Narrative and computational text analysis in business and economic history

References

• Abolafia, M. Y. (2010). Narrative construction as sensemaking: How a central bank thinks. Organization Studies, 31(3), 349–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akerlof, G. A., & Shiller, R. J. (2010). Animal spirits: How human psychology drives the economy, and why it matters for global capitalism. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Akerlof, G. A., & Snower, D. J. (2016). Bread and bullets. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 126, 58–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alsvik, O., & Munch-Møller, M. G. (2020). Historiografi møter algoritmer. Heimen, 57(3), 201–215.
   Google Scholar
• Arnold, T., & Tilton, L. (2015). Humanities data in R: Exploring networks, geospatial data, images, and text. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ash, E., Chen, D. L., & Naidu, S. (2019). Ideas have consequences: The impact of law and economics on American justice. Center for Law & Economics Working Paper Series, 4, 1–58.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, S. R., Bloom, N., & Davis, S. J. (2016). Measuring economic policy uncertainty. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131(4), 1593–1636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barens, I. (2011). ‘Animal spirits’ in John Maynard Keynes's general theory of employment, interest and money. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Beckert, J. (2016). Imagined futures: Fictional expectations and capitalist dynamics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beckert, J., & Bronk, R. (2018). Uncertain futures: Imaginaries, narratives, and calculation in the economy. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benoit, K., & Laver, M. (2007). Estimating party policy positions: Comparing expert surveys and hand-coded content analysis. Electoral Studies, 26(1), 90–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benoit, K., Watanabe, K., Wang, H., Nulty, P., Obeng, A., Müller, S., & Matsuo, A. (2018). quanteda: An R package for the quantitative analysis of textual data. Journal of Open Source Software, 3(30), 774.
   Google Scholar
• Binder, J. M. (2016). Alien reading: Text mining, language standardization, and the humanities. In Debates in the digital humanities 2016. Matthew Gould and Lauren Klein (eds.), (pp. 201–217). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bird, S., Klein, E., & Loper, E. (2009). Natural language processing with python: Analyzing text with the natural language toolkit. Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly Media, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Blaydes, L., Grimmer, J., & McQueen, A. (2018). Mirrors for princes and sultans: Advice on the art of governance in the medieval Christian and islamic worlds. The Journal of Politics, 80(4), 1150–1167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blei, D. M. (2012a). Probabilistic topic models. Communications of the ACM, 55(4), 77–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blei, D. M. (2012b). Topic modeling and digital humanities. Journal of Digital Humanities, 2(1), 8–11.
   Google Scholar
• Blei, D. M., & Lafferty, J. D. (2006). Dynamic topic models. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Machine Learning (pp. 113–120).
   Google Scholar
• Blei, D. M., & Lafferty, J. D. (2009). Topic models. Text Mining: Classification, Clustering, and Applications, 10(71), 34.
   Google Scholar
• Blei, D. M., Ng, A. Y., & Jordan, M. I. (2003). Latent Dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3, 993–1022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blevins, C. (2014). Space, nation, and the triumph of region: A view of the world from Houston. The Journal of American History, 101(1), 122–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blevins, C. (2016). Digital history's perpetual future tense. In Debates in the digital humanities, Matthew Gould and Lauren Klein (eds.), (pp. 308–324). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bolukbasi, T., Chang, K. W., Zou, J. Y., Saligrama, V., & Kalai, A. T. (2016). Man is to computer programmer as woman is to homemaker? Debiasing word embeddings. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (pp. 4349–4357).
   Google Scholar
• Braudel, F. (1972). The Mediterranean and the Mediterranean world in the age of Philip II (Vol. 1). London: Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, T. B., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J., Dhariwal, P., et al. (2020). Language models are few-shot learners. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.14165.
   Google Scholar
• Caliskan, A., Bryson, J. J., & Narayanan, A. (2017). Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biases. Science, 356(6334), 183–186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerchiello, P., & Nicola, G. (2018). Assessing news contagion in finance. Econometrics, 6(1), 5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakrabarti, P., & Frye, M. (2017). A mixed-methods framework for analyzing text data: Integrating computational techniques with qualitative methods in demography. Demographic Research, 37, 1351–1382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Commons, J. R. (1931). Institutional economics. The American Economic Review, 21, 648–657.
   Google Scholar
• Dale, R. (2004). The first crash: Lessons from the south sea bubble. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Daston, L., & Galison, P. (2007). Objectivity. New York: Zone Books.
   Google Scholar
• Dehler-Holland, J., Schumacher, K., & Fichtner, W. (2020). Topic modeling uncovers shifts in media framing of the German renewable energy act. Patterns, 100169.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Deringer, W. (2018). Calculated values: Finance, politics, and the quantitative age. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Devlin, J., Chang, M. W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2018). Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.04805.
   Google Scholar
• de Vries, J. (2013). The return from the return to narrative. Max Weber Lecture (01).
   Google Scholar
• de Vries, J. (2018). Changing the narrative: The new history that was and is to come. Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 48(3), 313–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vries, J. (2019, November). Playing with scales: The global and the micro, the macro and the nano. Past & Present, 242(Supplement 14), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.1093/pastj/gtz043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P., Nag, M., & Blei, D. (2013). Exploiting affinities between topic modeling and the sociological perspective on culture: Application to newspaper coverage of US government arts funding. Poetics, 41(6), 570–606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dittmar, J., & Seabold, S. (2019). New media and competition: Printing and Europe's transformation after Gutenberg. Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
   Google Scholar
• Dow, S. (2010). The psychology of financial markets: Keynes, minsky and emotional finance. In D. Papadimitriou and L.R. Wray (Eds.), The elgar companion to Hyman Minsky (pp. 246–62). Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, J. A., & Aceves, P. (2016). Machine translation: Mining text for social theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 42, 21–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell, J. (2016). Corporate funding and ideological polarization about climate change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(1), 92–97. https://www.pnas.org/content/113/1/92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fligstein, N., Stuart Brundage, J., & Schultz, M. (2017). Seeing like the Fed: Culture, cognition, and framing in the failure to anticipate the financial crisis of 2008. American Sociological Review, 82(5), 879–909.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Funk, K., & Mullen, L. A. (2018). The spine of american law: Digital text analysis and U.S. legal practice. The American Historical Review, 123(1), 132–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geese, L. (2020). Immigration-related speechmaking in a party-constrained parliament: Evidence from the ‘Refugee Crisis’ of the 18th German Bundestag (2013–2017). German Politics, 29(2), 201–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentzkow, M., Kelly, B., & Taddy, M. (2019). Text as data. Journal of Economic Literature, 57(3), 535–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentzkow, M., & Shapiro, J. M. (2010). What drives media slant. Evidence from US daily newspapers? Econometrica, 78(1), 35–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentzkow, M., Shapiro, J. M., & Taddy, M. (2019). Measuring group differences in high-dimensional choices: Method and application to congressional speech. Econometrica, 87(4), 1307–1340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldgar, A. (2008). Tulipmania: Money, honor, and knowledge in the Dutch golden age. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gonen, H., & Goldberg, Y. (2019). Lipstick on a pig: Debiasing methods cover up systematic gender biases in word embeddings but do not remove them. arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.03862.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., Milligan, I., & Weingart, S. (in press). Exploring big historical data: The historian's macroscope (2nd ed.). London: World Scientific Publishing Company. http://www.themacroscope.org/2.0/.
   Google Scholar
• Grajzl, P., & Murrell, P. (2019). Toward understanding 17th century English culture: A structural topic model of Francis Bacon's ideas. Journal of Comparative Economics, 47(1), 111–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimmer, J., & Stewart, B. M. (2013). Text as data: The promise and pitfalls of automatic content analysis methods for political texts. Political Analysis, 21(3), 267–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guldi, J. (2019). Parliament's debates about infrastructure: An exercise in using dynamic topic models to synthesize historical change. Technology and Culture, 60(1), 1–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurciullo, S., & Mikhaylov, S. J. (2017, October). Detecting policy preferences and dynamics in the UN general debate with neural word embeddings. In 2017 International Conference on the Frontiers and Advances in Data Science (FADS) (pp. 74–79). Xi'an: IEEE. [2020-05-04]http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8253197/ 10.1109/FADS.2017.8253197.
   Google Scholar
• Gutmann, M. P., Merchant, E. K., & Roberts, E. (2018). ‘Big data’ in economic history. The Journal of Economic History, 78(1), 268–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, W. L., Leskovec, J., & Jurafsky, D. (2016a). Cultural shift or linguistic drift? comparing two computational measures of semantic change. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (Vol. 2016, p. 2116).
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, W. L., Leskovec, J., & Jurafsky, D. (2016b). Diachronic word embeddings reveal statistical laws of semantic change. arXiv preprint arXiv:1605.09096.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, S., McMahon, M., & Prat, A. (2018). Transparency and deliberation within the FOMC: A computational linguistics approach. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 133(2), 801–870.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hitchcock, T. (2013). Confronting the digital. Cultural and Social History, 10(1), 9–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobsbawm, E. J. (1980). The revival of narrative: Some comments. Past & Present, 86, 3–8.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgson, G. M. (2006). What are institutions? Journal of Economic Issues, 40(1), 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes, D. R. (2013). Economy of words: Communicative imperatives in central banks. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jockers, M. L. (2013). Macroanalysis: Digital methods and literary history. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jockers, M. L., & Thalken, R. (2020). Text analysis with R. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Jurafsky, D., & Martin, J. H. (2014). Speech and language processing (Vol. 3). London: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Karsdorp, F. ((n.d.)). Python programming for the humanities. http://www.karsdorp.io/python-course/.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, I. S. (2017). Political cleavages within industry: Firm-level lobbying for trade liberalization. American Political Science Review, 111(1), 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kindleberger, C. P. (1978). Manias, panics, and crashes: A history of financial crises. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Klingenstein, S., Hitchcock, T., & DeDeo, S. (2014). The civilizing process in London's Old Bailey. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(26), 9419–9424.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozlowski, A. C., Taddy, M., & Evans, J. A. (2019). The geometry of culture: Analyzing the meanings of class through word embeddings. American Sociological Review, 84(5), 905–949.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, K. D. (2018). Using structural topic modeling to identify latent topics and trends in aviation incident reports. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 87, 105–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulkarni, V., Al-Rfou, R., Perozzi, B., & Skiena, S. (2015). Statistically significant detection of linguistic change. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web (pp. 625–635).
   Google Scholar
• Lamoreaux, N. (2015). The future of economic history must be interdisciplinary. The Journal of Economic History, 75(4), 1251–1257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamoreaux, N. R. (2016). Beyond the old and the new: Economic history in the United States. In Routledge Handbook of Global Economic History, Boldizzoni, Francesco and Hudson, Pat (eds.), (pp. 35–54). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Levingston, O. (2020). Minsky's moment? The rise of depoliticised Keynesianism and ideational change at the Federal Reserve after the financial crisis of 2007/08. Review of International Political Economy, 1–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loughran, T., & Mcdonald, B. (2011). When is a liability not a liability? Textual analysis, dictionaries, and 10-Ks. The Journal of Finance, 66(1), 35–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manjoo, F. (2020). How do you know a human wrote this. New York Times, Editorial, 29.
   Google Scholar
• Masson, C., & Paroubek, P. (2020). NLP analytics in finance with DoRe: A French 250 million-token corpus of corporate annual reports. In Proceedings of the 12th Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (pp. 2261–2267).
   Google Scholar
• Mikolov, T., Sutskever, I., Chen, K., Corrado, G. S., & Dean, J. (2013). Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (pp. 3111–3119).
   Google Scholar
• Miller, I. M. (2013). Rebellion, crime and violence in Qing China, 1722–1911: A topic modeling approach. Poetics, 41(6), 626–649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mimno, D., & Lee, M. (2014). Low-dimensional embeddings for interpretable anchor-based topic inference. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) (pp. 1319–1328).
   Google Scholar
• Mishev, K., Gjorgjevikj, A., Vodenska, I., Chitkushev, L. T., & Trajanov, D. (2020). Evaluation of sentiment analysis in finance: From lexicons to transformers. IEEE Access, 8, 131662–131682.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, R. (2018). Web scraping with python: Collecting more data from the modern web. Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly Media, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Montfort, N. (2016). Exploratory programming for the arts and humanities. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moreno, Á. I., & Caminero, T. (2020). Application of text mining to the analysis of climate-related disclosures. Documentos de Trabajo/Banco de España, 2035.
   Google Scholar
• Moretti, F. (2013). Distant reading. London: Verso Books.
   Google Scholar
• Mullen, L. (2018). Computational historical thinking: With applications in R. https://dh-r.lincolnmullen.com.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, H., von Nordheim, G., Boczek, K., Koppers, L., & Rahnenführer, J. (2018). Der Wert der Worte–Wie digitale Methoden helfen, Kommunikations-und Wirtschaftswissenschaft zu verknüpfen. Publizistik, 63(4), 557–582.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, L. K. (2020). Computational grounded theory: A methodological framework. Sociological Methods & Research, 49(1), 3–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, D. J., & Block, S. (2006). Probabilistic topic decomposition of an eighteenth-century American newspaper. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(6), 753–767.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennington, J., Socher, R., & Manning, C. D. (2014). Glove: Global vectors for word representation. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) (pp. 1532–1543).
   Google Scholar
• Peters, M. E., Neumann, M., Iyyer, M., Gardner, M., Clark, C., Lee, K., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2018). Deep contextualized word representations. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.05365.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, L. (2016). The transnational and the text-searchable: Digitized sources and the shadows they cast. The American Historical Review, 121(2), 377–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radford, A., Narasimhan, K., Salimans, T., & Sutskever, I. (2018). Improving language understanding by generative pre-training.
   Google Scholar
• Rhody, L. M. (2012). Topic modeling and figurative language. Journal of Digital Humanities, 2(1).
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, M. E., Stewart, B. M., & Airoldi, E. M. (2016). A model of text for experimentation in the social sciences. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 111(515), 988–1003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, M. E., Stewart, B. M., & Tingley, D. (2019). Stm: An R package for structural topic models. Journal of Statistical Software, 91(1), 1–40.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, B. M. (2012). Words alone: Dismantling topic models in the humanities. Journal of Digital Humanities, 2(1).
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, B. M. (2016). Do digital humanists need to understand algorithms? In Debates in the Digital Humanities (Vol. 53), Matthew Gould and Lauren Klein (eds.), Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sewell, W. H., Jr. (2005). Logics of history: Social theory and social transformation. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sewell, W. H., Jr. (2010). A strange career: The historical study of economic life. History and Theory, 49(4), 146–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiller, R. J. (2015). Irrational exuberance: Revised and expanded third edition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shiller, R. J. (2017). Narrative economics. American Economic Review, 107(4), 967–1004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiller, R. J. (2020). Narrative economics: How stories go viral and drive major economic events. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Silge, J., & Robinson, D. (2017). Text mining with R: A tidy approach. Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly Media, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair, S., Rockwell, G., & Mony, M. (2018). The art of literary text analysis. https://github.com/sgsinclair/alta/blob/master/ipynb/ArtOfLiteraryTextAnalysis.ipynb.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, Q. (1969). Meaning and understanding in the history of ideas. History and Theory, 8(1), 3–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slapin, J. B., & Proksch, S. O. (2008). A scaling model for estimating time-series party positions from texts. American Journal of Political Science, 52(3), 705–722.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, N. A. (2019). Contextual word representations: A contextual introduction. arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.06006.
   Google Scholar
• Soto, P. E. (2019). Breaking the word bank: Effects of verbal uncertainty on bank behavior. SSRN Electronic Journal, [2020-05-04] https://www.ssrn.com/abstract=3347329 10.2139/ssrn.3347329.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, L. (1979). The revival of narrative: Reflections on a new old history. Past & Present, 85, 3–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stulpe, A., & Lemke, M. (2016). Blended reading: Theoretische und praktische Dimensionen der Analyse von Text und sozialer Wirklichkeit in Zeitalter der Digitalisierung. In Text mining in den sozialwissenschaften (pp. 17–61). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Temin, P., & Voth, H. J. (2004). Riding the south sea bubble. American Economic Review, 94(5), 1654–1668.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terechshenko, Z., Linder, F., Padmakumar, V., Liu, M., Nagler, J., Tucker, J. A., & Bonneau, R. (2020). A comparison of methods in political science text classification: Transfer learning language models for politics. Available at SSRN.
   Google Scholar
• Tetlock, P. C. (2007). Giving content to investor sentiment: The role of media in the stock market. The Journal of Finance, 62(3), 1139–1168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuckett, D., Holmes, D., Pearson, A., Chaplin, G., et al. (2020). Monetary policy and the management of uncertainty: A narrative approach. Bank of England Staff Working Papers, 870, 1–28. https://www.ssrn.com/abstract=3627721.
   Google Scholar
• Tvinnereim, E., Fløttum, K., Gjerstad, Ø., Johannesson, M. P., & Nordø, Å.D. (2017). Citizens' preferences for tackling climate change. Quantitative and qualitative analyses of their freely formulated solutions. Global Environmental Change, 46, 34–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vol'chik, V. V. (2017). Narrativnaia i institutsional'naia ekonomika. Zhurnal Institutsional'nykh Issledovanii, 9(4), 132–143.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, B. W., & Horowitz, S. (n.d.). Introduction to text analysis: A coursebook. http://walshbr.com/textanalysiscoursebook/.
   Google Scholar
• Wehrheim, L. (2019). Economic history goes digital: Topic modeling the journal of economic history. Cliometrica, 13(1), 83–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welbers, K., Van Atteveldt, W., & Benoit, K. (2017). Text analysis in R. Communication Methods and Measures, 11(4), 245–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickham, H., & Grolemund, G. (2016). R for data science: Import, tidy, transform, visualize, and model data. Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly Media, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, Y., Kiros, R., Zemel, R., Salakhutdinov, R., Urtasun, R., Torralba, A., & Fidler, S. (2015). Aligning books and movies: Towards story-like visual explanations by watching movies and reading books. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (pp. 19–27).
   Google Scholar