. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2017.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taalbi, J. (2017c). Origins and pathways of innovation in the third industrial revolution: Sweden, 1950–2013. (Lund Papers in Economic History; No. 159). Lund: Lund University.
   Google Scholar
• Torregrosa, S., Pelkonen, A., Oksanen, J., & Kander, A. (2017). Impact of innovation policy on firm innovation: A comparison of Finland and Sweden, 1970–2013 (Lund Papers in Econmoic History; No. 160). Lund: Lund University.
   Google Scholar
• Utterback, J. (1994). Mastering the dynamics of innovation: How companies can seize opportunities in the face of technological change. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Have, R., Saarinen, J., Pesonen, P., & Rilla, N. (2009). Innovation as objective: The SFINNO approach. In J. Saarinen, & N. Rilla (Eds.), Changes in innovation: Towards an improved understanding of economic renewal (pp. 9–19). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Vijg, J. (2011). The American technological challenge: Stagnation and decline in the 21st century. New York: Algora Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Villar, C., Pla-Barber, J., & Alegre, J. (2012). Unravelling the moderating effects of size and experience on product innovations and exports: A study in a medium knowledge-intensive industry. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 24(2), 219–238. doi: 10.1080/09537325.2012.647650
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, R. M., Jeanes, E., & Rowlands, R. (2002). Measuring innovation: Applying the literature-based innovation output indicator to public services. Public Administration, 80(1), 201–214. doi: 10.1111/1467-9299.00300
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weitzman, M. L. (1998). Recombinant growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(2), 331–360. doi: 10.1162/003355398555595
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar